National Academies Press: OpenBook

Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report (2010)

Chapter: Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming

« Previous: Attachment D: Selected Recent Reports on Science and Technologyfor Waste Immobilization
Suggested Citation:"Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming." National Research Council. 2010. Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12937.
×

Attachment E:
Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming

A bed of granular material can be made to exhibit fluid-like properties by passing a liquid or gas through it. This process is referred to as fluidization, and the apparatus that supports this process is referred to as a fluidized bed. Fluidization came to age during World War II, when the urgent demand for aviation gasoline led to the development and construction of the first fluid bed catalytic cracker. In addition to gasoline production, fluidization technology is broadly used in coal gasification and combustion, mineral processing, food processing, pharmaceuticals, soil washing, manufacturing of polymers, waste treatment, and environmental remediation. Its applications include several unit operations such as drying, heating/cooling, particle coating, and chemical reactions.


The Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming (FBSR) of nuclear waste is a relatively new technology, though the fluidization phenomenon and steam reforming are well established in the chemical engineering field. Steam reforming is a method for generating hydrogen by reacting fossil fuels with water. For example, for natural gas:

If coal is used as a carbon source, it first undergoes pyrolysis or devolatilization then the char (C) reacts with steam according to the following reaction:

The H2 is combined with O2 so that no excess H2 exists in the system at any one time. This combination is exothermic and provides energy in the form of heat for the autocatalytic operation of the FBSR.


The FBSR consists of two fluidized beds. The first one operates in a reducing environment and its function is to evaporate the liquid nuclear waste stream; destroy organics; reduce nitrates, nitrites, and nitric acid to nitrogen gas; and form a stable solid waste product. The first stage fluidized bed of the FBSR process is referred to as the Denitration and Mineralization Reformer, or DMR. The DMR uses superheated steam as the fluidizing media. The bed material consists of granular solid additives and co-reactant(s), such as carbon, clay, silica, and/or catalysts. Liquid waste is directly fed to the fluidized bed after minor pre-treatment (e.g., to concentrate or dilute solubles) except the addition of clay.


By analogy to the above steam reforming chemistry, the carbon fed to FBSR (coal in this instance) produces H2 and CO. For organic compounds in the waste stream which undergo pyrolysis to form various hydrocarbons, the reducing environment is generated by the following reaction:

Suggested Citation:"Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming." National Research Council. 2010. Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12937.
×

Similarly, the nitrates contained in the liquid waste are reduced to

In the steam environment, the sodium oxide is transferred to sodium hydroxide:

yielding the overall reaction

The NO and NO2 are further reduced to nitrogen gas by the reaction of CO, C, or H2 generated from the reaction of the organic material with steam as shown above. The nitrates can also be reduced by the addition of a catalyst or a metal. For example:

The second fluidized bed of the FBSR process operates in an oxidizing environment and is referred to as the Carbon Reduction Reformer, or CRR. The fluidizing gases are the off-gas from the first stage and added oxygen. Its function is to gasify carbon fines carried over in the process gases from the DMR, oxidize CO and H2 to CO2 and water, and convert trace acid gases to stable alkali compounds by reacting these acids with the bed media consisting of calcium carbonate and/or calcium silicate particles.


The addition of bulk aluminosilicates to the fluidized bed results in the production of anhydrous feldspathoid phases such as sodalite. The sodalite family of minerals (including nosean) are unique because they have cage-like structures formed of aluminosilicate tetrahedra. The remaining feldspathoid minerals, such as nepheline, have a silica “stuffed derivative” ring type structure. The cage structures are typical of sodalite and/or nosean phases where leach testing has indicated that the cavities in the cage structure retain anions and/or radionuclides which are ionically bonded to the aluminosilicate tetrahedra and to sodium cation.


Sodalite has the formula Na8[Al6Si6O24](Cl2). In sodalites and analogues with sodalite topologies, the cage is occupied by two sodium and two chlorine ions. When the 2NaCl are replaced by Na2SO4, the mineral phase is known as nosean, (Na6[Al6Si6O24](Na2SO4)). Since the Cl, SO4, and/or S2, are chemically bonded and physically restricted inside the sodalite cage structure, these species do not readily leach out of the respective FBSR waste form mineral phases. Thus, FBSR waste forms can be useful for immobilizing these species to prevent their leaching into groundwater.


Other minerals in the sodalite family, namely hauyne and lazurite which are also cage structured minerals, can accommodate either (SO4=) or (S=) depending on the REDOX of the sulfur during the steam reforming process. Sodalite minerals are known

Suggested Citation:"Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming." National Research Council. 2010. Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12937.
×

to accommodate Be in place of Al and S2 in the cage structure along with Fe, Mn, and Zn, e.g., helvite (Mn4[Be3Si3O12]S), danalite (Fe4[Be3Si3O12]S), and genthelvite (Zn4[Be3Si3O12]S). These cage-structured sodalites were minor phases in HLW supercalcine waste forms and were found to retain Cs, Sr, and Mo into the cage-like structure, e.g., Mo as Na6[Al6Si6O24](NaMoO4)2. In addition, sodalite structures are known to retain B, Ge, I, and Br in the cage-like structures. Indeed, waste stabilization at Idaho National Laboratory currently uses a glass-bonded sodalite ceramic waste form (CWF) for disposal of electrorefiner wastes for sodium-bonded metallic spent nuclear fuel from the EBR II fast breeder reactor.

Suggested Citation:"Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming." National Research Council. 2010. Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12937.
×
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming." National Research Council. 2010. Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12937.
×
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"Attachment E: Fluidized Bed Steam Reforming." National Research Council. 2010. Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12937.
×
Page 23
Next: Attachment F: Joule Heated Melters »
Waste Forms Technology and Performance: Interim Report Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Waste Forms Technology and Performance study examines requirements for waste form technology and performance in the context of the disposal system in which the waste will be emplaced. The Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Management requested this interim report to provide timely information for fiscal year 2011 technology development planning. The authoring committee has focused this interim report on opportunities associated with selected aspects of three components of its statement of task. These tasks are:

  • The state-of-the-art tests and models of waste forms used to predict their performance for time periods appropriate to their disposal system.
  • Potential modifications of waste form production methods that may lead to more efficient production of waste forms that meet their performance requirements.
  • Potential new waste forms that may offer enhanced performance or lead to more efficient production.

The committee judges that the opportunities identified in this report are sufficiently mature to justify consideration by DOE-EM as it plans its fiscal year 2011 technology development program.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!