National Academies Press: OpenBook

Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments (2010)

Chapter:Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment

« Previous: Appendix D: Description of State Renewables Portfolio Standards
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×

E
Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment

While it is the intention of all life-cycle assessments (LCAs) to cover technologies from “cradle to grave” in a systematic way, there is significant variability in the assumptions, boundaries, and methodologies used in these assessments. Therefore, comparisons of LCAs should be done with caution; each is an approximation of a technology’s actual impact. A major complication in comparing LCAs is that there is no set standard by which such analyses are carried out. There are two basic kinds of LCAs: economic input/output (EIO) and process analysis (PA). PA can be thought of as a “bottom-up” approach in which specific information for the energy and emissions associated with each component of the technology is determined and then combined to obtain a complete life-cycle impact. In addition to being very time intensive, the PA can be limited in its utility by the fact that there is often a lack of information concerning one or more components of the technology, and this can lead to truncation errors.

EIO, on the other hand, does not track individual components, but instead uses economy sector level data to quantify the relationship between energy and the materials and processes produced. As compared to PA, EIO can be thought of as being a “top-down” approach. While having the advantage of being less time and data intensive, the EIO is limited in its accuracy by its dependence on highly aggregated data that may or may not be appropriate for the specific process or material being considered.

Recent investigations suggest that EIO analyses tend to give higher energy use and emissions estimates than does PA, perhaps because PA is only able to consider the subset of processes for which data are available (Fthenakis and Kim, 2007; Odeh and Cockerill, 2008). A third method, sometimes referred to as

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×

the “hybrid” LCA, attempts to address this issue by combining aspects of both techniques: using the PA approach where specific data are available and the EIO method where such data are not available.

To provide a coherent and consistent framework for LCAs, various agencies have compiled life-cycle inventory (LCI) databases that list the materials and energy inputs required for various technologies. For example, ECLIPSE (Frankl et al., 2004) is a LCI assessment project developed in Europe that looks at emissions and resource consumption. Other PA-type LCI databases include DEAM (Ecobilan, 2001), Franklin (Franklin Associates, 2008), and Ecoinvent (Pre Consultants, 2007b). EIO analyses typically rely on economic databases that are compiled by governmental bodies. For example, in the United States, the Department of Commerce generates data on air emission and water and energy use for 485 commodity sectors from various data sources.

Beyond the choice of LCA method and LCI database, there are any number of other factors that can affect LCA results and cause discrepancies among analyses. Assumptions about power plant capacity (or lifetime output), plant life expectancy, and energy infrastructure influence LCA results. In general, when comparing installations of the same energy technology, those with longer plant life expectancies and greater electrical output to the grid will have lower lifetime emissions per unit of electricity.

The nature of the underlying energy structure that supports the manufacture, operation, and dismantling of a given facility are also quite important. For example, the construction of a wind turbine in Sweden where much of the energy is produced using renewable sources will generally have less embedded CO2 emissions than the same turbine produced in the United States, where coal-fired power plants generate a significant fraction of the electricity available on the grid.

A further source of discrepancies for LCAs arises from the fact that these assessments are aimed at technologies that are often undergoing continuous modification and improvement. Comparisons cited here of an LCA for a given technology may differ because the technology under consideration evolved over the period from one LCA to another. This is especially true for solar and wind technologies where the ongoing rate of innovations is quite rapid. A further complication arises from the fact that some LCAs assess impacts for a hypothetical, future installation of the technology.

Another shortcoming of LCA is that it addresses only a single environmental impact. If one is in the position of choosing one technology over another, it would be desirable to have a more integrated understanding of the overall environmental

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×

impact of one technology over another. Environmental valuation methods attempt to do this by estimating the overall ecosystem impact of a technology using currency or “willingness to pay” as the unit to integrate across types of impacts. Impact categories included in environmental valuation methods typically relate to damages to humans, ecosystems, and resources. ExternE (European Commission, 1997) and Eco-indicator 99 (Pre Consultants, 2007a) are examples of environmental valuation methods used in Europe.

The main criticism of environmental valuation methods is of the step where disparate effects of LCAs are weighted and normalized into a single value per technology. Often the development of a single value is not adequate to capture the complexities of a technology, and metrics like “willingness to pay” can vary over time. For this reason we limit our discussion to LCA results.

REFERENCES

Ecobilan, P. 2001. TEAM/DEAM. 2001. Bethesda, Md.: PriceWaterhouseCoopers.

European Commission. 1997. External Costs of Electricity Generation in Greece. ExternE Project. Brussels.

Frankl, P., Corrado, A., and S. Lombardelli. 2004. Photovoltaic (PV) Systems. Final Report. ECLIPSE (Environmental and Ecological Life Cycle Inventories for present and future Power Systems in Europe). Brussels: European Commission. January.

Franklin Associates. 2008. Available at http://www.fal.com/lifecycle.htm.

Fthenakis, V.M., and H.C. Kim. 2007. Greenhouse-gas emissions from solar-electric and nuclear power: A life-cycle study. Energy Policy 35:2549-2557.

Odeh, N.A., and T.T. Cockerill. 2008. Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage. Energy Policy 38:367-380.

Pre Consultants. 2007a. Available at http://www.pre.nl/eco-indicator99.

Pre Consultants. 2007b. Available at http://www.pre.nl/ecoinvent/.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×
Page357
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×
Page358
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×
Page359
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Attributes of Life-Cycle Assessment." National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and National Research Council. 2010. Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12619.
×
Page360
Next: Appendix F: Atmospheric Emissions from Fossil-Fuel and Nuclear Electricity Generation »
Electricity from Renewable Resources: Status, Prospects, and Impediments Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $68.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

A component in the America's Energy Future study, Electricity from Renewable Resources examines the technical potential for electric power generation with alternative sources such as wind, solar-photovoltaic, geothermal, solar-thermal, hydroelectric, and other renewable sources. The book focuses on those renewable sources that show the most promise for initial commercial deployment within 10 years and will lead to a substantial impact on the U.S. energy system.

A quantitative characterization of technologies, this book lays out expectations of costs, performance, and impacts, as well as barriers and research and development needs. In addition to a principal focus on renewable energy technologies for power generation, the book addresses the challenges of incorporating such technologies into the power grid, as well as potential improvements in the national electricity grid that could enable better and more extensive utilization of wind, solar-thermal, solar photovoltaics, and other renewable technologies.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!