National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 3 The Test Development Process
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11168.
×

REFERENCES

American Council on Education (1993). Tests of the General Educational Development Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Author.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.


Center for Applied Linguistics (2003). Development of a computer-assisted assessment for adult English language learners. Task 16, Deliverable 16e.1 (Final): Test Manual/Technical Report. Washington, DC: Author.

Cizek, G.J. (1993). Reactions to the National Academy of Education report [Setting Performance Standards for Student Achievement]. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board.

Cizek, G.J. (2001), ed. Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Gormley, W.T., and Balla, S.J. (2004). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Gruber, J.E. (1987). Controlling bureaucracies. Berkeley: University of California Press.


Hambleton, R.K. (2001). Setting performance standards on educational assessments and criteria for evaluating the process. In G.J. Cizek (ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives, pp. 89-116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hambleton, R.K., and Plake, B.S. (1995). Extended Angoff procedures to set standards on complex performance assessments . Applied Measurement in Education, 8, 41-56.

Huynh, H., Meyer, P., and Barton, K. (2000). Technical documentation for the South Carolina PACT-1999 tests. Columbia: South Carolina Department of Education.


Impara, J.C., and Plake, B.S. (1998). Teachers' ability to estimate item difficulty: A test of the assumptions in the Angoff standard setting method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 35, 69-81.


Kane, M. (1995). Examinee-centered vs. task-centered standard setting. In Proceedings of Joint Conference on Standard Setting in Large-Scale Assessments, pp. 119-139. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board and National Center for Education Statistics.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11168.
×

McDonnell, L.M. (2004). Politics, persuasion, and educational testing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Mehrens, W. (1995). Methodological issues in standard setting for educational exams. In Proceedings of Joint Conference on Standard Setting in Large-Scale Assessments, pp. 221-263. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board and National Center for Education Statistics.


National Research Council (1999a). High stakes: Testing for tracking, promotion, and graduation. Committee on Appropriate Test Use. J.P. Heubert and R.M. Hauser, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (1999b). Grading the nation’s report card: Evaluating NAEP and transforming the assessment of educational progress. Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress. J.W. Pellegrino, L.R. Jones, and K.J. Mitchell, eds. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Committee on the Foundations of Assessment. J.W. Pellegrino, N. Chudowsky, and R. Glaser, eds. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.


Plake, B.S. (2002). Evaluating the technical quality of high stakes tests used in K-12 education. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35(3).

Plake, B.S., and Impara, J.C. (2001). Ability of panelists to estimate item performance for a target group of candidates: An issue in judgmental standard setting. Educational Assessment, 7, 87-98.

Plake, B.S., Impara, J.C., and Irwin, P.M. (2000). Consistency of Angoff-based predictions of item performance: Evidence of the technical quality of results from the Angoff standard setting method. Journal of Educational Measurement, 7, 87-98.


Reckase, M. (2001). Innovative methods for helping standard-setting participants to perform their task: The role of feedback regarding consistency, accuracy, and impact. In G.J. Cizek (ed.), Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives, pp.159-174. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.


Shepard, L.A. (1995). Implications for standard setting of the National Academy of Education evaluation of the National Assessment of Educational Progress achievement levels. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Standard Setting for Large-Scale Assessments, Volume II, pp.143-160. Washington, DC: National Assessment Governing Board and National Center for Education Statistics.


U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform (1997). Becoming an American: Immigration and immigrant policy. Washington, D.C.: Author.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11168.
×

U.S. Department of Homeland Security (2003). Fiscal year 2003 yearbook of immigration statistics, Table 31. Available: http://uscis.gov/graphics/shared/aboutus/statistics/NATZ2003yrbk/NATZ2003list.htm [Retrieved November 15, 2004].


Wise, L.L., Harris, C.D., Koger, L.E., Bacci, E.L., Ford, J.P., Sipes, D.E., Sun, S., Koger, M.E., and Deatz, R.C. (2003). Independent evaluation of the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE): AB 1609 Study Report. Prepared for the California State Department of Education, Sacramento, CA. Available: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/tg/hs/ab1609sr.asp [Retrieved August 31, 2004].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11168.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11168.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2004. Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11168.
×
Page 26
Next: Appendix: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff »
Redesigning the U.S. Naturalization Tests: Interim Report Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!