Skip to main content

In the Light of Evolution / Search Inside This Book
Return to Search Inside This Book results

22 matches found for How People Learn Brain,Mind,Experience,and School Expanded Edition. in Part IV: PHYLOGENY OF HUMAN BRAINS AND HUMAN MINDS

Select a page to see where your word(s) or phrase(s) are located in the OpenBook. Excerpts from the chapter provide context.


In the middle of page 251...
... showed them to other monkeys with recording electrodes in their vlPFC. This experiment revealed that the majority of vlPFC neurons integrate auditory and visual information in a nonlinear manner. This finding is important because human speech perception also involves a considerable amount of ... integration, as demonstrated by the McGurk effect (McGurk and MacDonald, 1976). Of course, audiovisual integration of vocalization-related stimuli is not identical to speech perception, which requires the ... of sounds and visual information with meanings. The latter type of integration still eludes the understanding of neurobiologists and is extremely difficult to study in monkeys. Nonetheless, the audiovisual integration that Romanski describes in monkeys is likely to have played a ...
At the bottom of page 251...
... In Chapter 16, Jessica Cantlon compares the mathematical abilities of nonhuman primates and humans, especially human children. Although we often think that mathematics requires symbols (e.g., numbers and operators), simple math can be ... without symbols. For example, one can compare two images and estimate, even without counting, which image contains more items of a particular sort. This kind of analog numerical estimation can also be performed ... human infants and nonhuman primates. Cantlon further reports that the analog math task activates homologous brain areas in the parietal cortex of both humans and ...
At the bottom of page 251...
... in primate brains. Given the importance of conspecific faces in the lives of most primates, the distinct patches of face-selective neurons in monkey and human brains were likely shaped by natural selection. Nonetheless, the development of face-selective neurons probably depends on extensive experience ... with faces, will generate a large number of neurons that selectively encode faces. Given other types of experience, the same mechanisms would (and do) generate patches of neurons selective for other kinds of behaviorally important stimuli. Stated succinctly, Barrett argues that natural selection ...
In the middle of page 252...
... Human Brain Evolution: From Gene Discovery to Phenotype Discovery...
At the bottom of page 252...
... The rise of comparative genomics and related technologies has added important new dimensions to the study of human evolution. Our knowledge of the genes that underwent expression changes ... were targets of positive selection in human evolution is rapidly increasing, as is our knowledge of gene duplications, translocations, and deletions. It is now clear that the genetic differences between humans and chimpanzees are far more extensive than previously thought; their genomes ... not 98% or 99% identical. Despite the rapid growth in our understanding of the evolution of the human genome, our understanding of the relationship between genetic changes and phenotypic changes is tenuous. This is true even for the most intensively studied gene, FOXP2, ... underwent positive selection in the human terminal lineage and is thought to have played an important role in the evolution of human speech and language. In part, the difficulty of connecting genes to phenotypes reflects our generally poor knowledge of human phenotypic specializations, as ... that are not amenable to invasive research. On the positive side, investigations of FOXP2, along with genomewide surveys of gene-expression changes and selection-driven sequence changes, offer the opportunity for “phenotype discovery,” providing clues to human phenotypic specializations ...

A total of pages of uncorrected, machine-read text were searched in this chapter. Please note that the searchable text may be scanned, uncorrected text, and should be presumed inaccurate. Page images should be used as the authoritative version.