The anthrax attacks in fall 2001 spurred an extensive and costly decontamination effort where many decisions had to be made about which sites required cleanup, what method to use, how to determine the effectiveness of the cleanup, and how "clean" the building had to be for reoccupation. As part of a project funded by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and managed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the National Research Council was asked to consider the criteria that must be met for a cleanup to be declared successful, allowing the reoccupation of a facility. The report finds that efficiently sampling and characterizing a pathogen is critical for choosing the best remediation strategy. However, there should be no universal standard for deciding when a building is safe to re-enter because varying pathogen amounts and characteristics could require different strategies. The report offers a flowchart for decision-makers that includes questions about the characteristics of the pathogen; how far it has spread; whether it is transmissible between humans; and how long it will survive to pose a threat. The report also recommends that a risk-assessment approach be adopted as part of a strategy for achieving a "socially acceptable" standard for cleanup.
National Research Council. 2005. Reopening Public Facilities After a Biological Attack: A Decision Making Framework. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11324.
|2 Infectious Disease Threats||23-41|
|3 Policy Precedents in Decontamination||42-55|
|4 Anthrax Decontamination After the 2001 Attacks: Social and Political Context||56-73|
|5 Framework for Event Management||74-79|
|6 Hazard Identification and Assessment||80-88|
|7 Factors Influencing Exposure to Harmful Biological Agents in Indoor Environments||89-104|
|8 Analyzing Health Risks||105-119|
|9 Sampling Strategies and Technologies||120-136|
|10 Decontamination Practices and Principles||137-156|
|11 Safe Reoccupation of a Facility||157-169|
|12 Harmful Biological Agents in a Public Facility: The Airport Scenario||170-176|
|Appendix A: Statement of Task||177-178|
|Appendix B: Presentations to the Committee||179-181|
|Appendix C: All Findings and Recommendations||182-192|
|Appendix D: Other Relevant Case Studies||193-198|
|Appendix E: Were the 2001 Anthrax Exposures Consistent with Dose-Response: The Case of the AMI Building||199-203|
|Appendix F: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members||204-210|
The Chapter Skim search tool presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter. You may select key terms to highlight them within pages of each chapter.
The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:
Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses.If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:
Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.
To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, pleaseclick here to view more information.