National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: BIOSCIENCE IN THE NANOTECHNOLOGY OF TRACKING AND LOCATING
Suggested Citation:"PANEL 4 DISCUSSION." National Research Council. 2004. Summary of the Sensing and Positioning Technology Workshop of the Committee on Nanotechnology for the Intelligence Community: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11032.
×
Page 16
Suggested Citation:"PANEL 4 DISCUSSION." National Research Council. 2004. Summary of the Sensing and Positioning Technology Workshop of the Committee on Nanotechnology for the Intelligence Community: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11032.
×
Page 17
Suggested Citation:"PANEL 4 DISCUSSION." National Research Council. 2004. Summary of the Sensing and Positioning Technology Workshop of the Committee on Nanotechnology for the Intelligence Community: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11032.
×
Page 18

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

PASSIVE CHEM/BIO TAGS 16 assays; patterned mesophases for compartmentalizing detection devices; and quantum dots for lasing, detecting, and signaling. Current recognition systems in biology primarily involve DNA hybridization or antigen-antibody binding. These methods are effective but often require significant sample preparation time and may be messy, involving unstable secondary reagents. The chemistry is often complicated, and detection of each new target requires that a new chemical assay be developed. DNA assays take “more time, reagents, and sample preparation than are generally acknowledged.” The recently developed fluorobodies, which are simple fluorescent tags that bind to a specific target and travel with it, offer a method for simpler and faster assays. Fluorobodies consist of antibody-binding loops fused with thermally stable green fluorescence protein (GFP). The recognition surface is generated and selected using phage display techniques to create large libraries, yielding high-affinity tags. These tags can bind, for instance, to unique glycolipids or glycoproteins on the cell surface of pathogens and thus identify them. (A comment at this point was that the GFP tags are monovalent, whereas most real antibodies are divalent, significantly increasing their affinity and specificity.) When mice eat the GFP, their skin fluoresces green. The latest development in this technology is split-GFP, whereby fluorescence occurs only after the binding to the target has occurred. By incorporating the fluorobodies into patterned mesophases (micrometer-level, not nanometer-level) on Si wafers, arrays of chemical and biological sensing elements can be established, making systematic, multiplexed analyses possible. The second focus of Trewhella's presentation was quantum dots (Q-dots)—semiconductor nanocrystals whose fluorescence properties can be tuned by varying their size. When the Q-dots are stabilized by incorporating them in a sol-gel nanocomposite, they can be combined with optical microcavities to produce microlasing devices. This lasing property can be exploited in the interrogation of Q-dot arrays. One can also use the Q-dots as luminescent tags by crosslinking them with biological molecules that bind to specific sites. Trewhella foresees revolutions exploiting the nano-bio interface involving molecular recognition elements held in predesigned scaffolds to generate a signal and amplify it (e.g., using Q-dots), as well as the use of active biomolecules, such as motor proteins, to assemble and actuate nanomaterials and structures (e.g., nanowires with programmable interconnects). Asked whether one can hook Q-dots on DNA, Trewhella said that this is probably feasible, although no one has done it, probably because of the highly hydrophobic environment of DNA. PANEL 4 DISCUSSION Discussion began with a question about the relative merits of natural antibodies and artificial structures such as fluorobodies. The advantage of antibodies is that they are raised in vivo and therefore naturally avoid binding to targets they are not supposed to bind to. Fluorobodies would not be expected to show this specificity. Most tests of fluorobodies are against intended targets, not against all of the other molecules that might bind nonspecifically to the binding loop. Nevertheless, fluorobodies were developed to detect successfully folded proteins in the human genome project and appear to show the same specificity as antibodies. The binding loops of fluorobodies may not be identical to the corresponding antibodies, but they must be similar. The observation was made that Q-dots (at least those made from CdSe nanocrystals) are not covert, since the Cd signature is detectable, for example, with x-rays. Could an invisible, two-dimensional bar code—for example, one that uses upconverting phosphors that can be irradiated at 980 nm and emit in the green and blue— be transferred to the skin of an uncooperative target? This would depend on how long the bar code takes to transfer and how long it can be expected to last. There was also speculation about feeding GFP to targets, thus creating people with fluorescent skin.

PASSIVE CHEM/BIO TAGS 17 With regard to active markers added to products, what is the mass fraction of marker? Markers are typically small compounds, generally present at the parts-per-billon level, although with deuterium-substituted isotopes, one can operate on the parts-per-trillion level. Isotag uses only stable isotope markers, in deference to public perceptions of the risks of radioactivity. Given variability in the natural abundance of isotopics—for example, deuterium is more abundant on the West Coast than on the East Coast—it was asked whether it would be possible to use geographical differences in isotope abundances to determine where a person had been. The answer is likely to be no, because people move around so much. Some work is being done to try to determine where people have been by analyzing the populations of bacteria that colonize their bodies, given that these populations reflect local environments. In a similar vein, it was asked how the anthrax spores mailed to various individuals 2 years ago could have been traced. One possibility was isotopic analysis not only of the spores themselves, but also of the admixed chemicals to determine where the spores had been grown. However, the biggest hope was DNA analysis of the strain. Unfortunately, DNA analysis revealed that the strain was garden variety anthrax used broadly to test vaccines. Another question was whether it would be possible to irradiate individuals with neutrons and create tags inside their bodies by neutron activation. Such tags were seen as likely to be short-lived (a few hours), although it was noted that palladium activates down to stable isotopes, which might be detectable for much longer times.

PASSIVE CHEM/BIO TAGS 18

Next: VESTA/PARD TECHNOLOGY »
Summary of the Sensing and Positioning Technology Workshop of the Committee on Nanotechnology for the Intelligence Community: Interim Report Get This Book
×
 Summary of the Sensing and Positioning Technology Workshop of the Committee on Nanotechnology for the Intelligence Community: Interim Report
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The emergence of nanotechnology as a major science and technology research topic has sparked substantial interest by the intelligence community. In particular the community is interested both in the potential for nanotechnology to assist intelligence operations and threats it could create. To explore these questions, the Intelligence Technology Innovation Center asked the National Research Council to conduct a number of activities to illustrate the potential for nanotechnology to address key intelligence community needs. The second of these was a workshop to explore how nanotechnology might enable advances in sensing and locating technology. This report presents a summary of that workshop. In includes an overview of security technologies, and discussions of systems, natural chemical/biological tags, passive chemical/biological tags, and radio/radar/optical tags.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!