National Academies Press: OpenBook

Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002 (2003)

Chapter: Front Matter

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×

Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

The National Academies Press
Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×

The Space Studies Board is a unit of the National Research Council, which serves as an independent advisor to the federal government on scientific and technical questions of national importance. The National Research Council, jointly administered by the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine, brings the resources of the entire scientific and technical community to bear through its volunteer advisory committees.

Support for the work of the Space Studies Board and its committees and task groups was provided by National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contract NASW-01001, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Contracts 50-DKNA-6-90040 and 50-DKNA-1-90024 and Purchase Order No. 40-AA-NR-11138, Environmental Protection Agency Grant X-82821401, Army Corps of Engineers Purchase Order DACA89-99-M-0147, NASA John C. Stennis Space Center Order NS-7570, Department of Transportation Order DTRS56-00-P-70077, U.S. Geological Survey Cooperative Agreement 00HQAG0204, National Science Foundation Grant ATM-0109283, Office of Naval Research Grant N00014-01-1-0753, and Air Force Office of Scientific Research Purchase Order FQ8671-0101168.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×

From the Chair

Balance and diversification are often said to be desirable attributes of investment portfolios, but they are also qualities of the Space Studies Board’s (SSB’s) work during 2002. The SSB led or participated in 11 studies and had 11 further studies at various points in their conduct at year’s end.

Of the studies completed in 2002, the Office of Space Science of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) was a sponsor of five. NASA’s Office of Earth Science and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) each sponsored three studies. NASA’s Office of Biological and Physical Research, the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Transportation, the U.S. Geological Survey, and the Army Corps of Engineers each sponsored two studies. The National Science Foundation, the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Office of Naval Research, and NASA’s Human Exploration and Development of Space Program were sponsors of one study each. Four of the studies had multiple sponsors. Two of SSB’s studies were requested by Congress.

The SSB collaborated with the Board on Physics and Astronomy, the Board on Life Sciences, the Board on Earth Sciences and Resources, and the National Academy of Public Administration, and it played a supporting role for one of the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board’s studies.

Two of SSB’s studies were first-ever surveys—the Solar System Exploration Survey and the Solar and Space Physics Survey—and both were completed in near-record time. Similarly, two space-station-related reports were accelerated and delivered ahead of schedule to better mesh with NASA’s 2004 budget preparations and with parallel studies being conducted by the NASA Advisory Council. These four reports placed heavy demands on both SSB staff and the committees.

As was also the case in 2001, a considerable part of SSB’s work involved responses to the restructuring of the International Space Station (ISS). The Board’s committees reacted vigorously to proposed reductions in ISS research capacity and the effects of limitations on up-mass and crew size. In the Board’s most recent meetings with NASA representatives, NASA assured the Board that the 2004 budget submission to Congress will restore at least some—and perhaps more—of the reductions in ISS science and the supporting capabilities available for the station. SSB will be following that development closely in 2003.

In 2001 NASA asked the SSB to review the effect of descoping the mission concept for the Next Generation Space Telescope, which has since been renamed the James Webb Space Telescope. In 2002 the Board issued a letter report on similar efforts by NASA regarding the Space Interferometry Mission and determined that the

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×

descoped mission would meet the scientific goals set out by the astronomy survey. Consistent with SSB’s favorable comments, the year 2002 saw NASA moving ahead with the development of the Webb telescope. The 6-meter-diameter, deployable primary mirror will be made up of 36 1-meter hexagonal segments, which will operate over a wavelength of 0.6 to 28 micrometers and be passively cooled to 40 K. The telescope will be placed in a halo orbit at L2. The mission will involve extraordinary technical achievements, and it promises to yield equally exciting scientific results. The Board will be following the mission’s development with great interest in future years.

Another likely task for 2003 will be collaboration between the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board and the SSB in examining the NASA initiative in space nuclear power and propulsion. The potential for greater interplanetary mission capability and reduced flight times makes the initiative attractive, but the engineering challenges and costs will require careful scrutiny.

In the succeeding sections of this annual report, all of the above topics and many more are discussed in greater detail. Looking forward, the year 2003 should be as exciting and productive as 2002 was.

John H. McElroy

Chair

Space Studies Board

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×

Contents

 

 

From the Chair

 

iii

1

 

Charter and Organization of the Board

 

1

2

 

Activities and Membership

 

6

3

 

Summaries of Major Reports

 

35

   

3.1 Assessment of Directions in Microgravity and Physical Sciences Research at NASA,

 

35

   

3.2 Assessment of the Usefulness and Availability of NASA’s Earth and Space Mission Data,

 

44

   

3.3 Factors Affecting the Utilization of the International Space Station for Research in the Biological and Physical Sciences,

 

51

   

3.4 Life in the Universe: An Assessment of U.S. and International Programs in Astrobiology,

 

55

   

3.5 New Frontiers in the Solar System: An Integrated Exploration Strategy,

 

61

   

3.6 Review of NASA’s Earth Science Enterprise Applications Program Plan,

 

70

   

3.7 Safe on Mars: Precursor Measurements Necessary to Support Human Operations on the Martian Surface,

 

74

   

3.8 The Sun to the Earth—and Beyond: A Decadal Research Strategy in Solar and Space Physics,

 

80

   

3.9 Toward New Partnerships in Remote Sensing: Government, the Private Sector, and Earth Science Research,

 

92

   

3.10 Using Remote Sensing in State and Local Government: Information for Management and Decision Making,

 

97

4

 

Short Report

 

101

   

4.1 Review of the Redesigned Space Interferometry Mission (SIM),

 

101

5

 

Congressional Testimony

 

105

   

5.1 Solar System Exploration Survey Recommendations on the Study of Near-Earth Objects,

 

105

6

 

Cumulative Bibliography

 

109

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×

Space Studies Board Chairs

Lloyd V. Berkner, Graduate Research Center, Dallas, Texas, 1958–1962

Harry H. Hess, Princeton University, 1962–1969

Charles H. Townes, University of California at Berkeley, 1970–1973

Richard M. Goody, Harvard University, 1974–1976

A.G.W. Cameron, Harvard College Observatory, 1977–1981

Thomas M. Donahue, University of Michigan, 1982–1988

Louis J. Lanzerotti, American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Bell Labs, 1989–1994

Claude R. Canizares, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1994–2000

John H. McElroy, University of Texas at Arlington (retired), 2000–

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2003. Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10709.
×
Page R6
Next: 1 Charter and Organization of the Board »
Space Studies Board Annual Report 2002 Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!