National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 7 - Conclusions and Recommendations
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23379.
×
Page 117
Page 118
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23379.
×
Page 118
Page 119
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2003. Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23379.
×
Page 119

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

117 REFERENCES 1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Washington, DC, 2001. 2. Harwood, D. W., J. M. Mason, W. D. Glauz, B. T. Kulakowski, and K. Fitzpatrick, Truck Characteristics for Use in Highway Design and Operation, Volume I, Research Report, Report No. FHWA-RD-89-226, Federal Highway Administration, August 1990. 3. Harwood, D. W., J. M. Mason, W. D. Glauz, B. T. Kulakowski, and K. Fitzpatrick, Truck Characteristics for Use in Highway Design and Operation, Volume II, Appendixes, Report No. FHWA-RD-89-227, Federal Highway Administration, August 1990. 4. Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2000. 5. Federal Highway Administration, Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study, Report No. FHWA-PL-00-029, August 2000. 6. Federal-Provincial-Territorial Memorandum of Understand- ing on Interprovincial Weights and Dimensions—1988, Sum- mary, Task Force on Vehicle Weights and Dimensions Policy, Council of Deputy Ministers Responsible for Transportation and Highway Safety, Ottawa, Canada. May 1999. 7. North American Free Trade Agreement Land Transportation Standards Committee, Performance Criteria in Support of Vehicle Weight and Dimension Regulations: Background Paper, Draft 1, October 1998. 8. North American Free Trade Agreement Land Transportation Standards Committee, Highway Safety Performance Criteria in Support of Vehicle Weight and Dimension Regulations: Candidate Criteria and Recommended Thresholds, Working Group 2 – Vehicle Weights and Dimensions, Report of the LTSS 2 Project Group, Discussion Paper, October 1999. 9. U.S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census: Vehicle Inven- tory and Use Survey, October 1999. 10. Economic Data Resources, Estimates of Commercial Motor Vehicles Using the Southwest Border Crossings, under the auspices of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, for the Federal Motor Carrier Administration, Bethesda, Maryland, September 2000. 11. Mendoza, A., M. De Alba, and E. Mayoral, “Analysis of Vehi- cles for International Motor Transport of Freight between Mex- ico and Other NAFTA Countries,” Transportation Research Record 1602, Transportation Research Board, 1997. 12. Transportation Research Board, Truck Weight Limits: Issues and Options, Special Report 225, 1990. 13. Transportation Research Board, Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles, Special Report 267, Transportation Research Board, February 2002. 14. Clayton, A. M., J. Montufar, and D. Middleton, Operation of Long Semitrailers (57 to 60 ft) in the United States, presented at the 82nd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2003. 15. Elefteriadou, L., D. W. Harwood, W. D. Glauz, J. Hawkins, J. McFadden, D. J. Torbic, and N. A. Webster, Evaluation of the Limitations in Roadway Geometry and Impacts of Traffic Operations and Potential Changes in Truck Size and Weight Policy, Report No. PTI 9720, prepared by Pennsylvania Transportation Institute and Midwest Research Institute for Battelle Memorial Institute as part of the FHWA Comprehen- sive Truck Size and Weight Study, June 1997. 16. Transportation Association of Canada, Geometric Design Guide For Canadian Roads, Ontario, Canada, 1999. 17. Clarke, R. M., W. A. Leasure, R. W. Radlinski, and M. Smith, Heavy Truck Safety Study, Report No. DOT-HS-807-109, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, March 1987. 18. Fancher, P. S., R. D. Ervin, C. B. Winkler, and T. D. Gillespie, A Factbook of the Mechanical Properties of the Components for Single-Unit and Articulated Heavy Trucks, Report No. DOT-HS-807-125, National Highway Traffic Safety Admin- istration, December 1986. 19. Fancher, P. S., and T. D. Gillespie, “Truck Operating Charac- teristics,” Synthesis of Highway Practice 241, National Coop- erative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, 1997. 20. Woodroofe, J. H. F., C. A. M. Smith, and L. E. Morisset, “A Generalized Solution of Non-Steady-State Vehicle Offtrack- ing in Constant Radius Curves,” Paper No. 852333, Society of Automotive Engineers, presented at the Truck and Bus Meeting and Exposition, Chicago, Illinois, December 1985. 21. Western Highway Institute, “Offtracking Characteristics of Trucks and Truck Combinations,” Research Committee Report No. 3, San Francisco, California: February 1970. 22. Glauz, W. D., and D. W. Harwood, “Superelevation and Body Roll Effects on Offtracking of Large Trucks,” Transportation Research Record 1303, Transportation Research Board, 1991. 23. Sayers, M., “FHWA/UMTRI Vehicle Offtracking Model and Computer Simulation—User’s Guide, Version 1.0,” Univer- sity of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, June 1984. 24. Analysis Group, Inc., “FHWA Vehicle Offtracking Model— IBM PC Version 1.0: Program Documentation and User’s Guide,” July 20, 1986. 25. California Department of Transportation, “Truck Offtracking Model (TOM), Program Documentation and User’s Guide,” Division of Transportation Planning, 1985. 26. DeCabooter, P. H., and C. E. Solberg, “Operational Consid- erations Related to Long Trucks in Urban Areas,” Trans- portation Research Record 1249, Transportation Research Board, 1989. 27. Bernard, J. E., and M. Vanderploeg, “Static and Dynamic Off- tracking of Articulated Vehicles,” Paper No. 800151, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1981. 28. Olson, P. L., D. E. Cleveland, P. S. Fancher, L. P. Kostyniuk, and L. W. Schneider, Parameters Affecting Stopping Sight Distance, NCHRP Report 270, National Cooperative High- way Research Program, Transportation Research Board, June 1984. 29. Saito, K., J. J. Henry, and R. R. Blackburn, “Development and Application of Predictor Models for Seasonal Variations in Skid Resistance,” Proceedings of Australian Road Research Board, Vol. 13, 1986.

118 30. Wambold, J. C., “Obtaining Skid Number at Any Speed from a Test at a Single Speed,” presented at the 67th Annual Meet- ing of the Transportation Research Board, January 1988. 31. Dijks, A. “Influence of Tread Depth on Wet Skid Resistance of Tires,” Transportation Research Record 621, Transporta- tion Research Board, 1977. 32. Hayhoe, G. F. and C. G. Shapley, Factors Affecting the Skid- ding Performance of Trucks, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Pennsylvania State University. 33. Ervin, R. D. and R. E. Wild, The Noise and Traction Charac- teristics of Bias Ply Truck Tires, UM-HSRI-PF-76-2-1, High- way Safety Research Institute, University of Michigan, 1976. 34. Gusakov, I., R. Rice, S. Pugliese, and R. Galganski, An Eval- uation of Methods to Investigate Truck Tire Wet Traction, Report No. DOT-HS-806-577, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1984. 35. Fancher, P. S., “Sight Distance Problems Related to Large Trucks,” Transportation Research Record 1052, Transporta- tion Research Board, 1986. 36. Code of Federal Regulations, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 121, Air Brake Systems, 49 CFR 571.121, revised as of October 1, 2002. 37. Fambro, D. B., R. Koppa, and K. Fitzpatrick, Determination of Stopping Sight Distances, NCHRP Report 400, National Coop- erative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, 1997. 38. Gillespie, T. D., “Start-Up Accelerations of Heavy Trucks on Grades,” Transportation Research Record 1052, Transporta- tion Research Board, 1986. 39. Hutton, T. D., “Acceleration Performance of Highway Diesel Trucks,” Paper No. 70664, Society of Automotive Engineers, 1970. 40. Fancher, P. S., “Vehicle Acceleration Characteristics Influ- encing Highway Design,” Interim Report, NCHRP Project 15-8, Transportation Research Board, May 1983. 41. Hayhoe, G. F., and J. G. Grundman, “Review of Vehicle Weight/Horsepower Ratio as Related to Passing Lane Criteria,” Final Report to NCHRP Project 20-7, Task 10, Transportation Research Board, October 1978. 42. Huff, T. S., and F. H. Scrivener, “Simplified Climbing Lane Design Theory and Road Test Results,” Bulletin 104, High- way Research Board, 1955. 43. St. John, A. D., and D. R. Kobett, Grade Effects on Traffic Flow Stability and Capacity, NCHRP Report 185, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, 1978. 44. Walton, C. M., and O. Gericke, An Assessment of Changes in Truck Dimensions on Highway Geometric Design Principles and Practices, Report No. 241-1, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 1981. 45. Western Highway Institute, “Horsepower Consideration for Trucks and Truck Combinations,” San Francisco, California 1978. 46. Gillespie, T. D., Methods for Predicting Truck Speed Loss on Grades, Report No. FHWA/RD-86/059, Federal Highway Administration, November 1985. 47. Bureau of the Census, “Truck Inventory and Use Survey— 1977,” Census of Transportation, 1979. 48. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, Washington, DC, 1984. 49. Harwood, D. W., A. D. May, I. B. Anderson, L. Leiman, and A. R. Archilla, “Capacity and Quality of Service Procedures for Two-lane Highways,” Final Report of NCHRP Project 3-55(3), Midwest Research Institute, November 1999. 50. Gusakov, I., D. J. Shuring, and D. Kunkel, Rolling Resistance of Truck Tires as Measured Under Equilibrium and Transient Conditions on Calspan’s Tire Research Facility, Report No. DOT-TST-78-1, Calspan Corporation, Buffalo, New York, 1977. 51. Ervin, R. D., R. L. Nisonger, C. C. MacAdam, and P. S. Fancher, Influence of Size and Weight Variables on the Sta- bility and Control Properties of Heavy Trucks, Report No. FHWA/RD-83/029, Federal Highway Administration, July 1986. 52. Gillespie, T. D., Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1992. 53. Navin, F. P. D., “Estimating Truck’s Critical Cornering Speed and Factor of Safety,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 1, January/February 1992. 54. Ervin, R. D., C. C. MacAdam, and M. Barnes, “Influence of the Geometric Design of Highway Ramps on the Stability and Control of Heavy-Duty Trucks,” Transportation Research Record 1052, Transportation Research Board, 1985. 55. Lozia, Zbigniew, “Rollover Thresholds of the Biaxial Truck During Motion on an Even Road,” The Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and on Tracks, Supplement to Vehicle System Dynamics 28, pp 735–740, 1998. 56. Garcia, L. O., F. R. Wilson, and J. D. Innes, Heavy Truck Dynamic Rollover: Effect of Load Distribution, Cargo Type, and Road Design Characteristics, presented at the 82nd annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2003. 57. Federal Highway Administration, Comprehensive Truck Size and Weight Study: Summary Report for Phase I—Synthesis of Truck Size and Weight (TS&W) Studies and Issues, March 1995. 58. Johansson, G., and K. Rumar, “Drivers’ Brake Reaction Times,” Human Factors, Vol. 13, No. 1, February 1971. 59. Glennon, J. C., “Effect of Sight Distance on Highway Safety,” in Relationship Between Safety and Key Highway Features, State of the Art Report 6, Transportation Research Board, 1987. 60. Neuman, T. R., J. C. Glennon, and J. E. Leisch, Stopping Sight Distance—An Operational and Cost Effectiveness Analysis, FHWA/RD-83/067, Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, July 1982. 61. Federal Highway Administration, Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, 2000. 62. Normann, O. K., “Progress in Study of Motor Vehicle Pass- ing Practices,” Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 19, 1939. 63. Prisk, C. W., “Passing Practices on Rural Highways,” High- way Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 21, 1941. 64. Normann, O. K., “Driver Passing Practices,” Bulletin 195, Washington, DC, Highway Research Board, 1958. 65. American Association of State Highway Officials, A Policy of Marking and Signing of No-Passing Zones on Two- and Three-Lane Roads, 1940. 66. Van Valkenburg, G. W., and H. L. Michael, “Criteria for No- Passing Zones,” Highway Research Record 366. Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 1971.

119 67. Weaver, G. D., and J. C. Glennon, “Design and Striping for Safe Passing Operations,” Highway Research Record 390, Highway Research Board, 1972. 68. Harwood, D. W., and J. C. Glennon, “Framework for Design and Operation of Passing Zones on Two-Lane Highways,” Transportation Research Record 601, Transportation Research Board, 1976. 69. Lieberman, E. B., “Model for Calculating Safe Passing Sight Distance on Two-Lane Rural Roads,” Transportation Research Record 869, Transportation Research Board, 1982. 70. Saito, M., “Evaluation of the Adequacy of the MUTCD Min- imum Passing Sight Distance Requirement for Aborting the Passing Maneuver,” Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, January 1984. 71. Donaldson, G. A., “Safety of Large Trucks and the Geomet- ric Design of Two-Lane, Two-Way Roads,” Transportation Research Record 1052, Transportation Research Board, 1986. 72. Fancher, P. S., “Sight Distance Problems Related to Large Trucks,” Transportation Research Record 1052, Transporta- tion Research Board, 1986. 73. Khasnabis, S., “Operational and Safety Problems of Trucks in No-Passing Zones on Two-Lane Highways,” Transportation Research Record 1052, Transportation Research Board, 1986. 74. Ohene, F. A., and S. A. Ardekani, “Minimum Passing Sight Distance for Completing or Aborting the Passing Maneuver,” ITE Journal, 58(7), 1988. 75. Glennon, J. C., “New and Improved Model of Passing Sight Distance on Two-lane Highways,” Transportation Research Record 1195, Transportation Research Board, 1998. 76. Harwood, D. W., and J. C. Glennon, “Passing Sight Distance Design for Passenger Cars and Trucks,” Transportation Research Record 1208, Transportation Research Board, 1989. 77. Kaub, A. R., “Passing Operations on a Recreational Two- Lane, Two-Way Highway,” Transportation Research Record 1280, Transportation Research Board, 1990. 78. Hughes, W. E., S. Joshua, and H. W. McGee, Study Designs for Passing Sight Distance Requirements, Report No. FHWA- RD-91-078, Federal Highway Administration, 1992. 79. Jones, J. R., “An Evaluation of the Safety and Utilization of Short Passing Sections,” M.S. Thesis, Texas A&M Univer- sity, 1970. 80. McGee, H. W., W. Moore, B. G. Knapp, and J. H. Sanders, Decision Sight Distance for Highway Design and Traffic Control Requirements, FHWA-RD-78-78, Federal Highway Administration, February 1978. 81. Harwood, D. W., J. M. Mason, R. E. Brydia, M. T. Pietrucha, and G. L. Gittings, Intersection Sight Distance, NCHRP Report 383, National Cooperative Highway Research Pro- gram, Transportation Research Board, 1996. 82. Federal Highway Administration, Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook, Report No. FHWA-TS-86-215, Septem- ber 1986. 83. Nichelson, G. R., “Sight Distance and Approach Speed,” pre- sented at the 1987 National Conference on Highway-Rail Safety, Association of American Railroads, September 1987. 84. Robinson, B. W., et al., Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, Report No. FHWA-RD-00-067, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, June 2000. 85. St. John, A. D., and D. W. Harwood, TWOPAS User’s Guide, Federal Highway Administration, May 1986. 86. St. John, A. D., and D. R. Kobett, Grade Effects on Traffic Flow Stability and Capacity, NCHRP Report 185, National Cooper- ative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, 1978. 87. Bowman, B. L., “Grade Severity Rating System (GSRS)— Users Manual,” Federal Highway Administration, Washing- ton, DC, 1989. 88. Johnson, W. A., R. J. DiMarco, and R. W. Allen, “The Devel- opment and Evaluation of a Prototype Grade Severity Rating System,” Report No. FHWA-RD-98-030, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, April 1981. 89. Allen, R. W., D. W. Harwood, J. P. Christos, and W. D. Glauz, The Capability and Enhancement of VDANL and TWOPAS for Analyzing Vehicle Performance on Upgrades and Down- grades Within IHSDM, Report No. FHWA-RD-00-078, Fed- eral Highway Administration, 2000. 90. Abdelwahab, W., and J. F. Morrall, “Determining Need for and Location of Truck Escape Ramps,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of Transportation Engineering, September/October 1997. 91. Kakaley et al., “Safety of Wide Buses,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and Federal Highway Admin- istration, May 1973. 92. Weir, D. H., and C. S. Schilling, “Measures of the Lateral Placement of Passenger Cars and Other Vehicles in Proxim- ity to Intercity Buses on Two-Lane and Multilane High- ways,” Systems Technology, Inc., October 1972 (cited in Reference 88). 93. Seguin, E. L., K. W. Crowley, P. C. Harrison, and K. Per- chonok, The Effects of Truck Size on Driver Behavior, Report No. FHWA/RD-81/170, Federal Highway Administration, March 1982. 94. Zegeer, C. V., D. W. Reinfust, J. Hummer, L. Herf, and W. Hunter, “Safety Effects of Cross-Section Design for Two- Lane Roads,” Transportation Research Record 1195, Trans- portation Research Board, 1988. 95. Harwood, D. W., F. M. Council, E. Hauer, W. E. Hughes, and A. Vogt, Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways, Report No. FHWA-RD-99-207, Federal Highway Administration, December 2000. 96. MacAdam, C. C., P. S. Fancher, and L. Segal, Side Friction for Superelevation on Horizontal Curves, Volume II: Techni- cal Report, Final Report of Contract No. DTFH61-82-C- 00019, University of Michigan Transportation Research Insti- tute, August 1985. 97. Glennon, J. C., and G. D. Weaver, “Highway Curve Design for Safe Vehicle Operations,” Highway Research Record 390, Highway Research Board, 1973. 98. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, unpub- lished data from Contract No. DTNH22-85-D-47259, April 1986. 99. Glennon, J. C., T. R. Neuman, R. R. McHenry, and B. G. McHenry, Highway-Vehicle-Object Simulation Model (HVOSM) Studies of Cross-Slope Breaks on Highway Curves, Report No. FHWA/RD-82/054, Federal Highway Adminis- tration, 1982. 100. Glennon, J.C., et al., HVOSM Studies of Highway Centerline Crowns, Technical Report, Contract No. DOT-FH-11-9575, Jack E. Leisch and Associates, unpublished, August 1983.

Next: Appendix A - Summary of Truck Characteristics »
Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 505: Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design presents guidance to roadway geometric designers on how to accommodate large trucks on the U.S. highway system.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!