The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 23... ...
23 Development of CMFunctions for Select Treatments 5.1 Background A key limitation of the HSM and the CMF Clearinghouse is the limited information regarding the variability in CMFs by application circumstances. It is difficult to think of any CMF of which it can categorically be said that the CMF would be constant from application to application.
|
From page 24... ...
24 Crash Modification Factors in the Highway Safety Manual: A Review the CMFunctions. The original evaluation used an EB before–after method.
|
From page 25... ...
Development of CMFunctions for Select Treatments 25 count is then used as the dependent variable, with the expected crashes as an offset in a count model that includes characteristics of application circumstances as independent variables. As in the case of metaregression, this approach can be used with individual sites, group of sites, or at the study level.
|
From page 26... ...
26 Crash Modification Factors in the Highway Safety Manual: A Review • For multivehicle crashes on undivided roadways, the CMF for shoulder width was found to increase as AADT increased. • The CMFs estimated for shoulder width and median width imply the same change in crash frequencies for a unit change in the variable -- for example, that a change in median width from 2 ft to 8 ft has the same effect on crashes as a change from 8 ft to 14 ft.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.