National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions (2015)

Chapter: 5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps

« Previous: 4 Human Spaceflight
Suggested Citation:"5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21816.
×

5

Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps

Figure 47 of the SR-SAG2 report plots the global distribution of confirmed and unconfirmed recurring slope lineae (RSL) with 50 km buffer zones around them (Figure 5.1). These buffer zones, the report argues, “provide for adequate precautions for spacecraft landings in their proximity, including an allowance for the possibility of an off-target landing (Figure 47)” (p. 943 of the SR-SAG2 report). This could be misinterpreted in the sense that a landing outside the areas shown in Figure 47 would definitely avoid RSL-related Uncertain or Special Regions, although the review committee is aware that this is certainly not the intention of the authors of the SR-SAG2 report. As RSL studies are a very active field of Mars research, it is expected that the number of fully and partially confirmed RSL will increase from now to the near future, just as it has increased from their first detection (McEwen et al. 2011) up to now (Dundas et al. 2015). Hence, the map displayed in Figure 47 represents only a snapshot in time and will probably be outdated soon. While it is helpful to provide a general overview of regions that may be favorable for the formation of RSL, it is of limited use in the identification of Uncertain or Special Regions. The same applies to other maps that also may be updated soon (e.g., Figures 45 and 46 of the SR-SAG2 report; see Figure 5.2).

Another potential source of misinterpretation related to the use of maps in Special Region studies is the issue of scale. Identification of a Special Region needs a multiscale approach (see also the discussion in Chapter 2, “Detectability of Potential Small Scale Microbial Habitats,” and thus, as far as missions to Mars are concerned, conservatism demands that each landing ellipse be scrutinized on a case-by-case basis. Maps, which come necessarily at a fixed scale, can only provide information at that scale and are, therefore, generalizations. The review committee envisages that the case-by-case evaluation will follow a process analogous to that used to certify the landing sites for Schiaparelli—the entry, descent, and landing demonstrator on ESA’s ExoMars 2016—and for NASA’s InSight lander. In the case of Schiaparelli, for example, all available data for the proposed site in Meridiani Planum were analyzed to determine if Special Regions existed within the landing ellipse. In particular, all HiRISE images were inspected for the possible presence of RSL.

In general, the review committee contends that the use of maps to delineate regions with a lower or higher probability to host Special Regions is most useful if the maps are accompanied by cautionary remarks on their limitations. Maps that illustrate the distribution of specific relevant landforms or other surface features can only represent the current (and incomplete) state of knowledge for a specific time—knowledge that will certainly be subject to change or be updated as new information is obtained.

Suggested Citation:"5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21816.
×

images

FIGURE 5.1 Locations of recurring slope lineae (RSL) on Mars, identified at the time of publication. Red circles indicate confirmed RSL, while yellow triangles represent partially confirmed RSL. RSL require high-resolution and time-series observations for initial identification. They may be the most significant candidate sites for Mars Special Regions. SOURCE: SR-SAG2 report (Rummel et al. 2014, Figure 47); courtesy of the Second MEPAG Special Regions Science Analysis Group.

images

FIGURE 5.2 Map depicting geological features relevant to characterizing Special Regions on Mars. Indicated units describe shallow ground ice or potential transient surface water in terms of their depth below the surface and spatial continuity. The map base is MOLA digital elevation model of Mars (~463 m/pixel; Neumann et al. 2001) in simple cylindrical projection. Purple is low in elevation, and grey is higher elevation. Red and blue lines delineating regions are approximately 50 km in width. SOURCE: SR-SAG2 report (Rummel et al. 2014, Figure 45); courtesy of the Second MEPAG Special Regions Science Analysis Group.

Suggested Citation:"5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21816.
×

Recommendation: Maps should only be used to illustrate the general concept of Special Regions and should not be used to delineate their exact location. Uncertain Regions in planned landing ellipses should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis as part of the site selection process. The goal of such an evaluation is to determine whether or not the landing ellipse contains water, ice, or subsurface discontinuities with a potential to contain hydrated minerals that could be accessed via a landing malfunction or by the operation of subsurface-penetrating devices (e.g., drills). As an example, landing site analysis will likely include a geological analysis, drawing on the Mars geologic literature (covering a broad range of relevant topics, including ground truth at previous lander locations) as well as orbital imaging, infrared spectroscopy, gamma-ray spectroscopy, and ground-penetrating radar sounding of the specific region.

Suggested Citation:"5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21816.
×
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21816.
×
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"5 Generalization of Special Regions and the Utility of Maps." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21816.
×
Page 30
Next: 6 Summary »
Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Planetary protection is a guiding principle in the design of an interplanetary mission, aiming to prevent biological contamination of both the target celestial body and the Earth. The protection of high-priority science goals, the search for life and the understanding of the Martian organic environment may be compromised if Earth microbes carried by spacecraft are grown and spread on Mars. This has led to the definition of Special Regions on Mars where strict planetary protection measures have to be applied before a spacecraft can enter these areas.

At NASA's request, the community-based Mars Exploration Program Analysis Group (MEPAG) established the Special Regions Science Analysis Group (SR-SAG2) in October 2013 to examine the quantitative definition of a Special Region and proposed modifications to it, as necessary, based upon the latest scientific results. Review of the MEPAG Report on Mars Special Regions reviews the conclusions and recommendations contained in MEPAG's SR-SAG2 report and assesses their consistency with current understanding of both the Martian environment and the physical and chemical limits for the survival and propagation of microbial and other life on Earth. This report provides recommendations for an update of the planetary protection requirements for Mars Special Regions.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!