National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R4
Page v
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R5
Page vi
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R6
Page vii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22247.
×
Page R7

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

N A T I O N A L C O O P E R A T I V E H I G H W A Y R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M NCHRP REPORT 789 Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis Haifang Wen Balasingam Muhunthan Jingan Wang Xiaojun Li Washington state University Pullman, WA Tuncer Edil James M. Tinjum University of Wisconsin at Madison Madison, WI Subscriber Categories Geotechnology  •  Pavements TRANSPORTAT ION RESEARCH BOARD WASHINGTON, D.C. 2014 www.TRB.org Research sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration

NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM Systematic, well-designed research provides the most effective approach to the solution of many problems facing highway administrators and engineers. Often, highway problems are of local interest and can best be studied by highway departments individually or in cooperation with their state universities and others. However, the accelerating growth of highway transportation develops increasingly complex problems of wide interest to highway authorities. These problems are best studied through a coordinated program of cooperative research. In recognition of these needs, the highway administrators of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials initiated in 1962 an objective national highway research program employing modern scientific techniques. This program is supported on a continuing basis by funds from participating member states of the Association and it receives the full cooperation and support of the Federal Highway Administration, United States Department of Transportation. The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies was requested by the Association to administer the research program because of the Board’s recognized objectivity and understanding of modern research practices. The Board is uniquely suited for this purpose as it maintains an extensive committee structure from which authorities on any highway transportation subject may be drawn; it possesses avenues of communications and cooperation with federal, state and local governmental agencies, universities, and industry; its relationship to the National Research Council is an insurance of objectivity; it maintains a full-time research correlation staff of specialists in highway transportation matters to bring the findings of research directly to those who are in a position to use them. The program is developed on the basis of research needs identified by chief administrators of the highway and transportation departments and by committees of AASHTO. Each year, specific areas of research needs to be included in the program are proposed to the National Research Council and the Board by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Research projects to fulfill these needs are defined by the Board, and qualified research agencies are selected from those that have submitted proposals. Administration and surveillance of research contracts are the responsibilities of the National Research Council and the Transportation Research Board. The needs for highway research are many, and the National Cooperative Highway Research Program can make significant contributions to the solution of highway transportation problems of mutual concern to many responsible groups. The program, however, is intended to complement rather than to substitute for or duplicate other highway research programs. Published reports of the NATIONAL COOPERATIVE HIGHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM are available from: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 and can be ordered through the Internet at: http://www.national-academies.org/trb/bookstore Printed in the United States of America NCHRP REPORT 789 Project 4-36 ISSN 0077-5614 ISBN 978-0-309-30813-7 Library of Congress Control Number 2014953276 © 2014 National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein. Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, FAA, FHWA, FMCSA, FTA, or Transit Development Corporation endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP. NOTICE The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, conducted by the Transportation Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the National Research Council. The members of the technical panel selected to monitor this project and to review this report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. The report was reviewed by the technical panel and accepted for publication according to procedures established and overseen by the Transportation Research Board and approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council. The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the researchers who performed the research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, or the program sponsors. The Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, the National Research Council, and the sponsors of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program do not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the object of the report.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council. The mission of the Transporta- tion Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individu- als interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org www.national-academies.org

C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M S AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research reported herein was performed under NCHRP Project 4-36 by the Washington State University and University of Wisconsin at Madison. The Washington State University was the contractor for this study; the University of Wisconsin served as a subcontractor. Dr. Haifang Wen, Washington State University, was the principal investigator; all work was done under his supervision. The work at University of Wisconsin at Madison was done under the supervision of Dr. Tuncer Edil. Dr. Wen and Dr. Edil would like to acknowledge the efforts of Dr. Ahmet Gocke, Mr. Zhipeng Su, Mr. Tirupan Mandal, and Mr. Jefferey D. Casmer in the sample preparation and testing and other aspects of the experimental work performed in this research. CRP STAFF FOR NCHRP REPORT 789 Christopher W. Jenks, Director, Cooperative Research Programs Christopher Hedges, Manager, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Amir N. Hanna, Senior Program Officer Andréa Parker, Senior Program Assistant Eileen P. Delaney, Director of Publications Natalie Barnes, Senior Editor NCHRP PROJECT 04-36 PANEL Field of Materials and Construction—Area of General Materials Jeff Uhlmeyer, Washington State DOT, Tumwater, WA (Chair) Njoroge W. Wainaina, Geosyntec (formerly North Carolina DOT), Raleigh, NC Khaled A. Galal, ERI, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Georgene M. Geary, Georgia DOT, Forest Park, GA Andrew Gisi, Kansas DOT, Topeka, KS (retired) M. Makbul Hossain, New York State DOT, Albany, NY Jorge A. Prozzi, University of Texas–Austin, Austin, TX Susan L. Tighe, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Jim Sherwood, FHWA Liaison G. P. Jayaprakash, TRB Liaison

F O R E W O R D By Amir N. Hanna Staff Officer Transportation Research Board This report presents information on the characterization of cementitiously stabilized lay- ers and the properties that influence pavement performance. It also contains recommended performance-related procedures for characterizing these layers and performance-prediction models for incorporation into the mechanistic–empirical pavement analysis methods. The material contained in the report will be of immediate interest to state materials, pavement, and construction engineers and others involved in the different aspects of pavement design and construction. Cementitiously stabilized materials—such as lean concrete, cement-stabilized aggregate, and soil stabilized with cement, lime, fly ash, or combinations thereof—are often used in subgrade, subbase, and base layers of flexible and rigid pavement structures. The short- and long-term properties of these materials differ substantially depending on factors such as the type and quantity of stabilizing agent, pavement structure, environmental conditions during and after construction, and loading. Although such stabilized materials have been used in highway construction for many years, limited research has dealt with the relation- ship of the properties of these materials to the performance of the pavements in which they are used. The AASHTOWare Pavement ME Design (formerly DARWin-ME) and the AASHTO Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide Manual of Practice (MEPDG) pro- vide a methodology for the analysis and performance prediction of pavements incorporat- ing such layers but do not adequately address the characterization of these materials, the changes of their properties over time, and their distress models. In addition, limited mate- rial properties have been considered in the MEPDG; other properties may have significant influence on the long-term performance and need to be considered. Thus, research was needed to identify properties of cementitiously stabilized materials that significantly influ- ence the design, constructibility, and performance of highway pavements; to recommend methods for measuring these properties; and to develop performance-prediction models for incorporation into the MEPDG. This information allows for rational analysis and design of flexible and rigid pavements constructed with cementitiously stabilized layers. Under NCHRP Project 4-36, “Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis,” Washington State University of Pullman, Washing- ton, worked with the objective of recommending performance-related procedures for char- acterizing cementitiously stabilized pavement layers for use in pavement design and analy- sis and incorporation in the MEPDG. To accomplish this objective, the research reviewed available information on the characterization of cementitiously stabilized layers, identified the properties that influence pavement performance and should be considered in pavement design and analysis, proposed test methods for measuring those properties for which test

methods are not readily available, and conducted an experimental investigation to quantify the influence of these properties on performance. Based on the findings of this work, the research proposed (1) performance models for incorporation into the mechanistic–empirical pavement analysis methods, and possibly the MEPDG, and (2) test methods for measuring several relevant material properties of cementitiously stabilized materials (presented as an attachment to the report) to allow better consideration of cementitiously stabilized layers in pavement structures. The recom- mended performance models would be particularly useful in improving the performance- prediction ability of the mechanistic–empirical pavement design and analysis procedures and the recommended test methods will facilitate measuring those material properties and their use as inputs into the design and analysis procedures. Appendixes A through F contained in the research agency’s final report provide elabo- rations and detail on several aspects of the research; they are not published herein but are available by searching for NCHRP Report 789 on the TRB website (www.trb.org). These appendixes are: A. Literature Review and Survey Results B. Mix Design and Test Procedure Evaluation C. Development of Experiments and Findings for Distress Models D. FWD Backcalculation Error Analysis E. Reasonableness Analysis of Field-Calibrated Models F. Bibliography

C O N T E N T S Note: Photographs, figures, and tables in this report may have been converted from color to grayscale for printing. The electronic version of the report (posted on the web at www.trb.org) retains the color versions. 1  Summary  3 Chapter 1 Introduction 3 Background 3 Research Objective 3 Organization of Report 4 Chapter 2 Pavement Distresses 4 Distresses of Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavement 5 Distresses of Concrete Pavements 7 Chapter 3 Laboratory Tests and Model Development 7 Materials and Mixture Design 8 Tests and Model Development 19 Chapter 4 Model Calibration 19 Data for Model Calibration 21 Calibration Procedures 23 Calibration Results 26 Chapter 5 Findings and Recommendations for Research 26 Findings 30 Recommendations for Future Research 31  References 33 Attachment Proposed Test Methods 72 Appendixes

Next: Summary »
Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis Get This Book
×
 Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 789: Characterization of Cementitiously Stabilized Layers for Use in Pavement Design and Analysis presents performance-related procedures for characterizing cementitiously stabilized layers for incorporation into mechanistic–empirical pavement analysis methods. Appendices to the report are available online.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!