National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Index

A

Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), 216, 218, 222–223, 234

Acceptability of risks, dimensions of value affecting, 140–143

Accounting statements, 313–315

categories of benefits and costs, 313

effects on state, local, and tribal governments, small business, wages and economic growth, 315

precision of estimates, 314

qualitative benefits and costs, 313

quantifying and monetizing benefits and costs, 313

separate reporting of transfers, 314–315

treatment of benefits and costs over time, 313–314

treatment of risk and uncertainty, 314

Activities of daily living (ADL), 115n, 126n, 318

Administrative guidance, history of regulatory analysis, 22

Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 21

Air quality, 145

improving, 1

AIS. See Abbreviated Injury Scale

Alternative assumptions, 310

Alternative HALY metrics for regulatory CEA, 86–91

choosing a HALY measure for regulatory analysis, 91

disability-adjusted life years, 88–90

healthy year equivalents, 88

quality-adjusted life years, 86–88

saved-young-life equivalents, 90–91

Alternative regulatory approaches, 266–269

different choices defined by statute, 266

different compliance dates, 266

different degrees of stringency, 267

different enforcement methods, 266

different requirements for different geographic regions, 267

different requirements for different sized firms, 267

informational measures rather than regulation, 268–269

market-oriented approaches rather than

direct controls, 268

performance standards rather than design standards, 267

Alternatives, evaluation of, 277–278

American Petroleum Institute v. OSHA, 45

Analytical approaches, 269–275

benefit–cost analysis, 269–270

cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), 270–272

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

distributional effects, 274–275

the effectiveness metric for public health and safety rulemakings, 272–274

scope of, 275

to unfunded mandates, 311

Ancillary benefits and countervailing risks, 289–290

Anderson, Henry A., 326–327

Annualized values, 212

APA. See Administrative Procedure Act

Applicability issues, 117

Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument, 126n

Assignment of health states by experts or other proxies, 106–109

expert assignment of health states using generic HRQL instruments, 110–111

Asymmetric information, 263–264

Availability issues, 98–102

Averaging, banking and/or trading (ABT) of credits, 268

B

Bacillus cereus, 204–210

Baseline, developing, 276–277

BAT. See “Best available technology”

Bayesian methods, 318

Benefit–cost analysis (BCA), 1–4, 7, 10–12, 15–22, 27–59, 64, 67, 129–134, 143–146, 151, 157, 168–174, 178–182, 188–189, 194, 197, 204, 214, 217, 229, 238, 241, 269–272, 292, 300, 318

calculation of net benefits, 31

valuation approach, 29–30

Benefit point transfer, 289

Benefits, 4, 318

Benefits analysis guidelines, 51–55

monetized health-adjusted life years in benefit–cost analysis, 53

OMB criteria for evaluating stated preference studies, 54

Benefits and costs

ancillary benefits and countervailing risks, 289–290

benefit-transfer methods, 287–289

categories of, 313

developing estimates of, 279–296

discount rates, 296–303

identifying and measuring, 275–310

methods for treating non-monetized, 290–292

monetizing health and safety, 292–296

other key considerations, 303–305

qualitative, 313

quantifying and monetizing, 291–292, 313

revealed preference methods, 282–285

stated preference methods, 285–287

treatment of uncertainty, 305–310

treatment over time, 313–314

Benefits transfer, 4, 116–121, 318

methods for, 287–289

BenMAP model, 229

“Best available technology” (BAT), 44

Best practices, 258

in stated preference surveys and benefits transfer, 125

Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, 121

Brauer, Carmen, 120

“Break-even” analysis, 260

Bush, George H.W., 22

Bush, George W., 22

C

Calculation

of cost-effectiveness, 36–37

of health gains, 149–151

Carter, Jimmy, 22

Case study analytic approach, 193–244

conclusion, 240–241

EPA’s nonroad engine air emissions regulation, 228–240

FDA’s juice processing regulation, 204–215

general approach, 195–203

NHTSA estimates of annual quantified benefits, 218

NHTSA’s child restraints regulation, 215–228

purpose and scope, 193–195

Case study process, 196

Category rating (CR), 77–81, 98

CDS. See Crashworthiness Data System

CEA. See Cost-effectiveness analysis

CEA Registry, 118, 228, 235, 240

Center for Risk Analysis, 117

“Cessation lag,” 300

CFR. See Code of Federal Regulations

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Charge to the committee, 2–3, 16–19

background, 16–18

OMB’s rationale for requiring CEA as part of regulatory analysis, 17

the task, 18–19

Child restraints anchoring, 145

Children, 146–148, 156

Choices, different, defined by statute, 266

Chronic condition HRQL values, catalogues of, 111–113

Circular A-4, 3, 16, 23, 40, 50, 53–56, 62–65, 134, 146, 152–154, 174, 194–196, 217, 258–315

accounting statement, 313–315

alternative regulatory approaches, 266–269

analytical approaches, 269–275

effective date, 315

identifying and measuring benefits and costs, 275–310

introduction, 259–261

key components of, 50

need for Federal regulatory action, 261–265

regulatory analysis, 258–259

specialized analytical requirements, 310–313

Clean Air Act, 43–44, 55

Clean Air Interstate Rule, 58, 156

Clinton, Bill, 22, 25

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 21

COI. See Cost of illness

Collecting data and conducting research to improve HRQL measurement and regulatory CEA, 13–14

recommendation 10, 13

recommendation 11, 13

recommendation 12, 13–14

Committee on Estimating the Health-Risk-Reduction Benefits of Proposed Air Pollution Regulations, 18

Committee on Summary Measures of Population Health, 18

Committee to Evaluate Measures of Health Benefits for Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation, 2, 5, 15, 40, 94, 193

Common property resource and public good, externality of, 262–263

Communicating methods and results, 64–65

“Community” index values, 93, 136

Comparisons

of cost-effectiveness ratios, 176

of key features of BCA and CEA, 39

to “with condition” values based on expert assignment, 202

to “with condition” values based on patient self-assessments, 202–203

Comparisons among elicitation methods, 81–86

empirical validity, 83–85

feasibility, 81–82

reliability, 82–83

theoretical reliability, 83

Competitive Enterprise Institute v. NHTSA, 49–50

Compliance cost

per death averted, 167, 170

per life year gained, 167, 170

Compliance dates, different, 266

Comprehensive ratio, 167, 170–171

Condition-specific indexes and applications to special populations, 102–106

HRQL measurement for children, 106–107

special populations, 104–105

Congress, 42

Construct validity, 318

Consumer Product Safety Act, 43

Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), 26, 46

Consumer surpluses, 281

Content validity, 70, 318

Contingent valuation approach, 125, 318

“Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines,” 303

Convergent validity, 318

Correlations, 318

and conversions among HRQL measures, 123–124

and cross-walks of HRQL measures, 126–127

Corrosion Proof Fittings v. EPA, 45

Cost, 319

Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), 1–4, 7–22, 27–28, 31–41, 46–58, 64–73, 83–88, 92, 103–105, 109–110, 116–119, 123–189, 194, 214, 217, 228, 236–241, 270–272, 285, 292, 300, 319

calculation of, 36–37

valuation approach, 32–36

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Cost-effectiveness ratios, 10, 212–215, 237–240

comparison of, 154–155, 176

compliance cost per death averted, 170

compliance cost per life year gained, 170

components of, 168

comprehensive ratio, 170–171

constructing and reporting, 11–12, 167–181

defining, 171–173

disaggregated impacts, 177

examples of, 169

examples of cost-effectiveness ratios, 169

health-benefits-only ratio, 170

nonmonetized benefits of the Environmental Protection Agency’s nonroad diesel rule, 179–180

recommendation 2, 11–12, 167–173

recommendation 3, 12, 173–174

recommendation 4, 12, 174–175

recommendation 5, 12, 175–177

recommendation 6, 12, 177–180

recommendation 7, 12, 181

Cost of illness (COI), 30, 33n, 319

Cost per life year ($/LY), 73

Cost per quality adjusted life year ($/QALY), 36, 73

CPSC. See Consumer Product Safety Commission

CR. See Category rating

Crashworthiness Data System (CDS), 218

Criteria for selecting integrated effectiveness measures for regulatory CEA, 7, 162

Criteria for selecting HALY metrics for regulatory CEA, 68–72

standard performance criteria for HRQL instruments, 70

Criterion validity, 319

Cryptosporidium parvum, 204–210

Current practices for regulatory analysis, 50–65

benefits analysis guidelines, 51–55

current valuation practices, 55–62

key analytic requirements of OMB guidelines, 51

other guidelines relavant to CEA, 62–65

Current valuation practices, 55–62

EPA’s morbidity inclusive life year (MILY) approach, 60–61

FDA’s benefit valuation approach, 59

maximum abbreviated injury scale (MAIS) categories used in NHTSA analyses, 58

NHTSA’s equivalent lives saved (ELS) approach, 60–61

quantified benefits of EPA’s nonroad diesel rule, 56

quantified benefits of the FDA’s juice processing rule, 57

D

DALY. See Disability-adjusted life year

Data collection and research needed to improve HRQL measurement and CEA for regulatory decision making, 184–188

direct and indirect uses of data, 283–285

recommendation 10, 185–186

recommendation 11, 186

recommendation 12, 187–188

Deaths averted, defined, 171

Decision analysis, 319

Decomposed valuation approach, 97

Degrees of stringency, different, 267

Delayed effects, risks with, 142

“Delphi methods,” 111, 309, 319

Department of Agriculture, 58

Department of Energy (DOE), 278

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), 13, 116, 186–187

Direct health care costs, 33

Direct non-health care costs, 33

Direct rating, category rating and visual analogue scales, 79–80

Direct uses of market data, 283–284

Disability, defined, 319

Disability-adjusted life year (DALY), 80–81, 88–91, 319

the WHO’s DALY, 89

Disaggregated impacts, 176–177

Disclosure, full, 314

Discount rates, 296–303

intergenerational discounting, 301–302

the rationale for discounting, 297–298

real discount rates of 3 percent and 7 percent, 298–300

social, 323

time preference for health-related benefits and costs, 300–301

time preference for non-monetized benefits and costs, 302–303

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Discounting, 152–154, 209, 319

the rationale for, 297–298

and timing of impacts, 63, 153

Distributional concerns about risks and regulatory interventions, 144–155, 183

calculation of health gains, 149–151

children, 146–148

comparing cost-effectiveness ratios, 154–155

distributional considerations in regulatory decisions, 147

population health data and subgroups, 148–149

risk-related considerations for regulatory decisions, 145

the treatment of future generations in CEA, 151–154

Distributional effects, 274–275

Documentation, 70

DOE. See Department of Energy

Domains, 34, 98–102, 319

and number of attribute levels for generic HRQL indexes, 95

Double-counting issues, 30, 62

E

Economic analysis, the role of, 19–26

Economic efficiency, 319–320

Economic regulation, the presumption against, 265

Economic values of uncertain outcomes, 310

“Economically significant” regulations, defining, 24

Effective date, 315

Effectiveness

constructing measures of, 272

selecting integrated measures of, 10–11, 272–273

Effectiveness metric, for public health and safety rulemakings, 272–274

ELS. See Equivalent lives saved

Emission reduction benefits, non-monetized, 303

Empirical validity, 83–85

mean valuations for 13 EQ-5D health states with four estimation methods, 85

the TTO method and discounting, 84

Endpoints, 207

describing, 197–198

Energy impacts, 312–313

Enforcement, 157

different methods for, 266

Environmental impact statements, 312

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 43–48, 58, 62, 101, 117, 120, 139, 143, 147–151, 156, 178, 194–199, 202, 228–232, 237–241, 276, 299, 303

New Source Review program, 291

Science Advisory Board, 294–295

violating TSCA, 48

EO. See Executive Orders

EOP. See Executive Office of the President

EPA. See Environmental Protection Agency

EPA analysis, 229–230

EPA estimates of annual quantified benefits, 230

EPA’s morbidity inclusive life year (MILY) approach, 60–61

EQ-5D. See EuroQoL-5D

Equivalent lives saved (ELS), 60, 215–217, 273

Escherichia coli O157:H7, 204–210

Estimates of QALY gains, 207–212, 223–228, 233–237

HRQL with illness at average age of incidence, 235

HRQL with injury, 227

HRQL with pathogen-related illness, 208

QALY total losses, 210, 224, 236

sensitivity analysis for QALY losses, 211, 226, 237

Estimating the Contributions of Lifestyle-Related Factors to Preventable Death, 186

Estimating the Public Health Benefits of Proposed Air Pollution Regulations, 121

Estimation of costs, 62–63

Estimation of “with condition” HRQL, 198–199

approaches for determining “with condition” HRQL, 200

Ethical and nonquantifiable aspects of regulatory decisions

beyond ratios, 130–158

conclusions, 157–158

distributional concerns about risks and regulatory interventions, 144–155

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

improving regulatory decision making, 155–157

value of a QALY, 134–140

Ethical and other implications of risks and of interventions to address risks, 140–144

dimensions of value affecting the acceptability of risks, 140–143

nonquantifiable impacts, 143

summary, 143–144

Ethical assumptions in QALY-based CEA, 132–134

valuing life years compared with valuing lives, 132–134

Ethically informed decisions, 7–9

EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D), 6, 18, 72, 79, 83–85, 94, 99–104, 111–112, 119–124, 128, 136, 165–166, 198–204, 214–215, 222–228, 232–234, 238, 252

availability, 101

domains, 100

history, 100

valuation, 100–101

EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) health states, mean valuations, with four estimation methods, 85

EVGGFP. See Global health status measure (EVGGFP—excellent, very good, good, fair, poor)

Executive Office of the President (EOP), 16

Executive Orders (EOs), 25

No. 12044—Improving Government Regulations, 22

No. 12291—Federal Regulation, 22

No. 12866—Regulatory Planning and Review, 3, 22–26, 258–262, 266, 275, 278, 310–311

No. 12898—Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 25

No. 13045—Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks, 25, 312

No. 13211, 312–313

No. 13272, 311

Expert assignment of health states, using generic HRQL instruments, 110–111

Externality, common property resource and public good, 262–263

“Extra-welfarists,” 27

F

Fatality risks, 293–296

FCI. See Functional Capacity Index

FDA. See Food and Drug Administration

Feasibility, 70, 81–82

defined, 44

Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 43

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), 46

Federal Register, 20–21

Federal regulatory action

market failure or other social purpose, 262–264

need for, 261–265

the presumption against economic regulation, 265

showing that regulation at the Federal level is the best way to solve the problem, 264–265

“Feeling thermometer,” 79

Firms, different requirements for different sized, 267

FMCSA. See Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 46, 53, 57, 114, 117, 151–152, 194, 197, 214, 222, 225–228, 232, 238, 241

analysis by, 204–205

benefit valuation approach of, 59

case study analytic approach, 205–207

cost-effectiveness ratios, 212–215

estimates of annual quantified benefits, 206

estimates of QALY gains, 207–212

juice processing regulation, 194, 204–215

Food Quality Protection Act, 45

Food safety, 145, 147, 209

Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), 46, 58

Food supply, safeguarding, 1

Ford, Gerald, 22

FSIS. See Food Safety and Inspection Service

Full disclosure, 314

Functional Capacity Index (FCI), 103, 198, 215, 222–226, 254–257

Functional status, 74, 320

Future generations in CEA, 152–154

discounting and timing of impacts, 153

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

future effects, 151–152

future generations, 152–154

treatment of, 151–154

G

Generic HRQL indexes, 6, 93–102, 320

domains and number of attribute levels for generic HRQL indexes, 95

the EuroQol-5D, 100–101

Health Utilities Index, 98–99

measuring HRQL with generic instruments—community value, 97

Quality of Well-Being Scale, 97–98

the SF-6D, 101–102

valuation surveys for generic HRQL instruments, 96

Generic indexes, 165–166

characterizing health states with, 166

Geographic regions, different requirements for, 267

Global Burden of Disease, 81

Global health status measure (EVGGFP—excellent, very good, good, fair, poor), 126n

Graham, John, 17

Guidelines relevant to CEA, 62–65

assessing uncertainty and nonquantified effects, 64

communicating the methods and results, 64–65

determining the distribution of impacts, 64

discounting impacts over time, 63

estimating costs, 62–63

using ratios, 64

H

HALYs. See Health-adjusted life years

Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, 120

Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), 199

Center for Risk Analysis, 117

Health-adjusted life years (HALYs), 2–10, 15–19, 27–28, 32–40, 52–56, 63–91, 122, 135, 159–163, 181, 320

alternative HALY metrics for regulatory CEA, 86–91

describing health states, 74–76

metrics of, 69

monetized, 52, 65

valuing health states and preference elicitation methods, 77–86

Health and Retirement Survey 2000, 99

Health and safety rulemakings, 47

Health-based requirements, 42–43

Health benefit values for regulatory analysis

correlations and cross-walks of HRQL measures, 126–127

criteria for selecting HALY metrics for regulatory CEA, 68–72

health-adjusted life years, 73–91

measures and strategies for obtaining, 67–129

research and development of metrics and valuation methodologies, 123–125

single-dimension measures of health-related outcomes, 72–73

sources of health state values for regulatory analysis, 92–123

summary and conclusions, 125–129

Health-benefits-only ratio, 167, 170

Health care policy, effectiveness in, 5

Health-care-treatment-cost impacts, defined, 172

Health effects likely to be quantified in forthcoming major health and safety rulemakings, 48

Health endpoints, describing, 197–198

Health gains, calculation of, 149–151

“Health–health” analysis, 49

Health indexes, 245–257

EuroQoL-5D, 252

Functional Capacity Index, 254–257

Health Utilities Index, 247–251

Quality of Well-Being Scale, 245–246

SF-6D, 253

Health profiling instruments, disease-specific, 103

Health-related effectiveness measures, 5–7

Health-related quality of life (HRQL), 2–16, 34–40, 52–53, 57–62, 67–79, 83–129, 133–137, 148–150, 156, 160–170, 177–189, 195–209, 214–218, 222, 227, 232–241, 273, 320

with illness at average age of incidence, 235

with injury, 227

measurement and regulatory CEA,

conducting research to improve, 13–14

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

measurement for children, 106–107

measurement quality, 166–167

with pathogen-related illness, 208

Health risks, regulating, 1

Health state index values

and benefits transfer, 116–121

the CEA Registry, 118

defined, 34n

from published sources, 120–121

Health state values for regulatory analysis, 92–123

approaches based on population survey data, 110–116

assignment of health states by experts or other proxies, 106–109

condition-specific indexes and applications to special populations, 102–106

generic HRQL indexes, 93–102

health state index values from prior studies and benefits transfer, 116–121

primary elicitation of condition-specific index values, 92–93

uncertainty in health status and preference measurement, 121–123

Health states, 74, 320

changes in, 136

concepts and domains used in defining self-reported health status, quality of life, and health-related quality of life, 76

describing, 74–76

health-adjusted life years, 75

“postregulatory,” 8

Health Utilities Index (HUI), 6, 71, 98–99, 104, 119–120, 124, 165–166, 198, 247–251

availability, 99

domains, 99

history, 98–99

Mark 1 (HUI-1), 99

Mark 2 (HUI-2), 99, 104, 107, 215, 222, 227, 247–248

Mark 3 (HUI-3), 72, 99–100, 120, 124, 202–204, 209, 214, 233, 249–251

valuation, 99

Healthy year equivalent (HYE), 88, 91, 320–321

“Hedonic price equations,” 281

Holistic approach, 97

HRQL. See Health-related quality of life

HRQL valuation, using ordinal data for, 124

HRQL values, 135–139

individual preferences and societal values, 138–139

whose values count, 135–138

HSPH. See Harvard School of Public Health

HUI. See Health Utilities Index

Hybrid requirements, 44–46

HYE. See Healthy year equivalent

I

IADL. See Immediate activities of daily living

ICD. See International Classification of Disease codes

Immediate activities of daily living (IADL), 115n

Impacts

on children, 312

determining the distribution of, 64

on small businesses and other small entities, 310–311

Indirect uses of market data, 284–285

Individual preferences, and societal values, 138–139

Informal caregiver time, 33

Information collection, paperwork, and recordkeeping burdens, 311

Information needed for regulatory decision making, 12–13, 181–184

distributional and other aspects of risk and regulation, 183

inadequate, 263–264

recommendation 8, 13, 181–184

recommendation 9, 13, 184

Information quality guidelines, 311–312

Information Quality Law, 311

Informational measures, rather than regulation, 268–269

Injuries, 321

reducing the risk of, 1

to restrained children, 219–221

Institute of Medicine (IOM), 2, 18, 116, 186, 193, 274

Committee on Summary Measures of Population Health, 18

Intangibles, 290

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Integrated measures of effectiveness, 10–11, 161–167

characterizing health states with generic indexes, 166

criteria for selecting integrated effectiveness measures for health-related CEA, 162

generic indexes, 165–166

HRQL measurement quality, 166–167

recommendation 1, 11, 161–167

valuation, 164–165

Interagency Working Group on Summary Measures of Population Health, 116

Intergenerational discounting, 301–302

International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes, 113, 233

International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicap, 89

Interobserver reliability. See Intrarater test-retest reliability

Intrarater test-retest reliability, 321

of the SG, TTO and visual analogue scale techniques, 82

IOM. See Institute of Medicine

J

Judicial review of regulatory analyses, 47–50

Juice processing. See Food safety

K

KABCO injury categories, 216

Kaldor-Hicks criterion, 31

L

Latency period, 300

“Learning curve” effects, 303

Life expectancy (LE), 87, 115n, 321

Life years (LYs), 8–9, 132–133

gaining, 172

Lives, 9, 133

Longevity, 4, 35, 38

changes in, 5

trading off, 139

LYs. See Life years

M

MAIS. See Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale

Mapi Research Institute, 102n

Market data, direct and indirect uses of, 283–285

Market failure or other social purpose, 262–264

externality, common property resource and public good, 262–263

inadequate or asymmetric information, 263–264

market power, 263

other social purposes, 264

Market-oriented approaches rather than direct controls, 268

Market power, 263

Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (MAIS), 60–61, 216–218, 222

categories used in NHTSA analyses, 58

Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale 2 (MAIS 2), 225

Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), 101–102, 111, 123, 148, 199, 203, 228, 232–237

Methods for treating non-monetized benefits and costs, 290–292

benefits and costs that are difficult to monetize, 291

benefits and costs that are difficult to quantify, 291–292

MILY. See Morbidity-Inclusive Life Year

Monetized emission reduction benefits, 303

Monetized health-adjusted life years in benefit cost analysis, 53

Monetizing benefits and costs, 292–296, 313

fatality risks, 293–296

nonfatal health and safety risks, 292–293

valuation of reductions in health and safety risks to children, 296

Monopoly issues, 263

Monte Carlo simulations, 309, 321

Morbidity, 321

changes in, 5

combining in a single measure with mortality, 139–140

Morbidity-Inclusive Life Year (MILY), 58–61, 156

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Mortality-based indicators, 5

Motor vehicle accidents, national costs of, 55

Multiple regression analysis, 281

N

National Automotive Sampling System (NASS), 218, 221–223

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 312

National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 98, 114, 126n, 148

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 46, 50–58, 103–104, 147, 194–202, 215–217, 221, 226–227, 232, 238, 241

case study analytic approach, 217–223

child restraints regulation, 194, 215–228

equivalent lives saved (ELS) approach, 60–61

estimates of annual quantified benefits, 218

estimates of QALY gains, 223–228

National Institute on Aging, 124

National Medical Expenditure Survey (NMES), 126n

National Research Council

Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, 121

Committee on Estimating the Health-Risk-Reduction Benefits of Proposed Air Pollution Regulations, 18, 185

NEPA. See National Environmental Policy Act

Net benefits, calculation of, 31

Neumann, Peter, 120

New Source Review program, 291

NHIS. See National Health Interview Survey

NHTSA. See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Nixon, Richard, 22

NMES. See National Medical Expenditure Survey

“Non-use values,” 284–285

Nonfatal health and safety risks, 292–293

Nonmonetized benefits and costs

of the EPA’s nonroad diesel rule, 179–180, 303

methods for treating, 290–292

Nonquantifiable impacts, 143

Nonquantified effects, assessing, 64

Nonroad diesel rule, 178, 194–195

Nonroad engine air emissions regulation, 228–240

case study analytic approach, 231–233

cost-effectiveness ratios, 237–240

EPA analysis, 229–230

estimates of QALY gains, 233–237

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 21

NRDC v. EPA, 44

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 26

O

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 42, 45

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 42–43, 46, 58

Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), 17, 315

Statistical and Science Policy Branch, 312

Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 1–4, 16–22, 26, 41, 50–55, 62–65, 93, 108n, 116, 121, 143, 149, 274, 279, 313–315

Circular A-4, 3, 16, 23, 40, 50, 53–56, 62–65, 134, 146, 152–154, 174, 194–196, 217, 258–315

criteria for evaluating stated preference studies, 54

rationale for requiring CEA as part of regulatory analysis, 17

OIRA. See Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

OMB. See Office of Management and Budget

OSHA. See Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Outcome measures, 8, 322

P

Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (PCEHM), 18, 32–33, 67, 93, 103–105, 110, 118–119, 122, 125, 128, 149, 172, 241

Paperwork Reduction Act, 93, 108n, 311

Pareto Principle, 31, 38

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Particulate matter (PM) emissions, 229

Patient self-assessments, 222

Patient time, 33

PCEHM. See Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine

Performance standards, rather than design standards, 267

Person trade-off (PTO), 6, 77–81, 89–91, 138–139, 155, 322

Personal control, degree of, 142

PM. See Particulate matter emissions

Population-based, condition-specific HRQL values, 112–113

Population health data, and subgroups, 148–149

Population survey data-based approaches, 110–116

catalogues of chronic condition HRQL values, 111–113

incorporation of health profiles and HRQL questions and instruments in routine population surveys, 114–116

sources for population-based, condition-specific HRQL values, 112–113

statistically inferred HRQL values, 114

“Postregulatory” health status, 8

Precision of estimates, 314

Preference-based indexes, 103, 322

“Preference weights,” 34n

Premature mortality, 72–73

Preventable mortality, 72–73, 211, 322

Primary elicitation of condition-specific index values, 92–93

Probabilistic analysis, of uncertainty, 64

Producer surpluses, 281

Professional judgment, 286

Proposed regulatory actions, need for analysis of, 259–260

PTO. See Person trade-off

Publicity, 157

Published sources, using health state index values from, 120–121

Purpose and scope issues, 193–195

EPA’s nonroad diesel rule, 194–195

FDA’s juice processing rule, 194

NHTSAs child restraint rule, 194

Q

QALDs. See Quality-adjusted life days

QALYs. See Quality-adjusted life years

Qualitative benefits and costs, 313

Quality

defined for benefit transfer studies, 116

of life, 74, 322

Quality-adjusted life days (QALDs), 59, 204

Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), 4–16, 34–37, 57–62, 68–71, 78–92, 103–105, 109, 117, 122–135, 139–154, 158–185, 193–197, 204–205, 214–217, 224–226, 234–241, 273, 322

gain in defined, 172

total losses, 210, 224, 236

Quality of Life Instruments Database, 102n

Quality of Well-Being Scale (QWB), 6, 58–59, 71–72, 97–98, 114, 122, 165–166, 198–204, 212–215, 222–227, 245–246

availability, 98

domains, 98

history, 97–98

self-administered version, 98

valuation, 98

Quantified benefits, 313

EPA estimates of annual, 230

of EPA’s nonroad diesel rule, 56

of the FDA’s juice processing rule, 57

QWB. See Quality of Well-Being Scale

R

Radon exposure levels, 30

RAND Health Insurance Experiment, 101

Rating scale (RS), 85, 90, 119, 322

Ratios

ethical and nonquantifiable aspects of regulatory decisions beyond, 130–158

scale of, 322

using, 64

Rawls, John, 17

Real discount rates, of 3 percent and 7 percent, 298–300

“Real options” methods, 306

Recent regulations

examples of, 46–47

health effects likely to be quantified in forthcoming major health and safety rulemakings, 48

summary of recent major health and safety rulemakings, 47

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Recommendations for regulatory cost-effectiveness analysis, 11–14, 159–189

constructing and reporting cost-effectiveness ratios, 167–181

data collection and research needed to improve HRQL measurement and CEA for regulatory decision making, 184–188

information needed for regulatory decision making, 181–184

selecting integrated measures of effectiveness, 161–167

summary, 188–189

Regulations

compliance costs defined, 172

at the Federal level, 264–265

recent, 46–48

summary, 65–66

types of risk regulations, 41–50

Regulatory analysis

choosing a HALY measure for, 91

current practices for, 50–65

key elements of, 260–261

Regulatory Analysis. See Circular A-4

Regulatory decision making, 155–157

enforcement, 157

presenting information needed for, 12–13

publicity, 157

relevance, 157

revisability and appeals, 157

Regulatory development

and economic analysis, 3–4

key requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, 21

process of, 20–22

requirements for regulatory analysis and decision making, 22–26

the role of economic analysis in, 19–26

Regulatory Flexiblity Act, 267, 310

“Regulatory flexiblity analysis” (RFA), 310–311

Regulatory interventions, 10

“Regulatory Right-to-Know Act,” 26, 258, 275, 278

Relevance, 157

Reliability, 70, 82–83, 323

intrarater test-retest reliability of the SG, TTO and visual analogue scale techniques, 82

Reporting cost-effectiveness ratios, 11–12, 167–181

Representativeness issues, 70

Reproducibility of results, 278–279

Requirements for regulatory analysis and decision making, 22–26

definition of “economically significant” regulations, 24

Executive Orders, 25

history of administrative guidance on regulatory analysis, 22

Research and development of metrics and valuation methodologies, 123–125

best practices in stated preference surveys and benefits transfer, 125

correlations and conversions among HRQL measures, 123–124

using ordinal data for HRQL valuation, 124

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 43

Resources for the Future, 17

Revealed preference methods, 282–285, 323

direct uses of market data, 283–284

indirect uses of market data, 284–285

Revisability and appeals, 157

RFA. See “Regulatory flexiblity analysis”

RIA, 279

“Risk neutrality,” 310

Risk-related considerations for regulatory decisions, 145

“Risk–risk” analysis, 49

Risks

with delayed effects, 142

detecting, 141–142, 145

dimensions of value affecting the acceptability of, 140–143

and dread, 142, 145

personal control over, 142, 145

treatment of, 314

Routine population surveys, incorporation of health profiles and HRQL questions and instruments in, 114–116

RS. See Rating scale

S

SAB. See Science Advisory Board

Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), 44–45

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

Salmonella (non typhi), 204–210

Saved young life equivalent (SAVE), 90–91

Science Advisory Board (SAB), 294–295

SDWA. See Safe Drinking Water Act

Self-reported health status (SRHS), 115n

“Senior discount” controversy, 134

Sensitivity analysis, 156, 225, 308–309, 323

for QALY losses, 211, 226, 237

SF-6D, 6, 71, 75, 94, 101–102, 123–124, 165–166, 198, 204, 214, 253

availability, 102

domains, 101–102

history, 101

valuation, 102

SF-12 data sets, 71, 101–102, 123–124, 165

SF-36 data sets, 71, 75, 101–102, 165

version 2, 102, 124

SG. See Standard gamble

“Shadow price” approach, 298

Single-dimension measures of health-related outcomes, 72–73

Small Business Administration, Chief Counsel for Advocacy of, 311

Social purposes, 264

“Social rate of time preference,” 299

Special populations, 104–105

Specialized analytical requirements, 310–313

analysis of unfunded mandates, 311

energy impacts, 312–313

environmental impact statements, 312

impact on small businesses and other small entities, 310–311

impacts on children, 312

information collection, paperwork, and recordkeeping burdens, 311

information quality guidelines, 311–312

SPM. See “Stated preference” methods

SRHS. See Self-reported health status

Standard gamble (SG), 77–78, 80–86, 90, 105–107, 119, 124, 323

Standard performance criteria, for HRQL instruments, 70

“Stated preference” methods (SPM), 30, 285–287, 323

Statistical and Science Policy Branch, 312

Statistically inferred HRQL values, 114

Statutory standards, 42–46

health-based requirements, 42–43

hybrid requirements, 44–46

technology-based requirements, 44

Summarizing Population Health, 116

Supreme Court, 43

“Switch points,” 308

T

Technology-based requirements, 44

Theoretical reliability, 83

“Threshold” analysis, 260

Time preference, 323

for health-related benefits and costs, 300–301

for non-monetized benefits and costs, 302–303

Time trade-off (TTO), 77–90, 100, 105, 114, 119–124, 128, 324

Toxic chemicals, minimizing exposure to, 1

Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 45, 48

Trade-off based methods, 80

for longevity, 139

Transfers, separate reporting of, 314–315

Transparency, 70, 261, 278–279, 314

TSCA. See Toxic Substances Control Act

TTO. See Time trade-off

TTO method and discounting, 84

U

Uncertain outcomes, economic values of, 310

Uncertainty

alternative assumptions, 310

assessing, 64

economic values of uncertain outcomes, 310

in health status and preference measurement, 121–123

probabilistic analysis of, 64

quantitative analysis of, 307–309

treatment of, 305–310, 314

Unfunded Mandates Act, 311

U.S. Constitution, 42

U.S. Public Health Service, 32

“Use values,” 284–285

Utility function, 324

Utility-theoretical model, 86

Utility theory, 70

“Utility weights,” 34n

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×

V

Validity, 324

concurrent, 318

convergent, 318

criterion, 319

Valuation, 29–30, 32–36, 70, 98–102, 137n, 164–165, 288–289

contingent, 125

decomposed, 97

of reductions in health and safety risks to children, 296

Valuation surveys, for generic HRQL instruments, 96

Value, 19n, 324

Value of a QALY, 134–140

combining morbidity and mortality in a single measure, 139–140

source of HRQL values, 135–139

summary, 140

Value of a statistical life (VSL), 59, 294–295, 324

Value of a statistical life year (VSLY), 59, 295

Valuing Health Outcomes conference, 17

Valuing health states and preference elicitation methods, 77–86

comparisons among elicitation methods, 81–86

direct rating—category rating and visual analogue scales, 79–80

person trade-off, 80–81

standard gamble, 78

time trade-off, 78–79

Valuing life years compared with valuing lives, 132–134

lives, life years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), 133

the “senior discount” controversy, 134

Visual analogue scale (VAS), 77, 80–85, 100, 107, 324

VSL. See Value of a statistical life

VSLY. See Value of a statistical life year

W

Wage-risk studies, 30n

Water quality, improving, 1

Weitzman, Martin, 302

Welfare economics, 83, 324

Well-being, 74, 76, 324

White House Council on Environmental Quality, 312

Whitman v. American trucking, 41

WHO. See World Health Organization

WHO’s DALY, 89

Willingness to accept (WTA), 29n, 280, 324

Willingness to pay (WTP), 16, 29–30, 34–38, 62, 65, 85, 195, 229, 280, 288, 292, 325

“With condition” HRQL, approaches for determining, 200

“With condition” values, 234

“With injury” values, 223

“With pathogen-related illness,” 215

“Without condition” HRQL, 199–203

comparison to “with condition” values based on expert assignment, 202

comparison to “with condition” values based on patient self-assessments, 202–203, 211

“Without condition” values, 234

“Without pathogen-related illness,” 215

World Health Organization (WHO), 87–89, 126n

Global Burden of Disease, 81

WTA. See Willingness to accept

WTP. See Willingness to pay

Y

Yellowstone National Park, 289

Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 351
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 352
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 353
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 354
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 355
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 356
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 357
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 358
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 359
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 360
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 361
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 362
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 363
Suggested Citation:"Index." Institute of Medicine. 2006. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11534.
×
Page 364
Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Get This Book
×
 Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Buy Hardback | $81.00 Buy Ebook | $64.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Promoting human health and safety by reducing exposures to risks and harms through regulatory interventions is among the most important responsibilities of the government. Such efforts encompass a wide array of activities in many different contexts: improving air and water quality; safeguarding the food supply; reducing the risk of injury on the job, in transportation, and from consumer products; and minimizing exposure to toxic chemicals. Estimating the magnitude of the expected health and longevity benefits and reductions in mortality, morbidity, and injury risks helps policy makers decide whether particular interventions merit the expected costs associated with achieving these benefits and inform their choices among alternative strategies. Valuing Health for Regulatory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis provides useful recommendations for how to measure health-related quality of- life impacts for diverse public health, safety, and environmental regulations. Public decision makers, regulatory analysts, scholars, and students in the field will find this an essential review text. It will become a standard reference for all government agencies and those consultants and contractors who support the work of regulatory programs.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!