The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 60... ...
3.2.2 Fine Aggregate Angularity Superpave specifies the uncompacted voids in fine aggregate test (AASHTO T304 or ASTM C1252, Method A) to ensure that the blend of fine aggregates in an HMA mixture has sufficient angularity, texture, or both to provide resistance to rutting.
|
From page 61... ...
ESALs, 45 >= 30 M ESALS Non Wear Mixes: 40 for all traffic levels Mississippi 4.75 mm NMAS mixes: 45 for all traffic levels 9.5 mm NMAS mixes: 40 < 3 M
|
From page 62... ...
Prior to the adoption of the Superpave method, FHWA recommended limiting natural sand to less than 15%. 3.2.3 Coarse Aggregate Angularity The coarse aggregate angularity test is used to measure the number of fractured faces on a coarse aggregate particle according to ASTM D5821 or AASHTO TP61-02.
|
From page 63... ...
Of the state agencies that specify ASTM D4791 or a similar agency test method, 63% specify criteria that match those outlined in AASHTO M323. Kentucky specifies less than 10% of 51 particles for all traffic levels.
|
From page 64... ...
The aggregate abrasion value test was developed by Ontario and produces results similar to the LA abrasion test, with more portable equipment (115)
|
From page 65... ...
Frequency distribution of sulfate soundness specifications.
|
From page 66... ...
The majority of the responding agencies specify the Superpave consensus aggregate properties and source property test methods; however, lower percentages follow the specification values for the consensus properties. Agencies provided little indication as to the reasoning behind their changes.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.