Improving Stakeholder Engagement in Aircraft Accident Response Planning (2017)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Imp ACKNOWLED This work was Research Prog Sciences, Eng COPYRIGHT I Authors herein persons who o Cooperative R purposes. Per FMCSA, FRA, product, metho uses will give a request permis DISCLAIMER The opinions a are not necess or the program The informatio edited by TRB roving S GMENT sponsored by t ram (ACRP), w ineering, and M NFORMATION are responsibl wn the copyrigh esearch Progra mission is give FTA, Office of d, or practice. ppropriate ack sion from CRP nd conclusions arily those of th sponsors. n contained in t . takeho he Federal Avia hich is adminis edicine. e for the authen t to any previo ms (CRP) gran n with the unde the Assistant Se It is expected th nowledgment o . expressed or im e Transportatio his document w AC Web-Only lder En Respon Futron Av N tion Administra tered by the Tra ticity of their m usly published o ts permission to rstanding that n cretary for Res at those reprod f the source of a plied in this re n Research Bo as taken direct RP Docume gagem se Plan iation Corpo orfolk, VA tion (FAA). It w nsportation Re aterials and for r copyrighted m reproduce ma one of the mate earch and Tec ucing the mate ny reprinted or port are those o ard; the Nation ly from the subm nt 31: ent in A ning ration Contrac as conducted t search Board ( obtaining writte aterial used he terial in this pub rial will be used hnology, PHMS rial in this docu reproduced ma f the researche al Academies o ission of the a ircraft tor’s Final Rep hrough the Airp TRB) of the Na n permissions f rein. lication for clas to imply TRB, A, or TDC endo ment for educat terial. For oth rs who perform f Sciences, Eng uthor(s). This m Acciden ort for ACRP Pr Submitted Ja ort Cooperative tional Academie rom publishers sroom and not AASHTO, FAA rsement of a p ional and not-fo er uses of the m ed the researc ineering, and M aterial has not t oject 10-22 nuary 2017 s of or -for-profit , FHWA, articular r-profit aterial, h. They edicine; been

The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, non- governmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president. The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president. The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies.org. The Transportation Research Board is one of seven major programs of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The mission of the Transportation Research Board is to increase the benefits that transportation contributes to society by providing leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal. The Board’s varied committees, task forces, and panels annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation. Learn more about the Transportation Research Board at www.TRB.org.

ACRP 10-22 Improving Stakeholder Engagement in Aircraft Accident Response Planning iii Table of Contents Summary .................................................................................................... 1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 1  Phased Approach.................................................................................................................... 2  Challenges .............................................................................................................................. 3  Lessons Learned ............................................................................................................... 3  Accident Location Data Analysis ....................................................................................... 3  Small Airport Participation ................................................................................................. 4  Conclusions and Follow-On Research .................................................................................... 4  Feedback from the Field ................................................................................................... 5  Follow-On Research and Development ............................................................................ 5  Research Approach .................................................................................. 5 Phase 1 – White Paper Development ..................................................................................... 6  Task 1 – Literature Review ............................................................................................... 6  Task 2 – Foundational Research ...................................................................................... 7  Task 3a – Workshops 1 through 3 Plan Development ...................................................... 9  Task 3b – Gap Analysis and Conduct of Workshops 1 through 3 ................................... 10  Task 4 – Develop Research Plan for the Remaining Tasks ............................................ 12  Task 5 – Deliver Draft White Paper ................................................................................. 13  Task 6 – Edit and Finalize White Paper .......................................................................... 13  Task 7 – Interim Meeting #1 ............................................................................................ 13  Phase 2 – Follow–On Research and Guidance Development .............................................. 13  Task 8 – Research Gaps Discovered in Phase 1 ........................................................... 13  Task 9/10 – Conduct Follow-On Workshops and Consolidate Findings ......................... 13  Task 11 – Develop Draft Airport Guidance Materials ...................................................... 16  Task 12 – Develop Pilot Study Plan ................................................................................ 16  Task 13 – Deliver Interim Report .................................................................................... 17  Task 14 – Interim Meeting #2 .......................................................................................... 17  Phase 3 – Pilot Studies ......................................................................................................... 17  Task 15 – Execute Pilot Study ........................................................................................ 17  Task 16 – Deliver Draft Final Contractor’s Report and Draft Final AAMG Tool .............. 18 Task 17 - Deliver Contractor's Final Report and Final AAMG Tool ………………………18 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 18 Appendix A – References ..................................................................... A-1 Appendix B – Aircraft Accident Location Research Results ............ B-1 Appendix C – Agenda and Participant Survey – Phase 1 ................. C-1 Appendix D – Phase 1 White Paper ..................................................... D-1 Appendix E – Agenda and Participant Survey – Phase 2 .................. E-1

ACRP 10-22 Improving Stakeholder Engagement in Aircraft Accident Response Planning iv Appendix F – AAMG Tool Version 1 Screen Shots ............................ F-1 Appendix G – Agenda and Participant Survey – Phase 3 ................. G-1 Appendix H – AAMG Tool Version 11 Screen Shots ......................... H-1