National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Understanding the Risks to the S&E Workforce
Suggested Citation:"The Risks of a Declining S&E Workforce." National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States: Tasks for University, Industry, and Government. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10647.
×

THE RISKS OF A DECLINING S&E WORKFORCE

What are the consequences of these demographic shifts that threaten the adequacy of the national S&E workforce? The risks are real. The nation risks losing a favorable trade balance, and becoming vulnerable to the unexpected, such as a major energy crisis, a national health emergency, a military threat, or terrorist attack. A decline in the availability of foreign workers would compound these risks.

  • The nation risks losing international, business, and economic leadership. If the S&E workforce is inadequate to need, the nation’s innovation engine will slow, curtailing U.S. competitiveness in a global economy that is revving up with unprecedented vigor. Bill Joyce, CEO of Hercules Incorporated, has summarized the situation:

    “If there are not enough trained people in the U.S., corporations will have to move R&D operations to countries where the trained people are. The pilot plant follows, because you need the R&D people nearby to help make it work. The manufacturing plant follows the pilot plant. Distribution, sales, and management follow the manufacturing. Once this process is started, it is not reversible. Corporations may not like it, but they will survive if there is no R&D in the U.S. The U.S. economy, however, will not recover from the loss of this business.28

  • Advances in the physical sciences will decline. Capability in basic science is essential to the three major emergent areas of research and innovation: biotechnology, nanotechnology, and information technology. Because of substantial budgetary shifts favoring the life sciences, losses in the physical sciences are magnified. The share of federal funding devoted to the physical sciences experienced a 17.7 percent decline from 1993 to 1999.29 Ironically,

Suggested Citation:"The Risks of a Declining S&E Workforce." National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States: Tasks for University, Industry, and Government. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10647.
×

the overwhelming majority—74.2 percent—of industrial R&D performed in the United States is based in the physical sciences, math, and engineering fields and requires workers with training in those backgrounds.30

The Director of the National Science Foundation, Rita Colwell, has said,

“This message has to be shouted. It can’t continue. We’re down 23-25 percent in math and physics, which is clearly a serious situation.”

  • The nation risks losing essential technological expertise. With the pending retirements of older S&E professionals, the nation will lose experts in key disciplines, for example high-energy physics and nuclear engineering.

  • The nation’s security-sensitive systems are at risk. A dearth of educated U.S. citizens in sensitive technical areas (e.g., nuclear engineering, hypersonics) carries clear and specific national security risks. National technological superiority is part of the foundation of our present military strategy. John Marburger, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, has cited the “Hart-Rudman Report” in support of this thesis. The Commission’s work has focused on how American science and technology, as well as education in science and technology, can and should be revitalized to better support the nation’s security needs and interests.31

In many western nations, government adopts a laissez-faire posture toward science and engineering talent development, relying on a market-based approach to foster the next generation of scientists and engineers. The United States can no longer afford to be so complacent.

28  

William Joyce. Government University Industry Research Roundtable. March 12-13, 2002. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

29  

Stephen A. Merrill. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education, [p. 27]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.

30  

Tim Studt and Dr. Jules J. Duga. “Smaller Increase Forecast for US Research Spending” [Table 3— International R&D]. Morris Plains, NJ: R&D Magazine. January 2002.

31  

U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century. Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2001.

Suggested Citation:"The Risks of a Declining S&E Workforce." National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States: Tasks for University, Industry, and Government. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10647.
×
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"The Risks of a Declining S&E Workforce." National Academy of Sciences. 2003. Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States: Tasks for University, Industry, and Government. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10647.
×
Page 12
Next: Strengthening the S&E Workforce »
Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States: Tasks for University, Industry, and Government Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $36.00 Buy Ebook | $28.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

At the request of the Government-University-Industry Research Roundtable (GUIRR), Shirley Ann Jackson, President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, presents in this brief paper her views of the challenges of the 21st century for the science and engineering workforce. Dr. Jackson identifies factors that she believes are contributing to a declining science and engineering workforce, describes the risks and consequences of this decline, and proposes specific, short-term tasks for universities, industry, and the federal government to strengthen and revitalize the workforce.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!