National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

Developing a
Framework for
Measuring
Community
Resilience

_________________________

SUMMARY OF A WORKSHOP

Dominic A. Brose, Rapporteur

Committee on Measures of Community Resilience:
From Lessons Learned to Lessons Applied

Resilient America Roundtable

Policy and Global Affairs Division

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
                      OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS    500 Fifth Street, N.W.    Washington, D.C. 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

This summary report and the workshop on which it was based were supported by the Federal Emergency Management Agency under contract HSFE40-14-C-006. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsor that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number: 13: 978-0-309-34738-9
International Standard Book Number: 10: 0-309-34738-6

Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Room 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2015 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

Committee on Measures of Community Resilience

Susan L. Cutter (Chair), Carolina Distinguished Professor of Geography, University of South Carolina and Director, Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute

Gerald E. Galloway, Jr. (NAE), Glenn L. Martin Institute Professor of Engineering and Affiliate Professor of Public Policy, University of Maryland

Robert Kolasky, Director, Strategy and Policy, Department of Homeland Security, Office of Infrastructure Protection

Linda Langston, Linn County (Iowa) Board of Supervisors

Richard Reed, Senior Vice President, Disaster Cycle Services, American Red Cross

Jacqueline Snelling, Senior Policy Advisor to the Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Individual and Community Preparedness Division

Staff

Lauren Alexander Augustine, Director, Program on Risk, Resilience, and Extreme Events

Elizabeth A. Eide, Director, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources

Sherrie Forrest, Program Officer, Program on Risk, Resilience, and Extreme Events

John H. Brown, Jr., Program and Administrative Manager, Program on Risk, Resilience, and Extreme Events

Jamie Biglow, Senior Program Assistant, Program on Risk, Resilience, and Extreme Events

Eric J. Edkin, Senior Program Assistant, Board on Earth Sciences and Resources

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

Preface and Acknowledgments

In 2012, the National Research Council convened a committee of experts to address the importance of resilience, discuss different challenges and approaches for building resilience, and outline steps for implementing resilience efforts in communities and within government. The committee’s report Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative provided a central reference for the current state of the nation’s resilience to disasters, and presents ways in which the nation can move forward on a path toward greater resilience.1 The report, sponsored by eight federal agencies and a community resilience organization, was national in scope and extended to stakeholders beyond the Washington, D.C. governmental community to recognize that experiential information necessary to understand national resilience lies in communities across the United States. On September 5, 2014 the National Research Council convened a one-day workshop in Washington, D.C. that built upon the report’s recommendation to develop a framework of resilience measures and indicators to support communities in increasing their resilience.

This report is a summary of the one-day workshop, which consisted of a keynote address and two panel sessions in the morning, and afternoon breakout sessions that began the discussion on how to develop a framework of resilience measures.

This workshop summary report has been prepared by the workshop rapporteur as a factual summary of what occurred at the workshop. The statements made are those of the rapporteur and do not necessarily represent positions of the workshop participants as a whole, the planning committee, or the National Research Council. This workshop summary is the result of the efforts and collaboration among several organizations and individuals. The workshop’s success would not have been possible without the invaluable contributions by the many speakers, panelists, moderators, and other participants who donated their time and expertise to inform these discussions. We would like to say a special thanks to Susan Cutter, Gerald Galloway, Roy Wright, Thomas de Lannoy, Michael Szönyi, Chuck Wemple, Arrietta Chakos, Sandi Fowler, Clay Stamp, Miriam Chion, Laura Cabiness, John Carberry, Lori Peek, Bill Solecki, Eric Tate, and Julie Hassett for their insightful presentations and discussion. We wish to also extend a sincere thanks to each member of the planning committee for their contributions in scoping, developing, and carrying out this project, Susan Cutter, chair, Gerald Galloway, Bob Kolasky, Richard Reed, Linda Langston, and Jacqueline Snelling.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise in accordance with procedures approved by the National Academies’ Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for quality and objectivity. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the process.

We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: Erwann Michel-Kerjan, University of Pennsylvania; Chris Poland, Chris D Poland Consulting Engineer; Clay Stamp, Talbot County Government; Monica Schoch-Spana, University of Pittsburgh; and Gene Whitney, Independent Consultant.

______________

1National Research Council (NRC). 2012. Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative. The National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the content of the report, nor did they see the final draft before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Mary Lou Zoback, Stanford University. Appointed by the National Academies, she was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the rapporteur and the institution.

The Resilient America Roundtable2 will use the workshop ideas as it develops a framework of resilience measures/indicators. The framework can help communities better understand their progress towards building resilience. The participants’ input and feedback from the plenary and the breakout sessions will be included in that framework and shared with the pilot communities and partner communities participating in the Resilient America program. Over the next two years, we will continue to receive additional input from our partners, through activities such as meetings, workshops, and webinars, and we will test the framework in our pilot communities. The overarching goal is to develop a framework that is applicable to many communities for measuring or tracking their efforts for building resilience.

Lauren Alexander Augustine, Director
Program on Risk, Resilience, and Extreme Events

______________

2Further information on the Resilient America Roundtable can be found at: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/resilientamerica/. For more information on this workshop and to view the plenary discussions of the workshop, please visit: http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/ResilientAmerica/PGA_152193.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/20672.
×
Page R10
Next: 1 Introduction »
Developing a Framework for Measuring Community Resilience: Summary of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $42.00 Buy Ebook | $33.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The 2012 National Research Council report Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative highlighted the challenges of increasing national resilience in the United States. One finding of the report was that "without numerical means of assessing resilience, it would be impossible to identify the priority needs for improvement, to monitor changes, to show that resilience had improved, or to compare the benefits of increasing resilience with the associated costs." Although measuring resilience is a challenge, metrics and indicators to evaluate progress, and the data necessary to establish the metric, are critical for helping communities to clarify and formalize what the concept of resilience means for them, and to support efforts to develop and prioritize resilience investments. One of the recommendations from the 2012 report stated that government entities at federal, state, and local levels and professional organizations should partner to help develop a framework for communities to adapt to their circumstances and begin to track their progress toward increasing resilience.

To build upon this recommendation and begin to help communities formulate such a framework, the Resilient America Roundtable of the National Academies convened the workshop Measures of Community Resilience: From Lessons Learned to Lessons Applied on September 5, 2014 in Washington, D.C. The workshop's overarching objective was to begin to develop a framework of measures and indicators that could support community efforts to increase their resilience. The framework will be further developed through feedback and testing in pilot and other partner communities that are working with the Resilient America Roundtable. This report is a summary of the one-day workshop, which consisted of a keynote address and two panel sessions in the morning and afternoon breakout sessions that began the discussion on how to develop a framework of resilience measures.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!