U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
This presentation is a discussion of how to address the problem of herbicide resistance, not from a technical perspective, but from a human perspective. Herbicide-resistant weeds are a game changer for agriculture just as drug-resistant microbes have been a game changer for the health care industry. Weed control today is chemically based. The reason nearly 100 percent of row crops are treated with herbicides is because nothing else comes close to the effectiveness and efficiency of herbicides in killing weeds over a wide area. Good weed management, on the other hand, involves the integration of many practices within the strategic approaches of prevention, avoidance, monitoring, and suppression. From the management perspective, one must assume that all fields have resistance present. That resistance may not have manifested itself yet in an actual plant and may not have been selected for yet, but because genes have many ways of moving around, proper management dictates that assumption. Weed resistance is an area-wide issue because of the propensity of weed resistance genes to move with ease from field to field. In the past, the next new chemical in the pipeline was used to solve resistance problems—no more. New mechanisms of action are not forthcoming in the near future, and a better job of integration must occur to preserve those valuable control tactics presently available. Successful systems in the future will be more management-intensive and involve more diversity of tactics. A mindset change may be necessary to fully incorporate these new, successful systems.
Managing resistance requires a new mindset!
Herbicide-resistant weeds are a game changer for agriculture just as drug-resistant microbes have been a game changer for the health care industry.
o They have occurred with multiple classes of chemistry.
o They have evolved because of complacent management.
o Managers need to be more observant and disciplined to avoid this problem.
The technology is not to blame—problem is based on how the technology was used.
All actors in the system (university, industry, agency, dealers, farmers) are to blame for the problem.
o They must work together to find and implement solutions; only then can preparation meet opportunity.
Kochia (Kochia scoparia), courtesy of WildBoar (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fille:Kochia_scoparia_02.jpg).