Changeable Message Sign Displays During Non-Incident, Non-Roadwork Periods (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

50 1. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2003 [On- line]. Available: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/. 2. Dudek, C.L., R.D. Huchingson, W.R. Stockton, R.J. Koppa, S.H. Richards, and T.M. Mast, Human Factors Requirements for Real-Time Motorist Information Dis- plays, Vol. 1—Design Guide, Report FHWA-RD-78-5, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Sep. 1978. 3. Dudek, C.L. and R.D. Huchingson, Manual on Real-Time Motorist Information Displays, Report FHWA-IP-86-16, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Aug. 1986. 4. Dudek, C.L., Guidelines on the Use of Changeable Mes- sage Signs, Report FHWA-TS-90-043, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., July 1991. 5. Dudek, C.L., Variable Message Sign Operations Manual, Report FHWA-NJ-2001-10, New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton, Dec. 2001. 6. Dudek, C.L., Changeable Message Sign Operation and Messaging Handbook, Report FHWA-OP-03-070, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://tmcpfs.ops.fhwa. dot.gov/cfprojects/new_detail.cfm?id=25&new=2. 7. Dudek, C.L., Dynamic Message Sign Message Design and Display Manual, Report FHWA/TX-04/0-4023-P3, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Apr. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-4023- P3.pdf. 8. Dudek, C.L., R.D. Huchingson, R.D. Williams, and R.J. Koppa, Human Factors Design of Dynamic Visual and Auditory Displays for Metropolitan Traffic Man- agement, Vol. 2—Dynamic Visual Displays, Report FHWA/RD-81/040, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1981. 9. Weaver, G.D., C.L. Dudek, D.R. Hatcher, and W.R. Stockton, “Approach to Real-Time Diversion of Freeway Traffic for Special Events,” Transportation Research Record 644, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 57–61. 10. Dudek, C.L., G.D. Weaver, D.R. Hatcher, and S.H. Richards, “Field Evaluation of Messages for Real-Time Diversion of Freeway Traffic for Special Events,” Trans- portation Research Record 682, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 37–45. 11. Upchurch, J., J.D. Armstrong, M.H. Baaj, and G.B. Thomas, “Evaluation of Variable Message Signs: Target Value, Legibility, and Viewing Comfort,” Transporta- tion Research Record 1376, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 35–44. 12. Staplin, L., K. Locco, S. Byington, and D. Harkey, High- way Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians, Report FHWA-RD-01-103, Federal Highway Administra- tion, Washington, D.C., Feb. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.tfhrc.gov/humanfac/01103/coverfront.htm. 13. Ullman, G.L. and C.L. Dudek, “Legibility Distance of Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Variable Message Signs,” CD-ROM Compendium, 6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, Nov. 1999. 14. Lerner, N.D., R.E. Llaneras, H.W. McGee, S. Taori, and G. Alexander, NCHRP Report 488: Additional Investi- gations on Driver Information Overload, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, 117 pp. [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_ 488a.pdf. 15. Dudek, C.L., S.D. Schrock, G.L. Ullman, and S.T. Chrysler, “Flashing Message Features on Changeable Message Signs,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1959, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 122–129 [Online]. Available: http://trb.metapress.com/content/ v3368577l76w5527/fulltext.pdf. 16. Dudek, C.L., S.D. Schrock, and G.L. Ullman, Impacts of Using Dynamic Features on Changeable Message Signs, Report FHWA-HOP-05-069, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://tmcpfs.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/cfprojects/new_detail. cfm?id=31&new=2. 17. Johnson, C.M., policy memorandum, Use of Change- able Message Signs (CMS), Jan. 19, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/ policy/pame.htm. 18. Peters, M.E., policy memorandum, “Click It or Ticket” Signs, Mar. 6, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://mutcd. fhwa.dot.gov/res-memorandum_clickit.htm. 19. Paniati, J.F., FHWA policy memorandum, AMBER Alert—Use of Changeable Message Sign (CMS), Aug. 16, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa. dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/ambermemo.htm. 20. Paniati, J.F., FHWA policy memorandum, Use of Change- able Message Sign (CMS) for Emergency Security Mes- sages, Mar. 21, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/securmemo.htm. 21. Paniati, J.F., FHWA policy memorandum, Information and Action: Dynamic Message Sign (DMS) Recom- mended Practice and Guidance, July 16, 2004. [Online]. Available: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/res-memorandum_ dms.htm. 22. Rensink, R.A., “Change Detection,” Journal of Annual Review Psychology, 2002. REFERENCES

51 23. Smith, S.A., INFORM Evaluation, Vol. I: Technical Re- port, Report FHWA-RD-91-075, Federal Highway Ad- ministration, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1992. 24. Dudek, C.L., NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 237: Changeable Message Signs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, 237 pp. 25. Dudek, C.L. and R.D. Hutchingson, Use of Changeable Message Signs for Displaying Travel Times and Other Time-Related Messages, Dudek & Associates, Bryan, Tex., Jan. 1991. 26. Dudek, C.L., N. Trout, S. Booth, and G.L. Ullman, Im- proved Dynamic Message Sign Messages and Operations, Report FHWA/TX/-01/1882-2, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Oct. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/1882-2.pdf. 27. PBS&J, AMBER, Emergency, and Travel Time Messag- ing Guidance for Transportation Agencies, prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., May 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.ops.fhwa. dot.gov/TravelInfo/resources/cms_rept/cmspractices. htm. 28. Stockton, W.R., C.L. Dudek, D.B. Fambro, and C.J. Messer, “Evaluation of Selected Messages and Codes for Real-Time Motorist Information Displays,” Trans- portation Research Record 600, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1976, pp. 40–41. 29. Johnson, C.M., memorandum, “Congestion Ahead” Mes- sages, Dec. 21, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://mutcd. fhwa.dot.gov/res-memorandum_congestion.htm. 30. Dudek, C.L., C.J. Messer, and H.B. Jones, “A Study of Design Considerations for Real-Time Freeway Informa- tion Systems,” Highway Research Record 363, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 1–17. 31. Dudek, C.L., R.D. Huchingson, R.J. Koppa, and M.L. Edwards, Human Factors Requirements for Real-Time Motorist Information Displays, Vol. 10—Evaluation of Traffic State Descriptor Variables, Report FHWA-RD- 78-14, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., Feb. 1978. 32. Hulbert, S. and J. Beers, Research Development of Changeable Messages for Freeway Traffic Control, Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Aug. 1971. 33. Smiley, A. and R. Dewar, Changeable Message Signs— A Driver Preference Survey, Report HSF-88-03, Research and Development Branch, Ontario Ministry of Trans- portation, Downsview, ON, Canada, Dec. 1988. 34. Vercruyssen, M., Variable Message Signage Content: Survey Test of Meaning and Simulation Test of Usability, Report CTS 97-03, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Sep. 1997 [On- line]. Available: http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ ResearchReports/reportdetail.html?id=1234. 35. Richards, S.H., R.C. Wuhderlich, and C.L. Dudek, “Field Evaluation of Work Zone Speed Control Techniques,” Transportation Research Record 1035, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 66–77. 36. Richards, S.H. and C.L. Dudek, “Implementation of Work Zone Speed Control Measures,” Transportation Research Record 1086, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986, pp. 36–42. 37. Benson, B.G., “Motorist Attitudes about Content of Variable-Message Signs,” Transportation Research Record 1550, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 48–57 [Online]. Available: http://trb.metapress.com/content/ f140x332683454q4/fulltext.pdf. 38. Ullman, B.R., C.L. Dudek, N.D. Trout, and S.K. Schoen- eman, AMBER Alert, Disaster Response and Evacuation, Planned Special Events, Adverse Weather and Environ- mental Conditions, and Other Messages for Display on Dynamic Message Signs, Report FHWA/TX/-06/ 0-4023-4, Texas Transportation Institute, College Sta- tion, Oct. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://tti.tamu.edu/ documents/0-4023-4.pdf. 39. Ullman, B.R., C.L. Dudek, and N.D. Trout, “AMBER Alert and Major Catastrophe Messages on Dynamic Message Signs: Focus Group Studies in Texas,” Trans- portation Research Record 1959, Transportation Re- search Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 114–121 [Online]. Available: http://trb. cmetapress.com/content/l7182271709717w7/fulltext.pdf. 40. Dudek, C.L., S.D. Schrock, and B.R. Ullman, “License Plate and Telephone Numbers in Changeable Message Sign AMBER Alert Messages,” Transportation Re- search Record 1959, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 64–71 [Online]. Available: http://trb.metapress.com/ content/16vkv54401179h03/fulltext.pdf. 41. Texas AMBER Alert Network, Office of the Governor, Rick Perry, State of Texas [Online]. Available: http:// www.governor.state.tx.us/divisions/press/initiatives/ amber.