National Academies Press: OpenBook

Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety (2009)

Chapter: Appendix A Statement of Task

« Previous: 9 Resources to Implement Improvements for Patient Safety and Resident Training
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12508.
Page 329
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A Statement of Task." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12508.
Page 330

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Appendix A Statement of Task The Institute of Medicine will form a consensus committee to (1) syn- thesize current evidence on medical resident schedules and healthcare safety and (2) develop strategies to enable optimization of work schedules to improve safety in the healthcare work environment. The strategies recom- mended will take into account the learning and experience that residents must achieve during their training. The recommendations will be structured to optimize both the quality of care and the educational objectives. The committee is asked to deliver its report in 12 months, and thus will focus on two priority tasks—each with component tasks as well as related issues to be considered as relevant to the main task but not neces- sarily studied in depth. Although the issues to be studied are broad ones, to permit comprehensive coverage of the priority issues in the specified timeframe, the scope is limited to medical residents (versus all physicians or all healthcare workers) and their work schedules (versus all work processes or the entire work environment). The committee is asked to consider the impact of recommended actions on costs; however, a detailed cost analysis is outside the scope of the study. Task #1: Review and Synthesize Evidence on Optimal Resident Work Schedules, including: • Evidence on the relationship between resident work schedules, resi­- dent performance, and the quality of care delivered by residents— specifically patient safety. Consider also evidence on the safety of the residents, the education and training experience of the resi- dents, the quality of the interactions from both the resident and 329

330 RESIDENT DUTY HOURS patient perspective, and other aspects of safety and quality of care such as care hand-offs and transitions. o As relevant, consider evidence on the relationship between sleep, fatigue, work schedules, and performance for other health care professionals as well as generally. • Evidence on the strategies, practices, interventions, and tools that have been employed in the United States, Australia, Canada, Eu- rope, New Zealand, and elsewhere to optimize the work schedules for residents to assure the safety and quality of patient care. Iden- tify barriers to change and strategies for overcoming them. Exam- ine how related issues are handled such as staffing, financial costs, and other resources. Consider also other approaches to the nature of resident work and the role of the resident (such as assigning tasks traditionally assigned to medical residents to other healthcare professionals) and resident training (such as use of simulations). o As relevant, consider approaches to similar issues in other health- care work environments and other industries as well as more general issues such as teamwork and organizational culture. Task #2: Develop Strategies for Implementing Optimal Resident Work Schedules • Make recommendations for how the strategies, practices, inter- ventions, and tools identified in Task #1 can be implemented to optimize resident schedules to improve the safety of the healthcare work environment and the quality of care. • Recommend actions for stakeholders including residents, hospi- tals, professional societies, accrediting bodies, administrators and funders of residency training programs, federal and state agencies, and policy makers at all levels. Identify actions that can be taken in the short and long term. The recommendations should specify who should take what actions to create a care environment that is safe for patients, residents, and other health workers. Recommen- dations should also address anticipated barriers to change such as the culture of medical education and health care institutions. o Consider and describe the consequences of these recommended actions for the cost of medical training and of health care. As discussed above, costs are to be considered in general terms— the task is not to develop explicit cost estimates for recom- mended changes.

Next: Appendix B Comparison of Select Scheduling Possibilities Under Committee Recommendations and Under 2003 ACGME Duty Hour Rules »
Resident Duty Hours: Enhancing Sleep, Supervision, and Safety Get This Book
Buy Hardback | $69.95 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Medical residents in hospitals are often required to be on duty for long hours. In 2003 the organization overseeing graduate medical education adopted common program requirements to restrict resident workweeks, including limits to an average of 80 hours over 4 weeks and the longest consecutive period of work to 30 hours in order to protect patients and residents from unsafe conditions resulting from excessive fatigue.

Resident Duty Hours provides a timely examination of how those requirements were implemented and their impact on safety, education, and the training institutions. An in-depth review of the evidence on sleep and human performance indicated a need to increase opportunities for sleep during residency training to prevent acute and chronic sleep deprivation and minimize the risk of fatigue-related errors. In addition to recommending opportunities for on-duty sleep during long duty periods and breaks for sleep of appropriate lengths between work periods, the committee also recommends enhancements of supervision, appropriate workload, and changes in the work environment to improve conditions for safety and learning.

All residents, medical educators, those involved with academic training institutions, specialty societies, professional groups, and consumer/patient safety organizations will find this book useful to advocate for an improved culture of safety.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!