National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

AN ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION TIME AND TIME INTERVAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Committee for an Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology

Naval Studies Board

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This work was performed under Department of the Navy Contract N00014-00-G-0230/0010, issued by the Office of Naval Research under contract authority NR 201-124. However, the content does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the Department of the Navy or the government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

The U.S. government has at least a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license throughout the world for government purposes to publish, translate, reproduce, deliver, perform, and dispose of all or any of this work, and to authorize others so to do.

International Standard Book Number 0-309-08522-5

Copies available from:

Naval Studies Board

National Research Council

2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20418

Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. Wm. A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

COMMITTEE FOR AN ASSESSMENT OF PRECISION TIME AND TIME INTERVAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

DAVID H. AUSTON,

Kavli Foundation and Institute,

Chair

LEONARD S. CUTLER,

Agilent Technologies

ROBERT E. DRULLINGER,

National Institute of Standards and Technology

ROBERT P. FRUEHOLZ,

The Aerospace Corporation

GERALD GABRIELSE,

Harvard University

WILLIAM P. KELLEHER,

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.

GLEN KOWACH,

Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies

LUTE MALEKI,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

THOMAS E. PARKER,

National Institute of Standards and Technology

BRADFORD W. PARKINSON,

Stanford University

RICHARD A. RIDDELL,

General Dynamics

SAMUEL R. STEIN,

Timing Solutions Corporation

ROBERT F.C. VESSOT,

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

JOHN R. VIG,

U.S. Army Communications-Electronics Command

Staff

RONALD D. TAYLOR, Director

DOROTHY ZOLANDZ, Study Director

MARY G. GORDON, Information Officer

SUSAN G. CAMPBELL, Administrative Assistant

IAN M. CAMERON, Project Assistant

SIDNEY G. REED, JR., Consultant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

NAVAL STUDIES BOARD

VINCENT VITTO,

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.,

Chair

JOSEPH B. REAGAN,

Saratoga, California,

Vice Chair

ARTHUR B. BAGGEROER,

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

ALAN BERMAN,

Applied Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University,

Special Adviser

JAMES P. BROOKS,

Northrop Grumman Ship Systems

JOHN D. CHRISTIE,

Logistics Management Institute

RUTH A. DAVID,

Analytic Services, Inc.

PAUL K. DAVIS,

RAND and the RAND Graduate School

ANTONIO L. ELIAS,

Orbital Sciences Corporation

BRIG “CHIP” ELLIOTT,

BBN Technologies

FRANK A. HORRIGAN,

Bedford, Massachusetts

RICHARD J. IVANETICH,

Institute for Defense Analyses

HARRY W. JENKINS,

ITT Industries

MIRIAM E. JOHN,

Sandia National Laboratories

DAVID V. KALBAUGH,

Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University

ANNETTE J. KRYGIEL,

Great Falls, Virginia

WILLIAM B. MORGAN,

Rockville, Maryland

JOHN H. MOXLEY III,

Korn/Ferry International

ROBERT B. OAKLEY,

National Defense University

NILS R. SANDELL, JR.,

ALPHATECH, Inc.

JAMES M. SINNETT,

Ballwin, Missouri

WILLIAM D. SMITH,

Fayetteville, Pennsylvania

RICHARD L. WADE,

Risk Management Sciences

MITZI M. WERTHEIM,

Center for Naval Analyses

Navy Liaison Representatives

RADM LEWIS W. CRENSHAW, JR.,

USN, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, N81

RADM JAY M. COHEN,

USN, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations, N91

Marine Corps Liaison Representative

LTGEN EDWARD HANLON, JR.,

USMC, Commanding General, Marine Corps Combat Development Command

RONALD D. TAYLOR, Director

CHARLES F. DRAPER, Senior Program Officer

MICHAEL L. WILSON, Program Officer

MARY G. GORDON, Information Officer

SUSAN G. CAMPBELL, Administrative Assistant

IAN M. CAMERON, Project Assistant

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

Preface

The Department of the Navy strives to maintain, through its Office of Naval Research (ONR), a vigorous science and technology (S&T) program in those areas considered critically important to U.S. naval superiority in the maritime environment, including littoral waters and shore regions. In pursuing its S&T investments in such areas, ONR must ensure that (1) a robust U.S. research capability to work on long-term S&T problems in areas of interest to the Department of the Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) is sustained, (2) an adequate supply of new scientists and engineers in these areas is maintained, and (3) S&T products and processes necessary to assure future superiority in naval warfare are provided.

One of the areas critical for the Department of the Navy is precision time and time interval (PTTI) science and technology. At the request of ONR, the National Research Council (NRC) established a committee, the Committee for an Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology, under the auspices of the Naval Studies Board, to assess the S&T in this area. The terms of reference of the study called for the committee to review and assess the health of the existing Department of the Navy programs that contribute to PTTI, evaluate the Navy’s research effort to develop capabilities needed for future clocks, identify non-Navy-sponsored research and development efforts that might facilitate progress in developing such advanced clocks, and recommend how the Navy’s research program should be focused so as to meet future needs. The committee was asked to determine whether this task area meets the criteria for a National Naval Responsibility by assessing the following:

  • Maturity of and challenges in key technology areas (including cost drivers),

  • Interaction with related technology areas,

  • Program funding and funding trends,

  • Scope of naval responsibility,

  • Scope, degree, and stability of non-Navy activities in key technology areas,

  • Performer base (academia, government, industry, foreign),

  • Infrastructure (leadership in the area),

  • Knowledge-base pipeline (graduate, postdoctoral, and career delineation),

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
  • Facilities and equipment, and

  • Integration with and/or transition to higher budget category programs.

Two key questions for the committee were, What technology developments are needed to meet the Navy’s long-term objectives? To what extent do these technology developments depend on Navy-sponsored R&D?

The committee was composed of individuals from a variety of backgrounds and organizations who are active in PTTI or related fields (see Appendix A). At its initial meeting, the committee received extensive briefings on the aims and accomplishments of the ONR research directed at PTTI, which is housed primarily in the Physical Sciences Division Code 331. This information was supplemented by additional information obtained through individual discussions with researchers and experts in the field. The committee’s subsequent discussions of the existing program and its adequacy were based on information provided in those briefings and on the committee members’ own experience.

The study began in December 2001 and lasted approximately 7 months. During that time, the committee held five meetings:

  • December 17-18, 2001, in Washington, D.C. Organizational meeting with briefings provided by ONR, the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL), the U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the Institute for Defense Analyses, and Datum.

  • January 23-24, 2002, in Washington, D.C. Briefings were provided by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), the office of the DOD Director of Defense Research and Engineering, the National Reconnaissance Office, and researchers from Pennsylvania State University and the University of Washington.

  • February 26-27, 2002, in Irvine, California. Briefings were provided by NIST, JPL, the Global Positioning System (GPS) Joint Program Office, the Department of the Navy’s Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center (SPAWAR), and a researcher from the University of Colorado.

  • March 26-27, 2002, in Washington, D.C. Briefings were provided by the Department of the Navy (OPNAV N70T/N60T), Frequency Electronics, Inc., and the Air Force Emerging Military Navigation and Timing Technology panel. (A scheduled briefing by Kernco was cancelled at the speaker’s request.)

  • April 17-18, 2002, in El Segundo, California. Committee deliberations and report drafting.

The resulting report, prepared in the ensuing several months, represents the committee’s consensus view on the issues raised and questions posed in the terms of reference.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×

Acknowledgment of Reviewers

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Anthony DeMaria, Coherent DEOS,

Norval Fortson, University of Washington,

Kurt Gibble, Pennsylvania State University,

Randall G. Hulet, Rice University,

Joseph J. Suter, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, and

Bruce Wald, Arlington Education Consultants.

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by H. Gregory Tornatore, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University. Appointed by the National Research Council, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
This page in the original is blank.
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2002. An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10541.
×
Page R12
Next: Executive Summary »
An Assessment of Precision Time and Time Interval Science and Technology Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Knowledge of time is essential to precise knowledge of location, and for this reason the Navy, with its need to navigate on the high seas, has historically played an important role in the development and application of advanced time realization and dissemination technologies. Discoveries coming from basic research funded by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) lie at the heart of today's highest performance atomic clocks, Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) expertise played a role in developing the space-qualified atomic clocks that enable the Global Positioning System (GPS), and the U.S. Naval Observatory (USNO) maintains and disseminates the standard of time for all of the Department of Defense (DOD). The Navy has made major investments in most aspects of precision time and time interval (PTTI) science and technology, although specific PTTI-related research has also been funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and non-DOD agencies such as the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Department of Commerce. Navy funding, largely through ONR, has a history of being an early enabler of key new developments. Judicious funding decisions by the Navy—particularly by ONR program officers—have underpinned most of the major advances in PTTI science and technology (S&T) in the last 50 years.

PTTI is important to modern naval needs, and indeed to all the armed Services, for use in both navigation and communications. Precise time synchronization is needed to efficiently determine the start of a code sequence in secure communications, to perform navigation, and to locate the position of signal emitters. Precise frequency control is required in communications for spectrum utilization and frequency-hopped spread-spectrum techniques. There are many examples of essential military operations that depend on PTTI and could benefit from improvements in PTTI technology. These include:

-GPS clocks and autonomous operations,

-Weapon system four-dimensional coordination,

-GPS antijamming,

-Network-centric warfare, and

-Secure military communications.

This report summarizes that reductions in the size, weight, and power requirements and increases in the ruggedness of PTTI devices without sacrificing performance would put more accurate and precise timekeeping in the hands of the warrior, improving capabilities in all of the above operations.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!