National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R4
Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R5
Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R6
Page vii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R7
Page viii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14593.
×
Page R8

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

TRANSPORTAT ION RESEARCH BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 2011 www.TRB.org T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M TCRP REPORT 149 Research sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation Subscriber Categories Public Transportation Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry Judith Gertler Amanda DiFiore QINETIQ NORTH AMERICA, INC. TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS GROUP Waltham, MA Gordon Hadlow Fort Collins, CO Alan Lindsey Lantana, TX Roy Meenes Carlsbad, CA

TCRP REPORT 149 Project A-34 ISSN 1073-4872 ISBN 978-0-309-21355-4 Library of Congress Control Number 2011938000 © 2011 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein. Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, FAA, FHWA, FMCSA, FTA, or Transit Development Corporation endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP. NOTICE The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Cooperative Research Program, conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. The members of the technical panel selected to monitor this project and to review this report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. The report was reviewed by the technical panel and accepted for publication according to procedures established and overseen by the Transportation Research Board and approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the researchers who performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, or the program sponsors. The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, the National Research Council, and the sponsors of the Transit Cooperative Research Program do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of the report. TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM The nation’s growth and the need to meet mobility, environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new technologies from other industries, and to intro- duce innovations into the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special Report 213—Research for Public Transit: New Directions, published in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Urban Mass Transportation Administration—now the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). A report by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need for local, problem- solving research. TCRP, modeled after the longstanding and success- ful National Cooperative Highway Research Program, undertakes research and other technical activities in response to the needs of tran- sit service providers. The scope of TCRP includes a variety of transit research fields including planning, service configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human resources, maintenance, policy, and administrative practices. TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. Pro- posed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, TCRP was autho- rized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a memorandum agreement out- lining TCRP operating procedures was executed by the three cooper- ating organizations: FTA, the National Academies, acting through the Transportation Research Board (TRB); and the Transit Development Corporation, Inc. (TDC), a nonprofit educational and research orga- nization established by APTA. TDC is responsible for forming the independent governing board, designated as the TCRP Oversight and Project Selection (TOPS) Committee. Research problem statements for TCRP are solicited periodically but may be submitted to TRB by anyone at any time. It is the responsibility of the TOPS Committee to formulate the research program by identi- fying the highest priority projects. As part of the evaluation, the TOPS Committee defines funding levels and expected products. Once selected, each project is assigned to an expert panel, appointed by the Transportation Research Board. The panels prepare project state- ments (requests for proposals), select contractors, and provide techni- cal guidance and counsel throughout the life of the project. The process for developing research problem statements and selecting research agencies has been used by TRB in managing cooperative research pro- grams since 1962. As in other TRB activities, TCRP project panels serve voluntarily without compensation. Because research cannot have the desired impact if products fail to reach the intended audience, special emphasis is placed on dissemi- nating TCRP results to the intended end users of the research: tran- sit agencies, service providers, and suppliers. TRB provides a series of research reports, syntheses of transit practice, and other support- ing material developed by TCRP research. APTA will arrange for workshops, training aids, field visits, and other activities to ensure that results are implemented by urban and rural transit industry practitioners. The TCRP provides a forum where transit agencies can cooperatively address common operational problems. The TCRP results support and complement other ongoing transit research and training programs. Published reports of the TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM are available from: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 and can be ordered through the Internet at http://www.national-academies.org/trb/bookstore Printed in the United States of America

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, on its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council. The mission of the Transporta- tion Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individu- als interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org www.national-academies.org

CRP STAFF FOR TCRP REPORT 149 Christopher W. Jenks, Director, Cooperative Research Programs Crawford F. Jencks, Deputy Director, Cooperative Research Programs Dianne S. Schwager, Senior Program Officer Jeff L. Oser, Senior Program Assistant Eileen P. Delaney, Director of Publications Kami Cabral, Editor TCRP PROJECT A-34 PANEL Field of Operations Mark Miller, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Washington, DC (Chair) Melvin Clark, Capital Metro, Austin, TX Bobby J. Griffin, Consultant, Flower Mound, TX Ronald Heintzman, ATU International, Mt. Angel, OR Paul W. King, California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, CA Loren Lintner, Austin-Bergstrom International Airport, Austin, TX Rodney P. Massman, Missouri DOT, Jefferson City, MO Gerald P. McGill, Continental Airlines, Kirtland, OH Terrence Spratt, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Philadelphia, PA James A. Stem, Jr., United Transportation Union, Washington, DC Joseph J. Vacek, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND Gretchen Wolfe, Charlotte Area Transit System Rail Operations Division, Fort Mill, SC David H. Wright, II, Chicago Transit Authority, Chicago, IL Douglas Farrow, FAA Liaison Miriam Kloeppel, FRA Liaison Carole Ferguson, FTA Liaison Kevin Dow, APTA Liaison Jeffrey Marcus, NTSB Liaison Rich Sampson, CTAA Liaison Christine Gerencher, TRB Liaison C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M S

TCRP Report 149: Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry was developed as a resource for improving safety-related rule compliance in the public transportation industry. Transit agencies should view the practices as ideas for consideration when looking for ways to improve an existing rules compliance program or when designing a program for a new operation. This report will be of interest to public tran- sit professionals who play a role in a transit agency’s rules compliance program, including the safety director, rules program officials, training director, or supervisors involved in daily oversight of transit operations and maintenance. The critical importance of safety to the public transportation industry makes compliance with safety-related rules a key concern. Despite the industry’s solid safety record, one major accident stemming from rule noncompliance can call into question the safety of the entire industry. While APTA’s adoption of a voluntary standard for rule compliance in 2004 is an important step, more remains to be done. Of particular concern are safety-related rules that are designed to prevent high-consequence events, especially those where the public is affected or where there may be harm to transit agency employees. Safety-related rules apply to employees involved in the operation and maintenance of the transit system. This includes vehicle operators, dispatchers, and other operations person- nel, as well as those who maintain the vehicles and track infrastructure. With few excep- tions, the practices described in this report are applicable to all public transit modes and are scalable to the size of the transit agency. QinetiQ North America conducted the research for TCRP Project A-34. The research began with a comprehensive review of safety-related and organizational research that iden- tified proven approaches for improving rules compliance in public transportation and other safety-critical industries, including the railroad, aviation, trucking, motorcoach, and petro- chemical industries. Using criteria relevant to public transportation, the research team selected best practices for improving safety-related rule compliance. Achieving safety-related rule compliance requires more than monitoring for noncompli- ance and responding to it when it occurs. It requires preventive actions designed to encour- age compliant behavior. This document suggests best practices for all of the elements of a comprehensive approach to safety-related rules compliance. The categories of best prac- tices, which correspond to the elements of a safety-related rules compliance program, are the following: • Screening and Selecting Employees • Training and Testing F O R E W O R D By Dianne S. Schwager Staff Officer Transportation Research Board

• Communication • Monitoring Rules Compliance • Responding to Noncompliance • Safety Management The report also presents best practices for a prototype safety reporting system for public transportation. The safety reporting systems for aviation, railroading, and firefighting as well as two systems in the public transportation industry were investigated and were the basis for the prototype safety reporting system. The focus of this investigation was on under- standing how the safety reporting system was developed, stakeholder concerns during sys- tem design, key features and provisions of each, and experiences to date.

1 Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Intended Report Usage 2 Development of TCRP Report 149 2 How to Use TCRP Report 149 6 Chapter 2 Understanding Rules Noncompliance 6 Framework for Understanding Noncompliance 8 Perceptual Errors 8 Distraction 9 Workload 9 Fatigue 10 Workstation Design 10 Risk Taking 12 Training 14 Incentive and Discipline Programs 17 Measuring Compliance with Leading and Lagging Indicators 17 Safety Culture, Management, and Rules Compliance 21 Chapter 3 Classifying Noncompliance 22 Level I: Employee Noncompliance 27 Level II: Preconditions for Employee Noncompliance 29 Level III: Supervisory Factors 31 Level IV: Organizational and Regulatory Factors 33 Investigating the Causal and Contributing Factors of Safety-Related Rules Noncompliance 39 Chapter 4 Best Practices You Can Use 39 Screening and Selecting Employees 39 Training and Testing 43 Communication 47 Monitoring Rules Compliance 56 Responding to Noncompliance 57 Safety Management 60 Chapter 5 Safety Reporting System Best Practices 60 Scalability of a Safety Reporting System 62 Stakeholder “Buy-In” 62 System Assurances 63 Pilot Implementation 63 Memorandum of Understanding 64 Reporting Process 65 Report Review Team 66 Review Process 66 Disseminating Safety Reporting System Information C O N T E N T S

67 References 70 Abbreviations 72 Appendix A Rules Compliance Practices in Other Industries 83 Appendix B Rules Compliance Practices in the Public Transportation Industry 92 Appendix C Safety Reporting Systems 109 Appendix D Rules Compliance Program Success Stories 115 Appendix E Effectiveness Metrics Note: Many of the photographs, figures, and tables in this report have been converted from color to grayscale for printing. The electronic version of the report (posted on the Web at www.trb.org) retains the color versions.

Next: Chapter 1 - Introduction »
Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 149: Improving Safety-Related Rules Compliance in the Public Transportation Industry identifies potential best practices for all of the elements of a comprehensive approach to safety-related rules compliance.

The categories of best practices, which correspond to the elements of a safety-related rules compliance program, include screening and selecting employees, training and testing, communication, monitoring rules compliance, responding to noncompliance, and safety management.

The report also outlines the features of a prototype safety reporting system for public transportation.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!