National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Charge to Participants and Workshop Core
Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

Problem Statement*

Jennifer Howse, Ph.D.

Not long ago, discourse on preterm birth was nearly always centered on the role of the mother. Increasingly, however, environmental hazards are being recognized as contributors to the devastating and costly problem of preterm birth. One purpose of this conference is to help establish a framework that will allow us to broaden our perspective and link our knowledge about environmental hazards to their potential effects on preterm birth. The work of the Honorable Paul Rogers, chair of the Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine, has been a major catalyst for this wider perspective.

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) is another positive force that is helping to redefine our thinking about preterm birth and its causes, and we are honored that the IOM has chosen to lend its weight to the examination of this issue. Several other important organizations are also represented at this workshop, including the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, all critical partners in research efforts to identify potential environmental and social contributors to preterm birth.

The interest of the March of Dimes in preterm birth is long-standing. Our efforts began in the early 1960s after the battle against polio had largely been won. Prevention of birth defects and infant mortality became the clinical components of our mission at that time, and we are proud to have been leaders in creating a blueprint for the establishment of neonatal intensive care units in the

*  

This chapter is an edited transcript of Dr. Jennifer Howse’s summations at the meeting.

Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

early 1970s. We also made contributions in research, particularly in respiratory therapy, which have helped extend the survival of infants in neonatal intensive care.

We can all take great pride and consolation in the sound record that we have achieved in this country since the early 1960s, and even earlier, in reducing infant mortality. Infant mortality rates have declined substantially since that time, although they have leveled off somewhat in recent years and 2010 targets are not yet in sight. However, juxtaposed against the declining infant mortality rate is the ever-increasing rate of preterm births, which rose from under 9 percent in 1980 to 11.6 percent in 2000, and which is considerably higher in the United States than in other industrialized countries. This increase is driven by a complex of factors that we are struggling to understand.

A possible approach to lowering preterm birth rates is to examine how they relate to race and ethnicity. An African-American baby’s risk for being born prematurely is nearly double that for a Caucasian baby. The risk is also higher for babies born to Native American and Hispanic women. For some time, the IOM has been at the forefront of noting such disparities and has been exploring possible links between preterm birth and environmental hazards.

The IOM’s 1999 report Toward Environmental Justice: Research, Education, and Health Policy Needs concluded that certain communities do tend to have higher levels of exposure to environmental toxicants. It also concluded that such exposure is compounded by various socioeconomic factors that often make these communities less able to deal with the problem, such as lower levels of education, higher levels of stress, and inadequate access to health care.

At the March of Dimes, we have believed for some time that progress toward understanding the biological and social aspects of labor and delivery needs to be accelerated. We have also noted that an epidemiological approach to understanding preterm labor has not yet received sufficient attention. During the past 10 years, the March of Dimes has invested resources in these issues. The investment was modest at first, but recently we have devoted many millions of research dollars to studying preterm birth.

In 1998, we initiated a focused perinatal epidemiological research portfolio called the Perinatal Epidemiological Research Initiative (PERI), an ongoing portfolio funded at just under $4 million. Through this portfolio, we seek to examine how the influence of external factors can be understood in terms of their biological plausibility. We did not expect the overwhelming response that we received from our request for proposals. More than 100 scientists from all over the world responded. We asked applicants to explain how they would conduct further exploration into the medical, psychological, and social factors that may combine with maternal and fetal biochemistry to lead to preterm birth. At the end of the review process, a panel of experts selected six promising epidemiological research projects for funding, including projects that focused on how elements such as infections, genetic predispositions, low socioeconomic status, stress, and

Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

other factors can initiate pathways to preterm delivery. We have been very pleased with the PERI studies so far.

Preterm birth is a complicated public health problem for which answers will not be found in any one place. We have not yet definitively shown clear cause-and-effect relationships between environmental factors and preterm birth, and we do not yet fully understand what constitutes the fetal environment. Nevertheless, we are encouraged by the large amount of promising research currently under way, some of which is funded by agencies and organizations represented at this workshop. Indeed, many in attendance are instrumental to the progress being made in understanding preterm birth. For example, several studies have been undertaken to investigate the link between air pollution and preterm birth, to determine if serum levels of the pesticide 1,1,1-trichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl) ethane (DDT) and its metabolite 1,1-dichloro-2, 2-bis(chlorophenyl) ethylene (DDE), correlate with preterm births, and to examine drinking water quality for clues as to how chemicals such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) might influence birth outcomes. All of this work is crucial, although the many promising studies that are providing clues to the environmental aspects of preterm birth will require additional, confirmatory studies.

Our challenge, today and in the foreseeable future, is to remain open to the full range of possibilities for studying preterm birth, to learn from one another, and to share the conviction that eventually we can understand the triggers of this condition. Through this process and the appropriate targeting of resources, we can move forward and take the next step, which will be to fashion public health strategies and clinical interventions that will more fully protect the health of our newborns.

Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page 9
Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page 10
Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page 11
Suggested Citation:"Problem Statement." Institute of Medicine. 2003. The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10842.
×
Page 12
Next: 1. Preterm Birth and Its Consequences »
The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Each year in the United States approximately 440,000 babies are born premature. These infants are at greater risk of death, and are more likely to suffer lifelong medical complications than full-term infants. Clinicians and researchers have made vast improvements in treating preterm birth; however, little success has been attained in understanding and preventing preterm birth. Understanding the complexity of interactions underlying preterm birth will be needed if further gains in outcomes are expected.

The Institute of Medicine’s Roundtable on Environmental Health Sciences, Research, and Medicine sponsored a workshop to understand the biological mechanism of normal labor and delivery, and how environmental influences, as broadly defined, can interact with the processes of normal pregnancy to result in preterm birth. This report is a summary of the main themes presented by the speakers and participants.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!