National Academies Press: OpenBook

Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (2003)

Chapter: Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports

« Previous: Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 85
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 86
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 87
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 88
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 89
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 90
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 91
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 92
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 93
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 94
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports." Institute of Medicine. 2003. Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10649.
×
Page 95

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix A Committee Recommendations and Conclusions from Previous Reports MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA VACCINE AND AUTISM: Conclusions The committee concludes that the evidence favors rejection of a causal rela- tionship at the population level between measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and autistic spectrum disorders (ASD). However, this conclusion does not ex- clude the possibility that MMR vaccine could contribute to ASD in a small number of children. The committee concludes that further research on the possible occurrence of ASD in a small number of children subsequent to MMR vaccination is warranted, and it has identified targeted research opportunities that could lead to firmer understanding of the relationship. Recommendations Public Health Response The committee recommends that the relationship between the MMR vaccine and autistic spectrum disorders receive continued attention. Policy Review The committee does not recommend a policy review at this time of the 85

86 IMMUNIZATION SAFFI Y REVIEW licensure of MMR vaccine or of the current schedule and recommendations for administration of MMR vaccine. Research Regarding MMR and ASD The committee recommends the use of accepted and consistent case defini- tions and assessment protocols for ASD in order to enhance the precision and comparability of results from surveillance, epidemiological, and biological in- vestigations. The committee recommends the exploration of whether exposure to MMR vaccine is a risk factor for autistic spectrum disorder in a small number of chil- dren. The committee recommends the development of targeted investigations of whether or not measles vaccine-strain virus is present in the intestines of some children with ASD. The committee encourages all who submit reports to VAERS of any diagno- sis of ASD thought to be related to MMR vaccine to provide as much detail and as much documentation as possible. The committee recommends studying the possible effects of different MMR . . . mmun~zahon exposures. The committee recommends conducting further clinical and epidemiological studies of sufficient rigor to identify risk factors and biological markers of ASD in order to better understand genetic or environmental causes. Communications The committee recommends that government agencies and professional or- ganizations, CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in particular, review some of the most prominent forms of communication regarding the hy- pothesized relationship between MMR vaccine and ASD, including information they provide via the Internet and the ease with which Internet information can be accessed.

APPENDIX A 87 THIMEROSAL-CONTAINING VACCINES AND NEURODEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS Conclusions The committee concludes that although the hypothesis that exposure to thime- rosal-containing vaccines could be associated with neurodevelopmental disor- ders is not established and rests on indirect and incomplete information, primarily from analogies with methylmercury and levels of maximum mercury exposure from vaccines given in children, the hypothesis is biologically plausible. The committee also concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between thimerosal exposures from childhood vac- cines and the neurodevelopmental disorders of autism, ADHD, and speech or language delay. Public Health Response Recommendations Policy Review and Analysis The committee recommends the use of the thimerosal-free DTaP, Hib, and hepatitis B vaccines in the United States, despite the fact that there might be remaining supplies of thimerosal-containing vaccine available. The committee recommends that full consideration be given by appropriate professional societies and government agencies to removing thimerosal from vaccines administered to infants, children, or pregnant women in the United States. The committee recommends that appropriate professional societies and gov- ernment agencies review their policies about the non-vaccine biological and phar- maceutical products that contain thimerosal and are used by infants, children, and pregnant women in the United States. The committee recommends that policy analyses be conducted that will in- form these discussions in the future. The committee recommends a review and assessment of how public health policy decisions are made under uncertainty. The committee recommends a review of the strategies used to communicate rapid changes in vaccine policy, and it recommends research on how to improve those strategies. Public Health and Biomedical Research portfolio. The committee recommends a diverse public health and biomedical research

88 Epidemiological Research IMMUNIZATION SAFER EVIL The committee recommends case-control studies examining the potential link between neurodevelopmental disorders and thimerosal-containing vaccines. The committee recommends further analysis of neurodevelopmental disor- ders in cohorts of children who did not receive thimerosal-containing doses as part of a clinical trial of DTaP vaccine. The committee recommends conducting epidemiological studies that com- pare the incidence and prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders before and after the removal of thimerosal from vaccines. The committee recommends an increased effort to identify the primary sources and levels of prenatal and postnatal background exposure to thimerosal (e.g., Rho (D) Immune Globulin) and other forms of mercury (e.g., maternal consumption of fish) in infants, children, and pregnant women. Clinical Research The committee recommends research on how children, including those diag- nosed with neurodevelopmental disorders, metabolize and excrete metals par- ticularly mercury. The committee recommends continued research on theoretical modeling of ethylmercury exposures, including the incremental burden of thimerosal with background mercury exposure from other sources. The committee recommends careful, rigorous, and scientific investigations of chelation when used in children with neurodevelopmental disorders, espe- cially autism. Basic Science Research The committee recommends research to identify a safe, effective, and inex- pensive alternative to thimerosal for countries that decide they need to switch from using thimerosal as a preservative. The committee recommends research in appropriate animal models on the neurodevelopmental effects of ethylmercury.

APPENDIX A MULTIPLE IMMUNIZATIONS AND IMMUNE DYSFUNCTION Conclusions Scientific Assessment Causality Conclusions 89 The committee concludes that the epidemiological evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between multiple immunizations and an increase in heter- ologous infection. The committee concludes that the epidemiological evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between multiple immunizations and an increased risk of type 1 diabetes. The committee concludes that the epidemiological evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between multiple immunizations and in- creased risk of allergic disease, particularly asthma. Biological Mechanisms Conclusions Autoimmune Disease In the absence of experimental or human evidence regarding molecular mim- icry or mercury-induced modification of any vaccine component to create an antigenic epitope capable of cross-reaction with self epitopes as a mechanism by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk of autoimmunity, the committee con- cludes that these mechanisms are only theoretical. The committee concludes that there is weak evidence for bystander activa- tion, alone or in concert with molecular mimicry, as a mechanism by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could pos- sibly influence an individual's risk of autoimmunity. In the absence of experimental or human evidence regarding loss of protec- tion against a homologous infection as a mechanism by which multiple immuni- zations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk of autoimmunity, the committee concludes that this mechanism is only theoretical. In the absence of experimental or human evidence regarding mechanisms related to the hygiene hypothesis as a means by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk of autoimmunity, the committee concludes that this mechanism is only theoretical. Considering molecular mimicry, bystander activation, and impaired

9o IMMUNIZATION SAFFI Y REVIEW immunoregulation collectively rather than individually, the committee concludes that there is weak evidence for these mechanisms as means by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influ- ence an individual's risk of autoimmunity. Allergic Disease The committee concludes that there is weak evidence for bystander activa- tion as a mechanism by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk of allergy. In the absence of experimental or human evidence regarding mechanisms related to the hygiene hypothesis as a means by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk of allergy, the committee concludes that this mechanism is only theoretical. The committee concludes that there is weak evidence for the existence of any biological mechanisms, collectively or individually, by which multiple immuni- zations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk of allergy. Heterologous Infection The committee concludes that there is strong evidence for the existence of biological mechanisms by which multiple immunizations under the U.S. infant immunization schedule could possibly influence an individual's risk for heterolo- gous infections. Significance Assessment The committee concludes that concern about multiple immunizations has been, and could continue to be, of societal significance in terms of parental worries, potential health burdens, and future challenges for immunization policymaking. Public Health Response Recommendations Policy Review The committee recommends that state and federal vaccine policymakers consider a broader and more explicit strategy for developing recommendations for the use of vaccines. The committee does not recommend a policy review by the CDC's Advi- sory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the American Academy of

APPENDIX A 91 Pediatrics' Committee on Infectious Diseases, and the American Academy of Family Physicians of the current recommended childhood immunization sched- ule on the basis of concerns about immune system dysfunction. The committee does not recommend a policy review by the Food and Drug Administration's Vaccines and Related Biologic Products Advisory Committee of any currently licensed vaccines on the basis of concerns about immune system dysfunction. Research Epidemiological Research The committee recommends exploring the feasibility of using existing vac- cine surveillance systems, alone or in combination, to study safety questions related to asthma and other important allergic disorders, as well as to type 1 diabetes and other important autoimmune diseases. The committee recommends exploring the use of cohorts for research on possible vaccine-related disease risks. Furthermore, the committee recommends that disease registries and research programs for autoimmune and allergic disor- ders routinely collect immunization histories as part of their study protocol. Basic Science and Clinical Research The committee recommends continued research on the development of the human infant immune system. The committee endorses current research efforts aimed at identifying genetic variability in human immune system development and immune system respon- siveness as a way to gain a better understanding of genetic susceptibility to vaccine-based adverse events. The committee recommends exploring the feasibility of collecting data on surrogate markers for autoimmune and allergic disorders in the vaccine testing and licensing process. The committee recommends exploring surrogates for allergy and auto-im- munity in existing cohort studies of variations in the vaccine schedule. Communication The committee recommends that an appropriate panel of multidisciplinary experts be convened by the Department of Health and Human Services. It would develop a comprehensive research strategy for knowledge leading to the optimal design and evaluation of vaccine risk-benefit communication approaches.

92 Causality Conclusions IMMUNIZATION SAFER EVIL HEPATITIS B VACCINE AND DEMYELINATING NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT The committee concludes that the evidence favors rejection of a causal rela- tionship between hepatitis B vaccine administered to adults and incident multiple sclerosis. The committee also concludes that the evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine administered to adults and multiple sclerosis relapse. The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and the first episode of a central nervous system demyelinating disorder. The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and ADEM. The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and optic neuritis. The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and transverse myelitis. The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and GBS. The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between hepatitis B vaccine and brachial neuritis. Biological Mechanisms Conclusions The committee concludes that there is weak evidence for biological mecha- nisms by which hepatitis B vaccination could possibly influence an individual's risk of the central or peripheral nervous system disorders of MS, first episode of CDD, ADEM, or optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, GBS, or brachial neuritis. SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT The committee concludes that concerns about the hepatitis B vaccine remain significant in the minds of some parents and workers who are required to take the vaccine because of occupational risk.

APPENDIX A Policy Review 93 PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE RECOMMENDATIONS The committee does not recommend a policy review of the hepatitis B vac- cine by any of the national and federal vaccine advisory bodies on the basis of concerns about demyelinating neurological disorders. The committee recommends continued surveillance of hepatitis B disease and increased surveillance of secondary diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatocel- lular carcinoma. Basic and Clinical Science The committee recommends continued research in animal and in vitro mod- els, as well as in humans, on the mechanisms of immune-mediated neurological disease possibly associated with exposure to vaccines. Communication The committee again recommends that government agencies and profes- sional organizations responsible for immunizations critically evaluate their com- munication services with increased understanding of, and input from, the in- tended user.

94 Causality Conclusions IMMUNIZATION SAFER EVIL SV40 CONTAMINATION OF POLIO VACCINE AND CANCER SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT The committee concludes that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between SV40-containing polio vaccines and cancer. Biological Mechanisms Conclusions The committee concludes that the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming virus. The committee concludes that the biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions. The committee concludes that the biological evidence is moderate that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans. SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT The committee concludes that concerns about exposure to SV40 through inadvertent contamination of polio vaccines are significant because of the seri- ousness of cancers as the possible adverse health outcomes and because of the continuing need to ensure and protect public trust in the nation's immunization program. PUBLIC HEALTH RESPONSE RECOMMENDATIONS Policy Review The committee does not recommend a policy review of polio vaccine by any of the national or federal vaccine advisory bodies, on the basis of concerns about cancer risks that might be associated with exposure to SV40, because the vaccine in current use is free of SV40. Policy Analysis and Communication The committee recommends that the appropriate federal agencies develop a Vaccine Contamination Prevention and Response Plan.

APPENDIX A Research 95 The committee recommends development of sensitive and specific serologic tests for SV40. The committee recommends the development and use of sensitive and spe- cific standardized techniques for SV40 detection. The committee recommends that once there is agreement in the scientific community as to the best detection methods and protocols, pre-1955 samples of human tissues should be assayed for presence or absence of SV40 in rigorous, multi-center studies. The committee recommends further study of the transmissibility of SV40 in humans. Until some of the technical issues are resolved, the committee does not recommend additional epidemiological studies of people potentially exposed to the contaminated polio vaccine.

Next: Appendix B: Public Meeting Agenda October 28, 2002 »
Immunization Safety Review: Vaccinations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $39.00 Buy Ebook | $31.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

With current recommendations calling for infants to receive multiple doses of vaccines during their first year of life and with sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) the most frequent cause of death during the postneonatal period, it is important to respond to concerns that vaccination might play a role in sudden unexpected infant death.

The committee reviewed epidemiologic evidence focusing on three outcomes: SIDS, all SUDI (sudden unexpected death in infancy), and neonatal death (infant death, whether sudden or not, during the first 4 weeks of life). Based on this review, the committee concluded that the evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship between some vaccines and SIDS; and that the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between other vaccines and SIDS, SUDI, or neonatal death. The evidence regarding biological mechanisms is essentially theoretical, reflecting in large measure the lack of knowledge concerning the pathogenesis of SIDS.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!