National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 7 - Conclusions
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22804.
×
Page 64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22804.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2012. An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22804.
×
Page 66

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

64 Apogee Research. 1996. Monetary Measurement of Environmental Goods and Services: Framework and Summary of Techniques for Corps Plan- ners. Evaluation of Environmental Investments Research Program, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Bethesda, Md. www.iwr.usace.army .mil/docs/iwrreports/96r24.pdf. Amekudzi, A., and M. D. Meyer. 2005. NCHRP Report 541: Consider- ation of Environmental Factors in Transportation Systems Planning. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Wash- ington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_ rpt_541.pdf. Baker, J. P., D. W. Hulse, S. V. Gregory, D. White, J. Van Sickle, P. A. Berger, D. Dole, and N. H. Schumaker. 2004. Alternative Futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 313–324. Bauer, W. S. 1980. A Case Analysis of Oregon’s Willamette Greenway Pro- gram. PhD dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis. http:// scholarsarchive.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/ 1957/9220/Bauer_Webb_S_1980.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed Febru- ary 28, 2011. Bean, M., R. Kihslinger, and J. Wilkinson. 2008. Design of U.S. Habitat Banking Systems to Support the Conservation of Wildlife Habitat and At-risk Species. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. http://moderncms.ecosystemmarketplace.com/repository/ moderncms_documents/ELI%20bank%20design.pdf. Bearden, D. M., and L. G. Luther. 2003. Environmental Streamlining Provisions in the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century: Sta- tus of Implementation. Congressional Research Service, The Library of Congress. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs4140/ m1/1/high_res_d/RS20841_2003Mar13.pdf. Benayas, J. M. R., A. C. Newton, A. Diaz, and J. Bullock. 2009. Enhance- ment of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restora- tion: A Meta-Analysis. Science, Vol. 325, pp. 1121–1124. BenDor, T. K., and M. W. Doyle. 2010. Planning for Ecosystem Service Markets. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp. 59–72. Benedict, M. A., and E. T. McMahon. 2006. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Boyd, J. W., and S. Banzhaf. 2007. What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units. Ecological Economics, Vol. 63, pp. 616–626. Brown, J. W. 2006. Eco-logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects. Federal Highway Administration: Washing- ton, D.C. www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/ecological/eco_index .asp. Accessed February 28, 2011. Brown, T. C., J. C. Bergstrom, and J. Loomis. 2007. Defining, Valuing, and Providing Ecosystem Goods and Services. Natural Resources Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 329–376. Cambridge Systematics, NatureServe, and Office of James M. Shrouds. 2008. Linking Environmental Resource and Transportation Planning. NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 32, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. http://onlinepubs.trb .org/onlinepubs/archive/NotesDocs/25-25(32)_FR.pdf. Carroll, N., J. Fox, and R. Bayon, eds. 2008. Conservation and Biodiver- sity Banking: A Guide to Setting up and Running Biodiversity Credit Trading Systems. Earthscan, Sterling, Virginia. Chan, K. M. A., M. R. Shaw, D. R. Cameron, E. C. Underwood, and G. C. Daily. 2006. Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services. PloS Biology, Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 2138–2152. www.plosbiology.org/ article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.0040379. Connaughton, J. L. 2003. Modernizing the National Environmental Policy Act: Back to the Future. N.Y.U. Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 12, pp. 1–4. Conservation Measures Partnership. 2012. Threats and Actions Tax- onomies. www.conservationmeasures.org/initiatives/threats- actions-taxonomies. Accessed May 10, 2012. Costanza, R., R. d’Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R. V. O’Neill, J. Paruelo, R. G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. 1997. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Ser- vices and Natural Capital. Nature, Vol. 387, pp. 253–260. www.uvm .edu/giee/publications/Nature_Paper.pdf. Costanza, R., and C. Folke. 1997. Valuing Ecosystem Services with Effi- ciency, Fairness and Sustainability as Goals. In Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (G. C. Daily, ed.), Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 49–68. Daily, G. C., S. Polasky, J. Goldstein, P. M. Kareiva, H. A. Mooney, L. Pejchar, T. H. Ricketts, J. Salzman, and R. Shallenberger. 2009. Eco- system Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver. Frontiers in Ecol- ogy and the Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 21–28. www.esajournals .org/doi/pdf/10.1890/080025. Dale, V. H., S. Brown, R. A. Haeuber, N. T. Hobbs, N. Huntly, R. J. Naiman, W. E. Riebsame, M. G. Turner, and T. J. Valone. 2000. Eco- logical Principles and Guidelines for Managing the Use of Land. Ecological Applications Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 639–670. http://128.138 .136.233/admin/publication_files/resource-2674-2000.30.pdf. Emerson, D. J., and C. Hoeffner. 2006. Improved Linkage between Transportation Systems Planning and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 48. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. www References

65 ICF International and USR Corporation. forthcoming. SHRP 2 Report S2-C01-RR-1: A Framework for Collaborative Decision Making on Additions to Highway Capacity. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communi- ties. Fisheries, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 21–27. Kolstad, C. D. 2000. Environmental Economics. Oxford, New York, N.Y. Kremen, C., and R. S. Ostfeld. 2005. A Call to Ecologists: Measuring, Analyzing, and Managing Ecosystem Services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 3, No. 10, pp. 540–548. Lestelle, L. C., L. E. Mobrand, J. Lichatowich, and T. S. Vogel. 1996. Eco- system Diagnosis and Treatment (EDT) Applied Ecosystem Analysis: A Primer. Report to Bonneville Power Administration, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Ore. https://pisces.bpa.gov/release/ documents/documentviewer.aspx?doc=33243-2. Limburg, K. E., R. V. O’Neill, R. Costanza, and S. Farber. 2002. Complex Systems and Valuation. Ecological Economics, Vol. 41, pp. 409–420. www.uvm.edu:8889/~gundiee/publications/Limburg_et_al.pdf. Manheim, M. L., J. H. Suhrbier, E. D. Bennett, L. A. Neumann, F. C. Colcard Jr., and A. T. Reno Jr. 1975. Transportation Decision Making: A Guide to Social and Environmental Considerations. NCHRP Report No. 156. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Mander, Ü., F. Müller, T. Wrbka. 2005. Functional and Structural Land- scape Indicators: Upscaling and Downscaling Problems. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 267–272. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well- Being: A Framework for Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Mobrand, L. E., L. C. Lestelle, L. Gilbertson, R. Browning, D. Bryson, R. Carmichael, E. Claire, B. Hadden, C. Huntington, L. Kuchenbecker, and M. Shaw. 1995. Grande Ronde Model Watershed Ecosystem Diag- nosis and Treatment: Template for Planning Status Report for Grande Ronde Model Watershed Project and Progress Report on the Applica- tion of an Ecosystem Analysis Method to the Grande Ronde Watershed using Spring Chinook Salmon as a Diagnostic Species. Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Ore. NatureServe. 2009. The NatureServe Vista 2.0 Process: A Guide to Solic- iting Expert Input. www.natureserve.org/prodServices/vista/docs/ expertInputGuide.pdf. Accessed February 25, 2011. NatureServe. 2012. Ecosystem Based Management Tools Network. www.smartgrowthtools.org/ebmtools/index.php. Accessed April 25, 2012. Nelson, E., G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, D. R. Cameron, K. M. A. Chan, G. C. Daily, J. Goldstein, P. M. Kareiva, E. Lonsdorf, R. Naidoo, T. H. Ricketts, and M. R. Shaw. 2009. Modeling Multiple Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity Conservation, Commodity Pro- duction, and Tradeoffs at Landscape Scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 4–11. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. 2006. Oregon Conservation Strategy. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Salem, Ore. Oregon Department of Transportation. 2007. Mitigation Operations Man- ual. E. Section 1. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore. Oregon Department of Transportation. 2008. Environmental Program- matic Permitting: Benefit/Cost Analysis. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Ore. Paulsen, C., P. J. Crist, G. Kittel, and I. Varley. 2010. Regionwide Cumu- lative Effects Analysis of Long-Range Transportation Plans. Journal of Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2158, No. 10–18. http://trb .metapress.com/content/12uv20470272677j/fulltext.pdf. Accessed February 28, 2011. Phelan, M. D., and S. Phelan. 2007. Environmental Mandates for a Proposed Highway or Bridge Project When the Habitat of an .transportation.org/sites/planning/docs/NCHRP%208-36(48)%20 Final%20Report.pdf. Environmental Law Institute (ELI). 2007. Mitigation of Impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat: Estimating Costs and Identifying Opportunities. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. Faber-Langendoen, D., L. Master, J. Nichols, K. Snow, A. Tomaino, R. Bittman, G. Hammerson, B. Heidel, L. Ramsay, and B. Young. 2009. NatureServe Conservation Status Assessments: Methodology for Assigning Ranks, NatureServe, Arlington, VA. www.natureserve.org/ publications/ConsStatusAssess_RankMethodology.pdf. Farber, S. C., R. Costanza, and M. A. Wilson. 2002. Economic and Eco- logical Concepts for Valuing Ecosystem Services. Ecological Econom- ics, Vol. 41, pp. 375–392. www.pdx.edu/sustainability/sites/www .pdx.edu.sustainability/files/media_assets/iss/fellow_publications/ Farber_et_al.pdf. Fisher, B., R. K. Turner, and P. Morling. 2009. Defining and Classifying Ecosystem Services for Decision Making. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 3, pp. 643–653. Floberg, J., M. Goering, G. Wilhere, C. Macdonald, C. Chappell, C. Rumsey, Z. Ferdana, A. Holt, P. Skidmore, T. Horsman, E. Alverson, C. Tanner, M. Bryer, P. Iachetti, A. Harcombe, B. McDonald, T. Cook, M. Summers, D. Rolph. 2004. Willamette Valley–Puget Trough– Georgia Basin Ecoregional Assessment, Volume One: Report. The Nature Conservancy, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Washington Department of Natural Resources, Oregon. Florida Department of Transportation, Environmental Management Office. 2011. Efficient Transportation Decision Making. https:// etdmpub.fla-etat.org/est/. Accessed February 25, 2011. Forest Trends and Ecosystem Marketplace. 2008. Payments for Ecosys- tem Services: Market Profiles. The Program on Forests (PROFOR), Washington, D.C. http://ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/ acrobat/PES_Matrix_Profiles_PROFOR.pdf. Gardner, R. C., J. Zedler, A. Redmond, R. E. Turner, C. A. Johnston, V. R. Alvarex, C. A. Ximenstad, K. Prestegaard, and W. J. Mitsch. 2009. Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act: Evaluating the Federal Compensatory Mitigation Regulation. Stetson Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 2: Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-24. Groot, R. S. D. 1987. Environmental Functions as a Unifying Concept for Ecology and Economics. Environmentalist, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 105–109. Groves, C. R. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner’s Guide to Planning for Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Guzy, M. R., C. L. Smith, J. P. Bolte, D. W. Hulse, and S. V. Gregory. 2008. Policy Research Using Agent-Based Modeling to Assess Future Impacts of Urban Expansion into Farmlands and Forests. Ecology and Society, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 37. www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol13/iss1/art37/. Hamilton, B. A., and M. B. Baker Jr. 2003. NCHRP Report 481: Environ- mental Information Management and Decision Support System— Implementation Handbook. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. pp. 144. http://onlinepubs .trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_481.pdf. Hughes, R. M., J. H. Gakstatter, M. A. Shirazi, and J. M. Omernik. 1982. An Approach for Determining Biological Integrity in Flowing Waters. Place Resource Inventories: Principles and Practices, A National Workshop. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Md. www.epa.gov/bioiweb1/pdf/AnApproachforDeterminingBiologi calIntegrityinFlowingWaters_hughes_etal_1982.pdf. ICF International. 2012. Transportation for Communities: Advancing Projects through Partnerships. www.transportationforcommuni ties.com/. Accessed March 21, 2012.

66 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012b. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Policies and Guidance. www.epa.gov/compliance/ resources/policies/nepa/. Accessed May 7, 2012. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2012a. National Wetlands Inventory. www.fws.gov/wetlands/. Accessed March 21, 2012. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services. 2012b. The Information, Planning and Conservation System. www.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed March 21, 2012. U.S. Forest Service. 2012. LANDFIRE. www.landfire.gov/. Accessed March 21, 2012. U.S. Geological Survey. 2012. The Gap Analysis Program: Keeping Common Species Common. http://gapanalysis.usgs.gov/. Accessed March 21, 2012. U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2004. Environmental Indica- tors: Better Coordination is Needed to Develop Environmental Indica- tor Sets that Inform Decisions. U.S. GAO: Washington, D.C. www .gao.gov/new.items/d0552.pdf. U.S. Government Accountability Office. 2005. Environmental Infor- mation: Status of Federal Data Programs that Support Ecological Indicators. U.S. GAO: Washington, D.C. www.gao.gov/new.items/ d05376.pdf. Vira, B., and W. M. Adams. 2009. Ecosystem Services and Conservation Strategy: Beware the Silver Bullet. Conservation Letters, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 158–162. Voluntary Carbon Standard. 2008. Guidance for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use Projects. Voluntary Carbon Standard: Washing- ton, D.C. www.v-c-s.org/sites/v-c-s.org/files/Guidance%20for%20 AFOLU%20Projects.pdf. Williams, J. N., C. Seo, J. Thorn, J. K. Nelson, S. Ervin, J. M. O’Brien, and M. W. Schwartz. 2009. Using Species Distribution Models to Predict New Occurrences for Rare Plants. Diversity and Distribu- tions Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 565–576. Wilson, M. A. and S. R. Carpenter. 1999. Economic Valuation of Fresh- water Ecosystem Services in the United States: 1971–1997. Ecological Applications, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 772–783. www.dnr.mo.gov/env/wpp/ rules/rir/mdc-other-lakes-wilson-carpenter1999.pdf. Yankelovich, D. 1991. Coming to Public Judgment: Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, N.Y. Endangered Species and/or Historical Properties Are in the Vicin- ity. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol. 133, No. 2, pp. 163. Redford, K. H., and W. M. Adams. 2009. Payment for Ecosystem Ser- vices and the Challenge of Saving Nature. Conservation Biology, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 785–787. Ruhl, J. B., S. E. Kraft, and C. Lant. 2007. The Law and Policy of Eco- system Services. Island Press, Washington, D.C. The Wetlands Conservancy. 2005. Oregon’s Greatest Wetlands. Oregon Wetlands Explorer. http://oregonexplorer.info/wetlands/Wetland Conservation/OregonsGreatestWetlands. Accessed October 21, 2010. Tripp, J. T. B., and N. G. Alley. 2003. Streamlining NEPA’s Environmental Review Process: Suggestions for Agency Reform. New York University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 12. U.S. Council on Environmental Quality. 1995. Memorandum of Under- standing to Foster the Ecosystem Approach. FHWA Policy Memo- randum, Office of Environment and Planning, Washington, D.C. www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/memoofun.htm. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Farm Service Agency. 2011. National Agriculture Imagery Program. www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/apfoapp?area =home&subject=prog&topic=nai. Accessed March 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA. 2005. Environment and Planning Linkage Process Legal Guidance. www.fhwa.dot.gov/hep/ plannepalegal050222.htm. Accessed May 8, 2012. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA. 2007. Statewide Transpor- tation Planning; Metropolitan Transportation Planning. Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 30, pp. 7224–7286. www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/ FR-2007-02-14/pdf/07-493.pdf. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water. 2007. Notice of Availability and Comment Period for Draft Federal Geographic Data Committee Wetland Mapping Standard. Federal Register, Vol. 72, No. 151, pp. 44133–44136. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Compensatory Mitiga- tion for Losses of Aquatic Resources, Final Rule. Federal Register. Vol. 73, No. 70, pp. 19594–19705. www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/pdf/ wetlands_mitigation_final_rule_4_10_08.pdf. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012a. HUD-DOT-EPA Partner- ship for Sustainable Communities. www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/ partnership/. Accessed March 21, 2012.

Next: Appendix A - Wetland Workflow and Data Development »
An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2 Get This Book
×
 An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP 2) Report S2-C06-RW-2: An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2 is designed to help transportation and environmental professionals apply ecological principles early in the planning and programming process of highway capacity improvements to inform later environmental reviews and permitting. Ecological principles consider cumulative landscape, water resources, and habitat impacts of planned infrastructure actions, as well as the localized impacts.

The report introduces the Integrated Ecological Framework, a nine-step process for use in early stages of highway planning when there are greater opportunities for avoiding or minimizing potential environmental impacts and for planning future mitigation strategies.

The report is part two of a four-volume set. The other volumes in the set are:

A supplemental report, Integrated Ecological Framework Outreach Project, documents the techniques used to disseminate the project's results into practitioner communities and provides technical assistance and guidance to those agencies piloting the products.

The primary product of these complementary efforts is the Integrated Ecological Framework (IEF). The IEF is a step-by-step process guiding the integration of transportation and ecological planning. Each step of the IEF is supported by a database of case studies, data, methods, and tools. The IEF is available through the Transportation for Communities—Advancing Projects through Partnerships (TCAPP) website. TCAPP is now known as PlanWorks.

This publication is only available in electronic format.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!