Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
I-1 Image Credits Chapter 3 Figure 3-1: Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 3-2: Federal Highway Adminis- tration; Figure 3-3: Aimen Consulting; Figure 3-4: Morgan State University; Figures 3-5, 3-12, 3-15, 3-17, 3-27: Neighborhood Solutions; Figures 3-6, 3-20: Miami Dade Metropolitan Plan- ning Organization; Figures 3-7, 3-8: New York City Department of Transportation; Figure 3-9: Center for Neighborhood Technology; Figures 3-13, 3-19, 3-34, 3-40, 3-41: Hoopa Valley Tribe; Figures 3-14, 3-22, 3-23, 3-35: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 3-11: City of Columbia, SC; Figures 3-18, 3-21, 3-26: Atkins; Figure 3-16: Atlanta Regional Commission; Figure 3-24: The Atlanta Development Authority; Figure 3-25: Alaska Department of Transpor- tation; Figures 3-28, 3-33, 3-36: City of Seattle; Kentucky Transportation Cabinet; Figure 3-29: Figures 3-30, 3-47: Wisconsin Department of Transportation; Figure 3-31: Michigan Department of Transportation; Figure 3-32: City of Austin; Figure 3-34: Northwest Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figures 3-37, 3-38: Carter & Carter Associates; Figure 3-39: Federal Highway Administration; Figure 3-42: Safe Routes to Schools National Partnership; Figure 3-43: New Jersey Department of Transportation; Figure 3-44: La Casa de Don Pedro; Figure 3-45: Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Quality Growth and Regional Development; Figure 3-46: San Francisco Public Health Department; Figure 3-47: Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 3-48: Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Chapter 4 Figure 4-1: Coastal Carolina University; Figures 4-2, 4-3: Miami Dade MPO; Figure 4-4: Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission; Figures 4-5, 4-6: Atlanta Regional Commis- sion; Figures 4-7, 4-8, 4-9: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 4-10: Kentucky Transportation Council; Figure 4-11, 4-12, 4-13: Community Planning Association of South- west Idaho; Figure 4-14: Lummi Nation; Figure 4-15: NW Tribal Technical Assistance Pro- gram, Richard Rolland; Figures 4-16, 4-17: Federal Highway Administration; Figures 4-18, 4-19: Georgia Department of Transportation; Figure 4-20: Southwest Region Planning Commis- sion; Figure 4-21: San Antonio-Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figures 4-22, 4-23, 4-24: City of Seattle; Figures 4-25, 4-26, 4-27: Morgan State University; Figure 4-28: Baltimore Metropolitan Council; Figure 4-29: Pittsburgh Interfaith Impact Network; Figures 4-30, 4-31, 4-32: Colorado Department of Transportation; Figures 4-33, 4-34: North Carolina Department of Transportation; Figure 4-35: Washington State Department of Transportation; Figures 4-36, 4-37, 4-38: Mississippi Department of Transportation; Figures 4-39, 4-40: Central Puget Soundâs Regional Transit Authority, Sound Transit; Figure 4-41: Urban Habitat; Figure 4-42:
I-2 Practical Approaches for Involving Traditionally Underserved Populations in Transportation Decisionmaking Missouri Department of Transportation; Figure 4-43: Shriver Center; Figures 4-44, 4-45: Arizona Department of Transportation; Figure 4-46: Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Chapter 5 Figures 5-1, 5-2, 5-3: Morgan State University; Figure 5-4: Neighborhood Solutions; Figure 5-5: Hillsborough County Metropolitan Planning Organization; Figure 5-6: Colorado Department of Transportation; Figure 5-7: Central Puget Soundâs Regional Transit Authority, Sound Transit; Figure 5-8: Massachusetts Department of Transportation; Figure 5-9: La Casa de Don Pedro; Figure 5-10: Somerset County, Ridewise Authority; Figure 5-11: Alamo Regional Mobility; Figure 5-12: Tennessee Department of Transportation; Figure 5-13: City of Seattle Department of Transportation; Figure 5-14: City of Alexandria, Virginia; Figure 5-15: Carter & Carter Associates; Figure 5-16: Atkins; Figure 5-17: Google Maps; Figure 5-18: Georgia Department of Transporta- tion; Figure 5-19: Community Planning Association of Southwest Idaho; Figures 5-20, 5-21: Chicago Metro Area Planning; Figure 5-22: Northwest Tribal Technical Assistance Program, Richard Rolland; Figure 5-23: Hoopa Valley Tribe; Figure 5-24: New Jersey Department of Transportation; Fig- ure 5-25: La Casa De Don Pedro; Figure 5-26: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; Figure 5-27: Oregon Department of Transportation.
