National Academies Press: OpenBook

Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research (2009)

Chapter: 2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control

« Previous: 1 Introduction
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 20
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control." Institute of Medicine. 2009. Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12616.
×
Page 26

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

2 Overview of Smallpox and Its Surveillance and Control S mallpox, the disease caused by the variola virus, is characterized by fever; headache; back pain; vomiting; and, most distinctly, a papular, and later vesicular, rash. Smallpox has a lengthy incubation period that averages 12–14 days, during which time the infected person is non- contagious. Within 2–3 days of the sudden onset of fever and other symp- toms, skin lesions begin to appear on the face, hands, arms, and legs, and eventually the trunk. Lesions erupt first on mucosal surfaces, including the mouth and nasal cavities, where they ulcerate and shed the virus in respi- ratory secretions (see Figure 2-1). Smallpox is most contagious during the febrile period and early stages of the rash, but remains transmissible until the resulting scabs have fallen off (Breman and Henderson, 2002). Smallpox was originally considered a single disease. However, it was subsequently subdivided into two clinical types, caused by closely related variants of the variola virus: “classical” or variola major, and variola minor or alastrim. The former had a higher case fatality rate of around 30 percent, while the latter was less severe, with only about 1 percent of cases resulting in death (Henderson and Fenner, 2001). Epidemiology Smallpox is uniquely a human disease, and variola virus has no other known host or reservoir species. Historically, the virus was transmitted pri- marily through aerosolization of respiratory secretions, as well as by direct contact with skin lesions or exposure to contaminated bedding or clothing. For variola major, transmission occurred mainly to close contacts because 19

20 FIGURE 2-1  Clinical manifestations and pathogenesis of smallpox and the immune response. Reprinted with permission from (Breman and Henderson, 2002) and (Strano, 1976). Copyright © 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. Other images provided by WHO, NIH, the American Registry of Pathology.

OVERVIEW OF SMALLPOX 21 the severity of the disease rendered most victims bed-ridden shortly after the onset of illness. Variola minor, with its milder presentation, could be transmitted much more widely because of patients’ mobility and remained endemic in some parts of the world even after variola major had been eliminated (Fenner et al., 1998). Smallpox epidemics occurred in cycles that varied from annually to every few years. The periodicity depended largely on the number of sus- ceptible individuals in the community, which was heavily influenced by the prevalence of prior infection and by vaccination levels (Fenner et al., 1998). As smallpox vaccination coverage increased, the size and frequency of outbreaks decreased (Fenner et al., 1998). Smallpox was endemic in almost all parts of the world until the mid- twentieth century. Vaccination campaigns had eliminated the disease from nearly all of Europe, Australia, and New Zealand by the early 1950s and from the American continents a decade later. The last case of smallpox in the United States occurred in 1949. Global eradication efforts accelerated in the mid-1960s, and areas of endemicity rapidly diminished in Asia and Africa. As noted in Chapter 1, the last known naturally transmitted case of smallpox occurred in 1977 in Somalia, while the last known case of the disease was due to a laboratory-associated accident in England the follow- ing year. WHO declared smallpox eradicated in May 1980. This achieve- ment has not yet been repeated with any other human pathogen. Table 2-1 summarizes the timeline for smallpox eradication. Surveillance And control The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States reminded the world that a biological agent could be used as a weapon of terror and made the research agenda for high-consequence pathogens such as variola a national priority (Lane et al., 2001). Even though naturally occurring smallpox has been eradicated (Henderson, 1987), the risk of smallpox resulting from a deliberate or accidental release of the agent remains (Mahalingam et al., 2004). Because of its characteristic rash, surveillance for smallpox was straight- forward when natural disease was present in the world. Today, by contrast, physicians lack familiarity with smallpox and may be unable to diagnose it (Breman and Henderson, 2002; Woods et al., 2004). WHO considers a single verified case of smallpox to be a public health emergency of interna- tional concern, and under the 2005 revisions of the International Health Regulations, reporting of such a case to WHO is obligatory. A diagnosis of smallpox must be confirmed by laboratory testing. Whereas transmission was historically limited primarily to close contacts, most people now alive have no natural or vaccine-induced immunity to the disease, and society is

22 LIVE VARIOLA VIRUS TABLE 2-1  Timeline for Smallpox Eradication Date Location Event 430 BC Survivors of smallpox called upon to care for the afflicted (as survivors were immune) Unknown Variolation, or inoculation, practiced in Africa, India, and China 1721 Europe and Variolation method introduced North America 1744 Japan Variolation method introduced 1798 England Edward Jenner first to discover a vaccine using cowpox 1909 Guinea First time an experimental dried vaccine was used 1949 Michigan State Freeze-drying invented Laboratories 1949 United States Last case of smallpox 1950s Western Eradication program started in western hemisphere by Hemisphere Pan American Sanitary Organization 1954 Lister Institute in Freeze-dried vaccine produced for commercial use England 1958 USSR suggests a global eradication program to WHA 1966 WHA decides to intensify the eradication program 1967 Intensified plan for eradication is launched by WHO 1977 Somalia Last naturally occurring case in the world 1978 United Kingdom Last two cases in the world, laboratory acquired 1979 Global eradication certified by a group of scientists 1980 Global Eradication and previous certification endorsed by WHA highly mobile; therefore, transmission dynamics today may be considerably different from those seen in the past. One key to implementing effective disease control strategies for a patho- gen such as variola is prompt and accurate detection, either directly by identifying the biological agent or indirectly by methods that demonstrate the host’s response to the suspected pathogen (Fraser et al., 2004). Since 1999, technological advances have yielded laboratory methods that permit the analysis of clinical specimens for orthopoxvirus nucleic acid (Loparev et al., 2001; Nitsche et al., 2004; Olson et al., 2004; Wenli et al., 2004; Aitichou et al., 2005; Shchelkunov et al., 2005; Fitzgibbon et al., 2006; Li et al., 2007; Sulaiman et al., 2008) or orthopoxvirus-specific proteins or antibodies (Karem et al., 2005; Huelseweh et al., 2006; Davies et al., 2007). CDC has distributed validated variola clinical diagnostics through the Laboratory Response Network (LRN), and assays for environmental detection exist (CDC, 2008). In response to the detection of variola, three options exist for control- ling any resulting outbreak of disease: isolation and quarantine, vaccina-

OVERVIEW OF SMALLPOX 23 tion, and administration of antiviral drugs. CDC has specific procedures in place for containment of the disease should it be diagnosed, including use of isolation and quarantine, identification and vaccination of close contacts, and vaccination of those not directly exposed. Similar protocols exist else- where in the world. The last decade has seen considerable efforts to develop next-­generation smallpox vaccines, and progress has been made in the development and licensure of live attenuated vaccinia-based vaccines utilizing modern pro- duction techniques (Monath et al., 2004; Vollmar et al., 2006; Wiser et al., 2007; Artenstein, 2008; Greenberg and Kennedy, 2008). In addition, contemporary experience has been acquired with vaccinating large popu- lations of individuals, including military personnel (CIDRAP, 2008) and volunteer first responders and laboratory workers (Casey et al., 2005). This experience has yielded new data on the safety profile and adverse effects associated with vaccination in a largely immunologically naïve population (Fulginiti et al., 2003; Grabenstein and Winkenwerder, 2003; Halsell et al., 2003; Talbot et al., 2003; Greenberg et al., 2004; Wollenberg and Engler, 2004; Malone, 2007; Kroger et al., 2008; Reif et al., 2008), as well as on the nature of the host’s response (Hammarlund et al., 2003a,b; Kennedy et al., 2004; Kim et al., 2006, 2007; Kan et al., 2007; Gassmann et al., 2008; Grosenbach et al., 2008). Progress has also been made in the development of drugs for treatment and postexposure prophylaxis of smallpox (Yang et al., 2005; Sliva and Schnierle, 2007; Bolken and Hruby, 2008; Nalca et al., 2008; Tse-Dinh, 2008; Painter et al., 2008). Despite the research that has been accomplished since 1999, capability gaps for smallpox control remain. These include the development and licen- sure of rapid field diagnostics that are specific for variola or for antibodies induced by variola infection, further assessment and licensure of antivirals for the treatment of smallpox, and a licensed smallpox vaccine with a more favorable safety profile. REFERENCES Aitichou, M., S. Javorschi, and M. S. Ibrahim. 2005. Two-color multiplex assay for the iden- tification of orthopox viruses with real-time LUX-PCR. Molecular & Cellular Probes 19(5):323–328. Artenstein, A. W. 2008. New generation smallpox vaccines: A review of preclinical and clinical data. Reviews in Medical Virology 18(4):217–231. Bolken, T. C., and D. E. Hruby. 2008. Discovery and development of antiviral drugs for bio- defense: Experience of a small biotechnology company. Antiviral Research 77(1):1–5. Breman, J. G., and D. A. Henderson. 2002. Diagnosis and management of smallpox. New England Journal of Medicine 346(17):1300–1308.

24 LIVE VARIOLA VIRUS Casey, C. G., J. K. Iskander, M. H. Roper, E. E. Mast, X. J. Wen, T. J. Torok, L. E. Chapman, D. L. Swerdlow, J. Morgan, J. D. Heffelfinger, C. Vitek, S. E. Reef, L. M. Hasbrouck, I. Damon, L. Neff, C. Vellozzi, M. McCauley, R. A. Strikas, and G. Mootrey. 2005. Adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States, January–October 2003. The Journal of the American Medical Association 294(21). CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). 2008. Acute­ generalized vesicular or pustular rash illness testing protocol in the United States. http://emergency.cdc.gov/agent/ smallpox/diagnosis/pdf/poxalgorithm11-14-07.pdf (accessed February 13, 2008). CIDRAP (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy). 2008. US military switching to new smallpox vaccine. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/bt/smallpox/news/ feb0808smallpox.html (accessed April 15, 2009). Davies, D. H., D. M. Molina, J. Wrammert, J. Miller, S. Hirst, Y. Mu, J. Pablo, B. Unal, R. Nakajima-Sasaki, X. Liang, S. Crotty, K. L. Karem, I. K. Damon, R. Ahmed, L. Villarreal, and P. L. Felgner. 2007. Proteome-wide analysis of the serological response to vaccinia and smallpox. Proteomics 7(10):1678–1686. Fenner, F., D. A. Henderson, I. Arita, J. Jezek, and L. D. Ladnyi. 1998. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Fitzgibbon, J. E., and J. L. Sagripanti. 2006. Simultaneous identification of orthopoxviruses and alphaviruses by oligonucleotide macroarray with special emphasis on detection of variola and Venezuelan equine encephalitis viruses. Journal of Virological Methods 131(2):160–167. Fraser, C., S. Riley, R. M. Anderson, and N. M. Ferguson. 2004. Factors that make an infec- tious disease outbreak controllable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101(16):6146–6151. Fulginiti, V. A., A. Papier, J. M. Lane, J. M. Neff, and D. A. Henderson. 2003. Smallpox vac- cination: A review, part II. Adverse events. Clinical Infectious Diseases 37(2):251–271. Gassmann, R., O. B. Engler, R. Steffen, M. Alex, C. P. Czerny, and M. Mutsch. 2008. Clinical and immune response to undiluted and diluted smallpox vaccine. Swiss Medical Weekly 138:392–397. Grabenstein, J. D., and W. Winkenwerder, Jr. 2003. US military smallpox vaccination program ����������������������������������������� experience. The Journal of the American Medical Association 289(24):3278–3282. Greenberg, R. N., and J. S. Kennedy. 2008. ACAM2000: A newly licensed cell culture-based live vaccinia smallpox vaccine. Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs 17(4):555–564. Greenberg, R. N., R. H. Schosser, E. A. Plummer, S. E. Roberts, M. A. Caldwell, D. L. Hargis, D. W. Rudy, M. E. Evans, and R. J. Hopkins. 2004. Urticaria, exanthems, and other benign dermatologic reactions to smallpox vaccination in adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38(7):958. Grosenbach, D. W., R. Jordan, D. S. King, A. Berhanu, T. K. Warren, D. L. Kirkwood-Watts, S. Tyavanagimatt, Y. Tan, R. L. Wilson, K. F. Jones, and D. E. Hruby. 2008. Immune responses to the smallpox vaccine given in combination with ST-246, a small-molecule inhibitor of poxvirus dissemination. Vaccine 26(7):933–846. Halsell, J. S., J. R. Riddle, J. E. Atwood, P. Gardner, R. Shope, G. A. Poland, G. C. Gray, S. ­ Ostroff, R. E. Eckart, D. R. Hospenthal, R. L. Gibson, J. D. Grabenstein, M. K. Arness, D. N. Tornberg, and Team Department of Defense Smallpox Vaccina- tion Clinical Evaluation. 2003. Myopericarditis following smallpox vaccination among v ­ accinia-naive US military personnel. The Journal of the American Medical Association 289(24):3283–3289. Hammarlund, E., M. W. Lewis, S. G. Hansen, L. I. Strelow, J. A. Nelson, G. J. Sexton, J. M. Hanifin, and M. K. Slifka. 2003a. Duration of antiviral immunity after smallpox vac- cination. Nature Medicine 9(9):1131–1137.

OVERVIEW OF SMALLPOX 25 Hammarlund, E. K., M. W. Lewis, J. M. Hanifin, and M. K. Slifka. 2003b. Is there still immunity to smallpox? Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 103(086). Henderson, D. A. 1987. Principles and lessons from the smallpox eradication programme. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 65(4):535–546. Henderson, D. A., and F. Fenner. 2001. Recent events and observations pertaining to smallpox virus destruction in 2002. Clinical Infectious Diseases 33(7):1057–1059. Huelseweh, B., R. Ehricht, and H.-J. Marschall. 2006. A simple and rapid protein ­ array based method for the simultaneous detection of biowarfare agents. Proteomics 6(10):2972–2981. Kan, V. L., J. Manischewitz, L. R. King, and H. Golding. 2007. Durable neutralizing ­antibodies after remote smallpox vaccination among adults with and without HIV infection. AIDS (London, England) 21(4):521–524. Karem, K. L., M. Reynolds, Z. Braden, G. Lou, N. Bernard, J. Patton, and I. K. Damon. 2005. Characterization of acute-phase humoral immunity to monkeypox: Use of immuno­globulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of monkeypox infection during the 2003 North American outbreak. Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology 12(7):867–872. Kennedy, J. S., S. E. Frey, L. Yan, A. L. Rothman, J. Cruz, F. K. Newman, L. Orphin, R. B. Belshe, and F. A. Ennis. 2004. Induction of human T cell-mediated immune ­responses after primary and secondary smallpox vaccination. Journal of Infectious Diseases 190(7):1286–1294. Kim, S. H., S. G. Yeo, J. H. Cho, H. B. Kim, N. J. Kim, M. D. Oh, K. W. Choe, Y. Jee, and H. Cho. 2006. Cell-mediated immune responses to smallpox vaccination. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 13(10):1172–1174. Kim, S. H., S. J. Choi, W. B. Park, H. B. Kim, N. J. Kim, M. d Oh, and K. W. Choe. 2007. Detailed kinetics of immune responses to a new cell culture-derived smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naive adults. Vaccine 25(33):6287–6291. Kroger, A., C. Vellozzi, M. Deming, C. G. Casey, X. Wen, and S. A. Norton. 2008. Dermato- logical lesions near the smallpox vaccination site after scab detachment. Clinical Infec- tious Diseases 46(Suppl. 3):S227–S233. Lane, H. C., J. L. Montagne, and A. S. Fauci. 2001. Bioterrorism: A clear and present danger. Nature Medicine 7(12):1271–1273. Li, Y., S. L. Ropp, H. Zhao, I. K. Damon, and J. J. Esposito. 2007. Orthopoxvirus pan- g ­ enomic DNA assay. Journal of Virological Methods 141(2):154–165. Loparev, V. N., R. F. Massung, J. J. Esposito, and H. Meyer. 2001. Detection and differentia- tion of Old World orthopoxviruses: Restriction fragment length polymorphism of the crmB gene region. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39(1):94–100. Mahalingam, S., I. K. Damon, and B. A. Lidbury. 2004. 25 years since the eradication of small- pox: Why poxvirus research is still relevant. Trends in Immunology 25(12):636–639. Malone, J. D. 2007. Pre-event smallpox vaccination for healthcare workers revisited—the need for a carefully screened multidisciplinary cadre. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 11(2):93–97. Monath, T. P., J. R. Caldwell, W. Mundt, J. Fusco, C. S. Johnson, M. Buller, J. Liu, B. Gardner, G. Downing, P. S. Blum, T. Kemp, R. Nichols, and R. Weltzin. 2004. ACAM2000 clonal Vero cell culture vaccinia virus (New York City Board of Health strain)—a second- generation smallpox vaccine for biological defense. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 8(Suppl. 2):S31–S44. Nalca, A., J. M. Hatkin, N. L. Garza, D. K. Nichols, S. W. Norris, D. E. Hruby, and R. Jordan. 2008. Evaluation of orally delivered ST-246 as postexposure prophylactic and antiviral therapeutic in an aerosolized rabbitpox rabbit model. Antiviral Research 79(2):121–127.

26 LIVE VARIOLA VIRUS Nitsche, A., H. Ellerbrok, and G. Pauli. �������������������������������������������������� 2004. Detection of orthopoxvirus DNA by real-time PCR and identification of variola virus DNA by melting analysis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42(3):1207–1213. Olson, V. A., T. Laue, M. T. Laker, I. V. Babkin, C. Drosten, S. N. Shchelkunov, M. Niedrig, I. K. Damon, and H. Meyer. 2004. Real-time PCR system for detection of ­orthopoxviruses and simultaneous identification of smallpox virus. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42(5):1940–1946. Painter, G. R., L. C. Trost, B. M. Lampert, M. R. Almond, R. M. Buller, E. Kern, G. P. Painter, A. T. Robertson, and R. O’Mahony. 2008. CMX001. Drugs of the Future 33(8):655. Reif, D. M., B. A. McKinney, A. A. Motsinger, S. J. Chanock, K. M. Edwards, M. T. Rock, J. H. Moore, and J. E. Crowe, Jr. 2008. Genetic basis for adverse events after smallpox vaccination. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 198(1):16–22. Shchelkunov, S. N., E. V. Gavrilova, and I. V. Babkin. 2005. Multiplex PCR detection and species differentiation of orthopoxviruses pathogenic to humans. Molecular & Cellular Probes 19(1):1–8. Sliva, K., and B. Schnierle. 2007. From actually toxic to highly specific: Novel drugs against poxviruses. Virology Journal 4(8). Strano, A.J. 1976. Smallpox. In: pathology of Tropical and Extraordinary Diseases. American Registry of Pathology: Washington, DC. Sulaiman, I. M., S. A. Sammons, and R. M. Wohlhueter. 2008. Smallpox virus ­resequencing GeneChips can also rapidly ascertain species status for some zoonotic non-variola o ­ rthopoxviruses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 46(4):1507–1509. Talbot, T. R., H. K. Bredenberg, M. Smith, B. J. Lafleur, A. Boyd, and K. M. Edwards. 2003. Focal and generalized folliculitis following smallpox vaccination among vaccinia-naive recipients. The Journal of the American Medical Association 289(24):3290–3294. Tse-Dinh, Y. C. 2008. An update on the development of drugs against smallpox. Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs 9(8):865–870. Vollmar, J., N. Arndtz, K. M. Eckl, T. Thomsen, B. Petzold, L. Mateo, B. Schlereth, A. H ­ andley, L. King, V. Hulsemann, M. Tzatzaris, K. Merkl, N. Wulff, and P. Chaplin. 2006. Safety and immunogenicity of IMVAMUNE, a promising candidate as a third generation smallpox vaccine. Vaccine 24(12):2065–2070. Wenli, M., W. Yan, W. Hongmin, and Z. Wenling. 2004. An oligonucleotide microarray for the detection of vaccinia virus. British Journal of Biomedical Science 61(3):142–145. Wiser, I., R. D. Balicer, and D. Cohen. 2007. An update on smallpox vaccine candidates and their role in bioterrorism related vaccination strategies. Vaccine 25(6):976–984. Wollenberg, A., and R. Engler. �������������������������������������������������������������� 2004. Smallpox, vaccination and adverse reactions to smallpox vaccine. Current Opinion in Allergy & Clinical Immunology 4(4):271–275. Woods, R., T. McCarthy, M. A. Barry, and B. Mahon. 2004. Diagnosing smallpox: Would you know it if you saw it? Biosecurity & Bioterrorism 2(3):157–163. Yang, G., D. C. Pevear, M. H. Davies, M. S. Collett, T. Bailey, S. Rippen, L. Barone, C. Burns, G. Rhodes, S. Tohan, J. W. Huggins, R. O. Baker, R. L. M. Buller, E. Touchette, K. Waller, J. Schriewer, J. Neyts, E. DeClercq, K. Jones, D. Hruby, and R. Jordan. 2005. An orally bioavailable antipoxvirus compound (ST-246) inhibits extracellular virus for- mation and protects mice from lethal orthopoxvirus challenge. Journal of Virology 79(20):13139–13149.

Next: 3 Comparative Poxvirology »
Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research Get This Book
×
 Live Variola Virus: Considerations for Continuing Research
Buy Paperback | $54.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Smallpox was a devastating disease that decimated human populations for centuries, and its eradication in 1980 was a monumental achievement for the global health community. Since then the remaining known strains of its causative agent, variola virus, have been contained in two World Health Organization (WHO)-approved repositories.

In 1999, the World Health Assembly (WHA) debated the issue of destroying these remaining strains. Arguments were presented on the need to retain the live virus for use in additional important research, and the decision to destroy the virus was deferred until this research could be completed. In that same year, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) convened a consensus committee to explore scientific needs for the live virus.

In the ten years since the first IOM report, the scientific, political, and regulatory environments have changed. In this new climate, the IOM was once again tasked to consider scientific needs for live variola virus. The committee evaluated the scientific need for live variola virus in four areas: development of therapeutics, development of vaccines, genomic analysis, and discovery research.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!