Resource Allocation of Available Funding to Programs of Work (2017)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

55 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), User and Non- User Benefit Analysis for Highways (The Redbook), AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2010. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), AASHTOWare Bridge Management (BrM) Software: Version 5.2, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2013 [Online]. Available: http://aashtowarebridge.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/5_2-whitepaper-march2013. pdf [accessed June 2016]. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), “The Economic Impact of Current Investment Trends in Surface Transportation Infrastructure,” Failure to Act Series, ASCE, Washington, D.C., 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Issues_and_Advocacy/Our_Initiatives/ Infrastructure/Content_Pieces/failure-to-act-transportation-report.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Anderson, S., K. Molenaar, and C. Schexnayder, NCHRP Synthesis 358: Guidance for Cost Estima- tion and Management for Highway Projects During Planning, Programming, and Preconstruction, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_574.pdf [accessed Feb. 2016]. Bai, Q., “Trade-Off Analysis in Multiobjective Optimization for Transportation Asset Management,” School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., 2012. Bai, Q. and S. Labi, Updating, Upgrading, Refining, Calibration and Implementation of Trade-Off Analysis Methodology Developed for INDOT, Publication FHWA/IN/JTRP-2012/32, Joint Trans- portation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, West Lafayette, Ind., 2012. Bai, Q., K.C. Sinha, and S. Labi, Tradeoff Analysis for Multiobjective Optimization in Transporta- tion Asset Management by Generating Pareto Frontiers Using Extreme Points Nondominated Sorting, Genetic Algorithm II, ITE, 2011. Bellomo, S.J., J.J. Mehra, J.R. Stowers, H.S. Cohen, M.R. Petersilia, and A.T. Reno, NCHRP Report 179: Evaluating Options in Statewide Transportation Planning/Programming—Issues, Techniques, and Their Relationships, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977. Bellomo, S., et al., NCHRP Report 199: Evaluating Options in Statewide Transportation Planning/ Programming Techniques and Applications, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1979. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., “Development of a Multimodal Tradeoffs Methodology for Use in Statewide Transportation Planning,” NCHRP Project 8 36(7) Phase I Final Report, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2001. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., “Development of a Multimodal Tradeoffs Methodology for Use in Statewide Transportation Planning,” NCHRP Project 8 36(7) Phase II Final Report, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004 [Online]. Available: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=1249 [accessed June 2016]. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., NCHRP Report 545: Analytic Tools to Support Transportation Asset Management, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_545.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., “The Relationship Between Asset Management and Performance Management.” NCHRP Project 20 24(58) Toward Developing Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20-24(58)_AssetMan- PerformanceMan_final.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Planning for Performance Tool—2016 Update: Technical Documen- tation – V25, Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, 2016. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and High Street Consulting Group, “Report on a National Forum on Performance-Based Transportation Planning and Programming,” NCHRP Project 20 24(58) Toward Developing Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010a [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20-24(58)_NationalForumSummary.pdf [accessed June 2016]. RefeRences

56 Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Boston Strategies International, Inc., Gordon Proctor and Associates, and M.J. Markow, NCHRP Report 666: Target-Setting Methods and Data Management to Support Performance-Based Resource Allocation by Transportation Agencies, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010b. Duncan, C. and G. Weisbrod, NCHRP Synthesis 480: Economic and Development Implications of Transportation Disinvestment, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015, 59 pp. [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/ nchrp_syn_480.pdf [accessed Feb. 2016]. Economic Development Research Group, Economic Benefits and Impacts of Utah’s Unified Plan, prepared for the Utah Transportation Coalition, Salt Lake City, 2012 [Online]. Available: http:// www.utahtransportation.org/downloads/Economic_Benefits_and_Impacts_of_Utahs_Unified_ Plan.pdf [accessed June 2016]. European Commission (EU), Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area—Toward a Competitive and Resource Efficient Transport System, White Paper, EU, Brussels, Belgium, 2011. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Economic Analysis Primer, Office of Asset Management, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2003. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), “FHWA Asset Management Position Paper,” FHWA, U.S.DOT, Washington, D.C., 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/ asstmgmt/amppinf.cfm [accessed June 2016]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), HERS-ST Highway Economic Requirements System—State Version: User’s Guide, Office of Transportation Performance Management, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/hersst/pubs/users/users_guide09. pdf [accessed June 2016]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Highway Statistics 2014, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2014/ [accessed June 2016]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), “Appendix B: Bridge Investment Analysis Methodology,” 2013 Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance, Report to Congress, U.S.DOT, Washington, D.C., 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/2013cpr/ [accessed June 2016]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Examples of Statewide Transportation Planning Practices, U.S.DOT, Washington, D.C., 1995 [Online]. Available: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/practices/stpp.pdf [accessed Feb. 2016]. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Asset Management Guide: Focusing on the Management of Our Transit Investments, Report No. 0027, FTA, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: https:// www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_Report_No._0027.pdf [accessed July 2016]. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Beginning the Dialog: Transit State of Good Repair, FTA, Washington, D.C., 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.transit.dot.gov/TAM/TSGRbeginning thedialogue [accessed July 2016]. Federal Transit Administration (FTA), National State of Good Repair Assessment, FTA, Wash- ington, D.C., 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-guidance/ asset-management/state-good-repair/2010-national-state-good-repair [accessed July 2016]. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), SIS Atlas, FDOT, Tallahassee, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.dot.state.fl.us/planning/systems/programs/mspi/pdf/SIS_Atlas_030816.pdf [accessed June 2016]. French Ministry of the Environment, Energy and the Sea, Schéma National des Infrastructures de Transport, Ministère de l’Environnement, de l’Énergie et de la Mer, Paris, 2011. Garrett, M., “Agenda D—2018–2021 STIP Funding Allocation Recommendation,” Memorandum, Oregon DOT, Salem, July 2, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/STIP/ Apply/OTCStaffReport.pdf [accessed June 2016]. German Federal Ministry for Traffic and Digital Infrastructure, Bundesverkehrswegeplan 2030, Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur, Berlin, 2016. Giaimo, G. and R. Schiffer, Eds., “Statewide Travel Demand Modeling: A Peer Exchange,” Conference in Longboat Key, Florida, Sept. 23–24, 2004 [Online], 2005. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/circulars/ec075.pdf [accessed June 2016].

57 Grant, M., J. D’Ignazio, A. Bond and A. McKeeman, “Performance-based Planning and Pro- gramming Guidebook,” prepared by ICF International, Inc. for FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2013, 146 pp. [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/performance_based_planning/ pbpp_guidebook/pbppguidebook.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Grant, M., T. Plaskon, S. Trainor, S. Suter, and J. Crossett, Research Results Digest 361: State DOT Public Transportation Performance Measures: State of Practice and Future Needs, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rrd_361.pdf [accessed June 2016]. High Street Consulting Group and Economic Development Research Group, “Economic Valuation of the Colorado Highway System,” Colorado DOT, Denver, 2013. Janik, D., “Best Practices in Using Programmatic Investment Strategies in Statewide Transportation Plans.” Project NCHRP 8-36 (67), Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, p. 92 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/archive/ NotesDocs/NCHRP08-36(67)_FR.pdf [accessed Feb. 2016]. Jaworski, T. and C. Kitchens, “National Policy for Regional Development: Evidence from Appalachian Highways,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, Working Paper 22073, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.nber.org/papers/w22073.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Lee, D.B., “Monitoring and Evaluation of State Highway Systems,” Transportation Research Record 891, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 24–28. Li, Q. and S. McNeil, “Advancing Asset Management for Interstate Highway Systems in Delaware,” 8th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Nov. 15–19, 2011, Santiago, Chile. Litman, T., “The Future Isn’t What it Used to Be: Changing Trends and Their Implications for Trans- port Planning,” Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.vtpi.org/future.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Liu, M. and D. Frangopol, “Optimizing Bridge Network Maintenance Management Under Uncer- tainty with Conflicting Criteria: Life-Cycle Maintenance, Failure and User Costs,” Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 11, 2006, pp. 1835–1845 [Online]. Available: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1835) [accessed June 2016]. Lorenz, J., and G. Weisbrod, “Getting Up to Speed with Transportation Economic Impact Tools,” Planning Magazine, American Planning Association, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2013. Louch, H., “Performance-Based Planning and Programming,” white paper prepared by Cambridge Systematics for FHWA, New York, N.Y., May 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa. dot.gov/planning/performance_based_planning/resources/white_paper/perfplan.pdf [accessed March 2016]. Lynch, T., “Analyzing the Economic Impact of Transportation Projects Using RIMS II, IMPLAN and REMI,” White paper prepared for the Office of Research and Special Programs, U.S.DOT, Washington, D.C., 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.remi.com/uploads/File/Articles/article_ 339.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Lyons, W., “Trends in Statewide Long-Range Transportation Plans: Core and Emerging Topics,” U.S.DOT—Volpe Center, Cambridge, Mass., March 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www. planning.dot.gov/documents/State_plans_report_508_A.PDF [accessed May 2016]. Macharis, C., A. de Witte, and J. Ampe, “The Multi-actor, Multi-criteria Analysis Methodology (MAMCA) for the Evaluation of Transport Projects: Theory and Practice,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 183–202 [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/229782639 [accessed June 2016]. Maggiore, M., J. Lorenz, and K. Schneweis, “Cross-Asset Resource Allocation and the Impact on System Performance,” NCHRP Project 08-91, Workshop 017, 2014 [Online]. Available: http:// onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conferences/2014/AssetManagement2014/Maggiore%20-%20 Workshop%20Cross%20Asset.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Maggiore, M. and K. Ford., NCHRP Report 806: Cross-Asset Resource Allocation and the Impact on System Performance, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2015 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_806.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT), 2017–2021 Capital Investment Plan, Draft for Public Review Presented to the Joint Boards April 11, 2016, MassDOT, Boston, 2016.

58 McCahill, C. and C. Spahr, “VMT Inflection Point: Factors Affecting 21st Century Travel,” State Smart Transportation Initiative, Sept. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.ssti.us/wp/wp-content/ uploads/2013/10/VMT_white_paper-final.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Metropolitan Area Planning Council, “Community Snapshots,” MetroBoston DataCommon, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://metroboston.datacommon.org/snapshots [accessed June 2016]. Middleton, S., “Cross-Modal Project Prioritization: A TPCB Peer Exchange,” U.S.DOT, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., May 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.planning.dot.gov/Peer/NorthCarolina/NCDOT_cross-modal_12-16-14.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Middleton, S. and T. Regan, “Performance-Based Planning and Programming in the Context of MAP-21: A TPCB Peer Exchange,” U.S.DOT—Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., Jan. 2015 [Online]. Available: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/54000/54500/54585/ NYMTC_Planning_MAP21_3-6-14.pdf [accessed March 2016]. MinVG (Bundesgesetz über die Verwendung der zweckgebundenen Mineralölsteuer und der National- strassenabgabe vom 1985), Schweizerisches Landsrecht 725.116.2, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/classified-compilation/19850046/index.html [accessed Aug. 2016]. Mizusawa, D. and S. McNeil, “Demonstrating the Benefits of Highway Economic Requirement System—State Version: A Case Study,” 7th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 23–28, 2008. National Association of State Budget Officers (NASBO), State Expenditure Report: Examining Fiscal 2013–2015 State Spending, NASBO, Washington, D.C., 2015 [Online]. Available: https:// www.nasbo.org/publications-data/state-expenditure-report/state-expenditure-report-fiscal- 2013-2015-data [accessed June 2016]. National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission, “Transportation for Tomorrow: Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission,” The Commission, Washington, D.C., 2007 [Online]. Available: http://transportationfortomorrow. com/final_report/ [accessed June 2016]. Neumann, L., F. Harrison, and K. Sinha, Transportation Research Circular 406: Transportation Plan- ning, Programming, and Finance: Proceedings of a Conference, Seattle, Wash., July 19–22, 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 50–63. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), “ConnectOregonVI: Instructions to Reviews,” ODOT, Salem, 2015a [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/CO/COVI- ReviewerInstructions.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), “Enhance Proposal Review Process: An Overview— 2018–2021 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program,” ODOT, Salem, 2015b [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/STIP/Apply/Guide_for_Completing_Enhance_ Proposal.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), “Guide for Completing Enhance Proposal—2018–2021 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program.” ODOT, Salem, 2015c [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/STIP/Apply/Guide_for_Completing_Enhance_Proposal.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), “Introduction to Enhance and Fix-it for the 2015–2018 STIP,” ODOT, Salem, 2012. Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), “What Is Mosaic? Mosaic: Value and Cost Informed Planning,” ODOT, Salem, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.oregonmosaic.org/ 5/what-is-mosaic.html [accessed June 2016]. Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC), “FAST Act Allocations. Agenda E,” Minutes of the Reg- ular Monthly Meeting, OTC, Salem, March 2016 [Online]. Available: https://www.oregon.gov/ ODOT/COMM/docs/OTCminnutes2016mar.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Park, H., “Leading in Lean Times: Maximizing Resources in a Constrained Environment,” NCHRP 20 24(81), 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/ NCHRP20-24(81)_Workshop-Draft-Final-Report-BL.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Paterson, L. and D. Vautin, “Evaluating the Regional Benefit/Cost Ratio for Transit State of Good Repair Investments,” Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2015, pp. 15–28 [Online]. Available: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jpt/vol18/iss3/2/ [accessed July 2016].

59 Pew Charitable Trusts, “Intergovernmental Challenges in Surface Transportation Funding,” Philadelphia, Pa., 2014 [Online]. Accessible: http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2014/09/ surfacetransportationintergovernmentalchallengesfunding.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Pietz, A. and B. Becker, “Maximizing Statewide Multimodal Transportation Systems: Looking to Transportation Option Solutions in Oregon,” 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Paper 16-4407, Washington, D.C., 2016. Robert, W. and D. Gurenich, Transportation Research E-Circular E-C128: Modeling Approach of the National Bridge Investment Analysis System, International Bridge and Structure Management: Tenth International Conference, Buffalo, N.Y., Oct. 20–22, 2008, pp. 297–312 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec128.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Saaty, T., Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the AHP, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1994. Sadasivuni, R., C. O’Hara, R. Nobrega, and J. Dumas, “A Transportation Corridor Case Study for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis,” presented at ASPRS Annual Conference, Baltimore, Md., 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.asprs.org/a/publications/proceedings/baltimore09/0082.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Shunk, G. and K. Turnbull, Eds., Transportation Research Circular E-C099: Statewide Transpor- tation Planning: Making Connections, Proceedings, Duck Key, Fla., Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/circulars/ec099.pdf [accessed Feb. 2016]. Sirianni, G., “Florida’s Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): A Multi-modal Approach to Statewide Planning and Investments,” presentation, Ohio Transportation Engineering Conference, Oct. 2015 [Online]. Available: https://www.dot.state.oh.us/engineering/OTEC/2015_OTEC_Presentations/ Tuesday_Oct.27/30/Sirianni_Session%2030v2.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Spence, K. and M.L. Tischer, “Multimodal Tradeoff Analysis for Planning and Programming,” Commonwealth of Virginia, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ archive/conferences/2007/Performance%20Measures/FinalPaper.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Spy Pond Partners, LLC, KKO & Associates, LLC, H. Cohen, and J. Barr, TCRP Report 157: State of Good Repair: Prioritizing the Rehabilitation and Replacement of Existing Capital Assets and Evaluating the Implications for Transit, Transportation Research Board of the National Acade- mies, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/167637.aspx [accessed July 2016]. Swiss Federal Roads Office, Roads and Traffic 2016—Developments, Facts and Figures, FEDRO, Ittigen, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.astra.admin.ch/dokumentation/00119/05558/ [accessed Aug. 2016]. Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular 465: Conference on Transporta- tion Programming Methods and Issues, Proceedings, Irvine, Calif., Dec. 1995, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. Tsamboulas, D., G. Yiotis, and G. Mikroudis, “A Method for Multi-Criteria Analysis in Transportation Infrastructure Investments,” International Journal of Transport Economics, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2007, pp. 113–131 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/42747790 [accessed June 2016]. Turnbull, K., Conference Proceedings 43: Key Issues in Transportation Programming, Seattle, Wash., Nov. 2006, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/CP43.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Turnbull, K., Conference Proceedings 49: Performance Measurement of Transportation Systems, Irvine, Calif., May 2011, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013. [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/conf/cp49.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Ul-Islam, R. and W. Hatcher, “Improving Decision Making Through Integrated Asset Valuation and Asset Condition Modeling,” 7th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, June 23–28, 2008. U.S.DOT, “Asset Management Primer,” Office of Asset Management, U.S.DOT, Washington, D.C., 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/amprimer.pdf [accessed June 2016]. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), Freight Transportation: National Policy and Strat- egies Can Help Improve Freight Mobility, GAO-08-287, GAO, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-287 [accessed June 2016].

60 Volpe Center, “Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning Peer Exchange on Performance-Based Planning,” key findings and recommendations from a Transportation Planning Capacity Building (TPCB) Peer Exchange, July 2012, U.S.DOT, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., Oct. 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.planning.dot.gov/Peer/Chicago/ CMAP_Peer_Exchange_Report.pdf [accessed May 2016]. Weisbrod, G., “Incorporating Economic Impact Metrics in Transportation Project Ranking and Selection Processes,” presentation, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011, 15 pp. Weisbrod G., et al., NCHRP Report 786: Economic Productivity and Transportation Investment Priori- ties, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2014 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_786.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Weldemicael, E. and C. Duncan, “Transportation Investment Toolkit,” Poster presentation, 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Jan. 2016 [Online]. Available: http://edrgroup.com/ pdf/TRB_2016_CO_Toolkit_CDUNCAN.pdf [accessed June 2016]. Wilbur Smith Associates, Appalachian Development Highways Economic Impact Studies, Appalachian Regional Commission, Washington, D.C., 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.arc.gov/research/ researchreportdetails.asp?REPORT_ID=68 [accessed June 2016]. Williamson, J., “Federal Aid to Roads and Highways Since the 18th Century: A Legislative History,” R42140, Congressional Research Service, Washington, D.C., 2012 [Online]. Available: https:// fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42140.pdf [accessed Aug. 2016]. Young, R., Ed., Transportation Research Circular E-C091: Innovations in Statewide Planning: A Peer Exchange, Conference Proceedings, Boston, Mass., June 2005, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006 [Online]. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/ onlinepubs/circulars/ec091.pdf [accessed Feb. 2016]. Zerbe, R., The Legal Foundation of Cost-Benefit Analysis, Law School and Evans School of Public Affairs, University of Washington, Berkeley Electronic Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://works. bepress.com/richard_zerbe/2 [accessed June 2016]. Zhang, L., P. Schonfeld, E. Kastrouni, E. Shayanfar, and X. He, Estimating the Economic Impacts of Multimodal Transportation Improvements, State Highway Administration Research Report SP409B4M, Feb. 2016 [Online]. Available: http://www.roads.maryland.gov/OPR_Research/MD- 16-SHA-UM-3-17_Economic-Impacts_Report.pdf [accessed June 2016].