This page intentionally left blank.
![]() |
The Future of Scientific Knowledge Discovery in Open Networked Environments: |
Washington, DC, March 10-11, 2011 |
|
Board on Research Data and Information in collaboration with Computer Science and Telecommunications Board National Academy of Sciences |
MARCH 10 AGENDA
Day 1: Workshop
Venable, LLP, 8 West Conference Center
Capitol Room
575 7th Street, NW, Washington, DC
I. Opening Session | ||
Session Chair: John King, University of Michigan | ||
8:30 | I.a Chair’s Welcoming Remarks | John King, University of Michigan |
8:40 | I.b Opening Remarks by the Project Sponsors | Sylvia Spengler and Alan Blatecky, Nat’l Science Foundation |
9:00 | I.c Keynote: An Overview of the State of the Art | Tony Hey, Microsoft Research |
II. Experiences with Developing Open Scientific Knowledge Discovery Environments and Using Them—Case Studies and Lessons Learned | ||
Session Chair: Sara Graves, University of Alabama at Huntsville |
9:30 |
II.a Experiences with developing open scientific knowledge discovery in research and applications |
|
Case studies: | ||
- International online astronomy research |
Alberto Conti, Space Telescope Sci. Institute |
- Integrative genomic analysis: Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, WA (sagebase.org) |
Stephen Friend, Sage Bionetworks | |
- Geoinformatics: Linked Environments for Atmospheric Discovery |
Kelvin Droegemeier, University of Oklahoma | |
10:30 | Break | |
10:50 |
II.b Implications of the three scientific knowledge discovery case studies—the user perspective |
|
- International online astronomy research |
Alyssa Goodman, Harvard University | |
- Integrative genomic analysis |
Joel Dudley, Stanford University | |
- Geoinformatics |
Mohan Ramamurthy, Unidata, UCAR | |
11:50 |
II.c Benefits and drawbacks of the three case studies--Panel Discussion of open scientific knowledge discovery system developers and users Panelists: same 6 speakers as in II.a and II.b, plus session chair |
|
12:30 |
Lunch in Venable cafeteria, 8th floor |
|
III. How Might Open Online Knowledge Discovery Advance the Progress of Science? |
||
13:30 |
III.a Technological factors |
|
- Interoperability, standards, and linked data |
James Hendler, RPI | |
- National technological needs and issues |
Deborah Crawford, Drexel University | |
14:30 |
III.b Socio-cultural, institutional, and organizational factors |
|
- Socio-cultural dimensions |
Clifford Lynch, |
Coalition for Networked Information | ||
- Institutional factors |
Paul Edwards, University of Michigan | |
15:30 | Break | |
15:50 |
III.c Policy and legal factors |
|
- Legal aspects |
Michael Madison, University of Pittsburgh School of Law | |
- Policy Issues |
Gregory Jackson, EDUCAUSE | |
16:50 |
III.d How can we tell? What needs to be known and studied to improve potential for success? Session Chair: Fran Berman, RPI |
|
- Government perspective |
Walter Warnick, Office of S&T Information, Department of Energy | |
- Academic perspective |
Victoria Stodden, Columbia University Law School | |
17:50 | Concluding Remarks | John King, University of Michigan |
17:55 | Adjourn | |
Closed Session | ||
18:15 |
Reception and working dinner for committee and speakers |
![]() |
The Future of Scientific Knowledge Discovery in Open Networked Environments: |
Washington, DC, March 10-11, 2011 |
|
Board on Research Data and Information in collaboration with Computer Science and Telecommunications Board National Academy of Sciences |
MARCH 11 AGENDA
Day 2: Workshop
National Academy of Sciences Keck Center
Room 100
500 Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC
I. Recap of Symposium Results and Discussion of Future Issues |
|
8:45 |
I.a Summary of Opportunities to Automated Scientific Knowledge Discovery in Open Networked Environments |
- Discussion to validate results from the symposium and identify issues in next 5-10 years |
|
9:45 |
1.b Summary of the Barriers |
- Discussion to validate results from the symposium and identify issues in next 5-10 years |
|
10:45 |
Coffee Break |
11:00 |
1.c Summary of Techniques and Methods for Development and Study of Automated Scientific Knowledge Discovery |
- Discussion to validate results from the symposium and identify issues in next 5-10 years |
|
12:00 |
Lunch in the Keck cafeteria |
13:00 |
II. Range of Options for Further Research |
Based on the results obtained in response to the preceding discussions, define a range of options that can be used by the sponsors of the project, as well as other similar organizations, to obtain and promote a better understanding of the computer-mediated scientific knowledge discovery processes and mechanisms for openly available data and information online across the scientific domains. The objective of defining these options is to improve the activities of the sponsors (and other similar |
organizations) and the activities of researchers that they fund externally in this emerging research area. |
|
- Discussion |
|
15:30 |
End of Meeting |
This page intentionally left blank.