National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

REGIONAL ISSUES IN AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY FOR EVERGLADES RESTORATION

Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem

Water Science and Technology Board

Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology

Division on Earth and Life Studies

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

Supported by the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, U.S. Department of the Interior, under assistance of Cooperative Agreement No. 5280-9-9029. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government.

International Standard Book Number 0-309-08621-3

Additional copies of this report are available from the
National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624–6242 or (202) 334–3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu

Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M.Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm.A.Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V.Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M.Alberts and Dr. Wm. A.Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

COMMITTEE ON RESTORATION OF THE GREATER EVERGLADES ECOSYSTEM (CROGEE)1,2

JEAN M.BAHR3, Chair,

University of Wisconsin, Madison

SCOTT W.NIXON, Vice-Chair,

University of Rhode Island, Narragansett

JOHN S.ADAMS,

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

LINDA K.BLUM,

University of Virginia, Charlottesville

PATRICK L.BREZONIK3,

University of Minnesota, St. Paul

FRANK W.DAVIS,

University of California, Santa Barbara

WAYNE C.HUBER,

Oregon State University, Corvallis

STEPHEN R.HUMPHREY,

University of Florida, Gainesville

DANIEL P.LOUCKS,

Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

KENNETH W.POTTER,

University of Wisconsin, Madison

LARRY ROBINSON,

Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University, Tallahassee

REBECCA R.SHARITZ3,

Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, Aiken, South Carolina, and University of Georgia, Athens

HENRY J.VAUX, JR.,

University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland

JOHN VECCHIOLI3,

U.S. Geological Survey (ret.), Odessa, Florida

JEFFREY R.WALTERS3,

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

Consultants to the Committee

THOMAS MORRIS3,

Las Vegas Valley Water District, Nevada

MARYLYNN V.YATES3,

University of California, Riverside

MICHAEL C.NEWMAN3,

Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point

NRC Staff

STEPHEN D.PARKER, Director,

Water Science and Technology Board

DAVID J.POLICANSKY, Associate Director,

Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology

WILLIAM S.LOGAN3, Senior Staff Officer,

Water Science and Technology Board

PATRICIA JONES KERSHAW, Staff Associate,

Water Science and Technology Board

1  

The activities of the Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem (CROGEE) are overseen and supported by the NRC’s Water Science and Technology Board (lead) and Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology (see Appendix B).

2  

For a list of acronyms, see Appendix D.

3  

A subgroup consisting of CROGEE members Patrick Brezonik, Rebecca Sharitz, John Vecchioli, Jeffrey Walters, plus consultants Thomas Morris, Marylynn Yates, and Michael Newman, and CROGEE chair Jean Bahr, with support by NRC senior staff officer Will Logan, took the lead in drafting the report.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

Preface

This report is a product of the Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem (CROGEE), which provides consensus advice to the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force (“Task Force"). The Task Force was established in 1993 and was codified in the 1996 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA); its responsibilities include the development of a comprehensive plan for restoring, preserving and protecting the south Florida ecosystem, and the coordination of related research. The CROGEE works under the auspices of the Water Science and Technology Board and the Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the National Research Council (NRC).

The CROGEE’s mandate includes providing the Task Force not only with scientific overview and technical assessment of the restoration activities and plans, but also to provide focused advice on technical topics of importance to the restoration efforts. The first of these items, approved by the Task Force in May 2000, was Aquifer Storage and Recovery. The workplan item noted that:

Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) is a key component of the Comprehensive [Everglades Restoration] Plan [CERP]. It is important that aspects of this technology, including water quality and its feasibility at the large scales being planned, be understood as soon as possible. Thus the CROGEE proposes that very high priority be given to the task of understanding and analyzing the ASR pilot projects and in addition, to incorporating the pilot test results into an ongoing assessment of regional impacts of the large scale ASR operations…Much of the value of adaptive management comes from designing pilot and other projects to maximize opportunities for learning. This is especially true for a large-scale project like ASR, where it is important to design (local) pilot projects that will allow inferences about injection, storage, and recovery aspects and impacts on water quality expected for the full project over the south Florida region.”

On October 19, 2000, a workshop on the pilot projects and related plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro areas was held by the CROGEE in Miami, Florida. The workshop was open to the public and was attended by about 60 people including personnel from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), federal, state and local agencies, universities, consulting firms, and environmental organizations. There were 10 invited experts from government, academia and the private sector, and eight members of the CROGEE present. A report was subsequently published, titled Aquifer

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

Storage and Recovery in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan: A Critique of the Pilot Projects and Related Plans for ASR in the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro Areas (NRC, 2001).

Shortly before the workshop, CERP planners extracted much of the proposed work on regional analysis of the subsurface from the Lake Okeechobee and Western Hillsboro pilot projects and reorganized it into a proposed Aquifer Storage and Recovery Regional Study. The NRC (2001) report commended this proposal, and recommended various elements for such a study. Much of the proposed work on geochemistry, water quality, and ecotoxicology was also added to this study. A fourth draft of the project management plan for the ASR regional study (http://www.evergladesplan.org/pm/mgmtplns.shtml) was prepared by the USACE and the SFWMD in May 2002, and the Task Force requested that the CROGEE conduct a technical review of this document. Specifically, this review examines the adequacy of the proposed scientific methods to address key issues raised in the CROGEE February 2001 report and other issues previously raised by the ASR Issue Team of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force Working Group in their 1999 report. Our conclusions and recommendations are based primarily on the collective experience and knowledge of the authors.

In addition to the CROGEE members who took the lead in drafting this report, I would also like to particularly thank three consultants to the committee, Tom Morris, Marylynn Yates, and Michael Newman, who graciously provided their time and expertise to this effort. We are also grateful for the assistance of Ronnie Best (U.S. Geological Survey), co-chair of the Science Coordination Team; Peter Ortner (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Working Group liaison to CROGEE; Terrence “Rock” Salt and Kevin Burger, Executive Director and Deputy Executive Director of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force; and Glenn Landers (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers) and Peter Kwiatkowski (South Florida Water Management District), Project Managers for the Aquifer Storage and Recovery Regional Study.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process.

We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Charles Haas, Drexel University

Mark Sandheinrich, University of Wisconsin, LaCrosse

Zhuping Sheng, Texas Agricultural and Mechanical University, El Paso

Amelia Ward, University of Alabama

Carol Wicks, University of Missouri, Columbia

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by George Hornberger, University of Virginia. Appointed by the National Research Council, Dr. Hornberger was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×

was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Jean M.Bahr, Chair

Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10521.
×
PageR12
Next: Executive Summary »
Regional Issues in Aquifer Storage and Recovery for Everglades Restoration: A Review of the ASR Regional Study Project Management Plan of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The report reviews a comprehensive research plan on Everglades restoration drafted by federal and Florida officials that assesses a central feature of the restoration: a proposal to drill more than 300 wells funneling up to 1.7 billion gallons of water a day into underground aquifers, where it would be stored and then pumped back to the surface to replenish the Everglades during dry periods. The report says that the research plan goes a long way to providing information needed to settle remaining technical questions and clearly responds to suggestions offered by scientists in Florida and in a previous report by the Research Council.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!