National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chaper 4: Conclusions and Suggested Research
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2006. Developing Guidelines for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23251.
×
Page 47
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2006. Developing Guidelines for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23251.
×
Page 48

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

45 BIBLIOGRAPHY Arndt, Jeffrey. Private/Public Partnerships to Serve Suburban Markets. Proceedings of the APTA Bus Operations and Technology Conference. Reno, NV: American Public Transportation Association, 1995. Boylan, Michael. “The Best Practices in Vanpooling.” TDM Review Winter 1999: Vol. VII Number 1. Association of Commuter Transportation. Winter 1999. Campoli, Julie and Alex S. MacLean. Visualizing Density. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2002. Carey, Graham N. Applicability of Bus Rapid Transit to Corridors with Intermediate Levels of Transit Demand.” Journal of Public Transportation 5.2 (2002): 97-114. Cervero, Robert. “Making Transit Work in the Suburbs.” Transportation Research Record 1451 (1994): 3-11. Cervero, Robert and John Beutler. Adaptive Transit: Enhancing Suburban Transit Services. Monograph 99-01. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, 1999. Cervero, Robert C. and Mark Dunzo. An Assessment of Suburban-Targeted Transit Service Strategies in the United States. UCTC Working Paper 178. Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center, UC Berkeley, 1993. Cervero, R. and R. Ewing. “Travel and the Built Environment.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1780, pp. 87-114. Cronin, J. Joseph, Roscoe Higyhtower, and Michael K. Brady. “Niche Marketing Strategies: The role of Special-Purpose Transportation Efforts in Attracting and Retaining Transit Users.” Journal of Public Transportation 3.3 (2000): 63-86. Dutton, John A. New American Urbanism. Abbeville Publishing Group, New York. 2000. Ewing, R. “Pedestrian and Transit Friendly Design: A Primer for Smart Growth.” American Planning Association. 1999. Farwell, Randall G. “Evaluation of OmniLink Demand-Driven Transit Operations: Flex-Route Services.” Transportation Quarterly 52.1 Winter (1998): 31-43. Farwell, Randall G. and Eric Marx. “Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of OmniRide Demand-Driven Transit Operations: Feeder and Flex-Route Services.” Transportation Research Record 1557 (1996): 1-14. Hess, P. and A.V. Moudon. “Site Design and Pedestrian Travel.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1674, pp. 9-19. Hess, P., A.V. Moudon and M. Logsdon. “Measuring Land Use Patterns for Transportation Research.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1780, pp. 17-24. Hooper, Katherine. Innovative Suburb-to-Suburb Transit Practices. Synthesis of Transit Practice 14. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1995.

46 Kimley-Horn & Associates. Local Municipal Transit Circulator Policy Study for Miami-Dade County. Orlando, FL: Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization, 2002. Kittelson & Associates, Inc., KFH Group, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., and Katherine Hunter-Zaworski. Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2nd Edition. TCRP Report 100. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2003. Landis, B., V. Vattikuti, R. Ottenberg, D. McLeod and M. Guttenberg. “Modeling the Roadside Walking Environment.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1773, pp. 82-88. Levinson, Herbert, Samuel Zimmerman, Jennifer Clinger, Scott Rutherford, Rodney L. Smith, John Cracknell, and Richard Soberman. Bus Rapid Transit, Volume 1: Case Studies in Bus Rapid Transit. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 90. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2003. Maat, K. and J.J. Harts. “Implications of Urban Development for Travel Demand in the Netherlands.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1780, pp. 9-16. Minerva, Victor, David Sampson, and Herbert Levinson. “Employer Shuttles – Concepts and Studies.” Transportation Research Record 1557 (1996): 32-39. Moudon, A.V. and P. Hess. “Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed Use, Medium Density Environments.” Transportation Research Record, Vol. 1578, pp. 48-55. Murray, Gail, David Koffman, Cliff Chambers and Peter Webb. Strategies to Assist Local Transportation Agencies in Becoming Mobility Managers. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 21. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997. Nelessen, Anton and Linda Howe. Flexible, Friendly Neighborhood Transit: A Solution for the Suburban Transportation Dilemma. Working Paper 86. Piscataway, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, 1995. Rosenbloom, Dr. Sandra. Transit Markets of the Future: The Challenge of Change. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 28. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1998. Round, Alfred and Robert Cervero. Future Ride: Adapting New Technologies to Paratransit in the United States. UCTC Working Paper 306. Berkeley: University of California Transportation Center, UC Berkeley, 1996. Southern California Association of Governments. Employment Density Study: Summary Report. The Natleson Company, Inc., 2001. Srinivasan, S. “Quantifying Spatial Characteristics.” Urban Studies, Vol. 39, No. 11, pp. 200H- 2028. Thompson, Gregory, L. “Achieving Suburban Transit Potential.” Transportation Research Record Report 1571. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1997. Urbitran Associates, Inc., Multisystems, SG Associates, and Robert Cervero. Guidelines for Enhancing Suburban Mobility using Public Transportation. Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 55. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1999.

Next: Appendix A: Land Use »
Developing Guidelines for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Web-Only Document: 34 Guidebook for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services examines the status of suburban transit from operational and land-use perspectives and describes the development of guidelines for evaluating, selecting, and implementing those services. The guidelines were published as TCRP Report 116: Guidebook for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!