National Academies Press: OpenBook

Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities (2015)

Chapter: Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates

« Previous: Appendix A: Usability Analysis: Tract-Level 2008-2012 ACS Data
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

Appendix B

Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates

This appendix examines the magnitude of discrepancies between the 2010 census and 2008-2010 American Community Survey (ACS) counts for age-sex strata in a systematic selection of communities: Fort Wayne, Indiana; Sterling Heights, Michigan; San Clemente, California; Valparaiso, Indiana; Sunnyside, Washington; Rayne, Louisiana; and Ely, Nevada. Table B-1 shows the raw differences and Table B-2 shows the percentage differences. Many of the communities examined are the size of an average census tract. In many instances, the 2008-2012 ACS 5-year period estimates do not approximate the 2010 census results when 5-year age groups by sex are compared, and some comparisons include differences by factors as large as two.

For example, in Ely, Nevada (population 4,255), the ACS reported 201 females aged 30-34 while the census reported 103, a 95 percent difference. For males aged 15-19 years, the ACS reported 263 residents while the census reported 168, a 57 percent difference. For Rayne, Louisiana (population 7,953), the female population aged 35-39 years was reported in the ACS as 437 and in the census as 258; for all people aged 40-44, the ACS reported 153, and the census reported 257. Though not included in the table, similar differences appear in a sample of census tracts for the Bronx as well.

These problems are not confined to very small areas. For San Clemente, California (population 63,522), the number of females aged 85 and older in the ACS was 564, compared with 777 in the census, a 27 percent difference. For Fort Wayne, Indiana (population 253,691), the ACS reported

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

2,206 males aged 80-84, and the census reported 1,862, a 19 percent difference. The ACS also reported 1,253 males aged 85 and older, and the census reported 1,450, a 14 percent difference. That is, the differences are found for both tract and city estimates for geographic areas that are smaller than the county level. Even with the difference in reference periods (point-in-time census estimates and 2008-2012 ACS estimates), differences of this magnitude in 5-year age groups are larger than what one would reasonably expect.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

TABLE B-1 Differences Between 2010 Census Counts and ACS 2008-2012 Population Estimates, by Sex and 5-Year Cohorts: Seven Cities

Population, by Sex and Age Cohorts Fort Wayne, Indiana Sterling Heights, Michigan San Clemente, California Valparaiso, Indiana Sunnyside, Washington Rayne, Louisiana Ely, Nevada
Census Total Population 253,691 129,699 63,522 31,730 15,858 7,953 4,255
Male 666 –812 1,036 –147 86 –25 96

Under 5 years

–33 –355 1 95 –177 212 3

5 to 9 years

347 –359 –448 62 368 –118 41

10 to 14 years

–169 174 368 –96 94 –43 55

15 to 19 years

–205 18 295 45 –153 –32 –95

20 to 24 years

95 –18 252 187 –147 –71 42

25 to 29 years

161 –321 330 90 78 58 37

30 to 34 years

98 182 258 105 248 –26 43

35 to 39 years

499 347 –325 –16 –141 –71 –24

40 to 44 years

–193 –455 114 81 34 –410 –9

45 to 49 years

458 –49 218 44 104 22 9

50 to 54 years

–82 114 155 –174 –43 –32 –12

55 to 59 years

243 –150 83 –11 –40 –22 8

60 to 64 years

–460 –16 34 –27 –93 57 6

65 to 69 years

143 16 –54 84 –90 38 12

70 to 74 years

–41 65 –155 –165 33 –16 –5

75 to 79 years

–48 27 –82 17 58 50 36

80 to 84 years

–344 –144 25 12 22 –10 –33

85 years and older

197 112 –33 197 –69 20 –18
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Population, by Sex and Age Cohorts Fort Wayne, Indiana Sterling Heights, Michigan San Clemente, California Valparaiso, Indiana Sunnyside, Washington Rayne, Louisiana Ely, Nevada
Female –592 624 –701 106 –3 6 –77

Under 5 years

–203 539 –175 –69 157 65 9

5 to 9 years

245 –252 –171 21 73 88 34

10 to 14 years

–214 343 –398 –103 9 91 –24

15 to 19 years

305 86 436 321 –11 –47 –83

20 to 24 years

89 –165 –70 –49 –188 –49 60

25 to 29 years

–318 –142 288 –169 185 41 39

30 to 34 years

–27 –288 –147 105 8 14 –98

35 to 39 years

93 –54 –415 46 123 –179 35

40 to 44 years

130 131 –289 120 –37 104 –98

45 to 49 years

65 203 510 –150 –198 9 26

50 to 54 years

–171 119 –207 55 70 –32 –15

55 to 59 years

–2 –95 –159 –10 –24 –7 7

60 to 64 years

–82 224 –117 –81 –85 18 7

65 to 69 years

–59 76 –89 –11 1 –16 16

70 to 74 years

–134 –88 –54 –65 –42 –42 39

75 to 79 years

–56 –73 155 44 –74 2 20

80 to 84 years

–114 –4 –12 86 –36 26 –48

85 years and older

–139 64 213 0 66 –80 –3
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Summary of 5-Year Cohorts

Maximum

499 539 510 321 368 212 60

Minimum

–460 –455 –448 –174 –198 –179 –98

Percentage of county population

71.4 15.4 2.1 19.3 6.5 12.9 42.4

Sampling rate

7.8 7.5 6.3 7.2 4.9 6.3 9.8

Unweighted sample size of population

19,764 9,748 3,981 2,276 775 499 415
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×

TABLE B-2 Percentage Differences Between 2010 Census Counts and ACS 2008-2012 Population Estimates, by Sex and 5-Year Cohorts: Seven Cities

Population, by Sex and Age Cohorts Fort Wayne, Indiana Sterling Heights, Michigan San Clemente, California Valparaiso, Indiana Sunnyside, Washington Rayne, Louisiana Ely, Nevada
Total Population 0.0 –0.1 0.5 1.2 0.5 –0.2 4.4
Male 0.5 –1.3 3.2 1.2 1.1 –0.7 2.1

Under 5 years

–0.3 –9.7 0.0 –15.2 –16.9 72.9 35.0

5 to 9 years

3.7 –9.2 –19.5 9.5 42.2 –35.8 43.0

10 to 14 years

–1.8 4.1 17.0 6.5 11.9 –15.0 –56.5

15 to 19 years

–2.2 0.4 13.6 –7.5 –20.1 –10.7 34.4

20 to 24 years

1.1 –0.4 13.1 2.5 –22.2 –27.5 27.4

25 to 29 years

1.8 –8.0 16.7 13.6 13.1 25.7 38.7

30 to 34 years

1.1 4.6 15.3 8.1 43.2 –13.3 –22.4

35 to 39 years

6.2 8.3 –15.3 10.3 –29.6 –37.0 –7.7

40 to 44 years

–2.5 –10.5 4.7 –1.8 8.1 –17.2 5.5

45 to 49 years

5.5 –1.0 8.5 8.7 25.9 7.9 –6.9

50 to 54 years

–1.0 2.4 6.0 4.7 –13.0 –11.6 4.2

55 to 59 years

3.2 –3.5 3.9 –19.9 –14.7 –9.9 4.2

60 to 64 years

–7.7 –0.4 1.9 –1.5 –45.4 26.9 11.4

65 to 69 years

3.6 0.5 –4.2 –6.2 –55.2 25.9 –5.8

70 to 74 years

–1.5 3.2 –17.2 25.5 28.7 –13.8 50.7

75 to 79 years

–2.1 1.9 –12.1 –54.6 61.7 50.5 –70.2

80 to 84 years

–18.5 –13.7 4.7 6.5 28.9 –16.4 –51.4

85 years and older

13.6 12.5 –7.0 4.7 –78.4 44.4 –3.7
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Female –0.5 0.9 –2.2 1.2 0.0 0.1 6.2

Under 5 years

–2.1 15.5 –9.1 11.6 16.4 23.1 27.6

5 to 9 years

2.7 –6.9 –8.0 –7.7 9.0 31.4 –18.2

10 to 14 years

–2.4 8.8 –18.8 2.3 1.2 33.3 –64.3

15 to 19 years

3.3 2.1 22.0 –8.6 –1.6 –17.2 47.6

20 to 24 years

0.9 –4.1 –4.4 16.9 –31.2 –21.0 35.1

25 to 29 years

–3.4 –3.4 16.6 –4.0 29.3 14.8 –95.1

30 to 34 years

–0.3 –7.2 –8.3 –16.7 1.4 6.5 37.2

35 to 39 years

1.1 –1.3 –18.5 10.7 25.9 –69.4 –77.8

40 to 44 years

1.7 2.9 –11.5 5.1 –8.4 40.5 16.9

45 to 49 years

0.8 4.0 19.6 12.6 –52.4 3.0 –8.5

50 to 54 years

–1.9 2.3 –8.5 –14.2 20.8 –10.7 4.5

55 to 59 years

0.0 –2.0 –7.4 5.8 –8.7 –2.7 5.4

60 to 64 years

–1.2 5.3 –6.4 –1.2 –38.6 7.3 15.1

65 to 69 years

–1.2 2.3 –7.1 –14.9 0.5 –7.9 44.3

70 to 74 years

–3.7 –3.7 –5.3 –2.1 –24.3 –25.1 29.0

75 to 79 years

–1.7 –3.9 19.4 –15.1 –64.3 1.5 –92.3

80 to 84 years

–3.8 –0.2 –1.7 9.0 –28.3 23.4 –4.2

85 years and older

–4.1 3.0 27.4 14.0 36.9 –78.4 0.0
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Population, by Sex and Age Cohorts Fort Wayne, Indiana Sterling Heights, Michigan San Clemente, California Valparaiso, Indiana Sunnyside, Washington Rayne, Louisiana Ely, Nevada
Summary of 5-Year Cohorts

Maximum

13.6 15.5 27.4 25.5 61.7 72.9 50.7

Minimum

–18.5 –13.7 –19.5 –54.6 –78.4 –78.4 –95.1

Mean absolute difference

3.1 4.7 10.9 10.3 25.9 23.8 30.0
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 129
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 131
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 132
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 133
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 134
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 135
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Examples of Differences Between Census Counts and ACS Population Estimates." National Research Council. 2015. Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21653.
×
Page 136
Next: Appendix C: Data Quality Filtering Rates, 1-Year ACS Data, 2012 »
Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities Get This Book
×
 Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey: Challenges, Tradeoffs, and Opportunities
Buy Paperback | $56.00 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The American Community Survey (ACS) was conceptualized as a replacement to the census long form, which collected detailed population and housing data from a sample of the U.S. population, once a decade, as part of the decennial census operations. The long form was traditionally the main source of socio-economic information for areas below the national level. The data provided for small areas, such as counties, municipalities, and neighborhoods is what made the long form unique, and what makes the ACS unique today. Since the successful transition from the decennial long form in 2005, the ACS has become an invaluable resource for many stakeholders, particularly for meeting national and state level data needs. However, due to inadequate sample sizes, a major challenge for the survey is producing reliable estimates for smaller geographic areas, which is a concern because of the unique role fulfilled by the long form, and now the ACS, of providing data with a geographic granularity that no other federal survey could provide. In addition to the primary challenge associated with the reliability of the estimates, this is also a good time to assess other aspects of the survey in order to identify opportunities for refinement based on the experience of the first few years.

Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey provides input on ways of improving the ACS, focusing on two priority areas: identifying methods that could improve the quality of the data available for small areas, and suggesting changes that would increase the survey's efficiency in responding to new data needs. This report considers changes that the ACS office should consider over the course of the next few years in order to further improve the ACS data. The recommendations of Realizing the Potential of the American Community Survey will help the Census Bureau improve performance in several areas, which may ultimately lead to improved data products as the survey enters its next decade.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!