In 2001, the National Research Council (NRC) completed a congressionally mandated assessment of the benefits and costs of DOE's fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs, Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? The Congress followed this retrospective study by directing DOE to request the NRC to develop a methodology for assessing prospective benefits. The first phase of this project—development of the methodology—began in December 2003. Phase two will make the methodology more robust and explore related issues, and subsequent phases will apply the methodology to review the prospective benefits of different DOE fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs. In developing this project, three considerations were particularly important. First, the study should adapt the work of the retrospective study. Second, the project should develop a methodology that provides a rigorous calculation of benefits and risks, and a practical and consistent process for its application. Third, the methodology should be transparent, should not require extensive resources for implementation, and should produce easily understood results. This report presents the results of phase one. It focuses on adaptation of the retrospective methodology to a prospective context.
National Research Council. 2005. Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One): A First Look Forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11277.
|2 From Retrospective to Prospective Evaluation||9-12|
|3 Methodology for Prospective Evaluation of Department of Energy Programs||13-31|
|4 Expert Panel Process||32-37|
|5 Results of Applying the Methodology||38-47|
|6 Conclusions and Recommendations||48-51|
|Appendix A: Committee Biographical Information||53-58|
|Appendix B: Statement of Task||59-59|
|Appendix C: Presentations and Committee Meetings||60-61|
|Appendix D: Letter Report||62-69|
|Appendix E: Prospective Evaluation of DOE Programs: A Preliminary Methodology||70-74|
|Appendix F: Report of the Panel on Benefits of Lighting R&D||75-88|
|Appendix G: Report of the Panel of Sequestration R&D||89-101|
|Appendix H: Report of the Panel of Benefits of Fuel Cell R&D||102-119|
|Appendix I: The Lighting Cse Study Recast as a Decision Tree||120-120|
|Appendix J: Expected Benefits Results and Report Guidance||121-123|
|Appendix K: Information Request to the Department of Energy||124-126|
The Chapter Skim search tool presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter. You may select key terms to highlight them within pages of each chapter.
The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:
Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses. If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:
Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.
To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, pleaseclick here to view more information.