National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 3. Assessment
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. The Subjective Well-Being Module of the American Time Use Survey: Assessment for Its Continuation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13535.


Aguiar, M., and Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring trends in leisure: The allocation of time over five decades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969–1006, 1008.

Archer, M., Paleti, R., Konduri, K., and Pendyala, R. (2012). “Modeling the connection Between Activity-Travel Patterns and Subjective Well-Being. Submitted for Presentation and Publication, 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.

Boeham, J.K., and Kubzansky, L.D. (2012). The Heart’s Content: The Association between Positive Psychological Well-Being and Cardiovascular Health.” Psychological Bulletin, online April 17, 2012. Available: (accessed September 7, 2012).

Christodoulou, C., Schneider, S., and Stone, A. (2012). Validation of a Brief Yesterday Measure of Hedonic Well-Being and Daily Activities: Comparison with the Day Reconstruction Method. Working Paper, June 4.

Deaton, A.S. (2011). The Financial Crisis and the Well-Being of Americans. NBER Working Papers 17128. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Available: (accessed July 29, 2012).

Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(2), 151–157.

Diener, E., Kahneman, D., Tov, W., and Arora, R. (2009). Income’s Differential Influence on Judgments of Life Versus Affective Wellbeing. Assessing Wellbeing. Oxford, UK: Springer.

Huppert, F.A. (2009). Psychological well-being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences. Applied Psychology: Health and Well]Being, 1, 137–164.

Kahneman, D., and Deaton, A. (2010, August). High Income Improves Evaluation of Life but not Emotional Well-Being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science.

Krueger, A.B., and Mueller, A. (2012). Time use, emotional well-being and unemployment: Evidence from longitudinal data. American Economic Review, 102(3), 594–599.

Krueger, A.B., and Stone, A.A. (2008). Assessment of pain: A community-based diary survey in the USA. Lancet, 371(May 3), 1519–1525.

Meyer, B.D., and Sullivan, J.X. (2009). Economic Well-Being and Time Use. Working paper, June 22.

Steg, L., and Gifford, R. (2005). Sustainable transportation and quality of life. Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 59–69.

Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., and Fitoussi, J.P. (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Available: (accessed August 2, 2012).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2012. The Subjective Well-Being Module of the American Time Use Survey: Assessment for Its Continuation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13535.
Next: APPENDIX Biographical Sketches of Panel Members »
The Subjective Well-Being Module of the American Time Use Survey: Assessment for Its Continuation Get This Book
Buy Ebook | $20.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The American Time Use Survey (ATUS), conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, included a subjective well-being (SWB) module in 2010 and 2012. The module, funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA), is being considered for inclusion in the ATUS for 2013. The National Research Council was asked to evaluate measures of self-reported well-being and offer guidance about their adoption in official government surveys. The charge for the study included an interim report to consider the usefulness of the ATUS SWB module, specifically the value of continuing it for at least one more wave. Among the key points raised in this report are the value, methodological benefits, and cost and effects on the ATUS and new opportunities.

Research on subjective or self-reported well-being has been ongoing for several decades, with the past few years seeing an increased interest by some countries in using SWB measures to evaluate government policies and provide a broader assessment of the health of a society than is provided by such standard economic measures as gross domestic product. NIA asked the panel to prepare an interim report on the usefulness of the SWB module of the ATUS, with a view as to the utility of continuing the module in 2013.

The Subjective Well-Being Module of the American Time Use Survey is intended to fulfill only one narrow aspect of the panel's broader task. It provides an overview of the ATUS and the SWB module, a brief discussion of research applications to date, and a preliminary assessment of the value of SWB module data. The panel's final report will address issues of whether research has advanced to the point that SWB measures-and which kinds of measures-should be regularly included in major surveys of official statistical agencies to help inform government economic and social policies.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!