When communities face complex public health emergencies, state local, tribal, and territorial public health agencies must make difficult decisions regarding how to effectively respond. The public health emergency preparedness and response (PHEPR) system, with its multifaceted mission to prevent, protect against, quickly respond to, and recover from public health emergencies, is inherently complex and encompasses policies, organizations, and programs. Since the events of September 11, 2001, the United States has invested billions of dollars and immeasurable amounts of human capital to develop and enhance public health emergency preparedness and infrastructure to respond to a wide range of public health threats, including infectious diseases, natural disasters, and chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear events. Despite the investments in research and the growing body of empirical literature on a range of preparedness and response capabilities and functions, there has been no national-level, comprehensive review and grading of evidence for public health emergency preparedness and response practices comparable to those utilized in medicine and other public health fields.
Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response reviews the state of the evidence on PHEPR practices and the improvements necessary to move the field forward and to strengthen the PHEPR system. This publication evaluates PHEPR evidence to understand the balance of benefits and harms of PHEPR practices, with a focus on four main areas of PHEPR: engagement with and training of community-based partners to improve the outcomes of at-risk populations after public health emergencies; activation of a public health emergency operations center; communication of public health alerts and guidance to technical audiences during a public health emergency; and implementation of quarantine to reduce the spread of contagious illness.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2020. Evidence-Based Practice for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25650.
|1 Advancing Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response System Capabilities to Respond to Increasing Threats||23-48|
|2 The Landscape and Evolution of Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Research in the United States||49-70|
|3 An Evidence Review and Evaluation Process to Inform Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Decision Making||71-115|
|4 Engaging with and Training Community-Based Partners to Improve the Outcomes of At-Risk Populations||116-137|
|5 Activating a Public Health Emergency Operations Center||138-159|
|6 Communicating Public Health Alerts and Guidance with Technical Audiences During a Public Health Emergency||160-179|
|7 Implementing Quarantine to Reduce or Stop the Spread of a Contagious Disease||180-204|
|8 Improving and Expanding the Evidence Base for Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response||205-250|
|Appendix A: Detailed Description of the Committee's Methods for Formulating the Scope of the Reviews and Capturing the Evidence||251-290|
|Appendix B: Mixed-Method Reviews of Selected Topics||291-292|
|Appendix B1: Mixed-Method Review of Strategies for Engaging with and Training Community-Based Partners to Improve the Outcomes of At-Risk Populations||293-332|
|Appendix B2: Mixed-Method Review of Activating a Public Health Emergency Operations Center||333-356|
|Appendix B3: Mixed-Method Review of Channels for Communicating Public Health Alerts and Guidance with Technical Audiences During a Public Health Emergency||357-386|
|Appendix B4: Mixed-Method Review of Implementing Quarantine to Reduce or Stop the Spread of a Contagious Disease||387-432|
|Appendix C: Commissioned Reports That Informed the Four Mixed-Method Reviews||433-434|
|Appendix D: Commissioned Scoping Review and Series of Evidence Maps||435-458|
|Appendix E: Public Committee Meeting Agendas and Proceedings of a Workshop - in Brief||459-464|
|Appendix F: Committee Member Biosketches||465-474|
The Chapter Skim search tool presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter. You may select key terms to highlight them within pages of each chapter.
The National Academies Press (NAP) has partnered with Copyright Clearance Center's Rightslink service to offer you a variety of options for reusing NAP content. Through Rightslink, you may request permission to reprint NAP content in another publication, course pack, secure website, or other media. Rightslink allows you to instantly obtain permission, pay related fees, and print a license directly from the NAP website. The complete terms and conditions of your reuse license can be found in the license agreement that will be made available to you during the online order process. To request permission through Rightslink you are required to create an account by filling out a simple online form. The following list describes license reuses offered by the National Academies Press (NAP) through Rightslink:
Click here to obtain permission for the above reuses.If you have questions or comments concerning the Rightslink service, please contact:
Rightslink Customer Care
Tel (toll free): 877/622-5543
To request permission to distribute a PDF, please contact our Customer Service Department at 800-624-6242 for pricing.
To request permission to translate a book published by the National Academies Press or its imprint, the Joseph Henry Press, pleaseclick here to view more information.