The Chapter Skim interface presents what we've algorithmically identified as the most significant single chunk of text within every page in the chapter.
Select key terms on the right to highlight them within pages of the chapter.
From page 241... ...
Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging 2023) from strongly agree to strongly disagree The TDS measures 5 enabling conditions underlying team success, Wageman et al.
|
From page 242... ...
. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science.
|
From page 243... ...
The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(4)
|
From page 245... ...
best practice An activity or strategy that can enable a science team to collaborate effectively to achieve its goals. competencies The knowledge, skills, and abilities required for team success.
|
From page 246... ...
team science Collaborative, interdependent research conducted by more than one individual.
|
From page 247... ...
APPENDIX E 247 team task analysis A process to identify work behaviors and associated knowledge, skills, and abilities for successful job or task performance. teamwork The interactions among team members that are essential for effective collaboration.
|
From page 249... ...
collectively acquire, share, and apply knowledge to achieve common goals How strongly do team members depend on each other and share the workload? Task The degree to which 5-item scale rated on a 5-point Likert scale Van Der Vegt et al.
|
From page 250... ...
rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1=not at content and outcomes all, 7=a lot) of the tasks being performed.
|
From page 251... ...
resolve disputes among team members in a constructive manner Team processes Team processes capture 50-item full scale (15-item transition processes Mathieu et al.
|
From page 252... ...
(2020) inclusion group members feel scale rated on a 5-point scale (1=strongly included in the team disagree, 5=strongly agree)
|
From page 253... ...
APPENDIX D 253 between members are valued and respected) Psychological Shared belief among 7-item scale rated on a 7-point scale (1=very Edmondson (1999)
|
From page 254... ...
rated on a 7-point scale ranging from members' co- strongly disagree to strongly agree constructed and collectively experienced 1) distance and 2)
|
From page 255... ...
Action: monitor team, manage team reached boundaries, challenge team, perform 2. Action phase: team task, solve problems, provide activities that resources, encourage team self contribute management, support social climate directly to goal accomplishment Temporal The extent to which 7-item scale rated on a 5-point scale (1=not at Mohammed and Nadkarni (2011)
|
From page 256... ...
Team viability Willingness for team 4-item scale rated on a 7-point Likert-type scale Tekleab et al.
|
From page 257... ...
Team The extent to which a 5-item scale (team learning behavior, context Edmondson (1999) performance team collectively support, team leader coaching, team achieves its goals and psychological safety, team efficacy)
|
From page 258... ...
Perceptions Research and Quality context: team structure, team leadership, Questionnaire that helps to identify situation monitoring, mutual support, and (T-TPQ) the strengths and areas communication.
|
From page 259... ...
. The survey also assesses individual measures process criteria of team effectiveness affective reactions (9 items)
|
From page 260... ...
. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams.
|
From page 261... ...
. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science.
|
From page 262... ...
Prepublication copy, uncorrected proofs
|
Key Terms
This material may be derived from roughly machine-read images, and so is provided only to facilitate research.
More
information on Chapter Skim is available.