Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
16 Other Health Effects his chapter briefly reviews some of the health outcomes of tobacco T consumption not covered in previous chapters. Although these outcomes by themselves are not as prevalent or threatening as car- diovascular disease, respiratory disease, or cancer, they do contribute significantly to the morbidity and reduced quality-of-life associated with smoking. In addition, cigarette smoking is associated with a small num- ber of positive health outcomes in Parkinsonâs disease, ulcerative colitis, and preeclampsia, which are reviewed here. This is not intended to be an exhaustive review of smoking-attributable disease but does include pep- tic ulcer disease, wound healing, inflammatory bowel disease, rheuma- toid arthritis, oral disease, dementia, osteoporosis, ocular disease, diabe- tes, dermatological disease, schizophrenia, and depression. PEPTIC ULCERS Cigarette smokers have been found to have an increased risk of peptic ulcer disease, increased rate of relapse after treatment, and increased risk of the complications associated with ulcer development (Kato et al., 1992; Smedley et al., 1988). A prospective study by Kato et al. (1992) is consis- tent with previous findings suggesting a positive association between cigarette smoking and gastric and duodenal ulcers, with relative risks (RR) of 3.4 and 3.0, respectively. This association was maintained after controlling for alcohol use. Ma et al. (1998) reviewed potential mecha- nisms of the effect of smoking on ulcer formation and healing. These 560
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 561 mechanisms include increased levels of oxygen-derived free radicals, which are known to injure gastric mucosa; decreased mucosal blood flow mediated by decreased levels of nitric oxide (NO; a potent vasodilator); increased neutrophil infiltration; reduced epithelial cell proliferation and granulation tissue formation; and decreased prostaglandin synthesis. Ma and his colleagues (1999) demonstrated grossly the slowing of ulcer heal- ing and an increase in ulcer size associated with smoking in rat models, which were attributed to reduced blood flow at the ulcer margins and decreased constitutive NO synthesis. Cigarette smoking has also been found to augment nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and alcohol-attributable peptic ulcer disease (Guo et al., 1999; Ma et al., 1998). Ulcer healing has been found to improve with cessation and reduc- tion of smoking. Presenting results consistent with many other studies, Tatsuta et al. (1987) described the course of healing of patients who were advised to reduce their smoking (by at least 50%) or to stop. They found that after 12 weeks of treatment, 91.7% of the ulcers had healed in patients who reduced or stopped smoking, while only 25% had healed in patients who continued to smoke. Furthermore, about 23% of ulcers recurred in patients who stopped or reduced their smoking during the six-month follow-up, while 75% recurred in those who continued to smoke. SURGICAL WOUND HEALING Cigarette smoking and its adverse effects on wound healing have been well established in animal models and in surgical patients (Mosely et al., 1978). Surgical complications experienced by smokers include in- creased failures of amputations, skin flaps, and atrioventricular (AV) shunts (Kwiatkowski et al., 1996). Mechanisms suggested for the adverse effects on wound healing include the cutaneous vasoconstrictive proper- ties of nicotine, poor oxygen delivery due to an increase in carboxyhemo- globin levels leading to cellular hypoxia and tissue ischemia, and possibly interference with cellular respiration and metabolism due to hydrogen cyanide (HCN) (Campanile et al., 1998; Jensen et al., 1991; Kwiatkowski et al., 1996; Silverstein, 1992). Further detrimental effects on wound healing attributed to smoking are decreased microcirculation due to increased platelet aggregation and microclot formation and reduction of epithelial cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages, which are important in scar forma- tion (Campanile et al., 1998; Silverstein, 1992). INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE Smokers with Crohnâs disease, especially women, have increased risk of developing severe disease and have a greater risk of requiring surgery
562 CLEARING THE SMOKE and of having postsurgical complications (Thomas et al., 2000). Studies, reviewed by Rhodes and Thomas (1994), have attributed a three- to five- fold higher risk of developing Crohnâs disease to smoking. Ex-smokers were found to have less risk, and nonsmokers or those who had quit for at least ten years were found to experience the least risk. Several studies have found a decrease in the need for surgery after smoking cessation and a decrease in recurrence after surgery (Cosnes et al., 1996; Yamamoto and Keighly, 2000). In contrast, smoking has been shown to have a protective effect for ulcerative colitis (UC), with odds ratios (ORs) between 0.34 and 0.48, and smokers with UC exhibit a better clinical course (reviewed by Calkins et al., 1989). The literature indicates a negative association (pooled OR=0.41) of current smoking with the development of ulcerative colitis, a signifi- cant positive association among ex-smokers, and a positive or equivocal risk among nonsmokers (Thomas et al., 2000). Researchers have found a positive influence of smoking on the clinical course of UC, with a lower rate of recurrence found among smokers (Fraga et al., 1997). Studies have revealed an earlier age of onset of ulcerative colitis in lifetime nonsmok- ers, and among a sample of patients who quit smoking, almost 70% devel- oped UC during the first year postcessation (Rhodes and Thomas, 1994; reviewed in Thomas et al., 1998). The pathological process is involved in the relationship between smoking and inflammatory bowel disease is unknown. It is speculated that nicotine affects cellular immunity, espe- cially the levels of immunoglobulin A (IgA) that are important in the defense of mucosal tissue (Rhodes and Thomas, 1994). It is also postu- lated that nicotine is involved in the reduction of blood flow and ischemic changes that may contribute to the changes seen in Crohnâs disease. RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS Environmental risk factors are known to be important in the patho- genesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The few studies that have evaluated smoking as a risk factor indicate a positive link between cigarette smok- ing and the development of rheumatoid arthritis (Uhlig et al., 1999). This relationship has been identified among men (Heliovaara et al., 1993), with a more modest association found among women smokers (Karlson et al., 1999). Smoking has also been more closely associated with seropositive RA compared to rheumatoid factor (RF) negative disease (Silman et al., 1996). Evidence of a dose-response relationship has not been consistently upheld. It is unclear whether smoking plays a causal role in the etiology or progression of rheumatoid arthritis or the formation of rheumatoid factor or whether it is linked to other unidentified factors that predispose patients to RA.
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 563 ORAL DISEASE Research has consistently found that cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for periodontal disease (Tomar and Asma, 2000); studies report 30- 75% of periodontitis linked to cigarette smoking. Smoking has been linked to increased frequency of diseased sites, reduced periodontal height, and a weak association with gingival bleeding (Bergstrom et al., 2000). A dose- related relationship has been described. In a review by Haber (1994), he noted that smokers had earlier onset of disease, resistance to treatment, and faster disease progression. Smoking cessation has been found to im- prove gingival health, and there is evidence of a decrease but not a com- plete reversal in the severity and prevalence of periodontitis among former smokers. Hypothesized mechanisms of action include smoking- induced impairment of immunity, reduced epithelial cell and fibroblast function involved in the healing process, decreased bone mineralization, and local nicotine-mediated gingival vasoconstriction leading to de- creased blood flow and tissue oxygen delivery (Christen, 1992; Haber, 1994; Palmer et al., 1999). Increased risk of oral lesions in immunocompromised smokers has been described. These lesions include hairy leukoplakia, oral candidiasis, and human papillomavirus (HPV) lesions; on the other hand, smoking has been consistently found to decrease the risk of aphthous ulcers (Palacio et al., 1997). Smokeless tobacco use has been extensively linked to oral disease. The prevalence of leukoplakia, a white mucosal plaque that cannot be attributed to any other disease process, among smokeless tobacco users is very high (at least 50% by some reports), and it is generally accepted that smokeless tobacco use is an important cause (Spangler and Salisbury, 1995). The site of plaque formation in smokeless tobacco users corre- sponds to tobacco contact with the mucosa. The prevalence of tobacco- associated leukoplakia exhibits a dose-response relationship, and there has been evidence of reversal of these changes upon cessation of tobacco use (Grady et al., 1990). A review by Walsh and Epstein (2000) found the rate of malignant transformation of tobacco-attributable leukoplakia to range between 4 and 17.5%. The dentitia and gingiva adjacent to the location of tobacco placement in the mouth are at a high risk of oral problems ranging from gingivitis and gingival recession to halitosis (Spangler and Salisbury, 1995). A study involving professional baseball players by Robertson et al. (1990) found that the only significant periodontal changes associated with smokeless tobacco use are gingival recession, loss of gingival attachment, and mu- cosal lesions at the area of tobacco placement. The evidence has been
564 CLEARING THE SMOKE uncompelling regarding the risk of dental caries and gingivitis among smokeless tobacco users (Walsh and Epstein, 2000). DEMENTIA Many previous studies have suggested an inverse relationship be- tween smoking and Alzheimerâs dementia (Brenner et al., 1993; Forbes and Hayward, 1993; reviewed in Lee 1994). More recent studies, however, have suggested no relationship or possibly a positive association (Debanne et al., 2000; Doll et al., 2000; Merchant et al., 1999; Ott et al., 1998). In a large prospective study of British doctors, Doll et al. (2000) found no significant association of current or former smoking with the risk of Alzheimerâs disease or other types of dementia including vascular de- mentia. In another large prospective study (the Rotterdam study) by Ott et al. (1998), it was found that smoking significantly increased the risk of vascular and Alzheimerâs dementia and was linked to a younger age of onset. Smokers with the apolipoprotein-E4 (APOE4) allele have shown a reduction in dementia risk, consistent with many other studies (Carmelli et al., 1999; Merchant et al., 1999; Ott et al., 1998; ). The association per- sisted when factors such as educational status, alcohol use, and ethnicity were controlled. Nicotine, however, has been shown to have beneficial effects on cog- nition in human and animal studies. Evidence exists to suggest that nico- tinic cholinergic receptors are decreased in Alzheimerâs patients, and the receptors have been found to increase with chronic exposure to nicotine. Nicotine has also been found to decrease neuron loss in animal models of Alzheimerâs disease (reviewed in Lee, 1994). Nicotine has been shown to acutely ameliorate recall, attentional, and visuospatial abilities (Leibovici et al., 1999; Newhouse et al., 1997) and to improve performance of memory-related tasks in animal studies (Buccafusco et al., 1999; Newhouse et al., 1997). Attempting to reconcile the contradictory studies, investigators have postulated numerous reasons for the inconsistent findings. Investigators have raised the possibility that the protective effect of smoking in Alzheimerâs disease (AD) may be mediated by the APOE4 allele (Ott et al., 1998; Van Duijn et al., 1995). Many of the earlier studies that pointed to a negative relationship between smoking and AD were case-control de- signs in which it is necessary to match cases and controls by age and other variables. In this design, there may be an increased effect of selective mortality among smokers, thus decreasing the proportion of smokers available (Debanne et al., 2000; Riggs, 1993). In addition to selection bias, other sources of bias that may have been a factor in the early studies include problems inherent in the design of retrospective studies such as
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 565 recall bias and the use of surrogate informants for case patients (Doll et al., 2000) and, generally, poor control of confounding variables. ORTHOPEDIC CONSEQUENCES Cigarette smoking has been linked to adverse orthopedic conse- quences including osteoporosis, hip fracture, and delay in bone healing. A dose-response effect has been reported for the increased risk of hip fracture and decreased bone mineral density (BMD) in many but not all studies (Cornuz et al., 1999; Hoidrup et al., 1999; Hollenbach et al., 1993; la Vecchia et al., 1991; ). Based on a meta-analysis by Law and Hackshaw (1997), one out of eight hip fractures is attributable to smoking. Smoking is associated with loss of bone mineral density, and this association in- creases with age especially in postmenopausal women. The study goes on to conclude that the risk of hip fracture is 17% greater in smokers at age 60, 41% greater at age 70, 71% greater at age 80, and 108% greater at age 90. Reversal of the risk for hip fractures has been described 10-20 years postcessation (Cornuz et al. 1999; la Vecchia et al., 1991). There have been few studies examining BMD and hip fracture risk among male smokers. An evaluation of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study found a nonsignificant in- creased risk associated with smoking (Mussolino et al., 1998). A review by Kwiatkowski et al. (1996) stated that bone mineral content of smokers was 10-20% lower among men and 20-30% lower among women. Hypoth- esized mechanisms include impairment of osteoblastic function and con- sequently decreased bone formation, reduced calcium absorption, vaso- constrictive effects of nicotine that prevent revascularization of healing bone, and decreased body weight due to smoking, which is an indepen- dent risk factor for osteoporosis. OCULAR DISEASE Cigarette smoking has been associated with numerous diseases of the eye. Smoking can induce tobacco smoke-mediated vasoconstriction, ath- erosclerosis, hyperviscosity, hypercoagueability, and decreased oxygen availability in ocular tissues. There is a strong association with ischemic diseases including amaurosis fugax, retinal infarction, and anterior is- chemic optic neuropathy (Solberg et al., 1998). Smoking has also been consistently associated with two of the most important causes of vision loss, cataracts and age-related macular degeneration. A dose-dependent relationship between cigarette smoking and risk and severity of cataracts has been established (Hankinson et al., 1992; West et al., 1995). A large prospective study by Delcourt et al. (2000) found an OR of 1.9 for nuclear-
566 CLEARING THE SMOKE type cataracts in current smokers and a two- to fourfold increase in the rate of cataract surgery among current and former smokers. Most studies have found the increased risk limited to nuclear-type cataracts, although there has been evidence of an increased risk of posterior subscapular cataracts as well (Solberg et al., 1998). The risk of cataract formation among smokers appears to be related to lifetime cumulative cigarette dose, with less reduction in risk found among heavy smokers compared to moderate and light smokers after cessation (Christen et al., 2000; Hankinson et al., 1992). The mechanism of smoking-associated cataract formation is thought to be due to direct and indirect oxidative damage to the lens and exposure to heavy metals in tobacco smoke. Age-related macular degeneration induced by free-radical formation and oxidative stress associated with cigarette smoking has also been well supported in the literature. Many studies have found a two- to threefold increase in risk of macular degeneration among smokers (reviewed in Solberg et al., 1998). DERMATOLOGIC CONDITIONS In many retrospective and prospective studies, cigarette smoking has been associated with premature wrinkling independent of age, sun expo- sure, pigmentation, and sex (Ernster et al., 1995; Smith and Fenske, 1996). Kadunce et al (1991) found a dose-response relationship associated with pack-years of exposure. Smokers with a 0.9 to 49 pack-year history were twice as likely to be wrinkled compared to nonsmokers. The risk increased to 4.7 among 50+ pack-year smokers. Tobacco smoke toxins are believed to have a detrimental effect on collagen and elastin integrity and on the microvasculature of skin, to increase oxidant stress free-radical activity, and to have possible antiestrogenic effects (reviewed in Frances, 1998; Kadunce et al., 1991; Leow and Maibach, 1998; Smith and Fenske, 1996). Psoriasis also has been found to be associated with cigarette smoking, especially in women (Mills, 1993; Naldi et al., 1999; Poikolainen et al., 1994). A recent case-control study by Naldi et al. (1999) found an OR of 1.5-2.4 among smokers and exhibition of a dose-response relationship. A few studies have also suggested a positive association of cigarette smoking with a variety of dermatological changes such as psoriasis pal- moplantar pustulosis, atopic dermatitis, and yellowing of fingers and nails (reviewed in Smith and Fenske, 1996). These findings are not dis- cussed in detail here.
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 567 DIABETES Several studies over the last decade have indicated a positive dose- related association between cigarette smoking and risk of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) (Nakanishi et al., 2000; Rimm et al., 1993, 1995; Simon et al., 1997; Uchimoto et al., 1999). In a Nursesâ Health Study cohort, Rimm et al. (1993) found a positive, dose-related association between cigarette smoking and development of NIDDM that persisted after controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), family history, physical activity, alcohol, and so forth. Simon et al. (1997), in another large prospective study, found a significant link between smoking and increased waist-to-hip ratios and an odds ratio of 1.38 for the relationship of smoking more than ten cigarettes per day and the prevalence of reported diabetes mellitus. The odds ratio was modified when data were adjusted for waist-to-hip ratio, suggesting a relationship between smoking-associated body fat distribution and the occurrence of diabetes. Investigators have consistently suggested that smoking is an independent risk factor for increased insulin resistance, measured by insulin clamp test and oral glucose challenge, among both diabetics and nondiabetics (Facchini et al., 1992; Targher et al., 1997), and increased transient blood glucose levels during oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests (Janzon et al., 1983). Muhlhauser (1994) in his review of smoking and diabetes discusses the epidemiological evidence suggesting increased risk of dia- betic nephropathy and retinopathy and increased overall mortality among smokers. RENAL DISEASE Smoking has been linked to abnormal renal function in diabetics and more recently in nondiabetics (Cirillo et al., 1998; Halimi et al., 2000; Pinto-Sietsma et al., 2000; Ritz et al., 2000). Research has consistently estab- lished the association of cigarette smoking with a two- to threefold in- creased risk of microalbuminuria and proteinuria and an increased rate of progression to diabetic nephropathy and ultimately end-stage renal dis- ease in type I and type II diabetics in a dose-responsive manner (reviewed in Orth, 2000; Ritz et al., 2000). Other studies have found an independent association of smoking with increased risk of developing renal failure in patients with autosomal dependent polycystic kidney disease, lupus ne- phritis, and glomeruloephritis (Ritz et al., 2000). Recently, consistent with previous findings, in a cross-sectional study of nondiabetic patients by Pinto-Sietsma and colleagues (2000), current smokers were found to have a dose-responsive increased rate of high- normal albuminuria and microalbuminuria (markers of some degree of
568 CLEARING THE SMOKE renal damage). Current smokers also had significantly abnormal glomeru- lar filtration rates (increased or decreased) compared to nonsmokers. Former smokers had a risk for both events that fell between that of cur- rent smokers and nonsmokers, suggesting some degree of reversibility of the effects of smoking. Another large population-based, cross-sectional study (Halimi et al., 2000) of subjects without known renal disease showed that current and former smokers, even after adjusting for diagnoses of diabetes and hypertension, had greater risks for proteinuria by dipstick testing compared to nonsmokers (RR=2-3). Current male smokers in this study also had a higher creatinine clearance than nonsmokers, suggesting a degree of glomerular hyperfiltration. Many mechanisms of smoking-attributable nephrotoxicity have been postulated including increased sympathetic nervous system activity, tran- sient blood pressure elevation, endothelial cell damage and dysfunction of renal vasculature, direct toxic effects on tublar cells, and oxidative stress (Orth, 2000; Pinto-Sietsma et al., 2000). SCHIZOPHRENIA It has been reported that up to 80% of patients with schizophrenia smoke cigarettes (McCreadie and Kelly, 2000; Simpson et al., 1999). The rate of smoking among schizophrenics is also higher than rates among other mentally ill patients (Leonard et al., 2000; Tidey et al., 1999). Many different reasons for the high rate of smoking among schizophrenics have been postulated including âself-medicationâ of the symptoms of schizo- phrenia, attenuation of the adverse effects of antipsychotic medication, social factors of schizophrenic patients that predispose them to smoke, or genetic vulnerability for both conditions (reviewed in Levin and Rezvani, 2000; Tidey et al., 1999). Nicotine may attenuate the negative symptoms of schizophrenia by stimulating the release of dopamine and glutamate (Dursun and Kutcher, 1999). Nicotine has also been found to stabilize sensory deficits found in schizophrenia including smooth eye tracking movements and auditory gating, possibly through decreased expression of the Î±-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (Durson and Kutcher, 1999; Leonard et al., 2000). Furthermore, cigarette smoking has been found to reduce monoamine oxidase activity, which is thought to increase vulner- ability to the development of schizophrenia (Fowler et al., 1996; Simpson et al., 1999). DEPRESSION Depression has consistently been linked with smoking (Breslau and Johnson, 2000; Glassman, 1993). Studies have demonstrated that a history
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 569 of major depression is associated with a greater prevalence of smoking and less success in smoking cessation (Anda et al., 1990; Balfour and Ridley, 2000; Kinnunen et al., 1996). Kinnunen and colleagues, looking at data from a randomized interventional trial, found that significantly fewer depressed smokers were able to remain abstinent three months after cessation compared to nondepressed smokers. The same study concluded that depressed patients were more responsive to the use of nicotine for cessation. Investigators have suggested that depressive symptoms may be a part of the withdrawal syndrome in those with a history of depres- sion, presenting an obstacle to successful cessation (Glassman, 1993). It has also been proposed that depression increases the intensity of nicotine dependence (Breslau et al., 1998; Carton et al., 1994). A prospective study by Breslau and colleagues (1998) with a five-year follow-up found that baseline major depression tripled the risk for progression to daily smok- ing. Smokers with a history of depression or depressive symptoms are thought to âself-medicateâ with nicotine and its antidepressant properties (Carton et al., 1994; Lerman et al., 1996). Other studies have hypothesized that smokers are predisposed to develop depression secondary to chronic nicotine central nervous system (CNS) effects. Investigators have sug- gested that certain genetic or environmental factors may predispose pa- tients to depression and the tendency to smoke independently (reviewed in Breslau et al., 1998). WEIGHT CHANGE Weight loss is a commonly cited reason for smoking, especially among young females (reviewed in Perkins, 1993), and fear of weight gain has been an obstacle to successful cessation (Emont and Cummings, 1987; Froom et al., 1998). It has been reported that around 80% of smokers gain weight after cessation (Perkins, 1993). The average weight gain after smok- ing cessation is 3-4 kg. This weight gain has been found to peak within the first few weeks or months of cessation, and smokers often return to the weight range of nonsmokers. A recent large prospective study, however, found that significant weight gain continued five years after cessation (OâHara et al., 1998). The amount of weight gain, however, is subject to many individual differences in baseline BMI, age, physical activity, ge- netic predisposition, and so forth (reviewed in Froom et al., 1998; OâHara et al., 1998; Pomerleau et al., 2000; Williamson et al., 1991). The physiologic effect of nicotine has been described as a combina- tion of a reduction in caloric intake and an increase in caloric expenditure. Although the evidence has been inconsistent, short-term increases in in- take postcessation occur, peaking within weeks or months (Froom et al., 1998), and decreases in intake upon relapse or initiation have been noted.
570 CLEARING THE SMOKE The research has supported acute changes in metabolic rate associated with changes in smoking, but chronic changes have not been as well supported. A further hypothesis for the weight change seen with change in smoking habits is the speculation that cigarette smoke or nicotine changes the weight set point of the smoker (reviewed in Perkins, 1993). Investigators have found that weight changes upon smoking initia- tion and cessation are nicotine associated (Emont and Cummings, 1987; Grunberg et al., 1986). Consistent with many previous studies, Doherty et al. (1996) found that nicotine replacement during smoking cessation sup- presses weight gain. In their randomized control study, they describe a linear relationship between nicotine dose and postcessation weight gain, with placebo users gaining the most weight. This relationship was main- tained when smoking was biochemically validated by serum cotinine. DRUG INTERACTIONS Exposure to cigarette smoke affects the metabolism of many catego- ries of drugs, which may make the action of a certain dose of a drug unpredictable. Certain constituents of tobacco smoke can affect drug ac- tion through pharmacokinetic (changes in absorption, distribution, me- tabolism, and elimination) and pharmacodynamic (changes in drug ac- tion or response) actions (Schein, 1995). Among the best-understood agents that affect enzymes of drug metabolism are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nicotineâthough less definedâselectively in- duces various cytochrome P-450 (CYP) enzymes and uridine 5-diphos- phate (UDP) glucuronosyltransferases, while carbon monoxide and heavy-metal constituents have been found to inhibit or decrease certain CYP enzymes (Zevin and Benowitz, 1999). The effect of cigarette smoke exposure on drug metabolism can influ- ence the action of many commonly used drugs, including certain anti- depressants, antipsychotics, heart medications such as Î²-blockers and antiarrhythmics, anticoagulants, alcohol, caffeine, theophylline, and others (DâArcy, 1984; Schein, 1995; Zevin and Benowitz, 1999). Many of the drug interactions are of unknown clinical significance, but others may necessitate the adjustment of medication dose among smokers. Although not considered to be due to an interaction of cigarette smoke and oral contraceptive pills, it is important to note the significantly increased risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in female smokers using oral contraceptives. FIRE SAFETY Cigarettes are the leading cause of accidental fires in the United States, causing about 20-25% of all fire deaths and resulting in about 1,000 deaths
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 571 and 2,500 injuries annually (Barillo et al., 2000; Brigham and McGuire, 1995). Often, fires are caused by the ignition of upholstered furniture and mattresses by lit cigarettes (Achauer and McGuire, 1989). Many fires also involve the use of alcohol by the smoker (Botkin, 1988). The fire hazard of cigarettes stems from the fact that a cigarette continues to burn until completely consumed. There has been a push from the public health community to force cigarette manufacturers to modify cigarettes to reduce their combustibil- ity (Chapman, 1999). In response to pressure from various organizations to decrease the danger of improperly discarded cigarettes, the Cigarette Safety Act of 1984 was signed. This act created the Technical Study Group in 1987 to study the technical and commercial feasibility of developing a fire-safe cigarette. This group was comprised of representatives of differ- ent medical organizations, federal agencies, the furniture industry, fire service, and four of the top tobacco companies (Barillo et al., 2000). The report of this group stated that it was technically and commercially fea- sible to develop fire-safe cigarettes and that a reduction of up to 90% in morbidity and mortality could be reached if such modifications were made (Achauer and McGuire, 1989). The main characteristics of cigarettes that were found to significantly decrease flammability included decreased packing density, smaller cigarette circumference, decreased paper poros- ity, and reduction of citrateâa paper-burning additive (Achauer and McGuire, 1989). The Fire Safe Act was passed in 1990 and mandated further study of the issue based on the recommendations of the Technical Study Group. The Technical Advisory Group was formed which devel- oped cigarette fire-safety test methods. No federal legislation has been passed up to this time that has set a fire-safety standard for cigarettes. In June 2000, however, the state of New York passed a cigarette fire-safety bill that would require all cigarettes sold in New York to meet flammabil- ity standards by 2003 (Perez-Pena, 2000). PARKINSONâS DISEASE Parkinsonâs disease is a neurological disease affecting 1-2% of the population that is characterized by motor dysfunction and, in severe cases, cognitive dysfunction caused by loss of dopamine and other neurotrans- mitters through the destruction of neurons in the substantia nigra. Over the last decade there have been many epidemiological studies suggesting a biologically protective effect of cigarette smoking on the risk of Parkin- sonâs disease. Numerous population based case-control and prospective studies have indicated an inverse dose-response relationship between smoking and Parkinsonâs disease (Checkoway and Nelson, 1999; Gorell et al., 1999; Grandinetti et al., 1994; Tzourio et al., 1997). In a large 26-year
572 CLEARING THE SMOKE prospective follow-up of the Honolulu Heart Study, Grandinetti et al. (1994) found the relative risk of Parkinsonâs disease among smokers to be 0.39 with a dose-response relation to pack-years of smoking. Postulated mechanisms of the neuroprotective traits of smoking include direct neu- ronal effects of nicotine on dopamine release in the substantia nigra, re- duction of the action of monoamine oxidase B, or reduction of free radical injury (Checkoway et al., 1998; Court et al., 1998; Grandinetti et al., 1994; Kelton et al., 2000). Critics of the protective association between smoking and Parkinsonâs disease have attributed the results to an artifact of selec- tive mortality of smokers that would have acquired Parkinsonâs, diagnos- tic errors, cause-and-effect bias, or another unrecognized confounder (Morens et al., 1996; Riggs, 1996). PREECLAMPSIA Studies have described an inverse relationship between cigarette smoking and the risk of preeclampsia. Many studies have reported around a 30-70% decrease in risk for preeclampsia among smokers, using re- ported daily cigarette use and serum cotinine levels, when compared to nonsmokers. A finding of a dose-response effect has been less consistent (reviewed in Conde-Agudelo et al., 1999; Klonoff-Cohen and Savitz, 1993; Lain et al., 1999; Lindqvist and Marsal, 1999). A population-based study by Cnattingius and colleagues (1997) found a decreased incidence of preeclampsia among smokers but also found that smokers who did de- velop preeclampsia tended to have worse pregnancy outcomes. In a case- control study by Marcoux et al. (1989), the protective effect of smoking for preeclampsia was maintained only among pregnant smokers who contin- ued to smoke throughout pregnancy or quit after 20 weeksâ gestation. The postulated mechanisms for this protective effect of cigarette smoking in- cludes the nicotine-mediated inhibition of fetal thromboxane A, stimula- tion of NO production, increased levels of thiocyanate, endothelial dam- age secondary to the oxidative stress effect of cigarette smoke, and altered immune responses (Cnattingius et al., 1997; Conde-Agudelo et al., 1999; reviewed in Lindqvist and Marsal, 1999). SUMMARY Several important diseases and conditions of adults, in addition to cardiovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and vari- ous cancers, have been associated with tobacco use. Some of the associa- tions are supported by substantial scientific evidence, and a causal link- age is likely. These illnesses must ultimately be subjected to the same evaluation with regard to changing risks and outcomes associated with
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 573 potential reduced-exposure products (PREPs), because they are common and clinically important, even if not often as fatal as the diseases consid- ered earlier in this report. Further, each of the conditions for which the association with tobacco use is substantial also offers the opportunity to address pathogenic mechanisms related to the varying constituents of PREPs, as well as the impact on disease incidence of coordinated behav- iors and exposures such as alcohol use, various dietary elements, and certain medications. RECOMMENDATIONS Surveillance The committee recommends that selected conditions, reviewed in this chapter, be part of a comprehensive, population-based surveillance pro- gram, as outlined in Chapter 6. This will allow determination of trends in occurrence for these tobacco-related conditions and assessment on a na- tional basis of whether changes in tobacco product use have an effect on these important health problems. Based on surveillance findings, more specific population, clinical, and basic research studies can be directed and justified, in order to pursue causal mechanisms and suggest more effective interventions. Applying Selected Conditions as Indicators of Clinical Harm Reduction Some of the conditions reviewed in this chapter may be applied as indicators of the general biological effects of new tobacco products. For example, cigarette smoking has been consistently found to be an indepen- dent risk factor for an adverse clinical course of both peptic ulcer disease and wound healing. The effects of smoking on ulcer formation and heal- ing have been clearly described clinically and in animal models. Peptic ulcers have been found to be larger, slower to heal, and more likely to recur among smokers and to exhibit clinically improved healing upon cessation. Surgical and traumatic wounds heal more slowly in cigarette smokers. The committee recommends that rigorous clinical studies be designed and executed to determine whether variations in ulcer and wound healing rates are related to different categories of tobacco prod- ucts, including those with claims of harm reduction. This may offer the opportunity to define some clinical outcomes that have clinical relevance in their own right and to identify potential indicators of harm alteration that could be obtained much sooner after the introduction of PREPs than would be possible when evaluating heart disease and cancer.
574 CLEARING THE SMOKE Other candidate diseases for such evaluation might include periodon- tal disease and Crohnâs disease. Here the outcomes to assess would be the effects of various conventional tobacco products and PREPs on the natu- ral history of the condition, including intermittancy, progression or re- gression, and longitudinally collected biomarkers of disease severity. As noted above, PREPs that alter the history and outcomes of these condi- tions could be further evaluated for specific constituent exposures that are associated with this altered history. This may lead to a more refined understanding of pathogenic mechanisms as well. There is also room for clinical and basic research on intermediate clinical outcomes. For example, as noted in this chapter, the risk of os- teoporosis has also been strongly linked to cigarette smoking. In con- trolled observational studies, bone mineral density has been found to be significantly lower among cigarette smokers, which contributes to a higher risk of osteoporotic fractures among older populations. While the effects of smoking on fracture rates may take a few decades or longer to detect, it is possible that surveillance for bone mineral density among those using PREPs and conventional products may prove valuable in a shorter time period and thus serve to detect important outcomes over an interval in which tobacco policy and clinical preventive interventions may have their greatest effects. REFERENCES Achauer BM, McGuire A. 1989. Fire safe cigarettes: an update. J Burn Care Rehabil 10(2):173- 174. Anda RF, Williamson DF, Escobedo LG, Remington PL. 1990. Smoking and the risk of peptic ulcer disease among women in the United States. Arch Intern Med 150(7):1437- 1441. Balfour DJK, Ridley DL. 2000. The effects of nicotine on neural pathways implicated in depression: a factor in nicotine addiction? Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 66(1):79-85. Barillo DJ, Brigham PA, Kayden DA, Heck RT, McManus AT. 2000. The fire-safe cigarette: a burn prevention tool. J Burn Care Rehabil 21(2):162-164. Bergstrom J, Eliasson S, Dock J. 2000. Exposure to tobacco smoking and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 27(1):61-68. Botkin JR. 1988. The fire-safe cigarette. JAMA 260(2):226-229. Brenner DE, Kukull WA, van Belle G, Bowen JD, McCormick WC, Teri L, Larson EB. 1993. Relationship between cigarette smoking and Alzheimerâs disease in a population-based case-control study. Neurology 43(2):293-300. Breslau N, Johnson EO. 2000. Predicting smoking cessation and major depression in nico- tine-dependent smokers. Am J Public Health 90(7):1122-1127. Breslau N, Peterson EL, Schultz LR, Chilcoat HD, Andreski P. 1998. Major depression and stages of smoking. Arch Gen Psychiatry 55:161-166. Brigham PA, McGuire A. 1995. Progress towards a fire-safe cigarette. J Public Health Policy 16(4):433-439.
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 575 Buccafusco JJ, Jackson WJ, Jonnala RR, Terry AV Jr. 1999. Differential improvement in memory-related task performance with nicotine by aged male and female rhesus mon- keys. Behavioral Pharmacology 10(6-7):681-690. Calkins BM. 1989. A meta-analysis of the role of smoking in inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 34(12):1841-1854. Campanile G, Hautmann G, Lotti T. 1998. Cigarette smoking, wound healing, and face-lift. Clin Dermatol 16(5):575-578. Carmelli D, Swan GE, Reed T, et al. 1999. The effect of Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 in the relationships of smoking and drinking to cognitive function. Neuroepidemiology 18(3):125-133. Carton S, Jouvent R, Widlocher D. 1994. Nicotine dependence and motives for smoking in depression. J Substance Abuse 6:67-76. Chapman S. 1999. Where thereâs smoke, thereâs fire. Tobacco Control 8(1):12-13. Checkoway H, Franklin GM, Costa-Mallen P, Smith-Weller T, Dilley J, Swanson PD, Costa LG. 1998. A genetic polymorphism of MAO-B modifies the association of cigarette smoking and Parkinsonâs disease. Neurology 50(5):1458-1461. Checkoway H, Nelson LM. 1999. Epidemiologic approaches to the study of Parkinsonâs disease etiology. Epidemiology 10(3):327-336. Christen AG. 1992. The impact of tobacco use and cessation on oral and dental diseases and conditions. Amer J Medicine 93(Suppl 1A):25S-31S. Christen WG, Glynn RJ, Ajani UA, Schaumberg DA, Buring JE, Hennekens CH, Manson JE. 2000. Smoking cessation and risk of age-related cataract in men. JAMA 284(6):713-716. Cirillo M, Senigalliesi L, Laurenzi M, Alfieri R, Stamler J, Panarelli W, De Santo NG. 1998. Microalbuminuria in nondiabetic adults: relation of blood pressure, body mass index, plasma cholesterol levels, and smoking: the Gubbio population study. Arch Intern Med 158(17):1933-1939. Cnattingius S, Mills JL, Yuen J, Eriksson O, Ros HS. 1997. The paradoxical effect of smoking in preeclamptic pregnancies: smoking reduce the incidence but increases the rates of perinatal mortality, abruptio placentae, and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177(1):156-161. Conde-Agudelo A, Althabe F, Belizan JM, Kafury-Goeta AC. 1999. Cigarette smoking dur- ing pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(4):1026-1035. Cornuz J, Feskanich D, Willett WC, Colditz GA. 1999. Smoking, smoking cessation, and risk of hip fracture in women. Am J Med 106(3):311-314. Cosnes J, Carbonnel F, Beaugerie L, Le Quintrec Y, Gendre JP. 1996. Effects of cigarette smoking on the long-term course of Crohnâs disease. Gastroenterology 110(2):424-431. Court JA, Lloyd S, Thomas N, Piggott, MA, Marshall, EF, Morris, CM, Lamb H, Perry RH, Johnson, M, Perry EK. 1998. Dopamine and nicotinic receptor binding and the levels of dopamine and homovanillic acid in human brain related to tobacco use. Neuroscience 87(1):63-78. DâArcy PF. 1984. Tobacco smoking and drugs: a clinically important interaction? Drug Intell Clin Pharm 18(4):302-307. Debanne SM, Rowland DY, Riedel TM, Cleves MA. 2000. Association of Alzheimerâs dis- ease and smoking: the case for sibling controls. J Am Geriatr Soc 48(7):800-806. Delcourt C, Cristol J, Tessier F, Leger CL, Michel F, Papoz L. 2000. Risk factors for cortical, nuclear, and posterior subscapular cataracts. Amer J Epidemiology 151(5):497-504. Doherty K, Militello FS, Kinnumen T, Garvey AJ. 1996. Nicotine gum dose and weight gain after smoking cessation. J Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64(4):799-807. Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. 2000. Smoking and dementia in male British doc- tors: prospective study. BMJ 320(7242):1091-1102.
576 CLEARING THE SMOKE Durson SM, Kutcher S. 1999. Smoking, nicotine and psychiatric disorders: evidence for therapeutic role, controversies and implications for future research. Medical Hypotheses 52(2):101-109. Emont SL, Cummings KM. 1987. Weight gain following smoking cessation: a possible role for nicotine replacement in weight management. Addictive Behaviors 12:151-155. Ernster VL, Grady D, Miike R, Black D, Selby J, Kerlikowske K. 1995. Facial wrinkling in men and women, by smoking status. Am J Public Health 85(1):78-82. Facchini FS, Hollenbeck CB, Jeppesen J, Chen YDI, Reaven GM. 1992. Insulin resistance and cigarette smoking. Lancet 339:1128-1130. Forbes WF, Hayward LM. 1993. Concerning the link between tobacco smoking and im- paired mental functioning. Can J Public Health 84(3):211-212. Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Pappas KJ, Logan J, MacGregor, R, Alexoff D, Shea G, Schlyer D, Wolf AP, Warner D, Zezulkova I, Cilento R. 1996. Inhibition of monoamine oxidase B in the brains of smokers. Nature 379:733-736. Fraga XF, Vergara M, Medina C, Casellas F, Bermejo B, Malagelada JR. 1997. Effects of smoking on the presentation and clinical course of inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 9(7):683-687. Frances C. 1998. Smokerâs wrinkles: epidemiological and pathogenic considerations. Clin Dermatol 16(5):565-570. Froom P, Melamed S, Benbassat J. 1998. Smoking cessation and weight gain. J Family Prac- tice 46(6):460-464. Glassman AH. 1993. Cigarette smoking: implications for psychiatric illness. Am J Psychiatry 150:546-553. Gorell JM, Rybicki BA, Johnson CC, Peterson EL. 1999. Smoking and Parkinsonâs disease: a dose-response relationship. Neurology 52(1):115-119. Grady D, Greene J, Daniels TE, Ernster VL, Robertson PB, Hauck W, Greenspan D, Greenspan J, Silverman S. 1990. Oral mucosal lesions found in smokeless tobacco users. J Am Dent Assoc 121(1):117-123. Grandinetti A, Morens DM, Reed D, MacEachern D. 1994. Prospective study of cigarette smoking and the risk of developing idiopathic Parkinsonâs disease. Am J Epidemiology 139(12):1129-1138. Grunberg NE, Bowen DJ, Winders SE. 1986. Effects of nicotine on body weight and food consumption in female rats. Psychopharmacology 90:101-105. Guo X, Mei QB, Cho CH. 1999. Potentiating effect of passive cigarette smoking on gas- trointestinal damage induced by indomethacin in rats. Dig Dis Sci 44(5):896-902. Haber J. 1994. Smoking is a major risk factor for periodontitis. Curr Opin Periodontol:12-8. Halimi JM, Giraudeau B, Vol S, Caces E, Nivet H, Lebranchu Y, Tichet J. 2000. Effects of current smoking and smoking discontinuation on renal function and proteinuria in the general population. Kidney Int 58(3):1285-1292. Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Colditz GA, Seddon JM, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Stampfer MJ. 1992. A prospective study of cigarette smoking and risk of cataract surgery in women. JAMA 268(8):994-998. Heliovaara M, Aho K, Aromaa A, Knekt P, Reunanen A. 1993. Smoking and risk of rheuma- toid arthritis. J Rheumatol 20(11):1830-1835. Hoidrup S, Gronbaek M, Pedersen AT, Lauritzen JB, Gottschau A, Schroll M. 1999. Hor- mone replacement therapy and hip fracture risk: effect modification by tobacco smok- ing, alcohol intake, physical activity, and body mass index. Am J Epidemiol 150(10):1085- 1093. Hollenbach KA, Barrett-Connor E, Edelstein SL, Holbrook T. 1993. Cigarette smoking and bone mineral density in older men and women. Am J Public Health 83(9):1265-1270.
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 577 Janzon L, Berntorp K, Hanson M, Lindell SE, Trell E. 1983. Glucose tolerance and smoking: a population study of oral and intravenous glucose tolerance tests in middle-aged men. Diabetologia 25(2):86-88. Jensen JA, Goodson WH, Hopf HW, Hunt TK. 1991. Cigarette smoking decreases tissue oxygen. Arch Surg 126:1131-1134. Kadunce DP, Burr R, Gress R, et al. 1991. Cigarette smoking: risk factor for premature facial wrinkling. Annals of Internal Medicine 114:840-844. Karlson EW, Lee IM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. 1999. A retrospective cohort study of cigarette smoking and risk of rheumatoid arthritis in female health professionals. Arthritis Rheum 42(5):910-917. Kato I, Nomura AM, Stemmermann GN, Chyou PH. 1992. A prospective study of gastric and duodenal ulcer and its relation to smoking, alcohol, and diet. Am J Epidemiol 135(5):521-530. Kelton MC, Kahn HJ, Conrath CL, Newhouse PA. 2000. The effects of nicotine on Parkinsonâs disease. Brain Cogn 43(1-3):274-282. Kinnunen T, Doherty K, Militello FS, Garvey AJ. 1996. Depression and smoking cessation: Characteristics of depressed smokers and effects of nicotine replacement. J Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64(4):791-798. Klonoff-Cohen HES, Savitz D. 1993. Cigarette smoking and preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 81(4):541-544. Kwiatkowski TC, Hanley Jr EN, Ramp WK. 1996. Cigarette smoking and its orthopedic consequences. Amer J Orthopedics 25(9):590-597. la Vecchia C, Negri E, Levi F, Baron JA. 1991. Cigarette smoking, body mass and other risk factors for fractures of the hip in women. Int J Epidemiol 20(3):671-677. Lain KY, Powers RW, Krohn MA, Ness RB, Crombleholme WR, Roberts JM. 1999. Urinary cotinine concentration confirms the reduced risk of preeclampsia with tobacco expo- sure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181(5 pt. 1):1192-1196. Law MR, Hackshaw AK. 1997. A meta-analysis of cigarette smoking, bone mineral density and risk of hip fracture: recognition of a major effect. BMJ 315(7112):841-846. Lee PN. 1994. Smoking and Alzheimerâs disease: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Neuroepidemiology 13(4):131-144. Leibovici D, Ritchie K, Ledesert B, Touchon J. 1999. The effects of wine and tobacco con- sumption on cognitive performance in the elderly: a longitudinal study of relative risk. Int J Epidemiol 28(1):77-81. Leonard S, Breese C, Adams C, Benhammou K, Gault J, Stevens K, Lee M, Adler L, Olincy A, Ross R, Freedman R. 2000. Smoking and schizophrenia: abnormal nicotinic receptor expression. European J Pharmacology 393:237-242. Leow YH, Maibach HI. 1998. Cigarette smoking, cutaneous vasculature, and tissue oxygen. Clin Dermatol 16(5):579-584. Lerman C, Audrain J, Orleans CT, Boyd R, Gold K, Main D, Caporaso N. 1996. Investigation of mechanisms linking depressed mood to nicotine dependence. Addictive Behaviors 21(1):9-19. Levin ED, Rezvani AH. 2000. Development of nicotinic drug therapy for cognitive disor- ders. European J Psychopharmacology 393:141-146. Lindqvist PG, Marsal K. 1999. Moderate smoking during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78:693-697. Ma L, Chow JYC, Cho CH. 1998. Effects of cigarette smoking on gastric ulcer formation and healing: possible mechanisms of action. J Clin Gastroenterol 27(Suppl 1):S80-S86. Ma L, Chow JY, Cho CH. 1999. Cigarette smoking delays ulcer healing: role of constitutive nitric oxide synthase in rat stomach. Am J Physiol 276(1 Pt 1):G238-48.
578 CLEARING THE SMOKE Marcoux S, Brisson J, Fabia J. 1989. The effect of cigarette smoking on the rise of preeclamp- sia and gestational hypertension. Am J Epidemiol 130(5):950-957. McCreadie RG, Kelly C. 2000. Patients with schizophrenia who smoke: private disaster, public resource. Br J Psychiatry 176:109. Merchant C, Tang MX, Albert S, Manly J, Stern Y, Mayeux R. 1999. The influence of smok- ing on the risk of Alzheimerâs disease. Neurology 52(7):1408-1412. Mills CM. 1993. Smoking and skin disease. Int J Dermatol 32(12):864-865. Morens DM, Grandinetti A, Davis JW, Ross GW, White LR, Reed D. 1996. Evidence against the operation of selective mortality in explaining the association between cigarette smoking and reduced occurrence of idiopathic Parkinson disease. Am J Epidemiology 144(4):400-404. Mosely LH, Finseth F, Goody M. 1978. Nicotine and its effect on wound healing. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 61(4):570-574. Muhlhauser I. 1994. Cigarette smoking and diabetes: an update. Diabet Med 11(4):336-343. Mussolino ME, Looker AC, Madans JH, Langlois JA, Orwoll ES. 1998. Risk factors for hip fracture in white men: the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. J Bone Miner Res 13(6):918-924. Nakanishi N, Nakamura K, Matsuo Y, Susuki K, Tatara K. 2000. Cigarette smoking and risk for impaired fasting glucose and Type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men. Ann Intern Med 133(3):183-191. Naldi L, Peli L, Parazzini F. 1999. Association of early-stage psoriasis with smoking and male alcohol consumption: evidence from an Italian case-control study. Arch Dermatol 135(12):1479-1484. Newhouse PA, Potter A, Levin ED. 1997. Nicotinic system involvement in Alzheimerâs and Parkinsonâs diseases. Implications for therapeutics. Drugs Aging 11(3):206-228. OâHara P, Connett JE, Lee WW, Nides M, Murray R, Wise R. 1998. Early and late weight gain following smoking cessation in the Lung Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 148(9):821- 830. Orth SR. 2000. Smoking-a renal risk factor. Nephron 86(1):12-26. Ott A, Slooter AJ, Hofman A, van Harskamp F, Witteman JC, van Broeckhaven C, van Duijn Cm, Breteler MM. 1998. Smoking and risk of dementia and Alzheimerâs disease in a population-based cohort study: the Rotterdam Study. Lancet 351(9119):1840-1843. Palacio H, Hilton JF, Canchola AJ, Greenspan D. 1997. Effect of cigarette smoking on HIV- related oral lesions. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol 14(4):338-342. Palmer RM, Scott DA, Meekin TN, Poston RN, Odell EW, Wilson RF. 1999. Potential mecha- nisms of susceptibility to periodontitis in tobacco smokers. J Periodontal Res 34(7):363- 369. Perez-Pena R. 2000. June 15. New York pact on fire-safety for cigarettes. [Online]. Available: www.nytimes.com. Perkins KA. 1993. Weight gain following smoking cessation. J Consulting and Clinical Psy- chology 61(5):768-777. Pinto-Sietsma SJ, Mulder J, Jansses WM, Hillege HL, de Zeeuw D, de Jong PE. 2000. Smok- ing is related to albuminuria and abnormal renal function in nondiabetic persons. Ann Intern Med 133(8):585-591. Poikolainen K, Reunala T, Karvonen J. 1994. Smoking, alcohol and life events related to psoriasis among women. Br J Dermatol 130(4):473-477. Pomerleau CS, Pomerleau OF, Namenek RJ, Mehringer AM. 2000. Short-term weight gain in abstaining women smokers. J Substance Abuse Treatment 18:339-342. Rhodes J, Thomas GA. 1994. Smoking: good or bad for inflammatory bowel disease? Gastro- enterology 106(3):807-810.
OTHER HEALTH EFFECTS 579 Riggs JE. 1993. Smoking and Alzheimerâs disease: protective effect or differential survival bias? Lancet 342:793-794. Riggs JE. 1996. The âprotectiveâ influence of cigarette smoking on Alzheimerâs and Parkin- sonâs diseases. Neurol Clin 14(2):353-358. Rimm EB, Chan J, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC. 1995. Prospective study of ciga- rette smoking, alcohol use, and the risk of diabetes in men. BMJ 310(6979):555-559. Rimm EB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rosner B, Hennekens CH, Speizer FE. 1993. Cigarette smoking and the risk of diabetes in women. Am J Public Health 83(2):211-214. Ritz E, Ogata H, Orth SR. 2000. Smoking: a factor promoting onset and progression of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes Metab 26(supp. 4):54-63. Robertson PB, Walsh M, Greene J, Ernster V, Grady D, Hauck W. 1990. Periodontal effects associated with the use of smokeless tobacco. J Periodontol 61(7):438-443. Schein JR. 1995. Cigarette smoking and clinically significant drug interactions. Ann Pharma- cother 29(11):1139-1148. Silman AJ, Newman J, MacGregor AJ. 1996. Cigarette smoking increases the risk of rheu- matoid arthritis. Results from a nationwide study of disease-discordant twins. Arthri- tis Rheum 39(5):732-735. Silverstein P. 1992. Smoking and wound healing. Amer J Medicine 93(suppl 1A):22S-24S. Simon JA, Seeley DG, Lipschutz RC, Vittinghoff E, Browner WF. 1997. The relation of smok- ing to waist-to-hip ratio and diabetes mellitus among elderly women. Prev Med 26(5 pt. 1):639-644. Simpson GM, Shih JC, Chen K., Flowers C, Kumazawa T, Spring B. 1999. Schizophrenia, monoamine oxidase activity, and cigarette smoking. Neuropsychopharmacology 20(4):392-394. Smedley F, Hickish T, Taube M, Yale C, Leach R, Wastell C. 1988. Perforated duodenal ulcer and cigarette smoking. J R Soc Med 81(2):92-94. Smith JB, Fenske NA. 1996. Cutaneous manifestation and consequences of smoking. J Am Acad Dermatol 34:717-732. Solberg Y, Rosner M, Belkin M. 1998. The association between cigarette smoking and ocular diseases. Surv Ophthalmol 42(6):535-547. Spangler JG, Salisbury PL. 1995. Smokeless tobacco: epidemiology, health effects and cessa- tion strategies. Am Fam Physician 52(5):1421-1430, 1433-1434. Targher G, Alberiche M, Zenere MB, Bonadonna RC, Muggeo M, Bonora E. 1997. Cigarette smoking and insulin resistance in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes melli- tus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82(11):3619-3624. Tatsuta M, Iishi H, Okuda S. 1987. Effects of cigarette smoking on the location, healing and recurrence of gastric ulcers. Hepatogastroenterology 34(5):223-228. Thomas GA, Rhodes J, Green JT. 1998. Inflammatory bowel disease and smokingâa review. Am J Gastroenterol 93(2):144-149. Thomas GA, Rhodes J, Green JT, Richardson C. 2000. Role of smoking in inflammatory bowel disease: implications for therapy. Postgrad Med J 76(895):273-279. Tidey JW, OâNeill SC, Higgens ST. 1999. Effects of abstinence on cigarette smoking among outpatients with schizophrenia. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 7(4):347- 353. Tomar SL, Asma S. 2000. Smoking-attributable periodontitis in the United States: findings from NHANES III. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Periodontol 71(5):743-751. Tzourio C, Rocca WA, Breteler MM, Baldereschi M, Dartigues JF, Lopez-Pousa S, Manubens- Bertran JM, Alperovitch A. 1997. Smoking and Parkinsonâs disease: an age-dependent risk factor? Neurology 49:1267-1272.
580 CLEARING THE SMOKE Uchimoto S, Tsumura K, Hayashi T, Suematso C, Endo G, Fujii S, Okada K. 1999. Impact of cigarette smoking on the incidence of Type 2 diabetes mellitus in middle-aged Japa- nese men: the Osaka Health Survey. Diabet Med 16(11):951-955. Uhlig T, Hagen KB, Kvien TK. 1999. Current tobacco smoking, formal education, and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 26(1):47-54. Van Duijn CM, Havekes LM, Van Broeckhoven C, de Knijff P, Hofman A. 1995. Apolipo- protein E genotype and association between smoking and early onset Alzheimerâs disease. BMJ 310:627-631. Walsh PM, Epstein JB. 2000. The oral effects of smokeless tobacco. J Can Dent Assoc 66(1):22- 25. West S, Munoz B, Schein OD, Vitale S, Macguire M, Taylor HR, Bressler NM. 1995. Ciga- rette smoking and risk for progression of nuclear opacities. Arch Ophthalmol 113(11):1377-1380. Williamson DF, Madans J, Anda RF, Kleinman JC, Giovino GA, Byers T. 1991. Smoking cessation and severity of weight gain in a national cohort. N Engl J Med 324(11):739- 745. Yamamoto T, Keighley MR. 2000. Smoking and disease recurrence after operation for Crohnâs disease. Br J Surg 87(4):398-404. Zevin S, Benowitz NL. 1999. Drug interactions with tobacco smoking. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet 36(6):425-438.