National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Front Matter
Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×

Overarching Workshop Themes

Participants of the September 29-30, 2016, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies) workshop on Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States provided perspectives from the radiation protection and user communities on potential communication improvements associated with adopting SI units for radiation measurements in the United States. Much of the discussions were focused on communications during emergency response and were triggered from the experience of the U.S. response to the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident in Japan. The workshop discussions can be organized in the following themes:

THEME 1: (Chapter 1) The United States has a long history of government policies supporting the adoption of SI units for all measurements. National and international organizations have recommended the exclusive use of SI units for radiation measurements for more than 30 years. However, the United States continues to use conventional units for radiation measurements. As a result, most radiation professionals in the United States must understand both conventional and SI units for radiation measurements and make conversions between the two.

THEME 2: (Chapter 2) SI units for radiation measurements are finding increasing use in the United States. However, the variability in the degree of current use of these units in the U.S. government is considerable. Some agencies (for example, the Department of Transportation and the National Institute of Standards and Technology) use SI units exclusively; others

Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×

(for example, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Energy) use a mix of SI and conventional units, and a few (for example, the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Radiological Emergency Preparedness program and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration) still use only conventional units for radiation measurements. The use of SI units for radiation measurements is also increasing in state and local governments, as well as in medicine and scientific publications. The nuclear power industry exclusively uses conventional units for radiation measurements and has no plans currently to adopt SI units.

THEME 3: (Chapter 3) Several workshop participants noted that the continuing use of conventional units for radiation measurements is problematic, particularly with respect to emergency response. Workshop participants from several agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Defense, the Department of Energy, and the Environmental Protection Agency, said that their agency’s credibility and trust was placed in jeopardy during the response to the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident because of near-miss conversion mistakes and other related issues. The exclusive use of SI units for radiation measurements has benefits, including alignment of the United States with international practice and improving communications with the public. There are several associated costs to the adoption of SI units related to changes in regulations, reporting, training, and instrumentation. Some budgetary relief in the form of grants or tax exemptions could assist various stakeholders, including state and local governments and nuclear and instrumentation industries, with the adoption of SI units for radiation measurements.

THEME 4: (Chapter 4) Experience from Canada and the United Kingdom related to converting from conventional to SI units for radiation measurements in the 1980s indicates that radiation professionals can adapt quickly to the change. The harmonization of radiation protection standards (including use of units for radiation measurements) within the European Union facilitated Europe’s response to the 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.

THEME 5: (Chapter 5) Several workshop participants noted that the adoption of SI units for radiation measurements is slow and a regulatory or policy change is needed to reendorse adoption of SI units and develop an adoption plan. Many workshop participants suggested that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s refusal to require SI units for radiation measurements is inhibiting federal, state, and local governments from adopting the

Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×

SI units for radiation measurements. However, some workshop participants noted that it is unlikely that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will readdress its policy in the near future. The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) could lead interagency efforts to establish unified guidance for the federal government related to use of units for radiation measurements. OSTP could further examine the merits of exclusively using SI units and support a plan to adopt the use of SI units for radiation measurements.

Assuming that U.S. federal and state agencies and other organizations consider adopting the SI units for radiation measurements, they will likely perform a cost–benefit analysis to assist them with the decision. The cost–benefit analysis expert invited to speak at the workshop noted that the costs and benefits related to adopting SI would need to be quantified based on the impact of the policy change over time. Many of the costs would be one-time costs but the benefits would be long term. Many workshop participants proposed a “cold turkey” approach to adopting SI units with advance notice of the start date to allow stakeholders time to prepare for the conversion.

This proceedings has been prepared by the workshop rapporteur as a factual summary of what occurred at the workshop. The workshop planning committee was solely responsible for organizing the workshop, identifying topics, and choosing speakers. The views contained in the proceedings are those of individual workshop participants and do not necessarily represent the views of all workshop participants, the planning committee or the National Academies.

Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×
Page 1
Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×
Page 2
Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×
Page 3
Suggested Citation:"Overarching Workshop Themes." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24645.
×
Page 4
Next: 1 Introduction and Context »
Adopting the International System of Units for Radiation Measurements in the United States: Proceedings of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Most countries in the world use the SI (Système International, also known as the metric system) units for radiation measurements in commercial and technical activities. The United States, in contrast, uses a mix of SI and conventional units for radiation measurements, despite 30-year-old national and international recommendations to exclusively use SI. Radiation professionals in the United States are faced with the need to understand both systems and make conversions between the two.

In September 2016, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine organized a workshop to explore potential communication improvements associated with adopting the international system of units (SI units) for radiation measurements in the United States. Participants discussed potential improvements in the effectiveness of responding to national and international radiation emergencies, international experiences in adopting the exclusive use of SI units of radiation measurements, and steps needed to adopt the exclusive use of SI units in the US in terms of timing, implementation, and ways to overcome or manage technical, economic, and policy barriers. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!