National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Letter response." National Research Council. 2010. An Evaluation of the Food Safety Requirements of the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13069.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

BOARD ON AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES

500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Phone: 202 334 3062 Fax: 202 334 1978 E-mail:banr@nas.edu www.dels.nas.edu/banr

November 29, 2010

Ms. Rayne Pegg

Administrator

Agricultural Marketing Service

U.S. Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20250

Mr. Alfred Almanza

Administrator

Food Safety and Inspection Service

U.S. Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Ave. SW Washington, DC 20250

Dear Ms. Pegg and Mr. Almanza,

In response to the request of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), the National Research Council of the National Academies created an ad hoc Committee on An Evaluation of the Food Safety Requirements of the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program of the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The committee’s charge is to evaluate the scientific basis of the current food safety requirements and prepare a report of its findings.

The committee (see Appendix A for membership and biographies) had two meetings in Washington, DC: on July 14–15 and on August 10–11, 2010. In the first meeting, the committee had the opportunity to hear from two industry experts about their companies’ food safety program. In the second meeting, the committee met with representatives of the Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and FSIS who have provided technical advice to the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program. The committee also spent part of the second meeting on report preparation in closed session. The AMS representatives attended open sessions of both meetings and entertained questions and requests for any additional documents that the committee needed for its study.

Throughout its deliberations and meetings since the beginning of this study, the committee has benefitted from open and frank discussion with USDA representatives—including those of AMS, ARS, and FSIS—and representatives of the meat processing industry. The committee expresses gratitude to them for their assistance in gathering information. The committee also commends AMS for placing a high priority on food safety issues and for seeking advice and input from ARS, FSIS, industry, and the National Research Council in establishing and reviewing its current specifications. In addition, this report reflects countless hours of research, writing, and editing by the committee and National Research Council staff, and the chair expresses sincere appreciation for their dedication and work.

The product of this fast-track study is the attached report. The report contains the committee’s findings and recommendations for AMS’s consideration as it continues to procure and provide safe

Suggested Citation:"Letter response." National Research Council. 2010. An Evaluation of the Food Safety Requirements of the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13069.
×

ground beef products to the National School Lunch Program and other federal food and nutrition programs.

Sincerely,

Gary R. Acuff,

Chair

Committee on An Evaluation of the Food Safety Requirements of the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program

Suggested Citation:"Letter response." National Research Council. 2010. An Evaluation of the Food Safety Requirements of the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13069.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Letter response." National Research Council. 2010. An Evaluation of the Food Safety Requirements of the Federal Purchase Ground Beef Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13069.
×
Page 2
Next: SUMMARY »
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!