National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: COST CONSIDERATIONS
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS." National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 1977. Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18431.
×
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS." National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 1977. Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18431.
×
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS." National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 1977. Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18431.
×
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"CONCLUSIONS." National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering. 1977. Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18431.
×
Page 50

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

CONCLUSIONS Although the record of safety for offshore platforms has been excellent, the panel finds that the proposed third- party verification program for new offshore platforms will enhance the orderly extension of DCS oil and gas activities in an expeditious and efficient way by assuring the public and the Congress of the integrity of the fixed offshore platforms. A secondary benefit will be a more uniform application of current technology. Specific conclusions follow: 0 A commitment by the USGS for sufficient, qualified personnel is required for initial and later implementation of the program. 0 A transition period is needed during which time the verification procedure is established in order to avoid dis- ruption of the present orderly develop- ment of the OCS and to utilize existing technical experitise fully. 0 While a verification system can provide documentation that design, fabrication, installation, inspection, and maintenance is in compliance with applicable criteria, guides, specifications, and codes, it can reduce, but not entirely eliminate, the possibility that a structural failure may result from conditions caused by the environment or man. 0 An ineffective or poorly executed or overly detailed and rigid verification system can introduce inordinate delays that may disrupt the orderly develop- ment of energy resources on the OCS, and may even increase the probability of accidents. 0 There are four major functions of a verification system to assure that performance criteria are met: systems 47

43 management; establishment of environ- mental conditions, design and con- struction procedures; promulgation of recommended practices for design and construction; and implementation of the verification procedures. No organization or agency, as presently constituted, is entirely suitable for implementation of the total verification system or for providing the systems management function. The management of verification needs to reside in the USGS and not be delegated; the environmental design conditions and recommended practices for design and construction should be established by the USGS (utilizing input from industry, professional societies, universities, individual experts, and public groups). The implementation of verification procedures should be delegated to independent third parties nominated by the operator and approved by the USGS within appropriate guide- lines. The presently available technology (design procedures, standards, codes, and environmental data) is capable of supporting the initiation of an adequate verification system for the U.S. OCS platform locations. However, there are two critical factors in implementing the proposed third-party verification program: (a) Consolidation and documentation, on a continuing basis, of: — environmental design conditions, — recommended practices for design and construction, — qualifications for third-party personnel, and — verification implementation procedures.

49 (b) The availability of personnel with technical capability and experience in offshore practice to support the associated effort, both in government and industry. Immediate requirements for the initiation and operation of a verification system are: ...adequate staffing in the USGS with qualified personnel to carry out the management function; ...establishment of a board of consul- tants. An adequate transition period is considered essential. The fully independent verifica- tion system should not be initiated until the USGS has the capability to manage it, and the associated policy, codes, specifications, and procedures needed for implementation of the system. In view of the difficulties likely to be encountered as offshore technology is applied in harsher environments, the current level of onoging research and • development in industry and government must be sustained and preferably raised to maintain and enhance the status of the technology. > The USGS verification personnel must be encouraged to participate in activities that will result in maintaining and up- dating their technical competence. Government personnel training through a cooperative program within the industry, such as is practiced by the U.S. Coast Guard and several other agencies, as well as specialized courses from universities having strong curricula in offshore struc- ture engineering, can help maintain technical proficiency. In addition, the USGS personnel should be encouraged to participate in professional society activities and conferences in the U.S. and overseas.

50 The adequacy of the USGS statutory basis with respect to human safety on structures which may remain manned during storms needs clarification.

Next: RECOMMENDATIONS »
Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems Get This Book
×
 Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

America's demand for energy is now growing at 2.5 percent a year, according to the Federal Energy Administration, and its dependence on foreign oil is increasing rapidly—from 26 percent before the 1973 oil embargo to 46 percent in February 1977. One important source of new oil and gas reserves lie off the coasts of the U.S. This offshore region, only about 2 percent of which has been opened for production, provided 16.4 percent of the nation's oil and 14 percent of its natural gas in 1975, and according to the predictions of the American Petroleum Institute by 1985 the yield could double.

In the near future, exploration and production will be extended from the principal sites of present offshore oil and gas reserves in the Gulf of Mexico and the offshore Southern California to the Gulf of Alaska and the Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, where storm, seismic, and geological conditions are different. The projected increase in such oil and gas recovery from the U.S. outer continental shelf has intensified public and government concerns about conserving vital resources, protecting the environment, and safeguarding human life.

Verification of Fixed Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms: An Analysis of Need, Scope, and Alternative Verification Systems reviews the practices in the verification of the structural adequacy of fixed offshore oil and gas platforms—that is, the production facilities permanently fixed to the seabed by pilings, spread footings, and other means. This book also reviews the need for establishing a third-party verification procedure and if deemed necessary, how that procedure might operate. This report recommends that a third-party verification system should be implemented by the United States Geological Survey for future production platforms in all U.S. waters, and discusses essential elements for the system, with a description of how third-party verification might operate.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!