National Academies Press: OpenBook

Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology (1994)

Chapter:Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts

« Previous: Appendix C: Source Reference Table
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×

APPENDIX D
Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts

More than 75 solicited expert accounts with supporting references were provided by practitioners, resource agencies, and environmental organizations to support preparation of this report. Findings derived from these accountings (Yozzo, 1991) are summarized below. Key references are included in the References. A selective source reference table categorized by habitat type and nature of treatment is included as Appendix C.

Issues related to marine habitat creation, protection, and enhancement were explored in order to assess the diverse concerns of federal and state agencies, academic institutions, public interest groups, and industry. A primary topic was the beneficial application of technology in the marine environment.

Nine geographical regions were represented: Mid-Atlantic, Gulf, Pacific, Southeast, Great Lakes, New England, Midwest, Canadian Pacific, and Canadian Atlantic. Technological applications to habitat projects range from coastal stabilization and artificial reef technology to the use of dredged material and exploitation of natural processes. Although many marine habitats have been restored and created, gaps in the state of practice were reported as shown in Table D-1. It identifies needs that practitioners believe should be the focus of habitat management research in the coming years. The geographical distribution is not a statistically valid sample, but region-specific interests and trends are suggested.

Two topics—(1) dredged material placement and (2) marsh creation, restoration, and management—were priority research needs in seven and eight of the nine regions. Hence these two research areas are deemed high-priority subjects

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×

TABLE D-1 Research Needs Derived on Reported Gaps in the Coastal Engineering State of Practice

Research Area

Region

Dredged material placement

G, MA, NE, SE, P, GL, M

Marsh creation, restoration, and management

G, MA, NE, SE, P, GL, CA,M

Restoration and management of seagrass beds

G, MA, P, NE, CP

Barrier island/dune restoration and management

G, MA

Shoreline protection and stabilization

G, MA, NE, SE, GL

Shoreline management

G, MA, NE, SE

Artificial reef development

G, MA, NE, SE, P

Restoration of fish spawning and nursery habitat

G, MA, NE, P, GL, M

Coastal landuse planning and public policy

MA, NE, P

Endangered species management

P

Point and nonpoint source pollution

NE, P, M

Abbreviations: CA, Canadian Atlantic; CP, Canadian Pacific; G, Gulf; GL, Great Lakes; M, Midwest; MA, Mid-Atlantic; NE, New England; P, Pacific; SE, Southeast.

in habitat management in all U.S. coastal regions. Restoration and management of specific habitat types, such as seagrass beds and coastal dune systems, are of particular significance in the Gulf, Mid-Atlantic, Pacific, New England, and Canadian Pacific regions.

Shoreline stabilization and protection are considered important in the Gulf, Mid-Atlantic, New England, Southeast, and, particularly, the Great Lakes region. Artificial reef research is of interest in all coastal regions, except the Great Lakes, whereas restoration of fish spawning and nursery habitats is of interest in all littoral regions of the United States. The New England, Mid-Atlantic, and Gulf regions also stand out with the highest number of research needs identified.

Respondents from all regions provided detailed descriptions of barriers to successful implementation of technology in habitat management projects. Because some barriers are region specific, they are based on geographic locations, as summarized in Table D-2.

No entry is shown for the Midwest, Canadian Pacific, and Canadian Atlantic regions because only one response was received from the Midwest and none from the other two regions on this particular issue. Lumped under policy constraints are: the requirement for least-cost options, lack of agreement among the different levels of decision makers (federal, state and local); and lack of a general

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×

TABLE D-2 Reported Barriers to Successful Implementation of Beneficial Technology in Marine Habitat Projects

 

Region

Reported Barriers/Constraints

MA

G

P

SE

GL

NE

Federal, state, and local policy

 

 

Funding

 

 

Inadequate project monitoring

 

 

 

Perception of a common resource

 

 

 

 

 

Lack of communication

 

 

 

 

 

Antiquated technology

 

 

 

 

 

Reactive management decisions

 

 

 

 

 

Lack of interagency cooperation

 

 

 

 

Lack of documented success

 

 

 

 

 

Lack of training, education, and knowledge

 

 

 

 

 

Provincialism

 

 

 

 

 

Abbreviations: As in Table D-1.

mitigation policy associated with the NMFS. The perception of resources as common property, especially, fisheries, is viewed as a major impediment in the development of artificial reef programs. The use of obsolete dredging technology was cited as another hindrance, although recourse appears available in advanced pump design and plant automation (Herbich, 1992b).

Lack of communication, not only between the engineering and scientific communities but also between engineers and regulatory agencies, was also viewed as a substantial barrier to effective implementation of technology. This deficiency could lead, for example, to a distrust of engineers by biologists, and it hinders promotion of the multidisciplinary approach that appears imperative to bringing projects to fruition. On the other hand, the lack of communication between engineers and regulatory agencies can cause antagonism between the two groups with consequent further alienation, to the apparent detriment of a rational execution of projects. Similarly, a parochial mentality can lead into an unwillingness to apply useful technology developed elsewhere.

Although Table D-2 may indicate that certain barriers are relevant to specific geographical regions, most of these issues are more endemic in nature than the table conveys. This assertion is supported in large measure by the responses on specific issues. Of the 71 respondents involved in habitat creation, restoration,

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×

and enhancement projects, only 12 percent used published criteria or guidelines in project design. Although 71.8 percent of the respondents did not respond to this question, the overall implication can still be construed as a reflection of the nascent state of this particular field of engineering in the marine environment. The apparent lack of codification of engineering planning and design standards appears likely to render habitat development or alteration an iterative experiment into the foreseeable future. Similarly, failure to respond to questions relating to employee training programs (81.8 percent), accreditation requirements (83.1 percent), and public education programs (67.5 percent) speaks clearly to an apparent nationwide phenomenon of inadequate training, inadequate education, and inadequate knowledge. It draws into question the capability of many practitioners to perform credibly that might by suggested by a demonstrated commitment to building requisite engineering and scientific knowledge among those entering the field and continuing throughout their professional development programs.

In identifying research needs, respondents were asked what in their view was the single most important technology that merited research and development. Although various topics were listed for future research in habitat protection and enhancement, 77 percent of respondents did not identify the most important technology. A pattern of regional trends is readily discernible from the responses, but certain key issues and research and development areas were cited often enough to render them of global importance. These include:

  • creation, restoration, and enhancement of wetland habitats;

  • improvements in technology for alternative uses of dredged materials; and

  • improvements in public policy and legislation regarding the protection and enhancement of marine environments.

The responses indicate that it is in these three areas that future efforts to improve the application of beneficial technology in the marine environment could be directed.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×
Page169
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×
Page170
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×
Page171
Suggested Citation:"Appendix D: Summary of Solicited Expert Accounts." National Research Council. 1994. Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2213.
×
Page172
Next: References »
Restoring and Protecting Marine Habitat: The Role of Engineering and Technology Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $60.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Tremendous changes have occurred this century in the nation's coastal habitats, in the way society views them, and in the way they are managed. This volume offers a complete, highly readable assessment of how scientific knowledge and coastal engineering capabilities can be more effectively used to protect and restore marine habitat. It addresses traditional and innovative uses of technology to protect remaining natural marine habitats, to enhance or restore those that have been altered, and to create marine habitat from lands used for other purposes. The use of dredged materials as a vital resource in protection and restoration work is explored. The book also explores organizational, management, and regulatory barriers to using the best available technology and engineering practice. Specific options for improvements are offered in each area.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!