National Academies Press: OpenBook

Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems (2011)

Chapter: References for Full-Depth Deck Panel and Decked Bulb-T Study

« Previous: References for PCSSS Study
Page 460
Suggested Citation:"References for Full-Depth Deck Panel and Decked Bulb-T Study ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/17643.
×
Page 460
Page 461
Suggested Citation:"References for Full-Depth Deck Panel and Decked Bulb-T Study ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/17643.
×
Page 461
Page 462
Suggested Citation:"References for Full-Depth Deck Panel and Decked Bulb-T Study ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/17643.
×
Page 462
Page 463
Suggested Citation:"References for Full-Depth Deck Panel and Decked Bulb-T Study ." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/17643.
×
Page 463

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

461 References for Full-Depth Deck Panel and Decked Bulb-T Study AASHTO Designation: PP 34-99 (1998), “Standard Practice for Estimating the Cracking Tendency of Concrete,” American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, June 1998, pp199-202 AASHTO LRFD (2010). “Bridge Design Specifications.” Fourth Edition, American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC American Concrete Institute. (2008). “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary,” ACI Committee 318, Farmington Hills, MI Bentz, E. C., and Collins, M.P. (2000). Response-2000 Reinforced Concrete Sectional Analysis. A software downloaded http://www.ecf.utoronto.ca/~bentz/r2k.htm (2006) Colorado DOT's 2005 Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, CDOT Specification Committee, Denver, CO Dragosavic, M.; van den Beukel, A.; Gijsbers, F.B.J., (1975) “Loop Connections between Precast Concrete Components Loaded in Bending,” Heron, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 3-35 Einea, A., Yehia, S. and Tadros, M. K. (1999) “Lap Splices in Confined Concrete” ACI Structural Journal, 96(6), 947-956 Ghanem, H., Phelan, S., Senadheera, S., and Pruski, K. (2008), “Chloride Ion Transport in Bridge Deck Concrete Under Different Curing Durations”, ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 3, May 1, pp. 218-225 Glass, G.K. and Buenfeld, N.R. (1995), “Chloride threshold levels for corrosion induced deterioration of steel in concrete,” Chloride Penetration into Concrete, International RILEM Workshop, St. Remy- Les Chevreuse Gordon, S. R.; May, I. M., (2005) “Development of In Situ Joints for Pre-Cast Bridge Deck Units,” Bridge Engineering 000, Issue BEO, pp. 1-14

462 Gulyas, R. J. and Champa, J. T. (1997), “Use of Composite Testing for Evaluation of Keyway Grout for Precast Prestressed Bridge Beams,” American Concrete Institute (ACI) Materials Journal, Technical Paper, V. 94, No. 3, May-June, pp. 244-250 Gulyas, R. J., Wirthlin G. J. and Champa, J. T. (1995), “Evaluation of Keyway Grout Test Methods for Precast Concrete Bridges,” Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal, V. 40, No. 1, January-February, pp. 44-57 Issa, M. A., Cyro do V., Abdalla, H., Islam, M. S., and Issa, M. A. (2003), “Performance of Transverse Joint Grout Materials in Full-Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Deck Systems,” Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal, V. 48, no. 4, July-August, pp. 92-103 Lawler, J. S., Connolly, J. D., Krauss, P. D., Tracy, S. L., and Ankenman, B. E. (2007), “Guidelines for Concrete Mixtures Containing Supplementary Cementitious Materials to Enhance Durability of Bridge Decks,” NCHRP Project 18-08A Report 566, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC Li, L., Ma, Z., Griffey, M. E., and Oesterle, R. G. (2010), “Improved Longitudinal Joint Details in Decked Bulb Tees for Accelerated Bridge Construction: Concept Development,” ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 15(3), 327-336 Li, L. (2009), “Development of Continuous Longitudinal Joints and Optimization of Intermediate Diaphragms in Decked Bulb Tee Girder Bridges for Accelerated Construction,” Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville Li, L., Ma, Z., and Oesterle, R. G. (2010a), “Improved Longitudinal Joint Details in Decked Bulb Tees for Accelerated Bridge Construction: Fatigue Evaluation,” ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 15(5) Ma, Z. et al (2007), “Field Test and 3D FE Modeling of Decked Bulb-Tee Bridges,” ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12(3), 306-314 Martin, L.D., and Osborn, A.E.N. (1983), “Connections for Modular Precast Concrete Bridge Decks,” Report No. FHWA/RD-82/106, US DOT, Federal Highway Administration Matsumoto, E., Waggoner, M. C., Sumen G., Kreger, M. E., and Breen, J. E. (2001), “Development of a Precast Bent Cap System,” University of Texas Austin, Project summary report 1748-S, March

463 Menkulasi, F. and Roberts-Wollmann, C. L. (2005), “Behavior of Horizontal Shear Connections for Full- Depth Precast Concrete Bridge Decks on Prestressed I-Girders,” Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal, V. 50, No. 3, May-June, pp. 60-73 Mrinmay B. (1986), “Precast Bridge Deck Design System,” Prestressed/Precast Concrete Institute (PCI) Journal, V. 31, No. 2, March-April, pp. 40-86 Nottingham, D. (1996), “Joints Grouting in Alaskan Bridges and Dock Decks,” Concrete International, V. 18, No. 2, February, pp.45-48 Precast Prestressed Concrete Institute, (2003) “Precast Prestressed Concrete Bridge Design Manual,” Chicago, IL., Sections 9.6 and 9.8 Ralls, M. L., et al. (2005), “Prefabricated Bridge Elements and Systems in Japan and Europe,” FHWA-PL- 05-003, March, 48pp Russell, H. G., Miller, R. A., Ozyildirim, H. C., and Tadros, M. K. (2006), “Compilation and Evaluation of Results from HPC Bridge Projects, Volume 1: Final Report,” Report No. FHWA-HRT-05-056, Federal Highway Administration, October Russell, H. G. and Ozyildirim, H. C. (2006), “Revising high performance concrete classifications” Concrete International, August, pp.43-49 Scholz, D.P., Wallenfelsz, J. A., Lijeron, C., Roberts-Wollmann, C. L., and Davis, R. T. (2007), “Recommendations for the connection between full-depth precast bridge deck panel systems and precast I-beams”, Report No. FHWA/VTRC 07-CR17, June Stanton, J., and Mattock, A.H. (1986) “Load distribution and connection design for precast stemmed multibeam bridge superstructures” NCHRP Rep. 287 Tepke, D. G. and Tikalsky, P. J. (2007), “Best Engineering Practices Guide for Bridge Deck Durability Report” February 24 Thompson, M.K., et al. (2006) “Behavior and Capacity of Headed Reinforcement” ACI Structure Journal, 103(4), 522-530 Treece, R.A.; Jirsa, J. O., (1987) “Bond Strength of Epoxy-Coated Reinforcing Bars,” Reinforced Concrete Research Council-Project 50, PMFSEL Report No. 87-1

464 Zhu, P. and Ma, Z. (2010a), “Selection of Durable Closure Pour Materials for Accelerated Bridge Construction,” ASCE Journal of Bridge Engineering, 15(6)

Next: Appendix A: NCHRP 10-71 Design Guide »
Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems Get This Book
×
 Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 173: Cast-in-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems offers suggested design and construction guidance for and includes five illustrative examples of durable case-in-place reinforced concrete connections for precast deck systems that emulate monolithic construction, considering issues including speed of construction, durability, and fatigue.

A summary of this project was published as NCHRP Research Results Digest 355: Summary of Cast-In-Place Concrete Connections for Precast Deck Systems.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!