National Academies Press: OpenBook

Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments (2017)

Chapter: Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries

« Previous: Appendix A - Selected Treatment Types for Evaluation
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 63
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 66
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 67
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B - Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24627.
×
Page 71

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

63 A P P E N D I X B Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries NCHRP Project 17-56 QC Pedestrian Volume Count Report Examples CITY AS RI RRFB PHB TREATMENT SITES COMPARISON SITES TUCSON, AZ 83 36 0 82 85 65 ST. PETERSBURG, FL 113 19 32 3 115 45 PORTLAND, OR 53 40 2 2 61 33 CHARLOTTE, NC 2 34 0 2 36 112 TOTAL (14 cities as of 8 Dec 2014) 292 313 50 96 499 476 AS = Advance Stop, RI = Refuge Island, RRFB = Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, PHB = Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon

64 Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Figure B-1. Example of a Tucson PHB with AS.

Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries 65 Figure B-2. Example of a Tucson PHB with RI and AS.

66 Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Figure B-3. Example of a St. Petersburg RRFB with AS.

Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries 67 Figure B-4. Example of a St. Petersburg AS.

68 Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Figure B-5. Example of a Portland RI.

Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries 69 Figure B-6. Example of a Portland RI.

70 Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Figure B-7. Example of a Charlotte Comparison Site (four lanes next to bus stop and no marked crosswalk).

Treatment and Comparison Site Examples of Pedestrian Count Summaries 71 Figure B-8. Example of a Charlotte RI without a marked crosswalk.

Next: Appendix C - Analysis of Charlotte Pedestrian Volumes to Determine Pedestrian Counting Procedure for NCHRP Project 17-56 »
Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP) Report 841: Development of Crash Modification Factors for Uncontrolled Pedestrian Crossing Treatments quantifies the safety benefits of four types of pedestrian crossing treatments—rectangular rapid flashing beacons, pedestrian hybrid beacons, pedestrian refuge islands, and advanced YIELD or STOP markings and signs—and presents a crash modification factor (CMF) for each treatment type. This information, which is suitable for inclusion in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Highway Safety Manual, the U.S. Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) CMF Clearinghouse, and other guidance, will be valuable to transportation agencies in choosing the appropriate crossing treatment for uncontrolled pedestrian crossings.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!