National Academies Press: OpenBook

Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes (2003)

Chapter: Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies

« Previous: Appendix A: Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and OECD Guidelines
Page 16
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 16
Page 17
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 17
Page 18
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 18
Page 19
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 19
Page 20
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 20
Page 21
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 21
Page 22
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 22
Page 23
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 23
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 24
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 25
Page 26
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 26
Page 27
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 27
Page 28
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 28
Page 29
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 29
Page 30
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 30
Page 31
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 31
Page 32
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 32
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 33
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 34
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22058.
×
Page 35

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

B-1 Appendix B: State Environmental Laws, Regulations and Policies State Law/Reg/Policy Description Alabama Code of Alabama Section 11-85-40 Requires planning agencies to perform comprehensive advisory planning and research and other activities related thereto for urban areas and regions or areas where rapid urbanization has occurred or is expected to occur. “Comprehensive advisory planning” is defined as: “comprehensive studies of the present and future development of the land economics and land policies of a region” including “preparation, as a guide for long-range development, of advisory general physical plans with respect to the pattern and intensity of land use and the provision of public facilities, including transportation facilities, together with long-range fiscal plans for such development.” 17 AAC 05.125. Statewide Transportation Planning Objectives One of the statewide transportation planning objectives is to further "the economic vitality of the state". When formulating goals and objectives in the statewide transportation plan, and the strategies to implement those goals and objectives, the Alaska DOT&PF must "consider the concerns of interested parties and minimize any adverse environmental, economic or social impact of the goals and objectives contained within the plan upon any segment of the population." 17 AAC 05.175. Project Needs List And Evaluation To be put on the "Needs List" for the STIP, projects will be evaluated on a set of criteria. For rural and urban streets, the criteria includes environmental factors such as economic benefits resulting from the project, the project's effect on health and quality of life, and environmental approval readiness. Additional criteria for remote roads and trails includes "whether the project improves access to water sources, landfills, sewage lagoons, honey bucket sites, health care, airports, subsistence sites, or a river and the ocean". Similar criteria exist for evaluating transit projects, TRAAK projects, and ITS projects. Alaska 17 AAC 05.135, 05.140, 05.145. Public Participation in the Statewide Transportation Planning Process, Methods for Receiving Public Input, and Public Review of the Draft Plan This section of the Alaska Administrative Code establishes guidelines for including public participation in the statewide transportation planning process.

B-2 Governor Jane Dee Hull issued this Executive Order which established the Governor’s Transportation Vision 21 Task Force to serve the purpose of “evaluating current practices, resources and infrastructures, and recommending and prioritizing the goals, funding, and specific plans that will establish a vision for transportation in Arizona for the 21st century.” Executive Order 99-2 as Amended by Executive Order 2000-16: Governor’s Transportation Vision 21 Task Force The Task Force recommended the adoption of performance based planning and programming and coordinating land use planning and transportation planning. However, to date, no mechanisms have been identified to coordinate land use and transportation. Guidance on Title VI and Environmental Justice This discussion paper was prepared to provide an overview of Title VI and Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice as they relate to the environmental planning process. It provides information on procedures to ensure that Title VI and EO 12898 factors are adequately considered in the planning process through utilization of public involvement and a systematic interdisciplinary approach to the identification and evaluation of alternatives, as well as by continuing to identify, avoid, minimize and mitigate adverse impacts. Arizona Growing Smarter Act of 1998 and Growing Smarter Plus Act of 2000 Growing Smarter and Growing Smarter Plus are closely intertwined, as the Plus legislation included amendments to the original Act. Governor Jane Hull signed into law both of these acts, which require cities and counties to address issues associated with urban growth and development. The general plan required by these acts must include the elements of land use and circulation and may include (depending on the city size) the elements of open space; growth area; environmental planning; cost of development; water resources; conservation; recreation; public buildings; public services and facilities; housing; conservation, rehabilitation, and redevelopment; safety; and bicycling. ADOT helps fund the development of and reviews the transportation component of the cities' and counties' General Plans. Arkansas Arkansas Code 21-1-102 The transportation policy of the state of Arkansas includes enhancing “the social and economic well-being of the citizenry of the state.” Senate Bill 45, Chapter 622, Statutes 1997 This bill requires the Department of Transportation to develop guidelines including objective criteria for measuring system performance and cost-effectiveness of candidate projects for placement in the TIP. California 1998 California Transportation Plan Transportation System Performance Measures Report The Transportation System Performance Measures Report identifies performance measures to aid in the decision making process, including environmental quality, equity, and economic well-being.

B-3 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code 21000 et. seq.) The Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and any subsequent revisions, amendments or updates to the plan must be in compliance with CEQA (Public Resources Code 21002.1). A Program or Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is typically prepared for the RTP. An EIR must (Public Resources Code 21080(d)) be prepared if the proposed action will have a significant effect on the environment. In the EIR, consideration of alternatives that would avoid or reduce significant environmental effects is required. A Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration may be prepared if no significant environmental impacts are identified, or if all identified potentially significant impacts will be mitigated below the level of significance. The CEQA document must address specific issues, the number and scope of which are determined by the potential environmental impacts. Congestion Management Plans are also subject to CEQA. Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 - California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines These guidelines provide comprehensive CEQA guidance in the areas of planning, programming, and project development. California, cont’d California Clean Air Act The California Clean Air Act (Health and Safety Code 40717) requires air quality plans to include reasonable transportation control measures. Performance standards for serious areas and additional standards for severe areas are specified. 43-1-1103 C.R.S. Requires a 20-year transportation plan for each transportation planning region that includes the metropolitan area of a metropolitan planning organization. This plan should include “expected environmental, social, and economic impacts of the recommendations contained in the transportation plan, including an objective evaluation of the full range of reasonable transportation alternatives, including traffic system management options, travel demand management strategies and other transportation modes, as well as improvements to the existing facilities and new facilities, in order to provide for the transportation and environmental needs of the area in a safe and efficient manner.” [43-1-1103(1)(d) C.R.S.] 43-1-106 C.R.S. A transportation commission is created in Colorado Revised Statutes 43-1-106. One duty of the commission is “to assure that the preservation and enhancement of Colorado's environment, safety, mobility, and economics be considered in the planning, selection, construction, and operation of all transportation projects in Colorado.” [43-1-106(8)(b) C.R.S.] Colorado Colorado Transportation Commission Environmental Policy Statement The Environmental Policy states that "CDOT will promote a transportation system that is environmentally responsible and encourages preservation of the natural and enhancement of the created environment for current and future generations." Also states that social, economic, and environmental concerns will be incorporated into the planning of the state's existing and future transportation system.

B-4 Connecticut General Statutes 13b-15 (Master Transportation Plan) States that “the commissioner shall develop and revise biennially a comprehensive, long-range, master transportation plan designed to fulfill the present and future needs of the state and to assure the development and maintenance of an adequate, safe and efficient transportation system.” This plan is intended to provide the Administration, General Assembly, local elected officials, and members of the general public with an understanding of the projects and programs that the Department will be pursuing over the next 10 years. In this plan, the commissioner of ConnDOT should “consider, among other things, federal air quality standards, conservation and cost of energy supplies…as well as long-range land use, environmental and energy impact and economic development patterns.” Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 22a-2a) Considered during project design and implementation. Inland Wetlands and Watercourses (Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 22a-36) Considered during project design and implementation. Tidal Wetlands (Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 22a-28) Considered during project design and implementation. Structures and Dredging (Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 22a-361) Considered during project design and implementation. Connecticut Flood Management by State Agencies (Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 25-68b) Considered during project design and implementation. 17 Delaware Code Section 8404 It is the duty of the Secretary of Transportation “to prepare a statewide master transportation plan that is consistent with the state's social, economic and environmental needs and goals.” Delaware Livable Delaware Initiative, Executive Order No. 14 This Initiative was passed on March 28, 2001 by Governor Ruth Ann Minner. It introduced the Livable Delaware initiative, stated eleven goals, and required each department to complete an implementation plan to address these goals. Transportation- related land use goals as identified by DelDOT are: 1. Direct investment and future development to existing communities, urban concentrations, and growth areas. 2. Protect important farmlands and critical natural resource areas. 3. Streamline regulatory processes and provide flexible incentives and disincentives to encourage development in desired areas. 4. Encourage redevelopment and improve the livability of existing communities and urban areas, and guide new employment into underutilized commercial and industrial sites. 5. Promote mobility for people and goods through a balanced system of transportation options. 6. Coordinate public policy planning and decisions among state, counties and municipalities.

B-5 Environmental Policy (Topic Number 000-625- 001-g) The Florida DOT adopted an environmental policy in February 2002 to “help preserve and enhance Florida’s natural, physical, cultural and social environment as they develop implement, and maintain transportation facilities and services”. Title XXVI, Section 339.175(5)(b)(4) of the Florida Statutes In cooperation with the DOT, each MPO should develop a long- range transportation plan and a transportation improvement program that considers projects and strategies that will “protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life”. Title XXVI, Section 339.155(2)(d) of the Florida Statutes Provides that the Department of Transportation will carry out a transportation planning process that will "protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation and improve quality of life." FDOT's Mission Statement, Title XXVI, Section 334.046(2) of the Florida Statutes The department will "provide a safe statewide transportation system that ensures the mobility of people and goods, enhances economic prosperity and preserves the quality of our environment and communities" Title XXVIII, Chapter 380 of the Florida Statutes - Land and Water Management This chapter recognizes the necessity to adequately to plan for and guide growth and development within this state in order to "protect the natural resources and environment of this state, ensure a water management system that will reverse the deterioration of water quality and provide optimum utilization of our limited water resources, facilitate orderly and well-planned development, and protect the health, welfare, safety, and quality of life of the residents." Activities related to Developments of Regional Impacts (DRIs) are also discussed. Title XXVIII, Section 380.27 of the Florida Statutes This section of the Florida Statutes discusses the coastal infrastructure policy and applies to the construction of bridges to barrier islands. Title XI, Chapter 163, Part II of the Florida Statutes In essence, this section of the Florida Statutes acts as a Growth Management Statute and consists of the Growth Policy Act, the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, and the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act. The law primarily relates to local comprehensive planning, but is relevant since FDOT projects must be consistent with local plans. Protecting and enhancing various aspects of the environment through proper planning are discussed. Florida Title XIII, Chapter 187 of the Florida Statutes Chapter 187 of the Florida Statutes is the State Comprehensive Plan. The plan sets forth broad policy guidance for all agencies and covers environmental goals and policies.

B-6 Title 32 (32-2-3) Georgia Code Title 32 of the Georgia Code requires the Department of Transportation to develop a comprehensive, statewide 20-year transportation plan that takes into account “the total environment of the community and region including land use, state and regional development goals and decisions, population, travel patterns, traffic control features, ecology, pollution effects, esthetics, safety, and social and community values.” Georgia Georgia Environmental Policy Act (GEPA) - Georgia Code 12-16 GEPA requires that an environmental affects report be prepared for all governmental actions which may significantly adversely affect the quality of the environment. This report is to include the environmental impact of the proposed action, alternatives, and mitigation measures. The long-range transportation plan is not subject to this act, it is only applicable to project level planning. HRS 279a-2, Statewide Transportation Plan Requires HDOT to prepare a statewide transportation plan that is “directed toward the ultimate development of a balanced, multi-modal statewide transportation system that serves clearly identified social, economic and environmental objectives.” The statewide transportation plan is to include projected transportation needs for a six-year period and a schedule of priorities for the construction, modification and maintenance of various segments of the statewide plan that may require state financial assistance for a twenty-year period. Both the six-year and twenty-year estimates are to be updated annually. Hawaii Hawaii State Planning Act, HRS 226; The Hawaii State Planning Act sets for objectives and policies for transportation planning. One of these objectives is planning a “statewide transportation system that is consistent with and will accommodate planned growth objectives throughout the state.” Some policies include: --Encouraging the development of transportation systems and programs which would assist statewide economic growth and diversification --Encouraging the design and development of transportation systems sensitive to the needs of affected communities and the quality of Hawaii’s natural environment --Encouraging the safe and convenient use of low-cost, energy efficient, non-polluting means of transportation --Coordinating intergovernmental land use and transportation planning activities --Encouraging diversification of transportation modes and infrastructure to promote alternate fuels and energy efficiency The Hawaii State Planning Act also sets goals and objectives for the economy, physical environment, other facilities systems, and socio-cultural advancement.

B-7 HRS 344, Environmental Policy This section establishes the state policy on the environment and provides guidelines to be considered by agencies to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life. Section 344-4 (6) states that with regards to transportation, all agencies should "encourage transportation systems in harmony with the lifestyle of the people and environment of the State; adopt guidelines to alleviate environmental degradation caused by motor vehicles; and, encourage public and private vehicles and transportation systems to conserve energy, reduce pollution emission, including noise, and provide safe and convenient accommodations for their users." Hawaii, cont’d HRS 343, Environmental Impact Statements This section establishes a system of environmental review and is administered by the Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) of the Hawaii Department of Health. Environmental Assessments are not required for feasibility or planning studies for possible future programs or projects which the agency has not yet approved, adopted or funded. Idaho Local Land Use Planning Act of 1975 (Idaho Code 67-65) 67-6508: Discusses Transportation Aspect involved in comprehensive planning, also discusses other elements of transportation planning, such as economic development, land use, natural resources, hazardous areas and community design. Kentucky None There are no state laws that require environmental assessment in the planning process. The environmental work completed in the planning process is all self-directed by the Cabinet. In the Statewide Transportation Plan, they have tried to weave in on a large scale an environmental ethic and environmental priorities. They are also beginning to look at environmental footprints in programming and early cost estimating before projects advance into the Cabinet's Six-Year Highway Plan. Environmental Policy Statement This policy, adopted May 12, 2000, states that a goal of the Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) is “to provide an environmentally sound transportation network and protect, preserve, and enhance Louisiana's cultural and natural resources.” It also states that it is the policy of the DOTD “to evaluate environmental consequences, both to the natural and to the human environment (including impacts to the community), and promote compatible solutions in serving the transportation needs of Louisiana.” Louisiana Louisiana DOTD Policy Directive on Project Commitments, Permits, and Agreements This policy directive applies at the project level. Its purpose is "to provide a procedure to ensure that all agreements and permits are identified as needed, and commitments for mitigation and enhancement measures adopted in the project planning and environmental phases are properly coordinated and handled in the project design, rights-of-way acquisition, and construction phases."

B-8 MDOT’s Environmental Policy Statement This statement, adopted November 1998, states that a policy of the Maine Department of Transportation is to “continuously evaluate actions for their impacts upon environmental resources” and to “conduct activities so as to avoid and minimize those impacts”. One of the stated methods of accomplishing the policy is to “develop and utilize an Integrated Transportation Decision-making process (ITD) regarding transportation projects that incorporate environmental considerations from the earliest planning state through construction and maintenance.” Maine’s Sensible Transportation Policy Act (23 M.R.S.A. E16773) Maine's Sensible Transportation Policy Act requires that transportation planning decisions “minimize the harmful effects of transportation on public health and on air and water quality, land use and other natural resources.” This act also requires an alternatives analysis (23 M.R.S.A. §73(3)(B)). Maine's Site Location of Development Law (38 MRSA 481) The purpose of this subchapter is to provide a practical means by which the state can "control the location of those developments substantially affecting local environment in order to insure that such developments will be located in a manner which will have a minimal adverse impact on the natural environment within the development sites and of their surroundings and protect the health, safety and general welfare of the people." Standards for development are provided in accordance with the aforementioned environmental goal. Maine Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection's Chapter 305, Natural Resources Protection Act (38 MRSA 480-A) - Permit by Rule Standards The findings of this subchapter include that the "State's rivers and streams, great ponds, fragile mountain areas, freshwater wetlands, significant wildlife habitat, coastal wetlands and coastal sand dunes systems are resources of state significance." Standards and permit processes are provided regarding activities that affect soils and waters. Maryland Transportation Performance Act (May 2000) The Maryland Transportation Performance Act requires MDOT to apply performance measures to the Maryland Transportation Plan and the State's Consolidated Transportation Program (CTP) or capital improvement program. In response, MDOT, assisted by an appointed advisory committee, developed a set of measurable, meaningful and manageable indicators to assist the Department. Beginning in 2002, an Annual Attainment Report of Transportation System Performance will accompany the Maryland Transportation Plan and the CTP. Legislation requirements can be found in §2-103.1 of the Transportation Article of the Maryland Code. Maryland Maryland Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Act and Executive Order Issued in 1997 by Governor Glendening, this initiative directs growth to areas where it is most environmentally suitable while protecting some of the State's most ecologically and environmentally valuable landscapes. It calls for transportation investments that satisfy current and projected travel demands while supporting smarter growth patterns.

B-9 Maryland State Highway Administration's (SHAs) Environmental Responsibility The Environmental Responsibility states that the primary goal of SHA is maintaining excellence in the natural and human environment that it serves. Some key elements of SHA's environmental policy include incorporating and integrating "smart growth, environmental protection and enhancement measures in planning…" as well as protecting and enhancing "all aspects of the natural and human environment whenever possible, using state-of-the-art practices." Economic Growth, Resource Protection, and Planning Act of 1992 This act is a general statewide policy to guide suitable development and protect sensitive areas. The Maryland Department of Transportation works with local planning agencies to obtain Maryland Department of Planning approval that major projects are consistent with this act. Maryland Environmental Policy Act The Maryland Environmental Policy Act is state legislation that requires consideration of environmental factors in decision making. This applies to many of MDOT's state funded projects and usually requires the development of an Environmental Assessment Form. Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Protection Law This law requires coordination with the Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Commission when impervious surface is proposed within 1000 feet of tidal influence. Non-tidal Wetlands Protection Act This act preserves wetlands and prescribes permitting requirements. MDOT coordinates regularly with the Maryland Department of Environment to ensure compliance. Endangered Species and Non- Game Conservation Act This act provides protection for all federally listed species and those listed in Maryland. MDOT coordinates with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the US Fish and Wildlife Service on any projects where significant impact is possible. Maryland, cont’d Maryland Reforestation Law When highway construction using State funds causes the cutting or clearing of forests lands, this law requires that these trees be replaced. Total Max. Daily Loads and Nat’l Pollutant Discharge Elimination Regs. These regulations require MDOT to be cognizant of environmental protection needs in all stages of project development. Upper Paint Branch Special Protection Area Regulation This local regulation controls land use and water quality management. Maryland Stormwater Regulations These regulations require 100% mitigation for new pavement 20% mitigation for redeveloped pavement. Stormwater Design Guidelines These guidelines provide information on how to size, design, select, and locate best practices at a new development site to comply with the State's storm water performance standards.

B-10 Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) MEPA requires state agencies to study the environmental consequences of their actions and to take all feasible actions to avoid, minimize, and mitigate damage to the environment. MEPA further requires state agencies to "use all practicable means and measures to minimize damage to the environment," by studying alternatives to the proposed project, and developing enforceable mitigation commitments, which will become permit conditions for the project if and when it is permitted. This regulation ties together transportation, land use, and environmental planning (301 CMR 11.03). Massachusetts Executive Order No. 385 - Planning for Growth This executive order was issued by Governor William Weld in April of 1996. It recognizes that "conflict between environmental quality and economic activity ultimately puts at risk environmental resources as well as economic opportunity" and states that "such conflict can be avoided to a great extent through proactive and coordinated planning oriented towards both resource protection and sustainable economic activity, known as growth management." All agencies are directed to "evaluate the effect of their current regulations, policies, plans and practices on their and others' ability to facilitate sustainable economic development and to preserve environmental quality and resources, and adopt changes to the extent necessary to effectively contribute to the attainment of these objectives." Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 174.01, Subdivision 2 One of Minnesota’s 14 transportation goals is “to ensure that the planning and implementation of all modes of transportation are consistent with the environment and energy goals of the state.” Minnesota State Statutes, Chapter 174.03, Subdivision 1 (2) Chapter 174.03, Subdivision 1 (2) of the Minnesota State Statutes states that the commissioner shall evaluate alternative transportation programs proposed for inclusion in the statewide transportation plan in terms of “impact of present and planned land uses, environmental effects, and energy efficiency”. Sustainable Development Act This act, passed in 1996, defines sustainable development as any “development that maintains or enhances economic opportunity and community well-being while protecting and restoring the natural environment upon which people and economics depend.” It directed the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB) to adopt principles of sustainable development and requires MnDOT to report to the EQB on how the missions and programs of the DOT reflect and implement the state sustainable development principles, or how they could be changed to do so. Minnesota Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 116D) The Minnesota Environmental Policy Act requires all state agencies to “utilize a systematic, interdisciplinary approach that will insure the integrated use of the natural and social sciences and the environmental arts in planning and in decision making which may have an impact on the environment.”

B-11 MCA 90-4-1010, Transportation Energy Policy The transportation energy policy is "to promote actions that encourage the conservation of energy through the environmentally responsible management and planning of efficient transportation systems." MCA 2-15-2505, Department of Transportation It is the purpose of the Department of Transportation to "provide energy-efficient and ecologically compatible transportation services with optimum efficiency, effectiveness, and economy." Montana MCA Title 75, Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Recognizes the importance of restoring and maintaining environmental quality and sets forth a policy to preserve and enhance the environment. The Montana DOT must follow all policies set forth in this Act. Nebraska Nebraska Statute 39- 1365.01 The Department of Roads is responsible for developing specific and long-range state highway system plans. In establishing planning priorities, the Department of Roads should consider a variety of factors, including: "economic development needs, current and projected demographic trends, and maintenance and enhancement of the quality of life for all Nebraska citizens." Nevada NRS 408.233 (1)(a) A primary responsibility of the planning division in the Department of Transportation is to "develop and coordinate balanced transportation policies and planning which are consistent with the social, economic and environmental goals of the state." NH Revised Statutes, Section 21-L:2 The department of transportation is responsible for planning a state transportation network that "supports state growth and economic development and promotes the general welfare of the citizens of the state." NH Revised Statutes, Section 228:99 – Statewide TIP This law requires Statewide public hearings to be held in order to solicit Public input on the program (STIP). Some of the input the public provides may be in relation to environmental considerations/planning for the Transportation projects. NH Revised Statutes, Section 227-C:9 - Directive for Cooperation in the Protection of Historic Resources This statute requires all state agencies to cooperate with the division of Historic Preservation in the location, identification, evaluation and management of historic resources New Hampshire House Bill (HB) 712 - Relative to coordinating state and local planning efforts Section 229:4 discusses the development of the State Comprehensive Plan and sets forth a number of goals and policies that address the consideration of environmental factors in planning. The plan is to include a transportation section, as well as "a section which identifies state policies and actions necessary to protect cultural and historic resources of statewide significance and assist in their rehabilitation or preservation, and generally assure their availability for future generations of state citizens" and "a natural resources section which identifies trends in land protection, open space, farm land preservation and protection, and proposes policies and actions necessary at the state level to protect those resources which are perceived to be of statewide significance."

B-12 New Jersey New Jersey State Planning Act of 1986, N.J.S.A. 52:18A-196 et seq The New Jersey State Planning Act requires sound and integrated statewide planning for the state to "...conserve natural resources, revitalize urban centers, protect the quality of its environment, and provide needed housing and adequate public services at a reasonable cost while promoting beneficial economic growth…." NM Admin. Code, Title 18, Trans. and Highways, Chapt.1, Trans. General Provisions, Part 4, This rule establishes procedures for Transportation Development Districts (TDDs) for project funding and for the State Transportation Authority (STA) to evaluate and prioritize such funding requests for planning statewide, regional and local transportation systems. The rule is limited in application to only planning/study proposals. A project ranking system is set forth that includes environmental impacts and alternatives analysis as part of the criteria for ranking. NM Admin Code, Title 2, Public Finance, Chapter 40, Part 30, Infra Bank This rule specifies the procedures and conditions for eligible public entity may apply for and obtain financial assistance from the bank. Per NMAC 2.40.30.13 D, prior to granting preliminary approval of an eligible project for financial assistance, the commission will consider "potential social, economic, and environmental impacts." New Mexico NM Admin Code, Title 20, Chap 2, Part 99 This rule implements the Clean Air Act for New Mexico as it applies to the conformity of transportation plans, programs, and projects to the State Implementation Plan. New York State Consolidated Laws Article 2, Section 14a. In order to help preserve agricultural lands, public park and recreational lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges and historical sites, the commissioner of the department of transportation planning is required to "cooperate and consult with the commissioners of agriculture and markets, parks and recreation, environmental conservation and health in developing transportation plans and programs so that such programs include measures to maintain or enhance the desirable natural characteristics of the land traversed." The cooperation and consultation is to be effected and implemented by memoranda of understanding between the commissioner of transportation and each of the aforementioned commissioners. New York State Department of Transportation Environmental Policy Environmental Policy recognizes an obligation to preserve, protect, and enhance the environment and to proactively protect, conserve, restore, and enhance important natural and man-made resources in the planning of facilities. The document also states that it is the policy of the Department of Transportation to seek opportunities to contribute to the advancement of State and federal environmental policies, programs and objectives through close coordination and communication with State and federal resource agencies. New York NYS Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) - Statutory Authority: Environmental Conservation Law Sections 3- 0301(1)(b), 3- 0301(2)(m) and 8- 0113 In New York State, most projects or activities proposed by a state agency or unit of local government require an environmental impact assessment as stipulates by the NYS Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). SEQRA requires the sponsoring or approving governmental body to identify and mitigate significant environmental impacts of the activity it is proposing or permitting. To standardize environmental assessments, Environmental Assessment Forms (EAFs) and special guidance documents are utilized. After completing an EAF, the lead agency determines the significance of an action's environmental impacts, and then decides whether to require (or prepare) an Environmental Impact Statement and whether to hold a public hearing on the proposed action.

B-13 Land Conservation and Development Department (OAR 660) Oregon has 19 state planning goals of which transportation is one element. These planning goals include guidance to "protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, and improve quality of life." The Transportation Planning Rule requires the planning of transportation systems that reduce vehicle miles traveled to meet Oregon's land use goals and to provide economic benefits. Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 660: Land Conservation and Development Department, Division 12: Transportation Planning This rule requires alternatives analysis for elements in the Transportation System Plan. Standards used to evaluate alternatives include minimizing "adverse economic, social, environmental and energy consequences" as well as supporting "urban and rural development by providing types and levels of transportation facilities and services appropriate to serve the land uses identified in the acknowledged comprehensive plan." ODOT Environmental Guidance This operational notice gives guidance on environmental stewardship within ODOT through a guidance statement, best management practices, a clear definition of enhancement and a process for enhancement related decisions, an Environmental Program statement, and clear roles, responsibilities and authorities throughout the organization. The document states that "the valuing of Oregon's environment is a responsibility of every ODOT employee and it is reflected in our decisions and actions." Oregon Revised Statutes, ORS 184.614 ORS 184.614 states that "as its primary duty, the Oregon Transportation Commission shall develop and maintain a state transportation policy and a comprehensive, long-range plan for a safe, multimodal transportation system for the state which encompasses economic efficiency, orderly economic development and environmental quality" Executive Order No. EO-00-23, Use of State Resources to Encourage the Development of Quality Communities Executive Order EO-00-23 recognizes the need to build and maintain quality communities and sets forth several quality development objectives, including encouraging "mixed use, energy- efficient development designed to encourage walking, biking and transit use" and facilitating "development that is compatible with community and regional environmental concerns and available natural resources (e.g., available water, air quality, etc.)." Executive Order No. EO-00-07, Promoting Sustainability in State Government Operations EO-00-07 defines sustainability as "using, developing and protecting resources at a rate and in a manner that enables people to meet their current needs and also provides that future generations can meet their own needs. Sustainability requires simultaneously meeting environmental, economic and community needs." This EO sets forth goals and guidelines to promote sustainability. Oregon Oregon Administrative Rules, Chapter 731: DOT Division 15: Coordination Rules (OAR 731-015-0005 through OAR 731- 015-0135) This rule is known as the State Agency Coordination Agreement (SAC). While its main purpose is to get coordination between agencies to happen in a predictable manner, it refers to the timing of environmental and planning activities. It also states that before a final plan is adopted, it must be documented that the plan in compliance with all applicable statewide planning goals.

B-14 Transportation System Planning (TSP) Guidelines 2001 These guidelines outline the expectations of the state planning goal regarding transportation. Included in this document are expectations regarding the type of environmental work that is needed during the planning process. One key addition to these guidelines is the emphasis placed on defining purpose and need in the development of the plan. A Purpose and Need Statement is a fundamental requirement when developing a plan that will require future NEPA documentation. Oregon, cont’d NEPA-Refinement Planning Process ODOT has adopted a policy of doing NEPA tiered documents called Location EIS for large transportation proposals still in the planning process. Test criteria were created to determine the conditions under which ODOT would be willing to commit serious environmental resources during the planning stage. This process is still in the experimental stages at ODOT. Executive Order 1999-1 In January 1999, Governor Tom Ridge issued this executive order requiring all commonwealth agencies to identify laws, regulations, practices, and policies, including the disbursement of public funding that will advance the Commonwealth's land use objectives. Pennsylvania Acts 67 and 68 These acts, signed into law in 2000, amended the municipal planning code to allow multi-municipality planning for the first time. All counties are required to have a comprehensive land use plan under the new regulations. State agencies are allowed to consider municipality and county plans and zoning when they make decisions on permitting and funding. Rhode Island Comprehensive Planning and Land Use Act of 1988 (Rhode Island General Laws, 45- 22.2) This act requires cities and towns to develop a comprehensive plan that includes the elements of land use; housing; economic development; natural and cultural resources; services and facilities; open space and recreation; and circulation. The goals of this act include promoting a more prosperous economic climate, promoting the protection of natural, historic, and cultural resources; promoting the preservation of open space and recreational resources; promoting a balance of housing choices; encouraging the involvement of citizens in the development of the plans; and encouraging the use of innovative development regulations and techniques that promote the development of land suitable for development while protecting natural, cultural, historical, and recreational resources, and achieving a balanced pattern of land uses. Rhode Island Rhode Island General Laws 42-11- 10: Statewide Planning Program Section 42-11-10 of the General Laws of Rhode Island directs the Statewide Planning Program to prepare, adopt, and amend strategic plans for the development of the state's human, economic and physical resources. Section 42-11-10(b) and (d) establish a state planning council to provide policy advice and guidance to state planning activities. Under this law, a State Guide Plan must be prepared, consisting of elements that address land use; physical development and environmental concerns; economic development; energy supply, access, use, and conservation; and human services. The State Guide Plan contains the Ground Transportation Plan, which is Rhode Island's long range transportation plan. The DOT must act within the guidance set forth by all elements of the Guide Plan.

B-15 Rhode Island State Planning Council Rule IX: Trans Planning and Public Involvement Procedures This rule discusses the steps involved in the planning process, what is to be included in plans, the requirement for consistency with the State Guide Plan and the public participation process that must be undertaken. Rhode Island cont’d Element 611 of the State Guide Plan: Ground Transportation Plan This element identifies goals and objectives for the Ground Transportation Plan. Two of the goals include: "Insure that the transportation system embraces the principles of environmental stewardship by meeting or exceeding environmental standards, and providing transportation facilities which enhance the communities they serve" and "Insure that the transportation system equitably serves all Rhode Islanders regardless of race, ethnic origin, income, age, mobility impairment, or geographic location." South Dakota none The South Dakota Department of Transportation is in the process of developing policies in the area of access management and corridor preservation. State laws and regulation regarding other environmental factors in transportation planning would just be a redundancy of federal laws and regulations. Tennessee Tennessee Department of Transportation, Environmental Policy Statement This policy statement recognizes the impact of transportation facilities on the natural, physical and social environment and places emphasis on preserving and enhancing "the existing landscape, environment and associated wildlife through balanced engineering, environmental and economic principles." TxDOT Environmental Policy (Texas Administrative Code, Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 2) TxDOT's Environmental Policy contains the memoranda of understanding adopted by TxDOT to implement Texas Civil Statutes, Article 6673g, which requires TxDOT to adopt a MOU with each state agency that has responsibilities for the protection of the natural environment or for the preservation of historical or archeological resources, and requires the department and each of the agencies to adopt the memoranda and all revisions by rule. This chapter also contains environmental review and public involvement procedures for TxDOT. TxDOT Environmental Policy Statement Subchapter A, Rule §2.2) This policy states that the commission and the department of transportation "will protect, preserve and, when practicable, enhance the environment……In implementing this policy, the department recognizes the need for effective communication and encourages coordination with the public, environmental or transportation interest groups, environmental agencies, resource agencies, businesses, communities, and similar entities in the transportation policy setting, planning, and development processes." Texas TxDOT Environmental Policy Directions and Guidelines (Subchapter A, Rule §2.4) In systems planning, TxDOT should encourage "the input of environmental/resource agencies, groups, and the public throughout the systems planning stage to ensure full consideration of environmental issues in the development of transportation plans and improvement programs and to allow for environmental enhancement, when practicable." The guidelines also suggest that TxDOT encourage MPOs and local governments to promote the integration of land use, transportation, and environmental planning as well as take a leadership role in the identification and consideration of environmental concerns during the development of regional transportation plans.

B-16 Texas Administrative Code, Title 43, Part 1, Chapter 13, Subchapter A, Rule §15.8 -- Statewide TIP The STIP will only be approved by the commission if it meets the requirements of facilitating "economic and social prosperity through the efficient movement of people and goods" and protecting, when feasible, and enhancing, where practicable, the environment in transportation activities. Texas Administrative Code, Subchapter A, Rule §15.3 -- Organization, Structure, and Responsibilities of Metropolitan Planning Organizations This rule states that "the MPO shall not approve any metropolitan transportation plan or transportation improvement program which does not conform with the SIP (State Implementation Plan), as determined in accordance with EPA conformity regulations." In non- attainment areas, the MPO is to coordinate the development of the transportation plan with the SIP development process, including the development of any transportation control measures (TCMs). TAC Title 31, Part 16, Chapters 501, 503, 505, 506 Coastal Zone Management (project development) Title 30, Part 1, Chapter 213 Edwards Aquifer (project development) Texas, cont’d Title 13, Part 2, Chapter 26.15 Texas Historical Commission (project development) Title 19, Chapter 1, Section 10i V.S.A Long Range Transportation Systems Plan should be developed pursuant to the planning goals and processes set forth in Act 200 of the Acts of 1988. Title 10 VSA Chapter 37 Section 905 (7) "The Vermont Wetland Rules" The Vermont Wetland Rules protect wetlands which are determined to be "so significant that they merit protection". They establish criteria for evaluating wetland significance as well as establish allowed wetland uses and provide for conditional wetland uses. Conditional uses require a Determination by the Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR). A Conditional Use Determination (CUD) will only be issued upon conclusion that the proposed activity will have no undue adverse effect on protected functions of the wetland or that the impacts are sufficiently mitigated. Title 10 VSA Chapter 41 "Regulation of Stream Flow" Chapter 41 of the VSA protects all waters of the State and establishes the ANR as Certifying Agency for Section 401 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Consultation with the ANR prior to altering or modifying the course, current or cross-section of waters of the State is required. Consultation is accomplished through the ANR Stream Alteration Permit (SAP) process. Vermont Title 10 VSA Chapter 151 "The Land Use and Development Law, Act 250" Act 250 Was established "to protect and conserve the lands and the environment of the state and to insure that these lands and environment are devoted to uses which are not detrimental to the public welfare and interests". It established "a state environmental board and district environmental commissions ... to regulate the use of lands" and Conditions and Criteria for the issuance of permits by the district commissions. Act 250 is applicable to "Construction by state or local government if the project involves more than 10 acres" and also applies to "substantial changes" in pre-existing developments.

B-17 Title 19 VSA Chapter 25 "The Scenic Road Law of 1977" The Scenic Road Law protects roads designated as scenic under the Vermont Scenic Roads program. It requires reconstruction or improvements to conform to standards established by the Transportation Board. Title 22 VSA Chapter 14 "The Historic Preservation Act of 1975" The Historic Preservation Act established the VT Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the Division for Historic Preservation, headed by the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), to identify and protect historic and archaeological resources. It requires all State Agencies to consult the Advisory Council before altering any property that is potentially of historical, architectural, archaeological or cultural significance. In addition, it requires all State agencies and municipalities to cooperate with the State Archaeologist in the preservation, protection, excavation, and evaluation of specimens and sites. Title 24 VSA Chapter 117 "Municipal and Regional Planning and Development, Act 200" This Act established a specific set of goals to encourage appropriate development of all lands in the state, and provided means for prevention of land development problems. One of these goals includes providing "for safe, convenient, economic and energy efficient transportation systems that respect the integrity of the natural environment, including public transit options and paths for pedestrians and bicyclers.” A Council of Regional Commissions was created to review state agency and regional plans. State agencies are prohibited from preparing, adopting, or implementing plans, which are inconsistent with said goals. Title 29 VSA Chapter 11 Sections 403 and 404 "Management of Lakes & Ponds" Sections 403 and 404 of Title 29 VSA Chapter 11 protect public waters and lands below mean water level. Obtaining a Lakes & Ponds Permit from the ANR Water Resources Board is required for construction involving temporary or permanent encroachment (such as concrete, sheet piling, earth or rock fill, or similar construction). The Water Resources Board will require proof that the encroachment will not adversely affect the public good. The Endangered Species Act of 1981 The Endangered Species Act protects threatened or endangered plants and animals and requires possession of a Threatened & Endangered Species (T&E) Permit before one can take, possess, transport or transplant threatened or endangered species. T&E Permits are acquired through coordination with the ANR. Executive Order No. 52-80, 3 VSA App. Ch. 3 This Executive Order protects farmland and requires coordination with the Department of Agriculture to avoid or minimize impacts on farmlands. Vermont cont’d The Memorandum of Understanding between the Agency of Transportation (AOT) & Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) regarding Bridge Rehabilitation & Replacement The Memorandum of Understanding provides for cooperation between the ANR and AOT to provide for the State's dual needs to protect the environment and to provide for safe and efficient transportation. The Memorandum requires site visits during the Conceptual Plan stage for the AOT, ANR, and Town to identify issues involved. It also requires cooperation between agencies to address unresolved issues prior to completion of Preliminary Plans.

B-18 33.1-23.03 VA Code Requires a 20-year Statewide Transportation plan that provides “consideration of projects and policies affecting all transportation modes” and promotes “economic development” and “environmental quality”. Virginia Chesapeake Bay Agreement (Chesapeake 2000) This agreement applies to states of Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and the District of Columbia. It is a commitment to nurture and sustain a Chesapeake Bay Watershed Partnership through living resource protection and restoration; vital habitat protection and restoration; water quality protection and restoration; sound land use; and stewardship and community engagement. Several specific goals relating to transportation are set forth, one of which being: "By 2002, the signatory jurisdictions will promote coordination of transportation and land use planning to encourage compact, mixed use development patterns, revitalization in existing communities and transportation strategies that minimize adverse effects on the Bay and its tributaries." Statewide Multimodal Plan Statute (RCW 47.06.040) Directs WSDOT “to identify and document potential affected environmental resources including, but not limited to, wetlands, storm water runoff, flooding, air quality, fish passage, and wildlife habitat” during the development of the Washington Transportation Plan (WTP). Clean Air Washington Act (CAWA) (RCW 70.94) CAWA requires transportation plans, programs, and projects to be consistent with the SIP in areas where the federal air quality standards are not met. It gives responsibility for determining conformity to the state, local government, or MPO that is developing the transportation plan, program, or project. Washington State Transportation Commission Policy Catalogue One of eight policy objectives is to “meet environmental responsibilities”. This objective includes minimizing and avoiding “air, water and noise pollution; energy usage; use of hazardous materials; flood impacts; and impacts on wetlands and heritage resources from transportation activities”. It also includes, when consistent with other priorities and practical, protecting, restoring, and enhancing “fish and wildlife habitats and wetlands impacted by transportation facilities”. Environmental Permit Streamlining Act (RCW 47.06) Adopted in May 2001, this act established an interagency Transportation Permit Efficiency and Accountability Committee (TPEAC) that is responsible for creating a sustained focus on achieving transportation and environmental goals of the state and for streamlining the environmental permitting process for transportation projects. Transportation Commission and State Transportation Department State Environmental Policy Act Rules (WAC 468-12) Integrates the policies and procedures of SEPA into the DOT’s programs, activities, and actions. With regards to timing (WAC 468-12-055), “The SEPA process shall be completed before the transportation department is irrevocably committed to a particular course of action. At the same time, the SEPA process should not be undertaken until a proposal is sufficiently definite to permit meaningful environmental analysis.” Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) (RCW 43-21C) Directs state and local decision makers to consider the environmental consequences of their actions

B-19 Washington cont’d SEPA Rules (WAC 197- 11) Implementing regulations that establish uniform requirements for agencies to use in evaluating the possible adverse environmental impacts of a proposal. With regards to timing (WAC 197-11-055), the rules state that the SEPA process should be “integrated with agency activities at the earliest possible time to ensure that planning and decisions reflect environmental values”. Wisconsin Statutes, 66.1001 – Comprehensive Planning States the 9 elements of a comprehensive plan to include: issues and opportunities; housing; transportation; utilities and community facilities; agriculture, cultural, and natural resources; economic development; intergovernmental cooperation; land- use; and implementation. Wisconsin Wisconsin Statutes, 1.13 – Land Use Planning Activities Encourages each state agency to design its programs, policies, infrastructures and F222investments to reflect a balance between the mission of the agency and local, comprehensive planning goals, including: “(a) Promotion of the redevelopment of lands with existing infrastructure and public services and the maintenance and rehabilitation of existing residential, commercial and industrial structures. (b) Encouragement of neighborhood designs that support a range of transportation choices. (c) Protection of natural areas, including wetlands, wildlife habitats, lakes, woodlands, open spaces and groundwater resources. (d) Protection of economically productive areas, including farmland and forests. (e) Encouragement of land uses, densities and regulations that promote efficient development patterns and relatively low municipal, state governmental and utility costs. (f) Preservation of cultural, historic and archaeological sites. (g) Encouragement of coordination and cooperation among nearby units of government. (h) Building of community identity by revitalizing main streets and enforcing design standards. (i) Providing an adequate supply of affordable housing for individuals of all income levels throughout each community. (j) Providing adequate infrastructure and public services and an adequate supply of developable land to meet existing and future market demand for residential, commercial and industrial uses. (k) Promoting the expansion or stabilization of the current economic base and the creation of a range of employment opportunities at the state, regional and local levels. (l) Balancing individual property rights with community interests and goals. (m) Planning and development of land uses that create or preserve varied and unique urban and rural communities. (n) Providing an integrated, efficient and economical transportation system that affords mobility, convenience and safety and that meets the needs of all citizens, including transit– dependent and disabled citizens.”

B-20 Trans 400 states that the policy of the Department of Transportation is to “strive to protect and enhance the quality of the human environment in carrying out its basic transportation mission and consider pertinent environmental factors consequential to any proposed action” beginning in the planning stage of development. Wisconsin cont’d Wisconsin Administrative Code, Trans 400, Environmental Policy Act Procedures for Department Actions It requires the DOT to conduct "Systems-Plan Environmental Evaluations" (SEEs) on all statewide transportation plans. The SEE examines potential environmental impacts at the system level over the entire planning period (usually 20-25 years). To date, SEEs have been completed for the Statewide Multimodal Plan (Translinks 21), the State Highway Plan, and the State Airport Plan. Currently, SEEs are being developed for the State Rail Plan and the update of Translinks 21.

Next: Appendix C: Results from Statewide, Metropolitan, and Environmental Resource Agencies »
Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes Get This Book
×
 Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning: Appendixes
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 77: Consideration of Environmental Factors in Transportation Skills Planning consists of the appendixes to NCHRP Report 541 of the same name, which examines procedures and methods for integrating environmental factors in transportation systems planning and decision making at the statewide, regional, and metropolitan levels.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!