National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 3 Improvements to CTR Metrics
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×

REFERENCES

Ball, Deborah Yarsike and Theodore P. Gerber. 2004. Will Russian Scientists Go Rogue? A Survey on the Threat and the Impact of Western Assistance. PONARS Policy Memo 357. Available at: http://www.gwu.edu/~ieresgwu/assets/docs/ponars/pm_0357.pdf; accessed July 19, 2011.

Davis, Paul C. 2002. Analytic Architecture Capabilities Based Planning, Mission-System Analysis, and Transformation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Publishing.

Department of Defense (DoD). 2003a. Defense Security Cooperation Agency. Directive Number 5105.65 issued October 31, 2000 (Incorporating Change 1, September 23, 2003). Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/510565p.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012.

DoD. 2003b. Defense Acquisition System. Directive Number 5000.1 (DoD 5000.1), May 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.ntip.navy.mil/cap/documents/500001p.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012.

DoD. 2003c. Operation of the Defense Acquisition System. Instruction Number 5000.2 (DoD I 5000.1), May 12, 2003. Available at: http://www.carlisle.army.mil/dime/documents/JPLD_AY08_Lsn%207_Reading%203_DoDI%205000-2.pdf ; accessed January 11, 2012.

DoD. 2011. Defense Acquisition Guidebook. Available at: http://at.dod.mil/docs/DefenseAcquisitionGuidebook.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012.

Government Accountability Office (GAO). 2003. Information Technology, A Framework for Assessing and Improving Enterprise Architecture Management (Version 1.1). GAO-03-584-G. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03584g.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012.

GAO. 2011. Border Security. Preliminary Observations on Border Control Measures for the Southwest Border. GAO-11-374T. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/assets/130/125500.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012.

International Science and Technology Center (ISTC). 2011. Statement of the 53rd Governing Board of the ISTC. 28.06.2011. Available at: http://www.istc.ru/istc/istc.nsf/va_WebPages/GBStatement53EngPrint; accessed July 19, 2011.

Keeney, R.L. and Raiffa H. 1993. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirkwood, C. W. 1997. Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×

Nacht, M. 2009. Memorandum for Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear and Chemical and Biological Defense Programs. Biological Threat Reduction Program Strategic Planning Guidance and Program Objectives. Available through the Public Access File for this study.

National Research Council (NRC). 1997. Controlling Dangerous Pathogens: A Blueprint for U.S.-Russia Cooperation. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 1997. Proliferation Concerns: Assessing U.S. Efforts to Help Contain Nuclear and Other Dangerous Materials and Technologies in the Former Soviet Union. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 1999. Protecting Nuclear Weapons Materials in Russia. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2006a. Biological Science and Biotechnology in Russia: Controlling Diseases and Enhancing Security. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2006b. Strengthening Long-Term Nuclear Security: Protecting Weapon-Usable Material in Russia. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2006c. The Fundamental Role of Science and Technology in International Development: An Imperative for the U.S. Agency for International Development. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2006d. Threat Agent Detection Response System Data Base. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2007a. U.S.-Russian Collaboration in Combating Radiological Terrorism. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2007b. The Biological Threat Reduction Program of the Department of Defense: From Foreign Assistance to Sustainable Partnerships. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2008. Improving Democracy Assistance: Building Knowledge Through Evaluation and Research.

NRC. 2009. Countering Biological Threats: Challenges for the Department of Defense’s Nonproliferation Program Beyond the Former Soviet Union. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

National Security Council. 2009. National Strategy for Countering Biological Threats. Washington, D.C.

Parnell, G. S., Driscoll, P. J., and Henderson D. L., Editors, 2011. Decision Making for Systems Engineering and Management, 2nd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×

Revill, J. 2009. Developing Metrics and Measures for Dual-Use Education. Research Report for the Wellcome Trust Project on ‘Building a Sustainable Capacity in Dual-use Bioethics.’ Available at: http://www.brad.ac.uk/bioethics/media/SSIS/Bioethics/docs/Education_metrics_and_measures_2 nd_DRAFT.pdf; accessed January 11, 2012.

Weber, A. 2010. Memorandum for Director, Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Subject: Implementation Guidance for: I. Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP) Activities in Pakistan; II. Improving Implementation Flexibility Across CBEP; and III. Pursuing Implementing Arrangements with International Organizations Relevant to the CBEP Mission.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academy of Sciences. 2012. Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13289.
×
Page 58
Next: Glossary and List of Acronyms »
Improving Metrics for the Department of Defense Cooperative Threat Reduction Program Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $38.00 Buy Ebook | $30.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) Program was created in 1991 as a set of support activities assisting the Former Soviet Union states in securing and eliminating strategic nuclear weapons and the materials used to create them. The Program evolved as needs and opportunities changed: Efforts to address biological and chemical threats were added, as was a program aimed at preventing cross-border smuggling of weapons of mass destruction. CTR has traveled through uncharted territory since its inception, and both the United States and its partners have taken bold steps resulting in progress unimagined in initial years. Over the years, much of the debate about CTR on Capitol Hill has concerned the effective use of funds, when the partners would take full responsibility for the efforts, and how progress, impact, and effectiveness should be measured.

Directed by Congress, the Secretary of Defense completed a report describing DoD's metrics for the CTR Program (here called the DoD Metrics Report) in September 2010 and, as required in the same law, contracted with the National Academy of Sciences to review the metrics DoD developed and identify possible additional or alternative metrics, if necessary. Improving Metrics for the DoD Cooperative Threat Reduction Program provides that review and advice.

Improving Metrics for the DoD Cooperative Threat Reduction Program identifies shortcomings in the DoD Metrics Report and provides recommendations to enhance DoD's development and use of metrics for the CTR Program. The committee wrote this report with two main audiences in mind: Those who are mostly concerned with the overall assessment and advice, and those readers directly involved in the CTR Program, who need the details of the DoD report assessment and of how to implement the approach that the committee recommends.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!