National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Attachment B COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
Suggested Citation:"Attachment C REFERENCES." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2009. Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12604.
×
Page 18
Suggested Citation:"Attachment C REFERENCES." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2009. Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12604.
×
Page 19

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Attachment C REFERENCES Bronfman, N.C., L.A. Cifuentes, M.L. DeKay, and H.H. Willis. 2007. Accounting for variation in the explanatory power of the psychometric paradigm: The effects of aggregation and focus. J. Risk Res. 10(4):527-554. Bronfman, N.C., L.A. Cifuentes, and V.V. Gutierrez. 2008a. Participant-focused analysis: Explanatory power of the classic psychometric paradigm in risk perception. J. Risk Res. 11(6):735-753. Bronfman, N.C., E.L. Vazquez, V.V. Gutierrez, and LA. Cifuentes. 2008b. Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile. J. Risk Res. 11(6):755-773. Davies, J.C. 1996. Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting Government Priorities. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. DeKay, M.L., H.K. Florig, P.S. Fischbeck, M.G. Morgan, K.M. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and K.E. Jenni. 2001. The use of public risk ranking in regulatory development. Pp. 208-230 in Improving Regulation: Cases in Environment, Health, and Safety, P.S. Fischbeck, and R.S. Farrow, eds. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. DeKay, M.L., P.S. Fischbeck, H.K. Florig, M.G. Morgan, K.M. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and K.E. Jenni. 2005. Judgment-based risk ranking for food safety. Pp. 198-226 in Toward Safer Food: Perspectives on Risk and Priority Setting, S.A. Hoffmann, and M.R. Taylor, eds. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1987. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. EPA/230/2-87/025. Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. EPA SAB (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board). 1990. Reducing Risk: Setting Priorities and Strategies for Environmental Protection. SAB-EC-90-021. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://yosemite.epa. gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/28704D9C420FCBC1852573360053C692/$File/REDUCING+RISK++++++ ++++EC-90-021_90021_5-11-1995_204.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. Finkel, A.M., and D. Golding. 1995. Worst Things First? The Debate over Risk-Based National Environmental Priorities. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Fischhoff, B. 1995. Ranking risks. Risk Health Saf. Environ. 6:189-200. Fischhoff, B. 2006. Cognitive processes in stated preference methods. Pp. 937-968 in Handbook of Environmental Economics, Vol. 2. Valuing Environmental Changes, K.G. Mäler, and J.R. Vincent, eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Florig, H.K., M.G. Morgan, K.M. Morgan, K.E. Jenni, B. Fischhoff, P.S. Fischbeck, and M.L. DeKay. 2001. A deliberative method for ranking risks (I): Overview and test-bed development. Risk Anal. 21(5): 913- 921. Gutiérrez, V.V., L.A. Cifuentes, and N.C. Bronfman. 2006. The influence of information delivery on risk ranking by lay people. J. Risk Res. 9(6):641-655. HM Treasury. 2004. The Orange Book: Management of Risk-Principles and Concepts. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. October 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.who.int/management/ general/risk/managementofrisk.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. HM Treasury. 2005a. Managing Risks to the Public: Appraisal Guidance. London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. June 2005 [online]. Available: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/Managing_risks_ to_the_public.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. HM Treasury. 2005b. Principles of Managing Risks to the Public. HM Treasury Cabinet Office, London, UK [online]. Available: http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/risk_principles_180903.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. Jones, K. 1997. A Retrospective on Ten Years of Comparative Risk. Prepared for American Industrial Health Council, Washington, DC, by Green Mountain Institute for Environmental Democracy, Montpelier, 18

VT. January 24, 1997 [online]. Available: http://heartland.temp.siteexecutive.com/pdf/23157i.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. Long, J., and B. Fischhoff. 2000. Setting risk priorities: A formal model. Risk Anal. 20(3):339-352. Minard, R.A. 1996. Comparative risk assessment and the States: History, politics and results. Pp. 23-62 in Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting Government Priorities, J.C. Davies, ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Morgan, K.M., M.L. DeKay, and P.S. Fischbeck. 1999. A multi-attribute approach to risk prioritization. Risk Policy Report 6(6):38-40. Morgan, M.G., H.K. Florig, M.L. DeKay, and P. Fischbeck. 2000. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Anal. 20(1):49-58. Morgan, K.M., M.L. DeKay, P.S. Fischbeck, M.G. Morgan, B. Fischhoff, and H.K. Florig. 2001. A deliberative method for ranking risks (II): Evaluation of validity and agreement among managers. Risk Anal. 21(5):923-937. Morgan, M.G., B. Fischhoff, L. Lave, and P. Fischbeck. 1996. A proposal for ranking risks within federal agencies. Pp. 111-148 in Comparing Environmental Risks: Tools for Setting Government Priorities, J.C. Davies, ed. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. Morgan, M.G., H.K. Florig, M.L. DeKay, and P. Fischbeck. 2000. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Anal. 20(1):49-58. Murray, C.J.L., and A.D. Lopez, eds. 1996. The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. OGC (Office of Government Commerce). 2008. Management of Risk (M_o_R). Office of Government Commerce, HM Treasury, London, UK [online]. Available: http://www.ogc.gov.uk/guidance_ management_of_risk_4441.asp [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. Palmgren, C.R., M.L. DeKay, P.S. Fischbeck, B. Fischhoff, and M.G. Morgan. 2000. Evaluating a Risk- Ranking Methodology. Society of Risk Analysis Annual Meeting Applications of Risk Analysis in Industry and Government, December 3-6, 2000, Washington, DC. UNC. 2008. UNC School of Public Health to help UAE assess environmental health risks. UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health. School of Public Health News: June 9, 2008 [online]. Available: http://www.sph.unc.edu/school_of_public_health_news/unc_school_of_public_health_to_help_uae_ assess_environmental_health_risks_7546_1957.html [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. USACE (US Army Corps of Engineers). 2008. Risk-Informed Decision Framework Appendix, Draft. Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Technical Report. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District, Mississippi Valley Division. February 2008 [online]. Available: http://lacpr. usace.army.mil/\Report\Draft Appendices\Risk Informed Decision Framework Appendix.pdf [accessed Dec. 2, 2008]. WHO (World Health Organization). 2008. The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. Geneva: World Health Organization [online]. Available: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GBD _report_2004update_full.pdf [accessed Jan. 9, 2009]. Willis, H.H., M.L. DeKay, M.G. Morgan, H.K. Florig, and P.S. Fischbeck. 2004. Ecological risk ranking: Development and evaluation of a method for improving public participation in environmental decision making. Risk Anal. 24(2):363-378. Willis, H.H., M.L. DeKay, B. Fischhoff, and M.G. Morgan. 2005. Aggregate, disaggregate, and hybrid analyses of ecological risk perceptions. Risk Anal. 25(2):405-428. 19

Next: Attachment D ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF REVIEWERS »
Letter Report on the Development of a Model for Ranking FDA Product Categories on the Basis of Health Risks Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!