National Academies Press: OpenBook

The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary (2003)

Chapter:Charge to Participants and Workshop Core

« Previous: Summary
Suggested Citation:"Charge to Participants and Workshop Core." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

Charge to Participants and Workshop Scope*

Donald R. Mattison

Preterm birth is one of the more complex and challenging chronic diseases that have captured the attention of the life sciences and environmental health sciences. Worldwide, preterm births—those that occur before 37 weeks of gestation—constitute 5 to 12 percent of all births, accounting for more than 400,000 births each year. In the United States alone, more than 1,200 babies are born prematurely every day, and the rate of prematurity in this country is increasing.

Our interest in preterm birth springs from the fact that children who are born too early suffer adverse consequences. One potential consequence of prematurity is respiratory distress syndrome, which impairs the areas of the lung over which oxygen transport and diffusion take place. Another possible consequence is brain damage, often from intraventricular hemorrhage and periventricular cysts, which can lead to neurodevelopmental problems. In industrialized and nonindustrialized countries alike, preterm birth is linked to morbidity and mortality. Clearly, we need to investigate the causes of this condition.

In the past, prematurity was defined by the infant’s birth weight—less than 2,500 grams. Recently, we have recognized that weight alone does not adequately characterize the risks faced by premature infants. Currently, characterizing the status of a child at birth involves both birth weight and gestational length. Infants of greatest concern are those with a gestational length of less than 32 weeks and a birth weight of less than 1,000 grams, because they suffer the most severe consequences.

During this workshop, we will place preterm birth in a framework similar to

*  

This chapter is an edited transcript of Dr. Donald Mattison’s summations at the meeting.

Suggested Citation:"Charge to Participants and Workshop Core." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

that for diseases such as diabetes or hypertension, which are influenced by multiple genetic, social, personal, and environmental factors. Although the biological reasons for differences across ethnic background have not been identified, certain populations have a substantially greater risk for prematurity, and prematurity rates vary by region across the country. For example, substantial differences between African Americans and Caucasians have been found in preterm birth rate and infant mortality associated with prematurity (Healthy People 2010). These differences are difficult to understand biologically, suggesting that environmental factors play a role. We must consider carefully what these environmental factors might be, because understanding the factors that influence these variations will help us develop a better sense of the cause of prematurity and strategies for preventing it.

Among the five leading causes of infant mortality, two—low birth weight and respiratory distress syndrome—are associated with being born too early. The economic costs of preterm birth are substantial, both at the beginning of life and throughout its course. Data from the Agency on Healthcare Research and Quality reveal that two of the five most expensive hospital conditions in the United States in 1997 were associated with prematurity (AHRQ, 1996). Respiratory distress syndrome, the most expensive condition, had a mean hospital charge of $68,000 and a length of stay of more than 24 days. Low birth weight did not lag not far behind, with a $50,000 mean hospital charge and a length of stay of more than 21 days. These data are for children who are discharged alive. We have begun experimenting with community interventions to try to understand how we can influence these outcomes.

Preterm deliveries fall into three broad categories or pathways. The first category is medically indicated early deliveries—those necessitated by maternal or fetal factors. In such cases, it is believed that whatever the potential consequences of prematurity may be, early delivery is much safer for both the mother and the child. The other two categories—early deliveries due to spontaneous preterm ruptured membranes and those due to spontaneous preterm labor—may respond to intervention. As ones knowledge of etiology improves, all of these pathways may yield to prevention. Some participants have asked that we consider the possibility that early deliveries in all three categories are modifiable. Some have suggested that the factors influencing early delivery in each of these categories may be the same. Thus, we need to examine whether the strategies for preventing early delivery in one category may prevent conditions associated with another category. One charge for this workshop is to consider why we have created separate categories, which may be artificial, and how prevention strategies may affect all categories simultaneously.

An underlying truth regarding prematurity that relates to the issue of separating individual, environment, and genetic factors is the unfortunate observation that the best predictor of having a preterm birth is having experienced one previously (Mattison et al., 2001). The risk increases with each successive preterm

Suggested Citation:"Charge to Participants and Workshop Core." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

birth. For example, if a woman’s first child is born at term, her risk for preterm delivery of a second child is about 4 percent. However, if her first baby is born prematurely, her risk for preterm delivery of a second child jumps to 17 percent. If her first and second children are born prematurely, her risk for preterm delivery of a third child rises to almost 30 percent. Looking deeply into this situation may provide a key to understanding the factors associated with prematurity.

Some factors influencing prematurity have already been identified. Most studies have focused on the individual and have set out to explore the characteristics of individuals that might confer risk for preterm delivery, some of which may be modifiable and some of which may not. Skin color and age are examples of characteristics that cannot be changed. The consequences of socioeconomic influences, which might persist across a life span, may respond to intervention at some level, but they may not be modifiable to any great extent within the individual.

Emerging data suggest that other factors play a role in prematurity. Some of these data point to environmental factors, and these findings bring us back to the traditional public health paradigm in which we must distinguish between social, biological, and environmental factors and try to understand how they interact in the condition of prematurity. Within this context, the specific goals of this workshop are to

  • summarize the clinical and epidemiological aspects of prematurity;

  • create an understanding that exposures to environmental chemicals can alter gestation length;

  • summarize cellular, molecular, and genetic aspects of control of preterm delivery;

  • recognize that current in vivo and in vitro toxicological testing models are inadequately designed to capture the data showing whether chemicals influence gestation length;

  • understand that, because preterm delivery is a substantial public health concern, toxicological approaches have to be developed to improve our understanding of the impacts of the chemicals on gestational length; and

  • recognize that a multidisciplinary approach is needed to better clarify the mechanism underlying gestational length

Our overall goal is to begin to summarize the current understanding of prematurity from the particular perspective that each of us brings to this topic and to stimulate cross-disciplinary interaction.

Suggested Citation:"Charge to Participants and Workshop Core." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page6
Suggested Citation:"Charge to Participants and Workshop Core." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page7
Suggested Citation:"Charge to Participants and Workshop Core." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page8
Next: Problem Statement »
The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Each year in the United States approximately 440,000 babies are born premature. These infants are at greater risk of death, and are more likely to suffer lifelong medical complications than full-term infants. Clinicians and researchers have made vast improvements in treating preterm birth; however, little success has been attained in understanding and preventing preterm birth. Understanding the complexity of interactions underlying preterm birth will be needed if further gains in outcomes are expected.

The Institute of Medicine’s Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine sponsored a workshop to understand the biological mechanism of normal labor and delivery, and how environmental influences, as broadly defined, can interact with the processes of normal pregnancy to result in preterm birth. This report is a summary of the main themes presented by the speakers and participants.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!