The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 203... ...
First, the committee defines team science as collaborative, interdependent research conducted by more than one individual. Most shared publications were published by science teams of approximately two to ten members (Wuchty et al., 2007)
|
From page 204... ...
Therefore, team science varies in form, since disciplinary differences and integration can vary. Specifically, team science can vary in the degree in which members are integrating concepts, techniques, and theories from different fields.
|
From page 205... ...
KEY TAKEAWAYS FROM THE REPORT: ENHANCING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TEAM SCIENCE From 2013 to 2015, the National Academies' Committee on the S cience of Team Science worked on a report to offer research-based guidance aimed at enhancing the processes and outcomes of collaboration in s cience (NRC, 2015)
|
From page 206... ...
Relatedly, the committee discovered that there was a need for deep knowledge integration arising from the goal of merging disparate expertise and disciplinary backgrounds. Large science teams often face difficulties due to their size, making coordination and communication more complex.
|
From page 207... ...
Similarly, when considering leadership and team science, the commit tee found that decades of "research on team and organizational leadership in contexts other than science provide a robust foundation of evidence to guide professional development for leaders of science teams" (NRC, 2015, p.
|
From page 208... ...
Often, agency announcements seeking team science proposals lack clarity regarding the expected level of collaboration and knowledge integration. To address these issues, the committee recommended funders mandate proposals for team-based research to include detailed collaboration plans (NRC, 2015)
|
From page 209... ...
These include the multi faceted and sometimes competing goals of team science projects and the multilevel perspective required to study science teams and processes at individual, team, and organizational levels. To address these challenges and promote advancements in team science, the committee recommended that public and private organizations allocate funding to support research on team science effectiveness.
|
From page 210... ...
. Enhancing the effectiveness of team science.
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.