National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols

Phase I Report

Committee on Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols

Food and Nutrition Board

Ellen A. Wartella, Alice H. Lichtenstein, and Caitlin S. Boon, Editors

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
500 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This study was supported by Contract No. 200-2005-13434, Task Order 20, between the National Academy of Sciences and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Contract No. HHSF22320810201, Task Order 12, between the National Academy of Sciences and the Food and Drug Administration. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-15827-5

International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-15827-3

Additional copies of this report are available from the

National Academies Press,

500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.

For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu.

Copyright 2010 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The serpent adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient Greece, now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin.

Suggested citation: IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2010. Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

“Knowing is not enough; we must apply.

Willing is not enough; we must do.”

—Goethe

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE
OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES


Advising the Nation. Improving Health.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine


The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.


The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.


The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.


The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.


www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

COMMITTEE ON EXAMINATION OF FRONT-OF-PACKAGE NUTRITION RATING SYSTEMS AND SYMBOLS

ELLEN A. WARTELLA (Chair), Professor,

Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

ALICE H. LICHTENSTEIN (Vice Chair),

Gershoff Professor, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, Tufts University, Boston, MA

LINDSAY H. ALLEN, Center Director,

USDA, ARS Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA

TRACY A. FOX, Nutrition Consultant and President, Food, Nutrition, & Policy Consultants,

LLC, Washington, DC

MATTHEW W. KREUTER, Professor,

Health Communication Research Laboratory, Washington University, St. Louis, MO

ANUSREE MITRA, Associate Professor,

Kogod School of Business, American University, Washington, DC

FRANCES H. SELIGSON, Consultant,

Hershey, PA

MARY T. STORY, Professor,

Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

VIRGINIA WILKENING,

Alexandria, VA

IOM Staff

CAITLIN S. BOON, Study Director (through August 2010)

ROMY NATHAN, Senior Program Officer

JANET MULLIGAN, Research Associate

LAURA PILLSBURY, Research Associate

SAMANTHA ROBOTHAM, Senior Program Assistant

ANTON BANDY, Financial Officer

GERALDINE KENNEDO, Administrative Assistant

LINDA D. MEYERS, Director,

Food and Nutrition Board

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

Reviewers

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

KELLY BROWNELL, Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, Yale University, New Haven, CT

NANCY CHAPMAN, N. Chapman Associates, Inc., Washington, DC

JEANNE P. GOLDBERG, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA

EDWARD GROTH III, Consultant, Groth Consulting Services, Pelham, NY

JANE E. HENNEY, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, OH

REGINA HILDWINE, Grocery Manufacturers Association, Washington, DC

LINDA VAN HORN, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

CONNIE M. WEAVER, Department of Food and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

CHRISTINA ZARCADOOLAS, Department of Community and Preventive Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by ELENA O. NIGHTINGALE, Washington, DC, and DIANE FEICKERT BIRT, Iowa State University. Appointed by the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

Preface

This country is experiencing the highest rates of overweight, obesity, and diet-related chronic diseases in its history, and there is a great emphasis on consumers making healthier food choices. Against the backdrop of a pressing public health crisis, Congress requested an Institute of Medicine study that would examine front-of-package nutrition systems and symbols and the effect that such systems and symbols could have on consumers choosing more nutritious foods.

The committee’s charge was to review front-of-package nutrition rating systems and symbols, identifying the systems developed by manufacturers, supermarkets, health organizations, and governments in the United States and abroad; evaluating the scientific basis of the underlying nutrient criteria; considering the strengths and limitations of various approaches; and planning a second phase of nutrition labeling to consider the consumer aspect of front-of-package systems. In 1990, passage of the Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (NLEA) standardized the way nutrition information is provided to the public by requiring the information to be displayed in the now iconic Nutrition Facts panel and setting criteria for nutrient claims and health claims. This study, undertaken 20 years after passage of NLEA, represents a new phase in the understanding and use of nutrition labeling.

Over a dozen systems have been developed over the years, so this was no small task, but in light of the potential public health benefit that could be achieved with front-of-package nutrition rating systems, it was a worthy one. We are pleased that the assembled committee had the individual expertise and experience as well as the collective will to serve the health of the public and had the willingness to meet the significant challenge of our charge. It was a privilege to be a part of this effort.

Over the course of the study, we met often and consulted many sources. Our first meeting set the tone as we heard from each of our study sponsors. A public workshop elicited needed input and was extremely useful to the committee’s deliberations. Invited speakers and panelists included Mark Andon, Claire Boville, Adam Drewnowski, Mark Kantor, David Katz, Joanne Lupton, Marion Nestle, Jacob Seidell, Kim Stitzel, and Kathy Wiemer. These individuals and others shared their data, perspectives, and experience with us on that day or afterward by input to the project website. Jim Crimmins, Brian Elbel, and Elizabeth Howlett provided valued service as unpaid consultants during the later part of the project as we developed plans for Phase II of the study. Neal H. Hooker resigned from the committee in April 2010; we are grateful for his contributions to our early work.

On behalf of the committee, we extend our deepest thanks to the able project staff: Caitlin Boon, study director (through August 2010); Romy Nathan, senior program officer; Janet Mulligan, research associate; Laura Pillsbury, research associate; and Samantha Robotham, senior program assistant. All gave generously of their talents and time. In addition, the committee would like to thank other members of the Food and Nutrition Board staff includ-

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

ing Linda Meyers, Food and Nutrition Board director; Anton Bandy, financial officer; Alice Vorosmarti, research associate; and Geraldine Kennedo, administrative assistant, who assisted at crucial times during the project.

The findings and conclusions in this report could not come at a better time. This year has been one of many events and new initiatives drawing even more attention to the current public health crisis of obesity, including First Lady Michelle Obama’s Let’s Move initiative, the anticipated release of the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans, and billions of dollars of government and private investments provided to our local communities in an effort to reverse the epidemic of obesity. To this end, we are grateful to have been able to contribute through this Phase I report to the discussion about the important role of nutrition labeling in these endeavors.

Ellen A.Wartella, Chair

Alice H. Lichtenstein, Vice-Chair

Committee on Examination of Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." Institute of Medicine. 2010. Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12957.
×
PageR12
Next: Summary »
Front-of-Package Nutrition Rating Systems and Symbols: Phase I Report Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The federal government requires that most packaged foods carry a standardized label--the Nutrition Facts panel--that provides nutrition information intended to help consumers make healthful choices. In recent years, manufacturers have begun to include additional nutrition messages on their food packages. These messages are commonly referred to as 'front-of-package' (FOP) labeling. As FOP labeling has multiplied, it has become easy for consumers to be confused about critical nutrition information. In considering how FOP labeling should be used as a nutrition education tool in the future, Congress directed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to undertake a two-phase study with the IOM on FOP nutrition rating systems and nutrition-related symbols. The Food and Drug Administration is also a sponsor.

In Phase 1 of its study, the IOM reviewed current systems and examined the strength and limitations of the nutrition criteria that underlie them. The IOM concludes that it would be useful for FOP labeling to display calorie information and serving sizes in familiar household measures. In addition, as FOP systems may have the greatest benefit if the nutrients displayed are limited to those most closely related to prominent health conditions, FOP labeling should provide information on saturated fats, trans fats, and sodium.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!