National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

Assessing Prevalence
and Trends in Obesity

NAVIGATING THE EVIDENCE

Committee on Evaluating Approaches to Assessing
Prevalence and Trends in Obesity

Food and Nutrition Board

Health and Medicine Division

images

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, DC
www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001

This activity was supported by Grant No. 72377 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization or agency that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-44271-8
International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-44271-0
Digital Object Identifier: 10.17226/23505

Additional copies of this workshop summary are available for sale from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2016 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested citation: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing prevalence and trends in obesity: Navigating the evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

Image

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president.

The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.

The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.

Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies.org.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

COMMITTEE ON EVALUATING APPROACHES TO ASSESSING PREVALENCE AND TRENDS IN OBESITY

SHARI BARKIN (Chair), Professor of Pediatrics and William K. Warren Foundation Endowed Chair, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

CHERYL A. M. ANDERSON, Associate Professor, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla

LYNN A. BLEWETT, Professor of Health Policy and Director, State Health Access Data Assistance Center (SHADAC), University of Minnesota, School of Public Health, Minneapolis

ELIZABETH GOODMAN, Associate Chief for Community-Based Research, MassGeneral Hospital for Children and Professor of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

ROSS HAMMOND, Senior Fellow, Economic Studies Program and Director, Center on Social Dynamics and Policy, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC

SANDRA HASSINK, Immediate Past President, American Academy of Pediatrics and Director, American Academy of Pediatrics Institute for Healthy Childhood Weight, Elk Grove Village, IL

AMY H. HERRING, Carol Remmer Angle Distinguished Professor of Children’s Environmental Health, Professor and Associate Chair, Department of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

GIRIDHAR MALLYA, Director of Policy and Planning, Philadelphia Department of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA (until September 2015)

MICHAEL G. PERRI, Dean, College of Public Health and Health Professions, and the Robert G. Frank Endowed Professor of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville

EDUARDO SANCHEZ, Chief Medical Officer for Prevention, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX

JACKSON P. SEKHOBO, Director, Evaluation, Research and Surveillance Unit, Division of Nutrition, New York State Department of Health, Menands, NY

SHUMEI S. SUN, W. Hans Carter Professor and Chair, Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond (from July 2015)

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

Consultant

DONALD HEDEKER, Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, IL

Study Staff

MEGHAN QUIRK, Study Director

JANET MULLIGAN, Senior Program Associate for Research (until January 2016)

ANNA BURY, Research Assistant (from December 2015)

RENEE GETHERS, Senior Program Assistant

ANN L. YAKTINE, Director, Food and Nutrition Board

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

Reviewers

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Lawrence D. Brown, University of Pennsylvania

Christina D. Economos, Tufts University

Barbara C. Hansen, University of South Florida

Shiriki Kumanyika, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

Cynthia L. Ogden, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Louise Ryan, University of Technology Sydney

David A. Savitz, Brown University

Andrea Sharma, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Anna Maria Siega-Riz, University of Virginia

Marion Standish, The California Endowment

Mary T. Story, Duke University

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Eileen T. Kennedy, Tufts University, and Diane F. Birt, Iowa State University. They were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

Preface

Obesity prevalence and trend estimates are at the crux of informing research, policies, and interventions. Stakeholders at the national, state, regional, local, and community levels search for information relevant to their particular jurisdictions to know how best to proceed. Often times, however, the available estimates appear to provide different accounts of the same issue. Obesity prevalence could be increasing, decreasing, or stabilizing depending on which published report is being considered. Underlying these seemingly conflicting results are not only fundamental principles of epidemiology and statistics, but also methodological approaches specific to the assessment of obesity. The interplay of these factors can make interpretation and application of the results challenging. It is the intent of this consensus report to examine key elements that affect the meaning of an obesity prevalence and trend estimate in order to help those seeking to use the published reports to systematically inform the decisions they need to make.

Prior to my involvement with this consensus study, I thought reviewing published reports was a relatively straightforward process. I relied on my training and experiential knowledge to guide my understanding of the findings. As a researcher who collects height and weight data on preschool-aged children, I was well aware of how difficult it can be to measure a young child, but also how critical it is in accurately assessing obesity status. As a medical doctor who has seen the demographic characteristics of my patient population change over time, I have encountered influxes and effluxes of population groups that exhibit different levels of obesity risk and have recognized that this has direct implications for understanding obesity prevalence and trends in my community. Now at the end of this study, I

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

am struck by the number of factors the committee identified as having an impact on obesity prevalence and trend estimates.

In preparing this report, the committee was primarily guided by two perspectives. First was the viewpoint of the investigator conducting a study that eventually leads to a published report. Second was the perspective of those at the national, state, and local levels who use reports to inform decision making (hereafter referred to as “end users”). The committee envisioned a range of end users, including but not limited to, policy makers and program planners at government public health agencies or nonprofit organizations; persons working in other public agencies (e.g., transportation, planning, parks and recreation), state legislatures, and educational institutions; private sector foundations and corporations; researchers and other data generators; and health care providers and payers. Given the array of potential end users, each with their own unique information needs and decisions to make, the committee developed a conceptual framework for extracting meaning from published reports that is intended to have broad application. These two perspectives, however, do not operate in isolation, and the committee foresees ways investigators and end users can enhance their collaborations to improve the future of data collection, analysis, and reporting. Advances that are on the horizon, both technological and otherwise, have the potential to encourage these collective efforts.

The committee would like to thank those who made contributions to this report. The Health and Medicine Division study staff included our incredibly hard-working study director, Meghan Quirk; Janet Mulligan; Anna Bury; and Renee Gethers. Their commitment to evidence and high quality was evident in their everyday work. Ann Yaktine, Director of the Food and Nutrition Board, gently guided us all toward our highest standards. The committee would also like to acknowledge the contributions of Lynn Parker, Senior Scholar, who provided critical feedback on the report; Anne Rodgers, who helped to organize and edit the report; Elena OvaittWeiss, who worked with the committee to design the framework; and Claire Wang, who provided feedback during initial framework development.

This report represents the collective efforts of the committee. The diverse perspectives—pediatrics, epidemiology, biostatistics, public health, heath disparities, and beyond—truly enriched this final product. Each member volunteered a substantial amount of time, with schedules that were overbooked and that sometimes took them across the globe and different time zones, to complete this report. The committee’s dedication to and passion for wrapping their minds around the complexities of the topic was apparent throughout this study process. It is one of life’s greatest joys

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

to work with inspirational, intelligent colleagues who push you to think deeply. I am grateful for their dedication and hard work.

Shari Barkin, Chair
Committee on Evaluating Approaches to Assessing
Prevalence and Trends in Obesity

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23505.
×
Page R14
Next: Summary »
Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity: Navigating the Evidence Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $74.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Obesity has come to the forefront of the American public health agenda. The increased attention has led to a growing interest in quantifying obesity prevalence and determining how the prevalence has changed over time. Estimates of obesity prevalence and trends are fundamental to understanding and describing the scope of issue. Policy makers, program planners, and other stakeholders at the national, state, and local levels are among those who search for estimates relevant to their population(s) of interest to inform their decision-making. The differences in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data have given rise to a body of evidence that is inconsistent and has created barriers to interpreting and applying published reports. As such, there is a need to provide guidance to those who seek to better understand and use estimates of obesity prevalence and trends.

Assessing Prevalence and Trends in Obesity examines the approaches to data collection, analysis, and interpretation that have been used in recent reports on obesity prevalence and trends at the national, state, and local level, particularly among U.S. children, adolescents, and young adults. This report offers a framework for assessing studies on trends in obesity, principally among children and young adults, for policy making and program planning purposes, and recommends ways decision makers and others can move forward in assessing and interpreting reports on obesity trends.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!