Labor–Management Partnerships for Public Transportation, Volume 2: Final Report (2015)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

H-1 A P P E N D I X H Evaluation Workshop Feedback Form Evaluate Labor-Management Partnership Toolkit Elements Please rate each of the LMP Toolkit elements from 1 to 5 (circle the number that you would like to assign to each element) and provide comments for your rating. Labor-Management Partnership Charter (signed document) Circle one: 1 = very effective; 5=not effective 1 2 3 4 5 Comment:___________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Labor-Management Partnership Guidance (14 Guidelines) Circle one: 1 = very effective; 5=not effective 1 2 3 4 5 Comment:___________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ Labor-Management Partnership Workshop Framework Circle one: 1 = very effective; 5=not effective 1 2 3 4 5 Comment:___________________________________________________________

H-2 Rank Labor-Management Partnership Guidelines Please rank the 14 Labor-Management Partnership guidelines (1 = most effective, 14 = least effective) and provide relevant comments for your ranking. Guideline Ranking Comments A . Im pr ov e th e Cu ltu ra l E nv iro nm en t f or P ar tn er sh ip 1. Respect the individuals representing the other party. 2. Design, implement and sustain effective communication B . Pr io rit iz e th e Be st Pa rtn er sh ip O bje cti ve s 3. Separate issues between integrative (or win-win) and distributive (or zero-sum) ones.

H-3 Guideline Ranking Comments C. A dv oc at e th e Pa rtn er sh ip 4. Establish broad-based buy-in from all key stakeholders with formality and structure that is made clear to all 5. Be confident that managers can cooperate with unions yet still continue to defend prerogatives and efficiency 6. Be confident that union leaders’ cooperation with management will not compromise members’ interests

H-4 Guideline Ranking Comments D . B ui ld S tre ng th w ith in th e Pa rtn er sh ip 7. Outline shared goals and expectations of the partnership 8. Align all necessary resources to support the partnership 9. Require consistent accountability of everyone in the organization with a governing or executing responsibility for the partnership 10. Provide for comprehensive skill building for both union and management throughout the course of the LMP 11. Provide an independent facilitator, if affordable

H-5 Guideline Ranking Comments E. M ak e th e M os t o f E ve nt s 12. Support stability in union and management leadership and smooth LMP leadership transitions 13. Take advantage of specific successes (e.g. pension fund governance, or apprenticeship) to build broader LMP 14. Take advantage of shared challenges and crises to catalyze partnership agreements

Abbreviations and acronyms used without definitions in TRB publications: A4A Airlines for America AAAE American Association of Airport Executives AASHO American Association of State Highway Officials AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ACI–NA Airports Council International–North America ACRP Airport Cooperative Research Program ADA Americans with Disabilities Act APTA American Public Transportation Association ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials ATA American Trucking Associations CTAA Community Transportation Association of America CTBSSP Commercial Truck and Bus Safety Synthesis Program DHS Department of Homeland Security DOE Department of Energy EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration FHWA Federal Highway Administration FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration FRA Federal Railroad Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration HMCRP Hazardous Materials Cooperative Research Program IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers ISTEA Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (2012) NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASAO National Association of State Aviation Officials NCFRP National Cooperative Freight Research Program NCHRP National Cooperative Highway Research Program NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration NTSB National Transportation Safety Board PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration RITA Research and Innovative Technology Administration SAE Society of Automotive Engineers SAFETEA-LU Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (2005) TCRP Transit Cooperative Research Program TDC Transit Development Corporation TEA-21 Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (1998) TRB Transportation Research Board TSA Transportation Security Administration U.S.DOT United States Department of Transportation

TRA N SPO RTATIO N RESEA RCH BO A RD 500 Fifth Street, N W W ashington, D C 20001 A D D RESS SERV ICE REQ U ESTED ISBN 978-0-309-37492-7 9 7 8 0 3 0 9 3 7 4 9 2 7 9 0 0 0 0 Labor–M anagem ent Partnerships for Public Transportation, V olum e 2: Final Report TCRP Report 181 TRB